Andy Symons & John Petrie (aka "Leaders of the Opposition")

This could be fun.

Feck them all, release every piece of dirt we have on them.

Yea Man wrote:

This could be fun.

Feck them all, release every piece of dirt we have on them.

Punchdrunk likes this

Newell Files ?

agreed. If what people have is legal release it. PM'S, text messages etc, the lot. Anything on Jones, Webb, Jameson, Newell, Hooper etc

I see on Pasoti it has been confirmed. from the main board to rumors and back to main board, maybe that place is starting to learn.

Brent is pure scum and the majority of us here on ATD has been proved right once again!!!!


Webb, Newell, Cerbs, Hooper and the rest of the filth!!!!!

What have you got to say for yourselves??

Out with my good lady tonight and on phone but will screenshot tomorrow the PM from a far flung (temporarily) supporter that plainly grasses up Wozzer for Deep Throat one week before he had to admit to it. It was this series of leaks which caused Wozzer to come clean

I said on the other thread that whilst I was cautious of saying Brent out without a valid replacement, it is absolutely right to demonstrate and protest against the mismanagement of the club.

This in my opinion is nothing short of a disgrace. A fans group with the aim to keeping the club accountable and when things get tricky on and off the pitch they chose the 'ignore' option. Well they're within their rights but it should now be clear that they've made the choice to alienate a massive proportion of the fanbase and chosen to make it clear that they will continue to run the club however they please and choose to not make themselves accountable to elected supporters. Essentially it says 'we will run the club into the ground and will refuse to take on supporter representation that is questioning when things are bad'. That is an absolute outrage and a further example of the club surrendering an extraordinary amount of goodwill that they had when they purchased the club.

A very depressing end to a great day as far as the football goes. For me it is simple- get behind JS and the lads of on matchdays and enjoy wins like this one. When it is not matchdays, continue to be militant for what we as members of the AFT feel is transparency and supporter representation with the club. I really thought we'd got a good egg with Brent- someone who genuinely wanted the fans to be at the very heart of everything through good or bad and someone who would do his very best to ensure our club was run properly, despite whatever money he may be making from the property. Quite frankly I feel thoroughly let down and angry about it all.

To be clear- I entirely disenfranchise myself from any mass unveiling of dirt in personal confrontations. I absolutely fully associate myself with the aims of the AFT to ensure accountability of the club. A political issue for me not a personal one, playing the ball not the man- but one I feel no less passionate about nonetheless.

Let the games begin.

As has been said before brent is know showing his true colours and I`m surprised it has taken this long. The trust has two options stand up and fight or wither and die.

Also the time has come for people that have evidence which would stand up in court to come forward and take legal action. There are many many people that are close to brent that have skeletons in there cupboards. Let them have it with both barrels.

GreenSam wrote:

I said on the other thread that whilst I was cautious of saying Brent out without a valid replacement, it is absolutely right to demonstrate and protest against the mismanagement of the club.

This in my opinion is nothing short of a disgrace. A fans group with the aim to keeping the club accountable and when things get tricky on and off the pitch they chose the 'ignore' option. Well they're within their rights but it should now be clear that they've made the choice to alienate a massive proportion of the fanbase and chosen to make it clear that they will continue to run the club however they please and choose to not make themselves accountable to elected supporters. Essentially it says 'we will run the club into the ground and will refuse to take on supporter representation that is questioning when things are bad'. That is an absolute outrage and a further example of the club surrendering an extraordinary amount of goodwill that they had when they purchased the club.

A very depressing end to a great day as far as the football goes. For me it is simple- get behind JS and the lads of on matchdays and enjoy wins like this one. When it is not matchdays, continue to be militant for what we as members of the AFT feel is transparency and supporter representation with the club. I really thought we'd got a good egg with Brent- someone who genuinely wanted the fans to be at the very heart of everything through good or bad and someone who would do his very best to ensure our club was run properly, despite whatever money he may be making from the property. Quite frankly I feel thoroughly let down and angry about it all.

To be clear- I entirely disenfranchise myself from any mass unveiling of dirt in personal confrontations. I absolutely fully associate myself with the aims of the AFT to ensure accountability of the club. A political issue for me not a personal one, playing the man not the ball- but one I feel no less passionate about nonetheless.

Should have listened to what people were saying on here before instead of patronizing, criticizing grammar, questioning schooling etc.... all very Pasoti....

Still nice to be proved right .............................yet again, he who laughs last and all that

punchdrunk wrote:

GreenSam wrote:

I said on the other thread that whilst I was cautious of saying Brent out without a valid replacement, it is absolutely right to demonstrate and protest against the mismanagement of the club.

This in my opinion is nothing short of a disgrace. A fans group with the aim to keeping the club accountable and when things get tricky on and off the pitch they chose the 'ignore' option. Well they're within their rights but it should now be clear that they've made the choice to alienate a massive proportion of the fanbase and chosen to make it clear that they will continue to run the club however they please and choose to not make themselves accountable to elected supporters. Essentially it says 'we will run the club into the ground and will refuse to take on supporter representation that is questioning when things are bad'. That is an absolute outrage and a further example of the club surrendering an extraordinary amount of goodwill that they had when they purchased the club.

A very depressing end to a great day as far as the football goes. For me it is simple- get behind JS and the lads of on matchdays and enjoy wins like this one. When it is not matchdays, continue to be militant for what we as members of the AFT feel is transparency and supporter representation with the club. I really thought we'd got a good egg with Brent- someone who genuinely wanted the fans to be at the very heart of everything through good or bad and someone who would do his very best to ensure our club was run properly, despite whatever money he may be making from the property. Quite frankly I feel thoroughly let down and angry about it all.

To be clear- I entirely disenfranchise myself from any mass unveiling of dirt in personal confrontations. I absolutely fully associate myself with the aims of the AFT to ensure accountability of the club. A political issue for me not a personal one, playing the man not the ball- but one I feel no less passionate about nonetheless.

Should have listened to what people were saying on here before instead of patronizing, criticizing grammar, questioning schooling etc all very Pasoti....

Still nice to be proved right .............................yet again, he who laughs last and all that

Just about says it all though really though doesn't it- the fact that you think it's nice to be proved right. Surely it'd be nicer to be proved wrong and the club actually be on the right path? However despite everything we are at least on the same side regarding the clubs attitude to the Trust- very depressing.

It is nice to be proved right........
not that i revel in the demise of the club, i just revel in the exposure of the stupidity of those that were idiotic enough to believe in Brent in the first place.

Still think the ice-rink is a good idea Hairy ??????

BRENT OUT !!!!! And take your ass bandit mates with you.

punchdrunk wrote:

GreenSam wrote:

I said on the other thread that whilst I was cautious of saying Brent out without a valid replacement, it is absolutely right to demonstrate and protest against the mismanagement of the club.

This in my opinion is nothing short of a disgrace. A fans group with the aim to keeping the club accountable and when things get tricky on and off the pitch they chose the 'ignore' option. Well they're within their rights but it should now be clear that they've made the choice to alienate a massive proportion of the fanbase and chosen to make it clear that they will continue to run the club however they please and choose to not make themselves accountable to elected supporters. Essentially it says 'we will run the club into the ground and will refuse to take on supporter representation that is questioning when things are bad'. That is an absolute outrage and a further example of the club surrendering an extraordinary amount of goodwill that they had when they purchased the club.

A very depressing end to a great day as far as the football goes. For me it is simple- get behind JS and the lads of on matchdays and enjoy wins like this one. When it is not matchdays, continue to be militant for what we as members of the AFT feel is transparency and supporter representation with the club. I really thought we'd got a good egg with Brent- someone who genuinely wanted the fans to be at the very heart of everything through good or bad and someone who would do his very best to ensure our club was run properly, despite whatever money he may be making from the property. Quite frankly I feel thoroughly let down and angry about it all.

To be clear- I entirely disenfranchise myself from any mass unveiling of dirt in personal confrontations. I absolutely fully associate myself with the aims of the AFT to ensure accountability of the club. A political issue for me not a personal one, playing the man not the ball- but one I feel no less passionate about nonetheless.

Should have listened to what people were saying on here before instead of patronizing, criticizing grammar, questioning schooling etc.... all very Pasoti....

Still nice to be proved right .............................yet again, he who laughs last and all that

Really?

Poor old pasoti don't know which way to turn tonight. Can it be their beloved st james the saviour isn't the lip quivering Argyle fan they were all led to believe?? Could it be that their superfan leaders were talking shit when the said they looked into brents eyes and reported to the adoring masses that st james the savouir "gets it"??

Brent is preciding over Argyle's death, make no mistake about it!

GreenSam wrote:

punchdrunk wrote:

GreenSam wrote:

I said on the other thread that whilst I was cautious of saying Brent out without a valid replacement, it is absolutely right to demonstrate and protest against the mismanagement of the club.

This in my opinion is nothing short of a disgrace. A fans group with the aim to keeping the club accountable and when things get tricky on and off the pitch they chose the 'ignore' option. Well they're within their rights but it should now be clear that they've made the choice to alienate a massive proportion of the fanbase and chosen to make it clear that they will continue to run the club however they please and choose to not make themselves accountable to elected supporters. Essentially it says 'we will run the club into the ground and will refuse to take on supporter representation that is questioning when things are bad'. That is an absolute outrage and a further example of the club surrendering an extraordinary amount of goodwill that they had when they purchased the club.

A very depressing end to a great day as far as the football goes. For me it is simple- get behind JS and the lads of on matchdays and enjoy wins like this one. When it is not matchdays, continue to be militant for what we as members of the AFT feel is transparency and supporter representation with the club. I really thought we'd got a good egg with Brent- someone who genuinely wanted the fans to be at the very heart of everything through good or bad and someone who would do his very best to ensure our club was run properly, despite whatever money he may be making from the property. Quite frankly I feel thoroughly let down and angry about it all.

To be clear- I entirely disenfranchise myself from any mass unveiling of dirt in personal confrontations. I absolutely fully associate myself with the aims of the AFT to ensure accountability of the club. A political issue for me not a personal one, playing the man not the ball- but one I feel no less passionate about nonetheless.

Should have listened to what people were saying on here before instead of patronizing, criticizing grammar, questioning schooling etc all very Pasoti....

Still nice to be proved right .............................yet again, he who laughs last and all that

Just about says it all though really though doesn't it- the fact that you think it's nice to be proved right. Surely it'd be nicer to be proved wrong and the club actually be on the right path? However despite everything we are at least on the same side regarding the clubs attitude to the Trust- very depressing.

you are right Sam i think all those involved would have been happy to been proven wrong over Brent and his intentions after all we are all fans of the club and want the best for it.

Brent has done himself no favours in sideling the trust and being secretative about the state of the club. after all the trust where doing there job asking questions about the state of the club speaking out for fans so we dont see another admin era or relegation.

If brent doesnt like being questioned he is not going to like the summer months if the club are relegated.

Chris and Ian must be very proud people tonight.

Ok well I'm betraying a confidence now but I know for a fact that Webb and Newell were involved in Greenman, and as Postey says he was but didn't make the threats that means one of those two did, because Lee Jameson opened his big gob after the Oxford game when he was as pissed as my grans mattress.

So Webb you cnut, was it you or your fat bastard mate Newell who threatened to come around in a gang with baseball bats?

And to think that both of these people, both connected to the club, blamed an 18 yr old club employee. How feckin low can you get?

PJ is bulking at The Docs release of info in a PM. The Doc only has to use the old Newell trick of precising an email. Anyway why would a board member ben sending that type of information around willy nilly anyway. You have to wonder about PJ motives even with that and you have to think Jones knew exactly what he was doing and what would happen.

Greenjock wrote:

Ok well I'm betraying a confidence now but I know for a fact that Webb and Newell were involved in Greenman, and as Postey says he was but didn't make the threats that means one of those two did, because Lee Jameson opened his big gob after the Oxford game when he was as pissed as my grans mattress.

So Webb you cnut, was it you or your fat bastard mate Newell who threatened to come around in a gang with baseball bats?

And to think that both of these people, both connected to the club, blamed an 18 yr old club employee. How feckin low can you get?

im feckin speechless

Greenjock wrote:

Ok well I'm betraying a confidence now but I know for a fact that Webb and Newell were involved in Greenman, and as Postey says he was but didn't make the threats that means one of those two did, because Lee Jameson opened his big gob after the Oxford game when he was as pissed as my grans mattress.

So Webb you cnut, was it you or your fat bastard mate Newell who threatened to come around in a gang with baseball bats?

And to think that both of these people, both connected to the club, blamed an 18 yr old club employee. How feckin low can you get?

f***ing hell!

Carry on at this rate and arch politico Jones, Brent and the other superfans will be able to make the club private members only and the whole ground all seater with the purchase of a new 3 piece suite for the first season in the BSP. Idiots.

i await The Presidents "I tried to warn you I'll help to build bridges but the Trust have to do it my way James Brent is blameless in this All in this together" missive

Greenjock wrote:

Ok well I'm betraying a confidence now but I know for a fact that Webb and Newell were involved in Greenman, and as Postey says he was but didn't make the threats that means one of those two did, because Lee Jameson opened his big gob after the Oxford game when he was as pissed as my grans mattress.

So Webb you cnut, was it you or your fat bastard mate Newell who threatened to come around in a gang with baseball bats?

And to think that both of these people, both connected to the club, blamed an 18 yr old club employee. How feckin low can you get?

why is this not in the public domain? its about time GJ You released your dossier on these two before its too late!

punchdrunk wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Ok well I'm betraying a confidence now but I know for a fact that Webb and Newell were involved in Greenman, and as Postey says he was but didn't make the threats that means one of those two did, because Lee Jameson opened his big gob after the Oxford game when he was as pissed as my grans mattress.

So Webb you cnut, was it you or your fat bastard mate Newell who threatened to come around in a gang with baseball bats?

And to think that both of these people, both connected to the club, blamed an 18 yr old club employee. How feckin low can you get?

im feckin speechless

I bet Jameson wishes he was that night!

This little gang of shit-stirring, back-stabbing, lying fuckers have all been involved in threats, attacking the Trust, abusing fans who don't toe the line, and the funniest thing is they all know about it all.

Jameson knows Webb and Newell were posting as Greenman, Greenman knew all about the private investigator hired to track me down, Newell knew all of the people posting as deepthroat, as did Postey, who posted as Greenman but won't say who else did?

The lot of them obviously tell each other everything and help to cover each others tracks.

Just a shame Jameson cant handle his drink and let slip that once again the club president has been involved in anonymously attacking fellow Argyle fans.

How many more accounts has Webb used to attack people? And what a cowardly prick he is. I would snap him in two and not bat a feckin eyelid. cnut

Somebody needs to collate the evidence of shenanigans and wrap it all up in one package.

GOB wrote:

Somebody needs to collate the evidence of shenanigans and wrap it all up in one package.

exactly GOB time is ticking away...