FORECASTING LEAGUE

Czarcasm wrote:

Moist_Von_Lipwig wrote:

Iggy wrote:: How many points for predicting a flounce?

Or a riot.

Foreshore. I've just finished smashing the house up. I'm now going to write to my MP.

Just putting it out there, if this is how the case is I may pull out of the league

Argo 4 [Reuben 2 ,Bobby ,Allesandra] Fylde 1

Guest

Czarcasm wrote:: I wasn't on about Phases. Have you actually looked at the points totals for Al myself and Jethro?

"just because your losing, just because your losing " Handbags

This couldn't have happened with Pete in charge.

I'm beating the goat but losing to a fooking Aardvark!

_______________________________________
Anonymity, lol you soft cocked cnut.

Guest

Arrdvark_Von_Lipwig wrote:

Iggy wrote:: How many points for predicting a flounce?

Or a riot.

Are you in the lead now Aard?

Guest

As there will be squabbles galore, i have decided to allow Czarcasm and Jethro to be admitted go the final because they both got 15.5 pts too. This is a one off gesture. So we will have 8 in the final instead of 6.

Should there be joint placings involving two or more people (at the top of the table) when phase two ends and a finalist is undecided, then a quiz question will be asked and whoever gives the correct answer then that person goes through.

I can't be any fairer than that.

It would appear that not all are keen on the alphabetical way of doing the tables. It is easier doing it that way, considering.

Posts : 1573 Join date : 2011-10-07 Age : 110

Iggy wrote:

Arrdvark_Von_Lipwig wrote:

Iggy wrote:: How many points for predicting a flounce?

Or a riot.

Are you in the lead now Aard?

Yep

Posts : 7504 Join date : 2014-03-30

A quiz question lol!

the internet, google, wikipedia can answer anything, why not just have a playoff rolling into the next game between those who are tied?

Posts : 1573 Join date : 2011-10-07 Age : 110

Les Miserable wrote:: A quiz question the internet, google, wikipedia can answer anything, why not just have a playoff rolling into the next game between those who are tied?

Rolling games.. First one to get an outright lead wins!.

Posts : 1573 Join date : 2011-10-07 Age : 110

Argyle 5 Fylde 0 Reid R x2 Reid B, Harvey, Allesandra

Posts : 1573 Join date : 2011-10-07 Age : 110

VillageGreen wrote:: As there will be squabbles galore, i have decided to allow Czarcasm and Jethro to be admitted go the final because they both got 15.5 pts too. This is a one off gesture. So we will have 8 in the final instead of 6.

Should there be joint placings involving two or more people at the top of the table when phase two ends, then a quiz question will be asked and whoever gives the correct answer then that person goes through.

It would appear that not all are keen on the alphabetical way of doing the tables.

Maybe I should change my name to Aardvark_Google_Von_Lipwig.

Posts : 10244 Join date : 2011-10-23

Czarcasm wrote:

Moist_Von_Lipwig wrote:

Iggy wrote:: How many points for predicting a flounce?

Or a riot.

Foreshore. I've just finished smashing the house up. I'm now going to write to my MP.

Who says writing to your MP is a waste of time? cheers

Argyle 2 Fylde 0 (R Reid both)

VillageGreen wrote:: As there will be squabbles galore, i have decided to allow Czarcasm and Jethro to be admitted go the final because they both got 15.5 pts too. This is a one off gesture. So we will have 8 in the final instead of 6.

Should there be joint placings involving two or more people (at the top of the table) when phase two ends and a finalist is undecided, then a quiz question will be asked and whoever gives the correct answer then that person goes through.

I can't be any fairer than that.

It would appear that not all are keen on the alphabetical way of doing the tables. It is easier doing it that way, considering.

If there is a tie would it be better to put someone through because

a) they predicted more correct scores than the others. Then
b) they predicted more correct results than the others. Then
c) they predicted more correct scorers than the others.

If it is still tied then naked mud wrestling on the Hoe. Last Man or Woman standing.

_______________________________________
I'm one of the common people so says the wife!
(A true GSG Girl)

PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17

He was behind me at Charlton! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Now an officially semi retired old fart! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Posts : 7178 Join date : 2011-05-12

Time to concentrate on the league

Argo 0-2 Fylde

Posts : 10244 Join date : 2011-10-23

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

VillageGreen wrote:: As there will be squabbles galore, i have decided to allow Czarcasm and Jethro to be admitted go the final because they both got 15.5 pts too. This is a one off gesture. So we will have 8 in the final instead of 6.

Should there be joint placings involving two or more people (at the top of the table) when phase two ends and a finalist is undecided, then a quiz question will be asked and whoever gives the correct answer then that person goes through.

I can't be any fairer than that.

It would appear that not all are keen on the alphabetical way of doing the tables. It is easier doing it that way, considering.

If there is a tie would it be better to put someone through because

a) they predicted more correct scores than the others. Then
b) they predicted more correct results than the others. Then
c) they predicted more correct scorers than the others.

If it is still tied then naked mud wrestling on the Hoe. Last Man or Woman standing.

Agreed. (But obviously only from this point forward) laugh

Village, ignore those whining curs, Pete would have sent the Whitleigh Beys round.

Argyle 4 Fylde 1 Reid 2, 1 pen, Lewis, Morgan.

_______________________________________
Anonymity, lol you soft cocked cnut.

VillageGreen wrote:: As there will be squabbles galore, i have decided to allow Czarcasm and Jethro to be admitted go the final because they both got 15.5 pts too. This is a one off gesture. So we will have 8 in the final instead of 6.

Should there be joint placings involving two or more people (at the top of the table) when phase two ends and a finalist is undecided, then a quiz question will be asked and whoever gives the correct answer then that person goes through.

I can't be any fairer than that.

It would appear that not all are keen on the alphabetical way of doing the tables. It is easier doing it that way, considering.

In case anyone was wondering the reason I (the defending champ no less) didn't enter this year....

Nobody wondered.

_______________________________________
Anonymity, lol you soft cocked cnut.

Is there a problem?

Keep up the good work. That's what I say.

Argyle 8 Pub village team 0

Smalley x 2
Wotton 2 (free kick & pen)
Morgan 1
Hartley 1
Allen 1
Lewi 1

seadog wrote:: Nobody wondered.

I wondered that.

Guest

Argyle 4 Never even heard of them 1 Reid, Smalley, Cox and Banton.

Posts : 2622 Join date : 2014-02-15

Argyle 3
Fylde 0

Guest

even though ive already qualified for the play offs as im ace and more importantly i got a big A ,
i shall predict a 2 - 0 win with nelson and blizzard scoring

» FORECASTING LEAGUE
» FORECASTING ANNOUNCEMENT
» FORECASTING LEAGUE
» PepsiPete Forecasting League 2017-18
» Forecasting League 2015-16