Shit hitting the fan again?

A really clever guy wouldn't post such sensitive information thinking it was a pm.

Good for you if you believe that version of events. I don't

All this revelation/speculation is almost certainly filtering out into the mainstream and will be damaging Mr Brent's ongoing creditworthiness. Can you imagine institutions lining up to fund Brent/Akkeron projects now, let alone the smaller creditors? It's a house of cards. The Trust needs to seriously start mobilising fast.

Mock Cuncher wrote:

Graham Clarke with an E FFS wrote:

I can confirm that it was intended to be a PM. It was a personal view. I have now had a long and very pleasant conversation with James Brent with an honest exchange of views on the club and the City I am much more reassured on the club's immediate future by facts that are not and will not be in the public domain. I am very happy for that to be on the record.

Thang fook fer that.

CALM DAIN EVERYONE FFS CALM DAIN U FOOKIN NUTCASES

Cock you may like to log onto PASOTI again to check the spelling.

Was the complete msg posted earlier in this thread or was that just an extract?

Can someone explain to me why he should in any way be 'crapping himself'? I don't see why, I'd have thought it's JB and the Psuperfans who are right now...

He's expanded his Empire too quickly and it seems clear he has major liquidity problems.

No HPP, a nice silver lining, FANTASTIC more like.

greensleeves wrote:

Dane, When GC states that he didn't intend for that post to be in the public domain then I believe him. He is a very articulate and clever guy and I respect his integrity in all this.

GS, your first sentence is correct. I simply pressed the wrong button! Sorry, to others I am just not that calculated.

I think GC is a top bloke as well Al. Not for him expressing outrage and then not resigning, not for him complaining about the bombshell of TW returning, letting JB know in no uncertain terms his views and then sitting a row behind TW in the directors box a few days later. Do you respect that pair of wankers integrity in the same way?

Graham Clark wrote:

greensleeves wrote:

Dane, When GC states that he didn't intend for that post to be in the public domain then I believe him. He is a very articulate and clever guy and I respect his integrity in all this.

GS, your first sentence is correct. I simply pressed the wrong button! Sorry, to others I am just not that calculated.

What did Brent say to reassure you, Graham?

Graham why was JB on the phone re assuring you so quick. With all these rumours floating around if have thought he would want to put a stop to them.

Who was he sending the pm to?

Graham has gone.

Dane. wrote:

Graham why was JB on the phone re assuring you so quick.  With all these rumours floating around if have thought he would want to put a stop to them.

With all the water that's gone under the bridge it surprises me that james Brent has picked up the phone so promptly to call GC. Not that I that has anything to do with GC.

Graham, why do you think that James Brent felt he needed to contact you so swiftly?

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

Graham has gone.

where, what, why, etc?

Jeez, it takes me hours just to read this forum these days, you just have to wonder what tomorrow will bring!

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

Graham has gone.

I believe that is an act of regrettable cowardice by Graham - very disappointing.

If Brent doesn't speak out now to allay fans' fears it will just feed the knowledge vacuum all his businesses will suffer a sharper decline.

greensleeves wrote:

Dane, When GC states that he didn't intend for that post to be in the public domain then I believe him. He is a very articulate and clever guy and I respect his integrity in all this.

On the 2nd Jan greensleeves wrote:
"Graham Clark writes a lot but what is he trying to say.Its just effing waffle"

Make your mind up Al/oddball/greensleeves...........or did the other greensleeves write that ? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

GOB wrote:

Graham, why do you think that James Brent felt he needed to contact you so swiftly?

Brent really has showed his hand there...

Rumour after rumour has percolated on the boards of Pasoti and ATD, and yet Grahams posting provoked swift action from James Brent. Is it because of what was said, or because it was Graham who said it?

That "its ok now lol" message from GC works about as well as trying to carry water from a well using a sieve.

Tings gon tits up ASAP m8s [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I would, at a guess, say both Rickler.

Peggy wrote:

Peggy wrote:

Flat_Track_Bully wrote:

How does one accidentally post instead of PMing? Sounds a bit like it might have been modded and a quick excuse found.

They seem to be saying that the person who posted it might be vulnerable to libel. As I think most of us have a lot of respect for said individual, might it be worth changing the name of this thread (perhaps to 'were f*cked'!)? After all Brent has a bit of a rep for being keen to call in the lawyers.

Good point - apart from anything else, it's being reported that he's very upset and worried about it. Who can change the thread title?

Thanks, anonymous person   

Should probably be 'shit hitting the fans' though.

     

It seems that complete panic was prompted by Graham's post/pm. I find that extremely odd.

Has Graham flounced or just gone to bed? I did see that Newell posted on the farm that it's very easy to accidentally send pm's out as posts and he does it all the time, er, yeh, we noticed.

Bollox! So one of the first ever posts/threads on Pasoti posted as a mistaken PM just happens to reveal some ghastly foreboding from one of the most respected individuals on the forum?

What are the odds? How many PMs get sent on Pasoti? What are the chances?

Well done to Graham for getting his info read, whether he meant it or not, that's what I say.

I imagine Graham has been threatened with libel, or Brent has convinced him a) this information being leaked now will damage the club b) measures such as Wrathall coming on board are being taken to avert catastrophe.

Graham wouldn't back down otherwise, I suspect. Claiming it was a mistaken PM clears him of libellous intent, at least.

I like the Pasoti and Newell 'defence' that it was a PM. LOL... Even if it was a PM..  So what?  Are the 'facts' different because it was a PM?  

The genie is out of the bottle.  It's too late to be put back in. Graham has said what he's said and it's going to get very interesting if Graham now claims he was wrong.  He will be seen as having been 'got at' by Brent.

Where does this leave the PASB and AFT?  They struggle to get answers and yet Brent is on the phone to GC in minutes explaining things in confidence.

Another sorry mess.

Morning. I'm in work trying to read ATD on my mobile. Have I missed anything tonight?

ejh wrote:

I imagine Graham has been threatened with libel, or Brent has convinced him a) this information being leaked now will damage the club b) measures such as Wrathall coming on board are being taken to avert catastrophe.

Graham wouldn't back down otherwise,  I suspect. Claiming it was a mistaken PM clears him of libellous intent, at least.

Nonsense and I phoned him by the way. It is not a claim but a fact and more easily done on a touch screen than you would believe as I have discovered. As I explained elsewhere and actually have intimated on here before the immediate future of the club is safeguarded but it is for the supporters groups to continue to ask the relevant questions. I will continue to comment but in an authorised way if I deem it pertinent to do so.