Plymouth Argyle Remain A Work In Progress plymouth

Greenjock wrote:

GOB wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

GOB wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

GOB wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Somebody needs to post Rob Martin's statement on the Pasoti thread and see if it's still an embarrassment?

I'm still catching up on this after being away but is it known as fact that this guy is who he says he is?

That'll be Newell's final throw of the dice to suggest it's not really a sponsor who was there! No Matter the club will be able to verify that he is bona fide and will either have to lose a regular sponsor or act on it.

So I fully expect Mr Newell's pre-planned home visit from Devon and Cornwall's finest will still take place this evening and I'll be arrested first thing tomorrow morning

I meant the guy that had written the thing?

.
Who Rob Martin from South West Fires and Flues who regularly have corporate packages and have advertising boards around the pitch? Or do you mean the guy who's written the 200% blog?

I think that's clutching at the most desperate of straws now to suggest either really

I'm just covering your arse Jock, I'm on your side. - I meant the guy that wrote the 200% thing.

What does it matter who the guy is who wrote the article? It's a football blog that has carried stories about Argyle before and it's there for all to see so I don't see how that can't be above board

Like I said, if someone posts the statement on Pasoti then we'll see what his lordship has to say about that?

Because it wouldn't be the first time that a certain person has made a comment in the hope of someone repeating that comment and therefore dropping themselves in the shyte.

I think if it could be confirmed that the guy is who he says he is and stands by the comment it would be a very big plus Jock.

ive rung the company and left a message for him to call me.
hope it can help.

No meeting Pete, out of the club that what I would call for, no less.
Sent the threads of this story from the three web sites to the Sun

I don't think Rob Martin (for president) says he's from South West Fires and Flues - he talks about being a guest of theirs and also sponsoring games himself - specifically the Gillingham game. So ringing South West Fires and Flues isn't going to get him, I reckon.

Peggy * wrote:

I don't think Rob Martin (for president) says he's from South West Fires and Flues - he talks about being a guest of theirs and also sponsoring games himself - specifically the Gillingham game. So ringing South West Fires and Flues isn't going to get him, I reckon.

*ding* - yup that's how I see it too.

Anyone got a pasoti account they can use to post Rob's comments?

Yea Man wrote:

Anyone got a pasoti account they can use to post Rob's comments?

urgh - i feel violated at the very thought.

From the outside and not knowing any of the main protagonists in this. If there is any legal issues, Leave that for the Police decide and sort it out. It does leave such a bitter taste in the mouth and the sad thing is all of them in this are suppose to be supporting the same club but some serious and possibly criminal act are being banded about.

You'd thought there were more important things to worry about. I do think Brent should really think about the people around him and advising him, This is not making him look good either. But he might know what he's doing and is going to give them enough rope to hang themselves and in the end leave him in charge to make his money out of any redevelopment and screw the football club

Love her or loathe her, woman of the moment, Margaret Thatcher once said -
'I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well if they attack one personally it means they have not a single political argument left.

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Love her or loathe her, woman of the moment, Margaret Thatcher once said -
'I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well if they attack one personally it means they have not a single political argument left.

I'm not convinced that the Newell thugs and knuckle-dragging entourage were capable of a single political argument in the first instance.

Angry of Manchester wrote:

GOB wrote:

Then I know it's quite a large number, but maybe everyone that has taken abuse should just turn up at the police station together and make a complaint because frankly, it's getting boring. Either someone does something about it or they just get on with life.

If just a fraction of the allegations that have been made are true then do something about it!

i agree whole heartily.

put up and back it up or drop it if you wont.

this addresses to all sides of the spat.

It's all well and good saying put up or shut up but I don't want to do either. Every now and then this all goes quiet because Ian Newell has a holiday, then he returns, upsets a load of people and it all gets dragged up again. I don't want to go wasting police time with an incident that happened to me more than a year ago, it was a hassle and cost me about £30 quid to have a virus removed from my pc but that was that, a lesson learned, don't go giving your personal details to websites that can't be trusted to take data protection seriously!
As long as Ian Newell publicly protests his innocence in all this then there will be people like me and Jock, Punchie, Peggy and loads others putting him and the rest of the internet using fans of Argyle straight. If I was telling lies I would have the super online solicitor to deal with, why haven't I?
As for an end to this, I think the meeting idea is proper bullshit, it would end at loggerheads unless Newell decides to come clean and he has shown no cajones ever in doing this. For all this to end it will take all the arse lickers to give up their campaign to protect him, Postey, Xisle (who is not involved in all this but still sees the need to ask people to let it drop even though he has posted about 50 replies on that thread alone), Cerbs, Ponty and all the multi's, all the Newell supporters can be counted on the fingers of one hand now, but it is a cabal, a clique and it needs sorting out.
If Ian Newell was a common supporter like me it would hardly matter at all that all this was going on, the fact that he drives the chairman to games, sits in the directors box and has now bought the biggest online fans forum makes it an altogether bigger issue. The attacks on the Trust, fans and supporters have got to stop, he is in a bigger position to influence people than he ever was, he needs to step down, leave, go, stop what he is doing, if it were just raising money we could all live with it, but it's not, you know it, I know it.

Iggy wrote:

Angry of Manchester wrote:

GOB wrote:

Then I know it's quite a large number, but maybe everyone that has taken abuse should just turn up at the police station together and make a complaint because frankly, it's getting boring. Either someone does something about it or they just get on with life.

If just a fraction of the allegations that have been made are true then do something about it!

i agree whole heartily.

put up and back it up or drop it if you wont.

this addresses to all sides of the spat.

It's all well and good saying put up or shut up but I don't want to do either. Every now and then this all goes quiet because Ian Newell has a holiday, then he returns, upsets a load of people and it all gets dragged up again. I don't want to go wasting police time with an incident that happened to me more than a year ago, it was a hassle and cost me about £30 quid to have a virus removed from my pc but that was that, a lesson learned, don't go giving your personal details to websites that can't be trusted to take data protection seriously!
As long as Ian Newell publicly protests his innocence in all this then there will be people like me and Jock, Punchie, Peggy and loads others putting him and the rest of the internet using fans of Argyle straight. If I was telling lies I would have the super online solicitor to deal with, why haven't I?
As for an end to this, I think the meeting idea is proper bullshit, it would end at loggerheads unless Newell decides to come clean and he has shown no cajones ever in doing this. For all this to end it will take all the arse lickers to give up their campaign to protect him, Postey, Xisle (who is not involved in all this but still sees the need to ask people to let it drop even though he has posted about 50 replies on that thread alone), Cerbs, Ponty and all the multi's, all the Newell supporters can be counted on the fingers of one hand now, but it is a cabal, a clique and it needs sorting out.
If Ian Newell was a common supporter like me it would hardly matter at all that all this was going on, the fact that he drives the chairman to games, sits in the directors box and has now bought the biggest online fans forum makes it an altogether bigger issue. The attacks on the Trust, fans and supporters have got to stop, he is in a bigger position to influence people than he ever was, he needs to step down, leave, go, stop what he is doing, if it were just raising money we could all live with it, but it's not, you know it, I know it.

Iggy wrote:

Angry of Manchester wrote:

GOB wrote:

Then I know it's quite a large number, but maybe everyone that has taken abuse should just turn up at the police station together and make a complaint because frankly, it's getting boring. Either someone does something about it or they just get on with life.

If just a fraction of the allegations that have been made are true then do something about it!

i agree whole heartily.

put up and back it up or drop it if you wont.

this addresses to all sides of the spat.

It's all well and good saying put up or shut up but I don't want to do either. Every now and then this all goes quiet because Ian Newell has a holiday, then he returns, upsets a load of people and it all gets dragged up again. I don't want to go wasting police time with an incident that happened to me more than a year ago, it was a hassle and cost me about £30 quid to have a virus removed from my pc but that was that, a lesson learned, don't go giving your personal details to websites that can't be trusted to take data protection seriously!
As long as Ian Newell publicly protests his innocence in all this then there will be people like me and Jock, Punchie, Peggy and loads others putting him and the rest of the internet using fans of Argyle straight. If I was telling lies I would have the super online solicitor to deal with, why haven't I?
As for an end to this, I think the meeting idea is proper bullshit, it would end at loggerheads unless Newell decides to come clean and he has shown no cajones ever in doing this. For all this to end it will take all the arse lickers to give up their campaign to protect him, Postey, Xisle (who is not involved in all this but still sees the need to ask people to let it drop even though he has posted about 50 replies on that thread alone), Cerbs, Ponty and all the multi's, all the Newell supporters can be counted on the fingers of one hand now, but it is a cabal, a clique and it needs sorting out.
If Ian Newell was a common supporter like me it would hardly matter at all that all this was going on, the fact that he drives the chairman to games, sits in the directors box and has now bought the biggest online fans forum makes it an altogether bigger issue. The attacks on the Trust, fans and supporters have got to stop, he is in a bigger position to influence people than he ever was, he needs to step down, leave, go, stop what he is doing, if it were just raising money we could all live with it, but it's not, you know it, I know it.

Absolutely, Iggy. He has got where he is now through a combination of tactics, most notably being the 'Look at me I'm a praaper fan and I do charitable things'. What others haven't seen untl recently is the subversive, bullying activities. I first noticed him when he wouldn't allow criticism/warnings over Stapleton and he/they banned me and several others. He tries to make out we are weirdos, not proper fans and send abusive PM's etc. Another lie......... but the nodding sheep believe him.
Underlying the whole persona is the desire to 'be somebody' at Home Park andwith Brent, he hit the jackpot. He isn't about to give up his control and powerbase easily. Old habits die hard.
If he had a brain, he'd retire from the need to control and bully others and 'enjoy the ride' but I fear there are bigger plans afoot, for when Brent has made his money and disappears into the sunset with his pot of gold.

All Argyle fans should be greatly concerned.

Iggy wrote:

Angry of Manchester wrote:

GOB wrote:

Then I know it's quite a large number, but maybe everyone that has taken abuse should just turn up at the police station together and make a complaint because frankly, it's getting boring. Either someone does something about it or they just get on with life.

If just a fraction of the allegations that have been made are true then do something about it!

i agree whole heartily.

put up and back it up or drop it if you wont.

this addresses to all sides of the spat.

It's all well and good saying put up or shut up but I don't want to do either. Every now and then this all goes quiet because Ian Newell has a holiday, then he returns, upsets a load of people and it all gets dragged up again. I don't want to go wasting police time with an incident that happened to me more than a year ago, it was a hassle and cost me about £30 quid to have a virus removed from my pc but that was that, a lesson learned, don't go giving your personal details to websites that can't be trusted to take data protection seriously!
As long as Ian Newell publicly protests his innocence in all this then there will be people like me and Jock, Punchie, Peggy and loads others putting him and the rest of the internet using fans of Argyle straight. If I was telling lies I would have the super online solicitor to deal with, why haven't I?
As for an end to this, I think the meeting idea is proper bullshit, it would end at loggerheads unless Newell decides to come clean and he has shown no cajones ever in doing this. For all this to end it will take all the arse lickers to give up their campaign to protect him, Postey, Xisle (who is not involved in all this but still sees the need to ask people to let it drop even though he has posted about 50 replies on that thread alone), Cerbs, Ponty and all the multi's, all the Newell supporters can be counted on the fingers of one hand now, but it is a cabal, a clique and it needs sorting out.
If Ian Newell was a common supporter like me it would hardly matter at all that all this was going on, the fact that he drives the chairman to games, sits in the directors box and has now bought the biggest online fans forum makes it an altogether bigger issue. The attacks on the Trust, fans and supporters have got to stop, he is in a bigger position to influence people than he ever was, he needs to step down, leave, go, stop what he is doing, if it were just raising money we could all live with it, but it's not, you know it, I know it.

My point is iggy i am seeing alot of talk from both sides of the debate and never any action taken. How many more times are we going to go round and round in circles and get no where. Which is why its time NOW to put up or let it slide and MOVE ON!!!!

It's no good taking an interest unless the person assaulted is prepared to take action.

Action is being taken - the club's investigating what happened in the Business Lounge, and doing so pretty thoroughly by all accounts. Given the emergence of Rob Martin (for president), a very important witness, I think we should wait and see what comes out of that.

At risk of repeating myself, meetings and conversations - face to face and on the phone - have taken place between a number of the people involved in this over the months, but nothing's changed: let's not forget the latest attack was only a couple of weeks ago. Now, though, there's a real chance of things changing: the club simply can't afford not to act when this kind of thing's happening on their premises and could have such an impact on income.

it will be interesting to see the outcome of their investigations. If true life time banning orders have been given for less.

A mate of mine got banned for three years for turning up to a match pissed, he did nt even get in!

Iggy wrote:

A mate of mine got banned for three years for turning up to a match pissed, he did nt even get in!

Looks like Nool and Pasoti are on the ropes over this.Good stuff

punchdrunk wrote:

Looks like Nool and Pasoti are on the ropes over this.Good stuff

Nool has brainwashed most of Pasoti so they probably don't even realise the latest devlopments

Not much happening on their thread though, is it being supressed or something?

probably waiting till 1800 when the old bill have been and gone

They're Sweating like Bombay money lenders over on the farm in nervousness, they realize that not even Nickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk can get them of the hook now.
Enjoy!!

One year pasoti ban. I wonder who sent me this meassage.

Quote :

HairyJ

Following on from your warning in November 2012 and then your one week suspension and your recent one month suspension you have continued to antagonise, harrass, libel and provoke other PASOTI users. This is disruptive and aimed to stir up trouble.

In accordance with the PASOTI agreement you are now suspended for one year, however this will be reviewed in October 2013.

Regards The Pasoti Moderators

The only person I've provoked (by calling him out) is Newell. Apparently I've libelled someone - in a deleted thread where I didn't actually name anyone. Is accusing someone of commiting a crime where they've not been convicted of it actually legal? Hmmmmmm.

Didn't take long for the new pasoti owner to start pushinh his weight around.

In the deleted thread, he implied I have stolen from work - has he had a ban?