| Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
|
+21Richard Blight GreenSam Mock Cuncher Chemical Ali PatDunne Jethro Coxside_Green Dane Mrrapson mouldyoldgoat Peggy Mapperley, darling Andrew Dodd Elias pepsipete Sir Francis Drake Czarcasm greensleeves Tringreen seadog Rickler 25 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:03 pm | |
| Gosh stuff gets moved around all over the place on here. Is it ghosts in the machine? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:13 pm | |
| - Sensiblegreeny wrote:
- Gosh stuff gets moved around all over the place on here. Is it ghosts in the machine?
Ghosts?!! Probably you boring the tits of everyone. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:18 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:53 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Nov 23, 2013 9:05 am | |
| |
|
| |
Rickler
Posts : 6529 Join date : 2011-05-10 Location : Inside the mind...
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:30 pm | |
| - Sensiblegreeny wrote:
- Just to save Nige correcting you later.
This first name stuff... and your creating of fantasy scenarios, getting more like Newell everyday aren't you? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Nov 23, 2013 8:52 pm | |
| You gave your first name away I didn't have to go hacking anywhere for it. Tell you what you can call me Hunny Bun if you like Nige. I just feel we could be such good friends if you only relaxed a bit. |
|
| |
Rickler
Posts : 6529 Join date : 2011-05-10 Location : Inside the mind...
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Nov 23, 2013 9:42 pm | |
| Duh, It's not the fact that you know it. It's the fact that you use it. It's just soooooo Newell.
Like I say... Fantasize all you want - But we are never ever ever ever going to be friends together..
Like ever... |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Nov 23, 2013 9:56 pm | |
| Shucks!!!!! and there was me thinking we were making progress and getting cosy. It's feckin annoying when people keep on with something isn't it. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:54 am | |
| [img] [/img] |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: split Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:30 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- I would recommend the ignore function. Works an absolute treat.
IT does work a treat, just get cock the elder to use it! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:20 pm | |
| I have no idea what suffered posted; probably some spitttle ridden spiteful, knuckle dragging attempt at English. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 2:13 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- I have no idea what suffered posted; probably some spitttle ridden spiteful, knuckle dragging attempt at English.
It was cock the younger, some helpful advice to cock the elder, beautifully presented in the queens finest english may i add. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: split Sun Nov 24, 2013 2:17 pm | |
| - GreenSam wrote:
- If ever there was an ideal game to put on some offers that would attract more fans, that's the one. Quid for a kid if accompanied by an adult? Or something else?
Would this offer be open to pappa cock and junior? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 2:56 pm | |
| Suffer no more.
This post was made by sufferedsince68 who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.
No thanks, I read better stuff on the back of a wc door in a pub. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 3:05 pm | |
| Ooooh. My posts got moved. Can I ask suffered why he's a cowardly lump of dogshit in this thread without facing the wrath of the mods? He runs his mouth like a £5 prostitute. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 3:26 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- Suffer no more.
This post was made by sufferedsince68 who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.
No thanks, I read better stuff on the back of a wc door in a pub. The rantings of a self obsessed, hypocritical nincompoop. Sticking people on the ignore list is the final desperate act of a hollering playground bully who likes to dish it out but when the glove is on the other hand. Ignore list |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:03 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 4:36 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- Ooooh. My posts got moved. Can I ask suffered why he's a cowardly lump of dogshit in this thread without facing the wrath of the mods? He runs his mouth like a £5 prostitute.
Where the hell did you find one that cheap? Cheapest I got was £25 plus a packet of woodbines just for a BJ. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 6:01 pm | |
| I'd happily wrestle both suffered and punchdrunk. I'd put both of them down. I've offered but they've both asked for a wrestling match without clothing involved. It's a bit frightening to be honest. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 6:31 pm | |
| Right. That's it. This thread is now locked. Enough bickering already. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:28 pm | |
| - Rickler wrote:
- Sensiblegreeny wrote:
- Rickler you can see quite clearly on this thread who is saying that if you don't attend then you shouldn't comment. Yet there are a number of people who post on here who like XIsle don't attend, because they can't due to distance, who comment on stuff all the time. You are one who doesn't attend so do you think you should stop posting on things? I'm not saying you should it is others who are in essence saying that. Tring is another. Even Freathy who doesn't go anymore. I probably could find others if needed. It's not the who it's the principal of if you call one person out for something then you must by it's nature include all others in the same category. You continually accuse me of hypocracy so perhaps you need to throw that at a few others.
WTF are you on about?
Anyway, whatever it is.... Since you have predicated your little theory on absolute nonsense, it is no surprise that you are sprouting nonsense.
Let me correct you yet again.
When in the UK I do attend. And I time my visits to the UK to maximize that attendance.
Got that, good. Let me never see you lie about that fact again. OWNED ONCE AGAIN SENSIBLE |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:34 pm | |
| According to some Pepsi you should bow out gracefully and say nothing anymore. If one poster shouldn't comment due to lack of attendance, no matter who that poster is, then if must follow that all non attendees should be considered the same. Unless of course some are more equal than others. (I don't think you should stop personally by the way).
Unless you are terminally thick Nige you can see exactly what I'm saying here and it isn't difficult for even you to grasp it. If you go then fine you go and to be honest I don't care one way or another. It wasn't a lie it was an assumption given your location. There are others whose comments are accepted who don't attend however which proves that it is only certain people who shouldn't comment according to the internet police rather than attendees. I won't bother to respond to Butthead. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:40 pm | |
| - Sensiblegreeny wrote:
- According to some Pepsi you should bow out gracefully and say nothing anymore. If one poster shouldn't comment due to lack of attendance, no matter who that poster is, then if must follow that all non attendees should be considered the same. Unless of course some are more equal than others. (I don't think you should stop personally by the way).
Unless you are terminally thick Nige you can see exactly what I'm saying here and it isn't difficult for even you to grasp it. If you go then fine you go and to be honest I don't care one way or another. It wasn't a lie it was an assumption given your location. There are others whose comments are accepted who don't attend however which proves that it is only certain people who shouldn't comment according to the internet police rather than attendees. I won't bother to respond to Butthead. Maybe you should put me on your ignore list as well. Winding you one track bullys up has given me victory the last few years,. Popcorn time |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:51 pm | |
| I don't have an ignore list Buttsie and if needs be I can just ignore you without one. Given your offering are usually just a copy of somebody else's with a few words changed it isn't that difficult. No doubt your alter ego will be along in a minute to complete the double act. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
| |
|
| |
| Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
|