Handbags at dawn, part 564949

Dick Trickle wrote:

and on and on and on and on and on...

That's Hairy...

Like father, like son...

Boring and Clueless.

If you read the thread, suffered was the first to post something off thread topic, negative and anti-Brent. Yep, that's interesting.

And spowell, can you not quote R.I.P. Rickler either.

hairy j wrote:

If you read the thread, suffered was the first to post something off thread topic, negative and anti-Brent. Yep, that's interesting.

And spowell, can you not quote R.I.P. Rickler either.

Of course you never retaliate and lower yourself to the same level you accuse your attackers. You're all as bad as each other. It's gone beyond banter FFS.

Keep it on topic because this thread is fast descending into the usual drivel by the usual suspects, and contravenes ATD's new behavioural guidlines as posted by Iggy

https://www.argyletd.com/t6321-some-new-rules

Person Of Interest wrote:

hairy j wrote:

If you read the thread, suffered was the first to post something off thread topic, negative and anti-Brent. Yep, that's interesting.

And spowell, can you not quote R.I.P. Rickler either.

Of course you never retaliate and lower yourself to the same level you accuse your attackers. You're all as bad as each other. It's gone beyond banter FFS.

Keep it on topic because this thread is fast descending into the usual drivel by the usual suspects, and contravenes ATD's new behavioural guidlines as posted by Iggy

https://www.argyletd.com/t6321-some-new-rules

Not sure if I'm being totally thick here, but where are the new rules? All I see in that link are the consequences of breaking them.

Person Of Interest wrote:

hairy j wrote:

If you read the thread, suffered was the first to post something off thread topic, negative and anti-Brent. Yep, that's interesting.

And spowell, can you not quote R.I.P. Rickler either.

Of course you never retaliate and lower yourself to the same level you accuse your attackers. You're all as bad as each other. It's gone beyond banter FFS.

Keep it on topic because this thread is fast descending into the usual drivel by the usual suspects, and contravenes ATD's new behavioural guidlines as posted by Iggy

https://www.argyletd.com/t6321-some-new-rules

I've read them.

Retaliation - exactly. Is criticising someone for where they work not personal abuse? When mods do nothing, I'll retaliate. Is personal abuse only abuse if it's reported to the mods by the person who feels 'abused'?

Is this the new rule then? "If you feel that you are being provoked into an argument please contact one of the moderators and we will deal with it".

At least PoI realises I "lower" myself when discussing suffered.

spowell92 wrote:

Is this the new rule then? "If you feel that you are being provoked into an argument please contact one of the moderators and we will deal with it".

Err, that's what it say's.

Rickler wrote:

Dick Trickle wrote:

and on and on and on and on and on...

That's Hairy...

Like father, like son...

Boring and Clueless.

Agree ricks bully boys the pair of them, i thought junior was deleting his account to concentrate on his pasb election campaign! 

Person Of Interest wrote:

spowell92 wrote:

Is this the new rule then? "If you feel that you are being provoked into an argument please contact one of the moderators and we will deal with it".

Err, that's what it say's.

It's not very clearly expressed. A singular rule labelled under the heading of "some new rules" for starters...

hairy j wrote:

At least PoI realises I "lower" myself when discussing suffered.

Hairy, Spowell, Suffs, everyone - I am not going to get drawn into some long insufferable game of right and wrong ping-pong. You know what I'm alluding to. I have much more important things to do, I.e pick the fleas off my dogs arse.


The thread stays on topic or get's locked.

Fin.

hairy j wrote:

At least PoI realises I "lower" myself when discussing suffered.

What about when your taking the piss out of disabled people? How proud pcc must be to employ you? crawl back under your rock you vile creep.

hairy j wrote:

spowell92 wrote:

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Not as bizarre as your backing for brent, if you think short term cheap signing's are the answer then you know nothing about football, if you think building a ministand and making homepark smaller is the answer then you know nothing about football. your just grateful to have a club to support no matter how shit that might be, that to me is bizarre.

You don't like Brent, we get it. And so you'll distort anything into an argument against him. Please, again tell me how the length of the contract is his fault? Because I was under the impression its the LONGEST contract allowed. And he was cheap too, right? To be honest, I think Obadeyi is a good player, so fair play for Mr Brent getting him on the cheap!! Although, I doubt you actually know anything of the finances behind his contract. Now the last part, I've read the Herald, BBC, Sky Sports and official site articles about Obadeyi returning and its funny because not one of them mention that he's a contractor brought in to build our new stand. In fact, none of those articles mention the proposed building at Home Park at all. It's strange, its almost as if its completely irrelevant.   

Are you getting what I'm trying to say Mr 68? Tope doesn't do building work, judge him as a footballer when you see him with your own eyes. You might not like him, (to be honest I doubt you like many things so I won't hold my breath) but that's fair enough because at least you've gone out and actively made your own judgement without it being clouded by all these other irrelevant points. But if your anti-Brent/anti-HHP arguments are so poor that you're in such a desperate position to force an argument from such an irrelevant topic then perhaps your standing on the whole thing isn't a particularly great or intelligent one...

   

You've done it again.

This is simple to answer. Sufferedfrombirthwithadeformedviewoftheplanet here has just one option to be what he sees as 'accepted' on a forum. He hasn't got very much to say at all about anything and he doesn't read much either (so he'll invent things in his miniscule brain). There's a sure fire way to gain acceptance from what he sees as like minded people and that's to reinforce, by regurgitation (not repitition) the same things. He doesn't think and generally becomes confused when he cannot use the regurgitation method - ask him about politics and it's like watching a small dog trying to climb a very tall ladder.

Aviva, Brent, rimmer, mini-stand, Webb, speccy, poodle

That's generally the semantic field. Next is the interspersion of expletives, personal rubbish (grandmothers will do, as will a hatred of left-wing people and 'public servants' - he hated knecht for a while) and cringe-worthy, awful quasi-polemicism. He hates everything at all that sways from what he sees as the hive mind.

At least most of the other posters on here who are 'antis' are fairly ok with giving praise where it is due but suffered is genuinely the worst poster to ever leave a shit smeared mark on any forum you'll ever see.

Cretinous and desperate in equal measure.

You really are an arrogant disgusting individual arn't you? or are you just being playful? The very worst internet troll.

Mods... ^^^^

That's your lot.

Why lock the thread POI ? just move all the childish shite to handbags and leave the other one open, i was just about to post on it FFS   

Gents keep this on topic or else escalation measures will apply.

Calm down cupcake. Firstly, 'I' didn't lock it. Secondly, it's locked why we (mods) jump in the middle of some squabbling 'grown men' whilst moving, locking, Pm'ing and splitting. belive it or not - there's a lot of worked involved.

It'll be open again once sorted out.  

FYI, Jack, it's now open again as long as it stays on topic.

Not good enough, i spent 6 hours composing a 14,000 word masterpiece, re-read it 9 times to check for grammatical errors, kissed myself on the ass for creating the finest tome since old Bill Shakeyspear breathed his last, hit send and the barsteward was locked. All that work down the swanee, i shall start again, see you on Sunday.   

I admire your dedication.  

Then just re do it now! I expect to see it by 9am tomorrow.   

Oh bullocks, i can't remember what i was going to say.      

Time is ticking!!!!