| Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
|
+21Richard Blight GreenSam Mock Cuncher Chemical Ali PatDunne Jethro Coxside_Green Dane Mrrapson mouldyoldgoat Peggy Mapperley, darling Andrew Dodd Elias pepsipete Sir Francis Drake Czarcasm greensleeves Tringreen seadog Rickler 25 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:11 pm | |
| Hang on, I didn't provoke Rickler whatsoever. I've had him on ignore for a long time. I use a tablet mostly and accidentally touched 'view this post'.
I've read other people's posts now - actively reading Suffered's posts as I wanted to see his 'view'.
I'm a creature etc. What are you? A better man?
Sad.
And again, what has my job got to do with it? Nothing.
I'll happily delete my account if you like. Being wished dead is really feckin low.
And suffered... who I also have on ignore as your posts are utterly pointless - what do you bring? You once had a laugh at my Dad once as he nursed his own Mother (my gran) through cancer and death - and every time I bring that up, you disappear as you can't bring yourself to justify yourself. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:21 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- Hang on, I didn't provoke Rickler whatsoever. I've had him on ignore for a long time. I use a tablet mostly and accidentally touched 'view this post'.
I've read other people's posts now - actively reading Suffered's posts as I wanted to see his 'view'.
I'm a creature etc. What are you? A better man?
Sad.
And again, what has my job got to do with it? Nothing.
I'll happily delete my account if you like. Being wished dead is really feckin low. Id love it if you deleted your account, really love it. |
|
| |
Rickler
Posts : 6529 Join date : 2011-05-10 Location : Inside the mind...
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:22 pm | |
| - GOB wrote:
- I rarely respond to you these days Rickler because like most, I believed you to had a disturbed character, today I think you have proved that.
Glad I fit in with the majority then, Gob. It's a good thing I don't give a damn what you think. Then again you know that, as last time I said it to you, you pulled the switch on me in the mod room and banned me from ATD. Not a bad move for someone who wasn't even a mod but just a 'guest' at the time. But then... When you've appointed yourself the moral conscience of ATD anything you say or do is justified, eh Gob? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:22 pm | |
| Answer my post you cretinous shit. I've edited it. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:27 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- Answer my post you cretinous shit. I've edited it.
Your a fvck liari never said anything about his mother you loathsome creep i can justify what i post can you creep? when the taxpayer employes rubbish like you then it is my buisness. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:31 pm | |
| Rickler, the only person hitting himself over the head is you, you are letting yourself down with comments that wish others to be dead. You do yourself no favours.
I remember newell saying that you had said the same thing about him, I didn't believe him but now... |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:35 pm | |
| You're an utter liar - that's to suffered.
I shall continue reading and contributing to this forum. I shall continue living too Rickler.
Just for the people who don't get it - I've had Rickler on ignore for a while and he can't take it. He'll likely try and hack me to find out why though - one thing Newell got right was that Rickler was/is an unhinged weirdo. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:38 pm | |
| In fairness to Rickler, F*ck off and die is quite a common expression in North America and although in poor taste i do think some people are overreacting. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:39 pm | |
| what an attention seeking troll
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:45 pm | |
| - Angry wrote:
- what an attention seeking troll
Yep. Thing is Angry, I'm having a laugh with you but you won't see it as you're quite dense. I live in Lipson, around here the expression, "I hope your entire family are cooked to death in a house fire" is a greeting. It's regional. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:47 pm | |
| - Rickler wrote:
- Hairy...
I'll say it in the simplest terms..
Why don't you just feck off and die.
Troll. It maybe humiliating for him but maybe Rickler should simply issue a pubic apology for the above and have done with it. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:48 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- You're an utter liar - that's to suffered.
I shall continue reading and contributing to this forum. I shall continue living too Rickler.
Just for the people who don't get it - I've had Rickler on ignore for a while and he can't take it. He'll likely try and hack me to find out why though - one thing Newell got right was that Rickler was/is an unhinged weirdo. You calling someone else a weirdo? you're the biggest fvck up going! a disgusting attention seeking bully boy troll!do us all a favour big boy and leave. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:54 pm | |
| And, you avoid it again.... sad and cowardly. I have you on ignore so I don't care but you owe it to my Dad to actually apologise. You won't as you're a twat.
I don't want an apology from Rickler. I don,t really care that much but when he takes a moral high ground against webb/newell - remember what a nice guy he is. Chris Webb is way, way nicer than Rickler. |
|
| |
Dane
Posts : 1945 Join date : 2013-02-23
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:55 pm | |
| Azzer is webb a nicer man than me ? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:58 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- And, you avoid it again.... sad and cowardly. I have you on ignore so I don't care but you owe it to my Dad to actually apologise. You won't as you're a twat.
I don't want an apology from Rickler. I don,t really care that much but when he takes a moral high ground against webb/newell - remember what a nice guy he is. Chris Webb is way, way nicer than Rickler. It's not just you though is it Hairy, I would image that any user with any moral instinct would find a comment of wishing death on someone as being unacceptable. It maybe acceptable in the murky world of LA, but this isn't LA and it's not acceptable. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:01 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- I've had Rickler on ignore for a while and he can't take it. He'll likely try and hack me to find out why though - one thing Newell got right was that Rickler was/is an unhinged weirdo.
Wooooah there Cowboy. Now you ARE trolling. Everyone knows it was Newell who had Rickler's email account seen to, not the other way around. Rickler's comments were wrong. Sadly, you seem to quite like the game, just as you enjoyed the hunt on the Farm. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:03 pm | |
| - GOB wrote:
- .....
It maybe humiliating for him but maybe Rickler should simply issue a pubic apology for the above and have done with it. I don't get this apology thingy. The only time it may be acceptable would be if the apology was unsolicited - it may then be genuine. Otherwise it's easy to say without any meaning whatsoever. I'm sorry but that's what I believe. And to those of you who are saying it's common currency in The States, this is not The States (though at times it's felt like we are the 51st). I've said elsewhere that people miss hairy's sense of humour. That's OK, I think that people miss mine also (and not just on ATD ). He's an idiot at times and at times I wish he would stop playing the asshole but that goes for all of us at times. It's easy to either ignore him or put him on your "unfriend" list. As for me, I think that suffered & hairy should fight a duel & whoever wins I would gladly have their babies. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:13 pm | |
| Suffered's babies would probably......... no, not going there.
He did have a sick larf at my Dad and Gran. That's true - fact is, I'd move on if he admitted it but he won't as that's all he has. I posted a stupid picture re: downs syndrome - I'll apologise now, it was wrong. He won't admit he was wrong though. He's a complete hypocrite.
And Dane, Chris Webb is nicer than you - he's actually a decent bloke. We all make mistakes.
I'll happily draw a line but others probably won't.
People said sensible was boring - so are they. Bully boys? Lol. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:19 pm | |
| - knecht wrote:
- GOB wrote:
- .....
It maybe humiliating for him but maybe Rickler should simply issue a pubic apology for the above and have done with it. I don't get this apology thingy. The only time it may be acceptable would be if the apology was unsolicited - it may then be genuine. Otherwise it's easy to say without any meaning whatsoever. I'm sorry but that's what I believe.
And to those of you who are saying it's common currency in The States, this is not The States (though at times it's felt like we are the 51st).
I've said elsewhere that people miss hairy's sense of humour. That's OK, I think that people miss mine also (and not just on ATD ). He's an idiot at times and at times I wish he would stop playing the asshole but that goes for all of us at times. It's easy to either ignore him or put him on your "unfriend" list. As for me, I think that suffered & hairy should fight a duel & whoever wins I would gladly have their babies.
Yes you're probably right Knecht. I do find Hairy as just one big antagonistic troll, if he thinks he can get a bite he goes fishing and rarely it can be a little amusing to see who he catches. But there's a massive difference between being a bit of a prat and the words that have been used on this forum today. If that sort of thing is allowed then why on earth is Paul Thomas being banned? |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15894 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:35 pm | |
| PT was banned for being a complete pain in the arse with some of the things he posted. Some stuff could have brought legal action against us. He joined a while back and he behaved himself and he was allowed to stay. He then deleted his account over something, I can't remember what. I was of the opinion at that time, if Dane was allowed to stay if he behaved himself with his internet history then Paul should be allowed as well. If 'Beast' is Paul or not and he wishes to stay on here then he needs to behave.
If Paul is reading this and he wants to join he can register in his own name like Dane and have certain restrictions and admin can decide if he can post. _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! Now an officially semi retired old fart! |
|
| |
Rickler
Posts : 6529 Join date : 2011-05-10 Location : Inside the mind...
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:04 pm | |
| - Jack Sheppard wrote:
- In fairness to Rickler, F*ck off and die is quite a common expression in North America and although in poor taste i do think some people are overreacting.
Quite... And if other American expressions are anything to go by... alf da yoof n Britan will ba sayin it neckst yeer. As for taste... A Gentleman is never unintentionally rude. |
|
| |
Jethro
Posts : 8363 Join date : 2013-01-03 Age : 34 Location : Dorset
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:13 pm | |
| Chilli hot spicy chilli baby back ribs |
|
| |
Czarcasm
Posts : 10244 Join date : 2011-10-23
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:36 pm | |
| - hairy j wrote:
- Suffered's babies would probably......... no, not going there.
He did have a sick larf at my Dad and Gran. That's true - fact is, I'd move on if he admitted it but he won't as that's all he has. I posted a stupid picture re: downs syndrome - I'll apologise now, it was wrong. He won't admit he was wrong though. He's a complete hypocrite.
And Dane, Chris Webb is nicer than you - he's actually a decent bloke. We all make mistakes.
I'll happily draw a line but others probably won't.
People said sensible was boring - so are they. Bully boys? Lol. You keep trying to re-write history with this line. Thing is, it isn't accurate and it's pretty poor taste to keep using it as a point-scoring exercise. SS68 made a comment that was insulting, BUT (and here's the important bit) it was made without him having any knowledge your grans illness/death. You or Sensible (can't quite recall) then chose to make public your grans illness/death, and linked SS68's comments directly to it (and here's the next important bit) so as to make out that SS68 had known about the illness and had made the comment out of spite. He didn't, and your constant periodical references to it, is a classic case of 'say something often enough and it becomes the truth/fact. Tedious. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:55 pm | |
| My Dad pointed it out though and suffered didn't back down. It did actually hurt my Dad's feelings. I'd be pretty pathetic if I didn't defend it. I did say I'd let it go if he apoligised. He hasn't done that yet has he - he won't.
I'm not a troll - I love a wind up. I'm like 90% of normal blokes. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 Sat Feb 08, 2014 10:05 pm | |
| - Czarcasm wrote:
- hairy j wrote:
- Suffered's babies would probably......... no, not going there.
He did have a sick larf at my Dad and Gran. That's true - fact is, I'd move on if he admitted it but he won't as that's all he has. I posted a stupid picture re: downs syndrome - I'll apologise now, it was wrong. He won't admit he was wrong though. He's a complete hypocrite.
And Dane, Chris Webb is nicer than you - he's actually a decent bloke. We all make mistakes.
I'll happily draw a line but others probably won't.
People said sensible was boring - so are they. Bully boys? Lol. You keep trying to re-write history with this line. Thing is, it isn't accurate and it's pretty poor taste to keep using it as a point-scoring exercise.
SS68 made a comment that was insulting, BUT (and here's the important bit) it was made without him having any knowledge your grans illness/death.
You or Sensible (can't quite recall) then chose to make public your grans illness/death, and linked SS68's comments directly to it (and here's the next important bit) so as to make out that SS68 had known about the illness and had made the comment out of spite.
He didn't, and your constant periodical references to it, is a classic case of 'say something often enough and it becomes the truth/fact.
Tedious.
Thanks czarcs the truth about what happened, i did apoligise to your old man, but you just like to lie about it, and i could'nt care less if you cant let it go! like i said your just a sad fvck up, my last comment on this until the next time, because with a creep like you there's always a next time. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
| |
|
| |
| Handbags at dawn, part 564949 | |
|