Last day to lodge planning objections with PCC.

Looking at that twatter just reinforces my belief that Newell and probably Webb are set to benefit financially from the HHP plans going through.

Newell is so desperate he sets up a second twatter account to slag off the FOCP and tell people what the weather is like in Plymouth?

Smacks of desperation on Newell's part and Webb is just orgasmic in his support of Brent anyway.

Does anyone believe for one minute that Newell wakes up with a hard-on every morning simply because he's so happy with living in Plymouth?

And would the world's biggest Argyle fan and club president be so in favour of plans that actually reduce the capacity

Both Greenjock and Hairy J have referred to twatter. As someone who doesn't use it, is there any chance of a link fellas?

Steve

I wouldn't bother if I was you
Apart from the occassional knowledgable person giving direct insight, it's full of sad bar stewards ready to implode and tell the world how hard done by they are (basically shite)  

cornysteve wrote:

Both Greenjock and Hairy J have referred to twatter. As someone who doesn't use it, is there any chance of a link fellas?

Steve

This is Newell's other account,his main one is IJN3 but everyone knows that's him. This is called Plymouth 2013 and it is sickeningly pro-Plymouth and anti the Friends of Central Park.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Cheers GJ. Having read that, Plymouth is the greatest place on earth. If people believe that, fair enough, but that twatter feed is more than a bit cringworthy in its parochrialness (sic?). I like Plymouth, but offered a choice between Sydney, San Francisco and Plymouth, my home city would come a distant third.

Steve

15th august is decsion day !

Wonder what PAFC Safety Advisory Group will make of the restriction to access tunnel into stadium caused by the tempoarary changing rooms and Tribute Lounge?

They aren't best pleased with the Planning Application with regard to Access Roads in particular

PCC Planning Letter 16/07

Quote :

SAG considers that the proposals put forward by the developer are not ideal with
regard to emergency access, but could be accommodated by the emergency services as
long as the other issues outlined below are addressed in any planning consent.

1.  The northern road (Lyndhurst end) should be closed to general traffic at any
time when the stadium is in use by the general public.  This should be enforced
through a planning condition linked to the Safety Certificate.

2.  The bollards along the northern road will cause an issue with access and egress.  
SAG would like these bollards removed.  Retaining the bollards will have a
negative impact on the egress from the stadium and could require the capacity of
the stadium to be reduced.

3.  There is still a concern that there will be conflict between emergency vehicles
and pedestrians particularly along the northern road (Guide to Safety at Sports
Grounds 5th  Edition DCMS 6.8 Access and egress for emergency vehicles p59).  
This will need to be properly managed and linked to the Safety Certificate.  A
suitable planning condition should be considered.  If this matter is not addressed
at the planning application stage it would need to be addressed through the
Safety Certificate by reducing the capacity of the ground.

Point 1 will mean that the Southern "stealth road" around the hotel to the car park alongside Gilbert Lane will be required more often.

Not sure if Points 2 & 3 would require further capacity reduction below that dictated by the Highways Agency Objection.

Quote :

Please note the following:

The SAG group includes representatives from a number of Council departments with
particular specialist responsibilities. The SAG members may wish to make additional
comments related specifically to their areas of responsibility.

The Chair of SAG (Peter Ford, Head of Development Management, PCC) and deputy
Chair (Guy Cooper, Building Control Marketing Leader, PCC) both have a conflict of
interest with regard to the planning application and the building regulations for the
Higher Home Park development and therefore neither are signatories to the comments
listed above.

First sign that PCC Planning may not be the pushover for the Akkeron / Tudor Evans pressure group many are hoping for.

PCC Planning Objection

Quote :

The following objection is made by GL Hearn, acting on behalf of M&G Real Estate (hereafter M&G)
(formerly PruPIM) in relation to the application submitted by Akkeron Group LLP for the above development.

M&G own a significant quantum of floorspace within the City centre. Having regard to the challenging
commercial property environment in Plymouth City centre, M&G is presently considering a number of
development and investment opportunities. The adopted vision, as expressed in the Core Strategy, seeks
‘to reinforce the City Centre’s role as a vibrant and thriving regional destination, providing high quality
shopping, recreation, cultural, civic, education and commercial facilities’. It is therefore of significant concern
that a substantial quantum of new leisure floorspace is proposed in an out-of-centre location. Such
proposals are likely to have significant implications for City centre investors including M&G.

The following sets out how M&G consider that the proposed development does not accord with the
development plan strategy (either in terms of overall strategy for the City centre and site-specific allocations);
that the evidence contained in the supporting submission is wholly inadequate; and that, having taken into
account other material considerations, the application in its current form should be refused.

Goes on to explain why HHP deviates from PCC core strategy in regards to protecting City Centre.

Interesting one for Tudor Evans and James Brent given their positions on PCC City Centre strategy groups since 2008.

Thanks again GG. This is now looking more and more like a half assed set of plans from somebody we were told is the consumate professional.

The fact that city-centre businesses are worried about the plans because it will take footfall and therefore trade from the city centre falls in line with the Government objective of discouraging out of town developments because they are having such a negative effect on town and city centres.

I'm surprised that Leigh Rapson is so pro the plans when it will almost certainly take prospective customers away from the centre of Plymouth where his business is located.

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Bandwagon wrote:

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Might explain the email from Argyle today, calling on supporters to make their voices heard, for or against, and giving a list of useful contacts. It also confirms what Dane's said about the Planning Committee meeting on 15 August.

(If people haven't had this, I can try to copy and paste it.)

Looks like this could take the whole stinking Evil plan crashing to the ground
   

Peggy * wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Might explain the email from Argyle today, calling on supporters to make their voices heard, for or against, and giving a list of useful contacts. It also confirms what Dane's said about the Planning Committee meeting on 15 August.

(If people haven't had this, I can try to copy and paste it.)

I thought this ## Pro Brent Rally Website ## was the work of PL2 who posted link on t'other side.

Couple of useful names to email there. Cheers postey  

Although I reckon it's moving into hands of big bheys with lawyers. Wonder how the tw@tter intimidation campaigns will work on them?

Nice one. There's some new names to register my objections with then.

Greenjock wrote:

Nice one. There's some new names to register my objections with then.

I wonder if Newell and Webb have those details on a USB incase the plans get rejected.

green_genie wrote:

Peggy * wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Might explain the email from Argyle today, calling on supporters to make their voices heard, for or against, and giving a list of useful contacts. It also confirms what Dane's said about the Planning Committee meeting on 15 August.

(If people haven't had this, I can try to copy and paste it.)

I thought this ## Pro Brent Rally Website ## was the work of PL2 who posted link on t'other side.

Couple of useful names to email there. Cheers postey  

Although I reckon it's moving into hands of big bheys with lawyers. Wonder how the tw@tter intimidation campaigns will work on them?

I see the host of that promotion website is Fuel Communications who are a marketing company (based at Crownhill Fort). Their clients include Argyle, Citibank and PCC. I think this Fuel mob also designed the Season ticket pack last season.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Chemical Ali wrote:

green_genie wrote:

Peggy * wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Might explain the email from Argyle today, calling on supporters to make their voices heard, for or against, and giving a list of useful contacts. It also confirms what Dane's said about the Planning Committee meeting on 15 August.

(If people haven't had this, I can try to copy and paste it.)

I thought this ## Pro Brent Rally Website ## was the work of PL2 who posted link on t'other side.

Couple of useful names to email there. Cheers postey  

Although I reckon it's moving into hands of big bheys with lawyers. Wonder how the tw@tter intimidation campaigns will work on them?

I see the host of that promotion website is Fuel Communications who are a marketing company (based at Crownhill Fort). Their clients include Argyle, Citibank and PCC. I think this Fuel mob also designed the Season ticket pack last season.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thats the toxic bank from the states - what's that got to do with Argyle? Watch this space, the markets are about to implode on Wall Street as interest rates find their right level, even bankers know this is the wrong time to borrow!!

Bandwagon wrote:

Chemical Ali wrote:

green_genie wrote:

Peggy * wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Might explain the email from Argyle today, calling on supporters to make their voices heard, for or against, and giving a list of useful contacts. It also confirms what Dane's said about the Planning Committee meeting on 15 August.

(If people haven't had this, I can try to copy and paste it.)

I thought this ## Pro Brent Rally Website ## was the work of PL2 who posted link on t'other side.

Couple of useful names to email there. Cheers postey  

Although I reckon it's moving into hands of big bheys with lawyers. Wonder how the tw@tter intimidation campaigns will work on them?

I see the host of that promotion website is Fuel Communications who are a marketing company (based at Crownhill Fort). Their clients include Argyle, Citibank and PCC. I think this Fuel mob also designed the Season ticket pack last season.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thats the toxic bank from the states - what's that got to do with Argyle? Watch this space, the markets are about to implode on Wall Street as interest rates find their right level, even bankers know this is the wrong time to borrow!!

Didn't you know James Brent was a global director with Citibank before becoming a hotelier / developer?

Pitbull ex DHSB Quote

I've just been out canvassing/campaigning on Lyndhurst road and in the streets behind, and when I asked the routine question "are there in issues you'd like to take up with us locally or nationally?" I got an awful lot of "why are they bleddy medling with central park", one old lady even told me to tell James Brent to pack his bags and go back to his hotels. Most people seriously concerned about traffic congestion outside their houses which is already pretty bad, most seriously against the idea of a cinema and hotel as they are worried it will drive out local business. Was an interesting couple hours, but amongst other national issues, that was the main local issue, and I have to say, I didn't expect it to arise so much and attract so much hatred.

green_genie wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Chemical Ali wrote:

green_genie wrote:

Peggy * wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Might explain the email from Argyle today, calling on supporters to make their voices heard, for or against, and giving a list of useful contacts. It also confirms what Dane's said about the Planning Committee meeting on 15 August.

(If people haven't had this, I can try to copy and paste it.)

I thought this ## Pro Brent Rally Website ## was the work of PL2 who posted link on t'other side.

Couple of useful names to email there. Cheers postey  

Although I reckon it's moving into hands of big bheys with lawyers. Wonder how the tw@tter intimidation campaigns will work on them?

I see the host of that promotion website is Fuel Communications who are a marketing company (based at Crownhill Fort). Their clients include Argyle, Citibank and PCC. I think this Fuel mob also designed the Season ticket pack last season.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thats the toxic bank from the states - what's that got to do with Argyle? Watch this space, the markets are about to implode on Wall Street as interest rates find their right level, even bankers know this is the wrong time to borrow!!

Didn't you know James Brent was a global director with Citibank before becoming a hotelier / developer?

Cheers - all about timing, why do you think it all had to be rushed through?

Bandwagon wrote:

green_genie wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Chemical Ali wrote:

green_genie wrote:

Peggy * wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Might explain the email from Argyle today, calling on supporters to make their voices heard, for or against, and giving a list of useful contacts. It also confirms what Dane's said about the Planning Committee meeting on 15 August.

(If people haven't had this, I can try to copy and paste it.)

I thought this ## Pro Brent Rally Website ## was the work of PL2 who posted link on t'other side.

Couple of useful names to email there. Cheers postey  

Although I reckon it's moving into hands of big bheys with lawyers. Wonder how the tw@tter intimidation campaigns will work on them?

I see the host of that promotion website is Fuel Communications who are a marketing company (based at Crownhill Fort). Their clients include Argyle, Citibank and PCC. I think this Fuel mob also designed the Season ticket pack last season.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thats the toxic bank from the states - what's that got to do with Argyle? Watch this space, the markets are about to implode on Wall Street as interest rates find their right level, even bankers know this is the wrong time to borrow!!

Didn't you know James Brent was a global director with Citibank before becoming a hotelier / developer?

Cheers - all about timing, why do you think it all had to be rushed through?

Apologies for the whoosh moment.

With the published (very) abbreviated accounts showing creditors needing to be paid £3.6M within next five years he may need some favours from Citibank.

Any ideas why PAFC's ultimate parent company owned by Nicola and James Brent is called Natatomissam?

[quote="green_genie"]

Bandwagon wrote:

green_genie wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Chemical Ali wrote:

green_genie wrote:

Peggy * wrote:

Bandwagon wrote:

Wobble time me thinks - proper objections now coming in, by people that could matter!! Pop corking on hold?

Might explain the email from Argyle today, calling on supporters to make their voices heard, for or against, and giving a list of useful contacts. It also confirms what Dane's said about the Planning Committee meeting on 15 August.

(If people haven't had this, I can try to copy and paste it.)

I thought this ## Pro Brent Rally Website ## was the work of PL2 who posted link on t'other side.

Couple of useful names to email there. Cheers postey  

Although I reckon it's moving into hands of big bheys with lawyers. Wonder how the tw@tter intimidation campaigns will work on them?

I see the host of that promotion website is Fuel Communications who are a marketing company (based at Crownhill Fort). Their clients include Argyle, Citibank and PCC. I think this Fuel mob also designed the Season ticket pack last season.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thats the toxic bank from the states - what's that got to do with Argyle? Watch this space, the markets are about to implode on Wall Street as interest rates find their right level, even bankers know this is the wrong time to borrow!!

Didn't you know James Brent was a global director with Citibank before becoming a hotelier / developer?

Cheers - all about timing, why do you think it all had to be rushed through?

Apologies for the whoosh moment.

With the published (very) abbreviated accounts showing creditors needing to be paid £3.6M within next five years he may need some favours from Citibank.

Any ideas why PAFC's ultimate parent company owned by Nicola and James Brent is called Natatomissam?3]quote

I see the merchant banker has named a subsidiary to Natatomissam Resurgam (West End) Limited, is feck all sacred or beyond his grubby clutch. Why should anyone name a new company Resurgam meaning I/we shall rise again:scratch: doesn't exactly send out the right message for a new company.

Highwayman wrote:

green_genie wrote:

With the published (very) abbreviated accounts showing creditors needing to be paid £3.6M within next five years he may need some favours from Citibank.

Any ideas why PAFC's ultimate parent company owned by Nicola and James Brent is called Natatomissam?3]quote

I see the merchant banker has named a subsidiary to Natatomissam Resurgam (West End) Limited, is feck all sacred or beyond his grubby clutch. Why should anyone name a new company Resurgam meaning I/we shall rise again:scratch: doesn't exactly send out the right message for a new company.

Thats an interesting name for a company. Have you any details for when it was formed or any trace of activity?

Almost hints at a West End regeneration scheme, but Mr Brent uses FDL (Five Directions Ltd) to facilitate Pavillions deal.

NATATOMISAM LIMITED


DIRECTOR'S CHANGE OF PARTICULARS / MR JAMES STEPHEN BRENT / 01/02/2010

DIRECTOR'S CHANGE OF PARTICULARS / MRS NICOLA HELEN BRENT / 01/02/2010

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That will be the grubby way that some people do business. Form as many different companies as possible, so when the shite hits the fan with one and its liquidated, they can carry on trading with the others. It should be that the owner of the company is hit but this doesn't seem to happen, which is the reason debt is traded around within these companies. Very handy placing the debt amassed by a person into one company and then dissolving it owing £££££.
sorry to state the obvious but I find it really annoying, especially as the last regime tried this tactic