Handbags at dawn, part 564949

I know i should'nt feed old man troll ,but who did i argue with who actually went to the match? my spelling knot gud i knoow, but i did'nt go to univirsity at the tax payers expence or "work" for the council again costing the taxpayer a fortune year after year, i might not be an edukated liberal luvvy, but the tax payer likes me.

It was just a look out for Ricki babe the English master who obviously has the job of marking contributions. You don't want to fall foul of the english police on here. You do seem to be a bit paranoid about education though along with anyone who works for the Council. Did one frighten you when you were a child?

Nobody actually said you did argue SS68. There are people who come on here with their expert opinion of something they got secondhand via somebody else's opinion or a radio commentary. You know the sort of thing "I wasn't there and I didn't see anything but it must have been crap because frankly that's all it could have been because I wanted it to be". Trying to be objective is a long way different from trolling. It seems though that if you aren't just negative about every single thing then your opinion doesn't count and of course you must be a troll. Take the other thread about the Trust. Your contribution was just a plain tirade about nothing to do with the topic at all. Two minutes later and Butthead joined in. It was a lets have a pop at this poster because he doesn't do what I want and blast everything Argyle, PCC, Brent and league 2. In your mind that's a troll despite giving a perfectly valid reasoned argument. But hey, who needs that sort of thing on a discussion website eh. You are the same as a number of others, you couldn't contribute to a discussion if your life depended on it.

Sensiblegreeny wrote:

It was just a look out for Ricki babe the English master who obviously has the job of marking contributions.    You don't want to fall foul of the english police on here.  

Get it right Sensy...

Knecht was the "English Police".

I was the 'catch the sanctimonious prick making elementary grammar mistakes himself whilst mocking the uneducated,' Police.

And you were busted.

Shucks.....outdone again by the masked one and his trusty friend.     How do they do it.     Mutual masturbation probably.

hairy j wrote:

What a bunch of utter cnuts - would you rather the team lost and 6,000 fans who've paid £20ish each went home unhappy? What a bunch of toss pots. What a bunch.

This started the lastest row, we were having a civilised discussion about the match, this was the trolls contribution. before that he was calling jack sheppard a cnut and a selfish prick, before that he had a tantrum with punch drunk and myself, tell me sensible green how do you have any sort of conversation with this poster?

You don't like it back do you? Take a read of your post history. That post was essentially a comment/statement (call it a tirade if you like) against people almost willing Argyle to lose so they can post their usual doom/gloom/anti-pasoti/anti-Brent stuff.
Actually, you seem to revel in failure and want anything even vaguely positive to fail just so you can post something negative.

hairy j wrote:

You don't like it back do you? Take a read of your post history. That post was essentially a comment/statement (call it a tirade if you like) against people almost willing Argyle to lose so they can post their usual doom/gloom/anti-pasoti/anti-Brent stuff.
Actually, you seem to revel in failure and want anything even vaguely positive to fail just so you can post something negative.

argyle have not finished higher than twenty first for the last six seasons is that the fault of the disbelievers? yes i'm anti pasoti, a shit forum run as a dictatorship to support brent, and self promote those who run it. yes i'm totaly anti brent, he's been a disaster. revel in failure? no i want argyle to be succesful, never want them to lose. but the main point is this is a free speech forum where anyone can post their veiw, the difference between me and you is i dont call other posters cvnts and tosspots over a match report because unlike you i dont try to preach to other posters or try to be oh so super clever, you got booted of pasoti because you like to be the centre of attension that was owners role, i will continue to post what i like, if you like it, thats a bonus x.

hairy j wrote:

. That post was essentially a comment/statement (call it a tirade if you like) against people almost willing Argyle to lose so they can post their usual doom/gloom/anti-pasoti/anti-Brent stuff.

A post typical of you and your's (sic) old man.

Who are these people almost willing Argyle to lose?

Go on... Actually name them!

Rickler wrote:

hairy j wrote:

. That post was essentially a comment/statement (call it a tirade if you like) against people almost willing Argyle to lose so they can post their usual doom/gloom/anti-pasoti/anti-Brent stuff.

A post typical of you and your's (sic) old man.

Who are these people almost willing Argyle to lose?

Go on... Actually name them!

Read this thread for a start. People are called "idiots" etc. for attending games, there's instant, thoughtless predictions of the team losing as that's what the gang mentality demands. I have no idea why anybody wants to post constant negativity.
I also don't understand your obsessive gripe that I'm related to someone - it's really quite weird (in a creepy way).

There is no gang mentality. Argyle are shite pure and simple and this is reflected by the general nature of the posts on ATD...just because we have won 2 on the bounce by late goals scored by central defenders and wingers does not mean we are going to be challenging for promotion as we rightfully should.
Things are going to be crap as long as the speccy banker and his clique are in town, that much is assured.
Are you saying we are wrong for pointing this out? FWIW i went on Saturday but i refuse to look down my nose at those who dont attend...unlike some it seems  

I don't look down my nose at people who don't attend but posting negative and ill-informed "opinions" when all you can really go on is a score-line (or a predicted one) is flakey at best. You've done it there - Allesandra isn't a winger, he's a striker not a wide player. We win 0-1 away at Mansfield and you've mentioned a "centre half" scoring - what difference does that make?

This thread starts out with the bemoaning of Sheridan picking "four centre halves" - he played three at the back and Nelson played in midfield and did quite well there. Nelson has played most of his reserve and youth games as a midfielder.

I'm critical of the team if they're bad but not before they kick off.

punchdrunk wrote:

There is no gang mentality. Argyle are shite pure and simple and this is reflected by the general nature of the posts on ATD...just because we have won 2 on the bounce by late goals scored by central defenders and wingers does not mean we are going to be challenging for promotion as we rightfully should.
Things are going to be crap as long as the speccy banker and his clique are in town, that much is assured.
Are you saying we are wrong for pointing this out? FWIW i went on Saturday but i refuse to look down my nose at those who dont attend...unlike some it seems  

punchy, you rickler or anyone else can say what they like its a  free speech forum !if the troll and his old man dont like it, they could set up their own forum which i'm sure would be as popular as the much missed cerbs site.

It's free speech unless it's something that suffered doesn't agree with/understand. You've not mentioned my job, my education, the colour of my socks or that I'm a liberal so I suppose I should be grateful.

Do you actually know what "troll" means?

hairy j wrote:

I don't look down my nose at people who don't attend but posting negative and ill-informed "opinions" when all you can really go on is a score-line (or a predicted one) is flakey at best. You've done it there - Allesandra isn't a winger, he's a striker not a wide player. We win 0-1 away at Mansfield and you've mentioned a "centre half" scoring - what difference does that make?

This thread starts out with the bemoaning of Sheridan picking "four centre halves" - he played three at the back and Nelson played in midfield and did quite well there. Nelson has played most of his reserve and youth games as a midfielder.

I'm critical of the team if they're bad but not before they kick off.

branson trotman blanchard and nelson are centre halfs first and foremost, argyle won, sheridan was proved right, but why should'nt anyone post what they like? if it upsets you dont read it! simples as uncle knecht would say.

hairy j wrote:

It's free speech unless it's something that suffered doesn't agree with/understand. You've not mentioned my job, my education, the colour of my socks or that I'm a liberal so I suppose I should be grateful.

Do you actually know what "troll" means?

somebody putting up offensive images for a laugh i would guess! though unlike you i'm not a bright lad.

For feck's isn't anyone capable of stepping back and leaving the other one to argue with them-self?

Feel free to carry on the boring shite here and leave the thread on the main board to the grown ups who wish to talk about the topic in question rather than weed out the proper posts from the shite that's being posted by the usual boring suspects.

Yea Man wrote:

Feel free to carry on the boring shite here and leave the thread on the main board to the grown ups who wish to talk about the topic in question rather than weed out the proper posts from the shite that's being posted by the usual boring suspects.

You playing god again?

punchdrunk wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Feel free to carry on the boring shite here and leave the thread on the main board to the grown ups who wish to talk about the topic in question rather than weed out the proper posts from the shite that's being posted by the usual boring suspects.

You playing god again?

I'm not playing god, I am god.

no comment

Yea Man wrote:

punchdrunk wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Feel free to carry on the boring shite here and leave the thread on the main board to the grown ups who wish to talk about the topic in question rather than weed out the proper posts from the shite that's being posted by the usual boring suspects.

You playing god again?

I'm not playing god, I am god.

God is on FB now, far funnier than you, by the way.

Thank fok these wankers have been given their own thread instead of feking up every other thread!

Thank you God  

GOB wrote:

Thank fok these wankers have been given their own thread instead of feking up every other thread!

Thank you God  

God bless you my child.

I always wanted to believe in God, if only someone could have just shown me some proof.

But now, I have proof. God exists, and he's on ATD, which is always a Bonus, of course. Hallelujah.