Northampton game & Prediction

Bollox excuse as well considering they knew that there was still a deal on the table from Luton in August that got held up Knew a deal would be done in jan for him

Taylor still out, Paton out for 3 weeks, Rooney in Squad proving we do have strength in depth after all, roar. I think well nick this. Carey 1 Dale 0

Earwegoagain wrote:

Are you Throbber in disguise? The sick making sychophant is getting his excuses in early and making it very clear that with our massive squad Taylor being out has FOOK all to do with the result.


"Well I don't think it matters who plays, this has all the tell tale bucket of banana skin omens for being one of them there 'typical Argo' results.

I don't predict defeats for Argyle every week, I just do it on the games where history tells us we fall flat on our faces. So don't please lump me in with Sam and Balham... although I will style it thus...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

NB - I will be highly delighted to be wrong because using my logarithmic method this game will be tougher to win than Posh and Pompey."

Wanker.

The wanker was right though wasn't he

...and last night too

X Isle wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Are you Throbber in disguise? The sick making sychophant is getting his excuses in early and making it very clear that with our massive squad Taylor being out has FOOK all to do with the result.


"Well I don't think it matters who plays, this has all the tell tale bucket of banana skin omens for being one of them there 'typical Argo' results.

I don't predict defeats for Argyle every week, I just do it on the games where history tells us we fall flat on our faces. So don't please lump me in with Sam and Balham... although I will style it thus...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

NB - I will be highly delighted to be wrong because using my logarithmic method this game will be tougher to win than Posh and Pompey."

Wanker.

The wanker was right though wasn't he

...and last night too

Throbber how about changing that idiotic strapline you're packing on the Farm to something along the lines of "lets demand we do spend the money that we DO have"

harvetheslayer wrote:

'Throbber' how about changing that idiotic strapline you're packing on 'the Farm' to something along the lines of "lets demand we do spend the money that we DO have"

Because my friend with the Championship on the horizon in the coming seasons I see history repeating itself.

I saw the overspend coming and it very nearly killed us, I don't want it happening again. The post administration story, the upward journey, has been sustainable and enjoyable. That is all I ask of my club.

Sadly going forwards I see the sustainability *and* the enjoyment being threatened by money matters. So far it has been getting the most from the money available and Argyle have been very very good at that, especially since Adams appointment.

Here on in though, with the way football is it becomes about how much you are prepared to throw at it. The sustainability model, the model I want followed, will only take you so far against clubs prepared to risk everything. I don't want Argyle to be that club but I know there are plenty of fans who do, plenty who are prepared to see Argyle go to the wall in pursuit of it.

Over here you guys have always been obsessed by money and conspiracy, sustainability doesn't fit the narrative on ATD, I get that, but then in truth when have I ever fitted that narrative

If you never want us to go for it and spend some cash to reap the rewards then enjoy life in the lower divisions.

There's nothing wrong with debt as long as it is manageable debt, take clubs like the big 4 in the Prem they all run with huge debt yet are the biggest clubs in the world. I know what I'd prefer but everyone is different.

I think our farm animal is confusing "sustainability" with asset and resource stripping" that these latest owners are up to. There's more than one way to skin a rabbit.... look at the Oystons for one..  If you want proof of Brent's "sustainability" credentials you need look no further than his record at Citi and the 50 billion dollar hole that grew and grew and grew on his watch. And he knew it.... and what did he do "seconds" before the balloon went up ? he scarpered with at least 50% of his ill gotten in a very big bag.
 
Sustainability where Brent and Hallett are concerned is all a mirage, sheeps' clothing etc., and intended merely to cover redirecting straight forward club income away from the football itself, and to where ? who only knows. You probably can't see that because you're a long, long way away.

Being a proper, a true, a real green in many ways, I know sustainability is the way forward, we all do instintively. So what have the same old profiteers and con men done now sustainability is sooooo trendy ? They have stolen and misappropriated our language, used our beliefs to cover their same old tracks. Brent taking part of HHP for himself, leaving the stadium corners for future pilfering, is NOT sustainable, where the football club is concerned. He even relies on volunteers to clear rubbish and paint the stadium.

X Isle wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

'Throbber' how about changing that idiotic strapline you're packing on 'the Farm' to something along the lines of "lets demand we do spend the money that we DO have"

Because my friend with the Championship on the horizon in the coming seasons I see history repeating itself.

I saw the overspend coming and it very nearly killed us, I don't want it happening again. The post administration story, the upward journey, has been sustainable and enjoyable. That is all I ask of my club.

Sadly going forwards I see the sustainability *and* the enjoyment being threatened by money matters. So far it has been getting the most from the money available and Argyle have been very very good at that, especially since Adams appointment.

Here on in though, with the way football is it becomes about how much you are prepared to throw at it. The sustainability model, the model I want followed, will only take you so far against clubs prepared to risk everything. I don't want Argyle to be that club but I know there are plenty of fans who do, plenty who are prepared to see Argyle go to the wall in pursuit of it.

Over here you guys have always been obsessed by money and conspiracy, sustainability doesn't fit the narrative on ATD, I get that, but then in truth when have I ever fitted that narrative

The simple strawman argument "look what happen last time won't wash on here", if there has been any movement its because we were at such a low starting point, which were then followed by the two worst ever league finishes as Brent tried to run the club on the cheap. The climb up the league we should never have been in was painful with numerous false dawns and shit football. The "overspend" as you put it wasn't a case of spending too much money, it was spending too much money on clearly shit players. Bad management.

The last 7 years have been shit punctuated with the occasional decent moment followed by more shit, think the Portsmouth play off semi final followed by the dross at Wembley. In the last 7 years we have seen the ground continue to rot with no sign of improvement (don't give me the mankover bollocks because that aint happening, like the mini stand), a bargain basement squad down to the abolsute bare bones because your Jimmy wouldn't sanction any replacements along with the worst type of supporters gaining influence.

Nobody on this forum is obsessed with money, just calling out a shyster owner who has pulled the wool over everyones especially the keep argyle crap brigade such as yourself.

beesrus wrote:

I think our farm animal is confusing "sustainability" with asset and resource stripping" that these latest owners are up to. There's more than one way to skin a rabbit.... look at the Oystons for one..  If you want proof of Brent's "sustainability" credentials you need look no further than his record at Citi and the 50 billion dollar hole that grew and grew and grew on his watch. And he knew it.... and what did he do "seconds" before the balloon went up ? he scarpered with at least 50% of his ill gotten in a very big bag.
 
Sustainability where Brent and Hallett are concerned is all a mirage, sheeps' clothing etc., and intended merely to cover redirecting straight forward club income away from the football itself, and to where ? who only knows. You probably can't see that because you're a long, long way away.

Being a proper, a true, a real green in many ways, I know sustainability is the way forward, we all do instintively. So what have the same old profiteers and con men done now sustainability is sooooo trendy ? They have stolen and misappropriated our language, used our beliefs to cover their same old tracks. Brent taking part of HHP for himself, leaving the stadium corners for future pilfering, is NOT sustainable, where the football club is concerned. He even relies on volunteers to clear rubbish and paint the stadium.

He won't be back Bees, he spotted a chance to remind everyone why he is the "Sussex Sage", loves his Argyle ee duz, only sees them play twice a season.

Perhaps here on ATD we are 'obsessed' with money - because we keep asking where has the money gone?

........well that didnt quite go to plan Throbbs did it

Hugh Watt wrote:

beesrus wrote:

I think our farm animal is confusing "sustainability" with asset and resource stripping" that these latest owners are up to. There's more than one way to skin a rabbit.... look at the Oystons for one..  If you want proof of Brent's "sustainability" credentials you need look no further than his record at Citi and the 50 billion dollar hole that grew and grew and grew on his watch. And he knew it.... and what did he do "seconds" before the balloon went up ? he scarpered with at least 50% of his ill gotten in a very big bag.
 
Sustainability where Brent and Hallett are concerned is all a mirage, sheeps' clothing etc., and intended merely to cover redirecting straight forward club income away from the football itself, and to where ? who only knows. You probably can't see that because you're a long, long way away.

Being a proper, a true, a real green in many ways, I know sustainability is the way forward, we all do instintively. So what have the same old profiteers and con men done now sustainability is sooooo trendy ? They have stolen and misappropriated our language, used our beliefs to cover their same old tracks. Brent taking part of HHP for himself, leaving the stadium corners for future pilfering, is NOT sustainable, where the football club is concerned. He even relies on volunteers to clear rubbish and paint the stadium.

He won't be back Bees, he spotted a chance to remind everyone why he is the "Sussex Sage", loves his Argyle ee duz, only sees them play twice a season.

Well spotted Hugh, I think most of us have spotted the online pattern by now. Funnily enough, I've just been talking with my brother on holiday about the shape of different people and motivations. He's a classic archetype, the Sage that is. Forecasts the future by controlling the past, or so he thinks. Ho hum.

Throbbers latest post on Pork Central currently being deciphered by Bletchley Park.......

"Maybe it's just me but I saw this thread last night and thought, what a silly thing to post.

I mean, is it really that surprising the feeling is different?...

They are different players, playing in a different league, to one example under a different manager, after a uniquely different season of wildly fluctuating form. You are different too, you can contextualise the last two, they have ended, you know the result and have had years to digest and reflect on them. This season is here and now and you don't know where or when it will end.

Of course it is going to feel different...everything is different.

Of course you are nervous...you don't know how it ends"

Learn to read English then

Laters haters

X Isle wrote:

Learn to read English then

Laters haters

Goodby Throbber, please do give our best regards to Internet Ian, The Fake Yank, Dimlow Daz and the rest of the farmyard animals.

Well played chaps

Tringreen wrote:

Well played chaps

yeah well done bees & Hugh watt handed him his arse on a plate

X Isle wrote:

Learn to read English then

Laters haters

No mate thats where you're hugely out of kilter. I dont hate anyone even outright cretins like Brent Deliar the Pig and yourself.

Now Lee Jameson thats a different kettle of fish all together. Still he was an adult and knew what he was doing. No good blaming the pig subsequently Lee....

Hugh Watt wrote:

X Isle wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

'Throbber' how about changing that idiotic strapline you're packing on 'the Farm' to something along the lines of "lets demand we do spend the money that we DO have"

Because my friend with the Championship on the horizon in the coming seasons I see history repeating itself.

I saw the overspend coming and it very nearly killed us, I don't want it happening again. The post administration story, the upward journey, has been sustainable and enjoyable. That is all I ask of my club.

Sadly going forwards I see the sustainability *and* the enjoyment being threatened by money matters. So far it has been getting the most from the money available and Argyle have been very very good at that, especially since Adams appointment.

Here on in though, with the way football is it becomes about how much you are prepared to throw at it. The sustainability model, the model I want followed, will only take you so far against clubs prepared to risk everything. I don't want Argyle to be that club but I know there are plenty of fans who do, plenty who are prepared to see Argyle go to the wall in pursuit of it.

Over here you guys have always been obsessed by money and conspiracy, sustainability doesn't fit the narrative on ATD, I get that, but then in truth when have I ever fitted that narrative

The simple strawman argument "look what happen last time won't wash on here", if there has been any movement its because we were at such a low starting point, which were then followed by the two worst ever league finishes as Brent tried to run the club on the cheap. The climb up the  league we should never have been in was painful with numerous false dawns and shit football. The "overspend" as you put it wasn't a case of spending too much money, it was spending too much money on clearly shit players. Bad management.

The last 7 years have been shit punctuated with the occasional decent moment followed by more shit, think the Portsmouth play off semi final followed by the dross at Wembley. In the last 7 years we have seen the ground continue to rot with no sign of improvement (don't give me the mankover bollocks because that aint happening, like the mini stand), a bargain basement squad down to the abolsute bare bones because your Jimmy wouldn't sanction any replacements along with the worst type of supporters gaining influence.

Nobody on this forum is obsessed with money, just calling out a shyster owner who has pulled the wool over everyones especially the keep argyle crap brigade such as yourself.

Great post Hugh, The sussex Throb and his fellow keep the club small and crap, dont want Argyle to grow and fufil its potential, for them third division fooball and a pat on the head from Jimmy is living the dream, patheic i know but its true.

harvetheslayer wrote:

X Isle wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Are you Throbber in disguise? The sick making sychophant is getting his excuses in early and making it very clear that with our massive squad Taylor being out has FOOK all to do with the result.


"Well I don't think it matters who plays, this has all the tell tale bucket of banana skin omens for being one of them there 'typical Argo' results.

I don't predict defeats for Argyle every week, I just do it on the games where history tells us we fall flat on our faces. So don't please lump me in with Sam and Balham... although I will style it thus...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

NB - I will be highly delighted to be wrong because using my logarithmic method this game will be tougher to win than Posh and Pompey."

Wanker.

The wanker was right though wasn't he

...and last night too

Throbber how about changing that idiotic strapline you're packing on the Farm to something along the lines of "lets demand we do spend the money that we DO have"

And change your FOOKIN avatar, wtf do you think you an arse licking capilist yes man has in common with Che Guevara? Do you even know who he is? Wanker.

And the Throbber scores a beauty of an own goal!

I echo that, hands up when you balls up, fair play.

On the subject of Doom Bar, best avoided altogether now it is yank owned

Bit like Argyle eh?

Earwegoagain wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

X Isle wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Are you Throbber in disguise? The sick making sychophant is getting his excuses in early and making it very clear that with our massive squad Taylor being out has FOOK all to do with the result.


"Well I don't think it matters who plays, this has all the tell tale bucket of banana skin omens for being one of them there 'typical Argo' results.

I don't predict defeats for Argyle every week, I just do it on the games where history tells us we fall flat on our faces. So don't please lump me in with Sam and Balham... although I will style it thus...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

NB - I will be highly delighted to be wrong because using my logarithmic method this game will be tougher to win than Posh and Pompey."

Wanker.

The wanker was right though wasn't he

...and last night too

Throbber how about changing that idiotic strapline you're packing on the Farm to something along the lines of "lets demand we do spend the money that we DO have"

And change your FOOKIN avatar, wtf do you think you an arse licking capilist yes man has in common with Che Guevara? Do you even know who he is? Wanker.

I also had the misfortune to read a post of his that a Corbyn Government would terrify him.

I’m about to stand down as admin, would it it be bad if I changed Tiger Tony’s user name to “Dumbnuts” and Xisles profile picture to a great big throbbing cock?

It's kind of a tradition Huge.

Change it to this Hugh

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]