| Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
|
+21Richard Blight GreenSam Mock Cuncher Chemical Ali PatDunne Jethro Coxside_Green Dane Mrrapson mouldyoldgoat Peggy Mapperley, darling Andrew Dodd Elias pepsipete Sir Francis Drake Czarcasm greensleeves Tringreen seadog Rickler 25 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Wed Nov 06, 2013 11:09 pm | |
| - Greenjock wrote:
- Maybe because they're using the real name of an ATD poster Knecht? Plus the fact they signed up 11 months ago and waited until now to post that then feck off.
I know you're more sensible than most but this is Newell or possibly Dr Liar having a bit of fun. Must get lonely for postey since he became a bachelor again. Nights seem longer in winter and need filling I suppose. There are a number of people in the world with that name, Jock. You may be right but to base it on one post would be a mistake. |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:07 am | |
| ATD in all its glory ! However, without it, hardly anyone would be aware of just how devious those running the club and purporting to be praaaaper faaaaans, really are. ps Cyprus is village. |
|
| |
Rickler
Posts : 6529 Join date : 2011-05-10 Location : Inside the mind...
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:11 am | |
| - Greenjock wrote:
- Rickler wrote:
- Anyone who thinks the problem is going to be solved by setting up a special thread is just nuts.
In fact, the problem is never going to be solved unless you start banning and that is against the ATD ethos.
So who are all these people complaining in private and why - aren't any of them brave enough to say publically?
And personally... I'm a lot more put off ATD by Greenjock's constant references to Hooper the Snooper etc than I am by Punchy giving Hairy a good licking which I actually enjoy. Maybe I should write and tell the mods and ask them for more of it? That must be you're put off by my constant references to Hooper the snooper because you keep in touch with the cnut and are friendly with him because you're often sending me PM's with information on this that or another you want me to post and congratulating me on my stance etc.
As I've said often before, there are loads of things that people could level about ATD but turning into Pasoti MKII isn't one of them. I get bored shitless by certain things and you obviously don't like me insulting your snooping friend. I can live with that
Just for you though Rickler, what an utter cnut that Tony Hooper is, he really is a feckin slimy piece of shit.
Greenjock, rant on... That's a given. But add taking the piss in every post you make if you want.. But I couldn't really care what you say, because, despite the impression you are trying to create, Tony Hooper is not a friend, he is a person I met once, briefly. And so I keep in constant touch with him do I? How on earth would you know? But since you want to... I have exchanged contact with him no more than a half dozen times in the last few years mainly to ask about PASB stuff. Is that okay? I've been in touch with you more times than I have ever been in touch with Tony Hooper and I haven't 'conversed' with him for several months if you must know. Which brings us to "often sending you PM's"? By my reckoning we have been in contact about a dozen times since you have been around and several of those concerned admin stuff and some were initiated by you. Whatever... However, it's pretty low of a mod though to be disclosing private PM conversations, some might say it's an "utter cuntish" thing to do, but since you mention it. Remind me... What have I ever wanted you to post on my behalf? It was a cheap shot, so explain yourself - you got that mental father/son tag team imagining all sorts of things, and frothing at the mouth with excitement. And for the record... I couldn't care less how much you insult 'Hooper', I'm still around after all these years so it obviously doesn't bother me that much. But many posters aren't, and your day in, day out non-stop bitching about him has probably driven people away as much as anything else, and certainly a lot more than me taking Sensy and Hairy to task for being hypocritical, arrogant and clueless. Funny thing is about you regarding 'Hooper'... You will do anything except go to the police or confront him personally. Why? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 7:43 am | |
| - Rickler wrote:
- Greenjock wrote:
- Rickler wrote:
- Anyone who thinks the problem is going to be solved by setting up a special thread is just nuts.
In fact, the problem is never going to be solved unless you start banning and that is against the ATD ethos.
So who are all these people complaining in private and why - aren't any of them brave enough to say publically?
And personally... I'm a lot more put off ATD by Greenjock's constant references to Hooper the Snooper etc than I am by Punchy giving Hairy a good licking which I actually enjoy. Maybe I should write and tell the mods and ask them for more of it? That must be you're put off by my constant references to Hooper the snooper because you keep in touch with the cnut and are friendly with him because you're often sending me PM's with information on this that or another you want me to post and congratulating me on my stance etc.
As I've said often before, there are loads of things that people could level about ATD but turning into Pasoti MKII isn't one of them. I get bored shitless by certain things and you obviously don't like me insulting your snooping friend. I can live with that
Just for you though Rickler, what an utter cnut that Tony Hooper is, he really is a feckin slimy piece of shit.
Greenjock, rant on... That's a given. But add taking the piss in every post you make if you want.. But I couldn't really care what you say, because, despite the impression you are trying to create, Tony Hooper is not a friend, he is a person I met once, briefly.
And so I keep in constant touch with him do I? How on earth would you know? But since you want to... I have exchanged contact with him no more than a half dozen times in the last few years mainly to ask about PASB stuff. Is that okay?
I've been in touch with you more times than I have ever been in touch with Tony Hooper and I haven't 'conversed' with him for several months if you must know.
Which brings us to "often sending you PM's"? By my reckoning we have been in contact about a dozen times since you have been around and several of those concerned admin stuff and some were initiated by you. Whatever...
However, it's pretty low of a mod though to be disclosing private PM conversations, some might say it's an "utter cuntish" thing to do, but since you mention it. Remind me... What have I ever wanted you to post on my behalf?
It was a cheap shot, so explain yourself - you got that mental father/son tag team imagining all sorts of things, and frothing at the mouth with excitement.
And for the record... I couldn't care less how much you insult 'Hooper', I'm still around after all these years so it obviously doesn't bother me that much. But many posters aren't, and your day in, day out non-stop bitching about him has probably driven people away as much as anything else, and certainly a lot more than me taking Sensy and Hairy to task for being hypocritical, arrogant and clueless.
Funny thing is about you regarding 'Hooper'... You will do anything except go to the police or confront him personally. Why? Rickler I don't really know what you want me to say? You're denying PM'ing me with "info" I might be interested in and am quite welcome to use as I please? You don't like my "rants" now? In your PM's you're full of praise for them, only it seems that I can rant at whomever I please as long as it's not the erstwhile private investigator? I can't stand Tony Hooper for what he has been doing, and I'm not the only ATD poster he has been asked to provide information about. That I know with certainty. Should I have gone to the Police at the very beginning of all of this? Yes I should've. Will going to the Police now be treated very urgently? No, not at all, and Hooper could well counter that it is his profession to "snoop" on others, even if it is slightly immoral doing it to fellow Argyle supporters he is supposed to represent. What's more he was a two-faced weasel in the way he courted votes on here before being found out then he fecked off just like that other PASB stalwart Jon Back who was another who was full of bonhomie towards ATD until he'd gained enough votes from posters on here then he cut right back on posting. Then of course he was lambasted for appearing in the directors box once elected, a position he's since filled on more occasions, and his withdrawal from ATD has been total. You yourself post quite infrequently these days but on almost every occasion it is to argue with either Sensible or Hairy. It seems that they irritate you so much that you can't post about anything else. Is that a problem? No I guess not because they can give as good as they get, but for some it gets as boring as my constant rants, except your posts are almost entirely devoid of humour. I have no real beef with you Rickler, your relationship with Tony Hooper is none of my business but pardon me to feck if I want to have my say against the slimy little toad, which I'm sure you would also do if it were you he had been snooping on, or your mother he provided personal information about including her home address. Perhaps if you do converse again you could ask him about his professional relationship with Mr. Barron? Ask if he's provided any details to the loan arranger? Or do you still hold the view that Hooper has never supplied info on me or anyone else? I'm sorry that you felt the need to solicit such a response but there you go. If you don't like the fact that I'm a mod on here then complain to the others, I would be more than happy to stand down immediately if that would cause you great pleasure. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:25 am | |
| At the risk of looking a total prat, (now there's an opening for anyone to have a go if ever there was one), I'd like to modify one of my posts last night. I said I was certain that Andrew Dodd was a real person. That was a stupid thing to say even by my standards! I'd reiterate though that there are a number of people with that name. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:15 am | |
| Andrew Dodd is a wanker, if that offends you Knect I am sorry but FFS did you really agree with what he said? Admittedly a lot of the name calling is puerile but it is justified in some cases, I can't be arsed to quote him but criticising players and manager? I'm aghast. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:20 am | |
| I've just speed read the last two pages because it's so feckin boring but a few points of interest, Hairy has obviously calmed down and has made a couple of funny posts, keep up the good work, Punchy seems as bored as I am with it all and has retired, Suffereds still champing away quietly and Sensi is still stirring the pot a bit, meanwhile Jock and Rickler have started a new spat but at least it's in the right thread so Andrew Nobb won't get offended by HIJACKED threads! The only thing I can't work out is who won? Who has got the biggest cock? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:07 pm | |
| Iggy, I did say that I thought that 'Andrew Dodd' had got it "(almost) completely wrong". I'd stand by that.
I did also say, "The everyday abuse on this site passes without question so often that the real outside world doesn't seem to exist". I'd stand by that.
I'm not offended at all. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:53 pm | |
| I'm fairly disgusted that my hijack thread has been hijacked. I might have to un-foe suffered and call him a poofter or something at this rate. This was all about me at one point and I was getting lots of attention. I'm glad Rickler's found a new nemesis though as I'm really overwhelmed being taken to task by a superior intellect; he is indeed one of the cleverest, cunning and articulate people ever to be born. - Spoiler:
nahhhh, he's a right weirdo who takes screenshots and keeps them in a filing cabinet
|
|
| |
Mapperley, darling
Posts : 2345 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 55
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:18 pm | |
| thats enough of the sniping, leave the poor old man alone, he helped save the club from greatness, afterall |
|
| |
Elias
Posts : 6006 Join date : 2011-12-05 Location : brent out
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:58 pm | |
| Fans calling players, managers, owners names when the teams struggling ? wonders will never cease. stroll on. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:28 pm | |
| http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/prestige-car-firm-boss-caught-2206641
Who has been a naughty boy then! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:08 pm | |
| And he's on here lecturing us on morality? you couldn't Pasoti that up. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:14 pm | |
| The biggest "cock" award has to go to Rickler. I accept that and felt the need to answer Iggy's question. Never let it be said that I can't accept somebody is a bigger cock than me.
I do draw a line at the thought of salivating over somebody though and especially a poster on ATD. I could now have nightmares and it will be this forum's fault. I could be seeking damages. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:30 pm | |
| - Hugh Watt wrote:
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/prestige-car-firm-boss-caught-2206641
Who has been a naughty boy then! Sorry, but that's not Postey. |
|
| |
Peggy
Posts : 1586 Join date : 2013-03-24 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 7:49 pm | |
| - Iggy wrote:
- Hugh Watt wrote:
- http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/prestige-car-firm-boss-caught-2206641
Who has been a naughty boy then! Sorry, but that's not Postey. No, it's not. I hate bastards who do stuff like that, though. |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15904 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:51 pm | |
| - Sensiblegreeny wrote:
- The biggest "cock" award has to go to Rickler. I accept that and felt the need to answer Iggy's question. Never let it be said that I can't accept somebody is a bigger cock than me.
I do draw a line at the thought of salivating over somebody though and especially a poster on ATD. I could now have nightmares and it will be this forum's fault. I could be seeking damages. I'm hurt Sensible, you told me you really liked me! _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! Now an officially semi retired old fart! |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15904 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:55 pm | |
| Ps the going rate for damages is 100K but people settle for 75K. _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! Now an officially semi retired old fart! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:12 pm | |
| I do love you mouldy and I'd settle for the £75k. Fancy a weekend somewhere on the proceeds? |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15904 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:16 pm | |
| Yes. PM me where and when and I will see if I can make it! _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! Now an officially semi retired old fart! |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:53 am | |
| Don't even think about it ! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Nov 16, 2013 11:13 pm | |
| In view of the York match thread I feel a bump coming on as it's the flavour of the times to do it.
I heard Suffered and Rickler had a meeting in the Blue Angel club with a view to reforming Village People. The meeting was cut short due to a shortage of Tenna Lady and both becoming too moist. |
|
| |
Elias
Posts : 6006 Join date : 2011-12-05 Location : brent out
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Nov 16, 2013 11:16 pm | |
| beat me to it |
|
| |
Rickler
Posts : 6529 Join date : 2011-05-10 Location : Inside the mind...
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:23 am | |
| - Sensiblegreeny wrote:
- In view of the York match thread I feel a bump coming on as it's the flavour of the times to do it.
I heard Suffered and Rickler had a meeting in the Blue Angel club with a view to reforming Village People. The meeting was cut short due to a shortage of Tenna Lady and both becoming too moist. Pity your feeble attempt at a joke was ruined with yet another sloppy spelling mistake rendering the whole thing useless. Fool. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:06 am | |
| - Sensiblegreeny wrote:
- In view of the York match thread I feel a bump coming on as it's the flavour of the times to do it.
I heard Suffered and Rickler had a meeting in the Blue Angel club with a view to reforming Village People. The meeting was cut short due to a shortage of Tenna Lady and both becoming too moist. Must try harder boringbloke |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
| |
|
| |
| Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
|