| Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
|
+21Richard Blight GreenSam Mock Cuncher Chemical Ali PatDunne Jethro Coxside_Green Dane Mrrapson mouldyoldgoat Peggy Mapperley, darling Andrew Dodd Elias pepsipete Sir Francis Drake Czarcasm greensleeves Tringreen seadog Rickler 25 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: split Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:59 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:20 pm | |
| Another trait of a Winker is to blindly reject criticism, but dont let me stop you from making an even bigger berk of yourself Boringbloke.
Being a Tit must run in the family |
|
| |
pepsipete
Posts : 14772 Join date : 2011-05-11 Age : 86 Location : Ivybridge
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:25 pm | |
| - Sensiblegreeny wrote:
- According to some Pepsi you should bow out gracefully and say nothing anymore. If one poster shouldn't comment due to lack of attendance, no matter who that poster is, then if must follow that all non attendees should be considered the same. Unless of course some are more equal than others. (I don't think you should stop personally by the way).
I refrain from commenting on current play, but as a season ticket holder for 25 years 1962 - 1985 I like to keep abreast with what is going on. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:35 pm | |
| I thought I locked this thread? Ok, I'm not a mod. I just thought I would try this citizens arrest sort of thingy. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:43 pm | |
| It's kind of lost it's meaning on this thread pepsi. I don't think anyone should be barred from making comment on anything if they want to whether they attend matches or don't. It's a bit daft talking about how crap this one is or that one is player wise if you haven't seen them or how rubbish a game is if you weren't there. Commenting on the politics of the club or PCC is another matter though. You don't have to attend anything to be able to hold an opinion on those things but it seems it does matter if you are certain people who are lets say not flavour of the moment. Not my intention to defend XIsle as such just to point out that it is inconsistant to use the non attendance argument just because you don't like a particular poster. There are a number who don't go to matches who post on here who aren't challenged on attendance. Hence the singer not the song quote. I don't think the point being made is that hard to grasp do you?
You can blame the Mods for keep bumping it POI. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:00 pm | |
| SG, I'm not getting involved mate. For what it's worth, I think a thread, this thread, of continuous knob measuring should have it's own forum on ATD. I lost it once on here and flounced (there's no shame in that ). Not again. Like I say, I won't get involved any more to the level of getting mad or frustrated to the point I would like to eat any particular poster (well, there are a few on here I could make an exemption for ) Personally, to me, it's entertainment. By me chipping in with infantile remarks was a futile attempt to lighten the mood, taking the p*ss, nothing more, nothing less. My two penneth worth is that the usual 4/5 posters who can't help themselves don't do themselves any justice. In fact, I think you should all set fire to yourselves - with immediate effect. I don't know what I'm talking about now so I'll disappear to my normal level of intellect down on Pepsi's word game. (Pep, that's not a slight on your thread mate - more a statement of my very, very limited intelligence ) |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:19 pm | |
| POI, believe it or not I recognise a piss take when I read it. Funnily enough I don't get offended by genuine piss taking. I actually find some of it quite funny. Piss taking though goes over some people's heads but if it gives them a buzz in thinking their responses are cleverer than the original poster then what the feck, it's served a purpose. I'm here for 2 purposes. One to point out injustice like Batman and the other to present a target for the terminally brain dead. It's a sort of care in the community thing. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:58 am | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:15 pm | |
| The Mods are no fun anymore. Hang around a while Hugh and I'm sure the next episode will be along soon. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:21 pm | |
| There are hardly any mods, a lot of people have stuff going on in their lives so the remaining mods don't have as much time to spend supervising the playground as some posters would like, as course if some people would grow the feck up or maybe get a life we wouldn't be needed to intervene in this pathetic crap now do me all a favour and give it a feckin rest for a minute? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:24 pm | |
| Iggy, you're talking absolute crap.
They need to give it a feckin rest for a lot more than a minute. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:37 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:50 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:53 pm | |
| I'd just ban everyone who disagreed with me in the interests of fairness. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:57 pm | |
| I'm not involved. Don't reel me into this omnishambles. I got voted for in the mod election and I was next in line after Angry threw a strop and resigned. By rights, I'd have banned sensiblegreeny, Tring, Rickler, sufferedsincebirthbecauseofhisstupidface, punchdrunk, Pepsi Pete, knecht, Jock, Iggy, Mock, SFD, Hugh Watt, Green Spam and had a nice forum. |
|
| |
Mrrapson
Posts : 562 Join date : 2012-04-30
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:35 pm | |
| Id have survived the cull? I'm honored hairy.
I'll chuck you that inflatable sheep when I see you next. |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15904 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:09 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- I'm not involved. Don't reel me into this omnishambles. I got voted for in the mod election and I was next in line after Angry threw a strop and resigned. By rights, I'd have banned sensiblegreeny, Tring, Rickler, sufferedsincebirthbecauseofhisstupidface, punchdrunk, Pepsi Pete, knecht, Jock, Iggy, Mock, SFD, Hugh Watt, Green Spam and had a nice forum.
I hate you hairy! You always single me out for special treatment. Why won't you ban me, is it some sort of goat crush you have on me or are you just strange? _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! Now an officially semi retired old fart! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:04 pm | |
| There you go, one of the busy Moods bumping the thread again. Fecking typical. |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15904 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:14 pm | |
| Don't blame me Sensible it was Mr Rapson!
And I am busy sorting out the admin Christmas party. _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! Now an officially semi retired old fart! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:32 pm | |
| You are all bleddy trouble makers the lot of you. |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15904 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:34 pm | |
| We are all banned from union street for lowering the tone of the place after last years do! That was Mock and Knecht's fault! _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! Now an officially semi retired old fart! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:15 am | |
| I've got Nigella doing the entertainment for this years bash, prizes if you can catch a ping pong ball. |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15904 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Wed Nov 27, 2013 9:10 am | |
| FFS Iggy, I told you I had sorted Big Mo out for that party game once she is out of the jungle! I will have to cancel now. _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! Now an officially semi retired old fart! |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
| |
|
| |
| Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
|