Akkeron response to WG

GOB wrote:

H&S, why ZYPH?

Why is it, you're happy to ask questions but not answer them?

Shonbo, don't forget to get your name down for the election, seriously.

Well, I'm just relieved that my fantastic sea view from deepest Peverell will not be lost.

Why the sudden hounding of ZYPH? I know who he is on Pasoti and another site and he's not one of the gang by any means.

Too many jumpy people at the moment.

How is life in Englands Garden at the moment ZYPH?

Greenjock wrote:

Why the sudden hounding of ZYPH? I know who he is on Pasoti and another site and he's not one of the gang by any means.

Too many jumpy people at the moment.

How is life in Englands Garden at the moment ZYPH?

Absolutely- sometimes I think there can be far too much of a witchhunt from here for anyone who deviates too much from the crowd. Not unlike the worst aspects of Pasoti that are so often castigated.

The essential difference is, he will not have his posts tampered with or be silenced on spurious charges, as on the farm.

Coming on here saying he's met brent and that asset stripping is not his style, is rather asking for some vitriolic replies. Sensible will be along to agree with him later.

Charlie Wood wrote:

Shonbo, don't forget to get your name down for the election, seriously.

Thanks for the thought but we need diversity Charlie, can't have a Mod room full of well rounded MODS, you need a bird and at least one skinny one. I fall into the MOG and Charlie Woods category

Anyway is there enough for a choice?

Graham Clark has made an interesting point that in refuting the WG proposals the consultants were guided by the constraints of building to the requirements of the Green Guide but he suggests they did not apply those same criterea to the extension of the horseshoe that Akkeron are so keen to push.

That would be utterly disingenuous behaviour and reinforces my view that they will do and say anything to silence the questioning voices. I just wish people would cast their minds back to Luggy's first Championship, people would have been locked out then and I'm sure several thousand of those that attended those last few home matches wouldn't have bothered if there was any question they might not get in. If that happens next time, maybe within 9 months, the chance to rebuild the fanbase will have been lost. How on earth can any of the supporters of the present proposals claim to have the best interests of our football club at heart,

shonbo wrote:

Charlie Wood wrote:

Shonbo, don't forget to get your name down for the election, seriously.

Thanks for the thought but we need diversity Charlie, can't have a Mod room full of well rounded MODS, you need a bird and at least one skinny one. I fall into the MOG and Charlie Woods category

Anyway is there enough for a choice?

Xactly

You can never have too much choice...except with my wife in a restaurant...just how long do you need to choose

Charlie Wood wrote:

Graham Clark has made an interesting point that in refuting the WG proposals the consultants were guided by the constraints of building to the requirements of the Green Guide but he suggests they did not apply those same criterea to the extension of the horseshoe that Akkeron are so keen to push.

That would be utterly disingenuous behaviour and reinforces my view that they will do and say anything to silence the questioning voices. I just wish people would cast their minds back to Luggy's first Championship, people would have been locked out then and I'm sure several thousand of those that attended those last few home matches wouldn't have bothered if there was any question they might not get in. If that happens next time, maybe within 9 months, the chance to rebuild the fanbase will have been lost. How on earth can any of the supporters of the present proposals claim to have the best interests of our football club at heart,

They don't. They have 'their own' interests at heart.

Greenjock wrote:

Why the sudden hounding of ZYPH? I know who he is on Pasoti and another site and he's not one of the gang by any means.

Too many jumpy people at the moment.

How is life in Englands Garden at the moment ZYPH?

Not really hounding, he made a remark about a year ago that makes his argument of today more than a little weak! Just been pointed out to him, that's all.

shonbo wrote:

Charlie Wood wrote:

Shonbo, don't forget to get your name down for the election, seriously.

Thanks for the thought but we need diversity Charlie, can't have a Mod room full of well rounded MODS, you need a bird and at least one skinny one. I fall into the MOG and Charlie Woods category

Anyway is there enough for a choice?

Shonbo! I am the skinny one!

You should see Mock he is massive!

Iggy wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Why the sudden hounding of ZYPH? I know who he is on Pasoti and another site and he's not one of the gang by any means.

Too many jumpy people at the moment.

How is life in Englands Garden at the moment ZYPH?

Not really hounding, he made a remark about a year ago that makes his argument of today more than a little weak! Just been pointed out to him, that's all.

Exactly Iggy. When I was on the farm swimming against the tide and not enjoying the ride as instructed, did anyone think I was being 'hounded' ? As far as I can see, those of us who have largely been proven correct all along on virtually every issue, have never complained once of being hounded, despite being a minority group until recently.

If you don't like the heat, stay out of the kitchen. On ATD we won't throw you out.

Greenjock wrote:

Why the sudden hounding of ZYPH? I know who he is on Pasoti and another site and he's not one of the gang by any means.

Too many jumpy people at the moment.

How is life in Englands Garden at the moment ZYPH?

Hi jock........I generally just read what's going on........but I do feel at times that something more needs to be said........you would think that everything at PAFC is doom & gloom and the world is against everything that ATDers believe in........I just feel that some of the posters on here love to walk around wearing boards declaring that the "end of the world is nigh"

Kent is ok jock.......even to the extent that "old sensible" pops down to Folkestone now and again to get away from the doom & gloomers.

ZYPH wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Why the sudden hounding of ZYPH? I know who he is on Pasoti and another site and he's not one of the gang by any means.

Too many jumpy people at the moment.

How is life in Englands Garden at the moment ZYPH?

Hi jock........I generally just read what's going on........but I do feel at times that something more needs to be said........you would think that everything at PAFC is doom & gloom and the world is against everything that ATDers believe in........I just feel that some of the posters on here love to walk around wearing boards declaring that the "end of the world is nigh"

Kent is ok jock.......even to the extent that "old sensible" pops down to Folkestone now and again to get away from the doom & gloomers.

What on earth has Folkestone done to deserve that!

He's probably trying to get away from hairy for a while!

Sorry I just thought that people were trying to unmask ZYPH as somebody else when he's hardly Newell's best mate.

Has Graham Clark's post been confirmed or was it more of a question?

If it's a fact then I hope there are plans to raise the point with Brent and his team. There are grey areas and bending the rules and there is downright lying and cheating.

worried of penzance wrote:

Outside of the national scaling down of the all seated process, we must be just about the first league club ever to find themselves in a new stadium with a smaller capacity.

Uh duh !

But you aren't going to be in a "new stadium" so your premise is flawed straight off the keyboard.

I haven't bothered to check but I would have a couple of quid that just about every little club like yours that has ever flirted with the your glass ceiling of the middle of the Championship then subsequently faded back your natural level finishes up with a reduced capacity, few of them I am shore would have turned their noses up at a freebee new stand to go with their freebee older stands and their freebee pitch.

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

(should the Premier League ever be reached)

A swift perusal of this place always cheers me up.

What does superfanboy Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk know then? I smell a cheese covered rat!

esmer wrote:
I think too many are putting their faith in future expansion. It is highly unlikely to ever happen. We will be too small a club to ever compete consistently over a period of years at the top end of the Championship which is the only way we would build the fan base to a regular 17,000 week in week out and justify spending £2.5 million. It's just not going to happen.



Graiser replied "Yes it will"

Niiiiiiiiiiiiiikkkkkk also replied "You can bet your life it will"

It will happen.Esmer is so off the pace these days.If Nikkkk says it will happen then it will.

Given Nikkks interest rates I'll steer clear of betting if I were you Graiser...

Watch out Pokesy! Someone other than you will be getting a solicitors letter!

greensleeves wrote:

It will happen.Esmer is so off the pace these days.If Nikkkk says it will happen then it will.

Really? On what do you base that statement?

Jock just an opinion thats all.

Freathy wrote:

Watch out Pokesy! Someone other than you will be getting a solicitors letter!