Plymouth Argyle Talk - Democratic

The 'ONLY' Independent Internet Forum for Argyle Fans
 
HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

 

 Akkeron response to WG

Go down 
+31
pepsipete
nzgreen
125+1
lawnmowerman
Mapperley, darling
Highwayman
Rickler
Lord Tisdale
GreenSam
Dingle
shonbo
mouldyoldgoat
Richard Blight
Greenskin
argyl3
PlymptonPilgrim
Czarcasm
Peggy
Grovehill
Freathy
Tringreen
Scratchwood
Elias
Argyle Fans' Trust
Charlie Wood
greensleeves
green_genie
Flat_Track_Bully
Dougie
Han Solos Other Ship
Damon.Lenszner
35 posters
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 11 ... 16  Next
AuthorMessage
Rickler

Rickler


Posts : 6529
Join date : 2011-05-10
Location : Inside the mind...

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 7:34 pm

greensleeves wrote:
It will happen.Esmer is so off the pace these days.If Nikkkk says it will happen then it will.

What's Ponty say? That is the true barometer.

Whatever Ponty says... Bet the opposite. (See his recent bet that Sheridan wouldn't stay for latest confirmation that he is right on form)

It's like the sun coming up in the East...
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 7:44 pm

greensleeves wrote:
Jock just an opinion thats all.

Oh ok so in your opinion esmer is way off the mark and in your opinion if nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk says something then it must be so.

In my opinion you hang out with the wrong crowd. Do you like flight simulators?
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 7:50 pm

Lord Tisdale wrote:
worried of penzance wrote:


Outside of the national scaling down of the all seated process, we must be just about the first league club ever to find themselves in a new stadium with a smaller capacity.

Uh duh !

But you aren't going to be in a "new stadium"

Tizzy, you're getting desperate in your search for pedantic contrariness for it's own sake, but then again that's what you do best... in fact, it's all you do.
When and if this stand gets demolished and the subbuteo stand replaces it, and the two giant di(c)e replace the corners, the whole ground will be a "new build" and WILL be of smaller capacity than if the old stadium had just been decked out with seating .... look up the seating capacity of the old Lyndhurst stand to give you a base calculation to start from if you can be bothered. Feel free to point out the error of my calculations and logic ... you know you want to.. I'll be picking holes.
Back to top Go down
greensleeves




Posts : 517
Join date : 2013-04-21

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 7:53 pm

no to flight simulators nor sex and travel ...i'm here and you're going to have to get used to me.or press your ignore button...your choice.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:02 pm

I can quite understand not liking flight simulators it,s a bit geeky but not liking sex? thats a bit odd and then there's travel how strange, Have you ever been outside the shire then?
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:06 pm

greensleeves wrote:
no to flight simulators nor sex and travel ...i'm here and you're going to have to get used to me.or press your ignore button...your choice.

But you do know Nikkkkkkkk obviously. How else would you form your opinion? Unless you're just a tw@t who's jumped on the Nikkkkkkkk is fab bandwagon, or free bus?
Back to top Go down
greensleeves




Posts : 517
Join date : 2013-04-21

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:13 pm

Jock your language should really improve......Do I know Nikkkk...haha...do I jump on Bandwagons....haha....do I get a free bus....haha....am I a rabbit...haha...justanotherfan that's all.
Back to top Go down
Highwayman

Highwayman


Posts : 749
Join date : 2012-08-03
Age : 67

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:16 pm

greensleeves wrote:
Jock your language should really improve......Do I know Nikkkk...haha...do I jump on Bandwagons....haha....do I get a free bus....haha....am I a rabbit...haha...justanotherfan that's all.
Agree with this bit, he spells FUCKWIT wrong every fecking time scratch

Bung in a comma or 10 and it could be tcm. Rolling Eyes
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:30 pm

greensleeves wrote:
Jock your language should really improve......Do I know Nikkkk...haha...do I jump on Bandwagons....haha....do I get a free bus....haha....am I a rabbit...haha...justanotherfan that's all.

Sorry but you made the statement that if Nikkkkkkkk says it will happen then it will happen did you not?

So you either know him well enough to have seen that statement to be true or you're someone who pretends they know somebody when in reality you're just going by what ass-lickers like Newell and Postey say about him.

Which is it?
Back to top Go down
Mapperley, darling

Mapperley, darling


Posts : 2345
Join date : 2011-05-10
Age : 55

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:33 pm

i'll join in...

or maybe he is nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Back to top Go down
http://www.nicegarden.co.uk
greensleeves




Posts : 517
Join date : 2013-04-21

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:40 pm

Highwayman...I thought and still do that TCM was very funny and very clever too.Funny thing is I have met him and we shared many a glass or two.Dunno if it was him on here or someone else.Good fun and who knows he may re appear.

Jock....I'd have trouble picking him out in an ID parade......I was just reading the post on PASOTI where he said to some guy that you can stick your life on it or something like that.When someone says something with that sort of conviction.then you feel its going to happen,which is on what I based my comment.No insider knowledge.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:43 pm

I think we know thats not true gs. Your original statement was much more definite than your latest statement which makes you sound like a starstruck bandwagon jumper Smile
Back to top Go down
Greenskin

Greenskin


Posts : 6243
Join date : 2011-05-16
Age : 64
Location : Tavistock area

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 8:46 pm

greensleeves wrote:
Jock your language should really improve......Do I know Nikkkk...haha...do I jump on Bandwagons....haha....do I get a free bus....haha....am I a rabbit...haha...justanotherfan that's all.

Is the lack of spacing of any relevance?
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 9:01 pm

greensleeves wrote:
It will happen.Esmer is so off the pace these days.If Nikkkk says it will happen then it will.

Sorry to bump this, but, I think Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk is alluding to the fact the £2.5 million required for the horseshoe extension, 'WILL' happen. clown

Is he pissed? I have been told that nicccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk does like a red wine or 30.
Back to top Go down
Highwayman

Highwayman


Posts : 749
Join date : 2012-08-03
Age : 67

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 9:08 pm

Greenskin wrote:
greensleeves wrote:
Jock your language should really improve......Do I know Nikkkk...haha...do I jump on Bandwagons....haha....do I get a free bus....haha....am I a rabbit...haha...justanotherfan that's all.

Is the lack of spacing of any relevance?

Would this be one of your pearls of wisdom then GS/ justanotherfan.


"What part of the above does not show that James Brent is actually going above and beyond that which would serve his bottom line. If he were only in it for commercial reasons then make no mistake, a smaller capacity than proposed would be built. I think his commitment to PAFC has so far been admirable, I have no doubt that along with all other fans (he surely is one) he would love to see a large, state of the art ground but he also has responsibilities to shareholders and investors, not to mention banks. It would be criminally irresponsible to put a project of this magnitude in jeopardy to satisfy the dreams and aspirations of a vocal minority when said dreams and aspirations have no historical basis."
Back to top Go down
greensleeves




Posts : 517
Join date : 2013-04-21

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 9:19 pm

Highwayman,,,,, thats boring old PASOTI talk,,,,,Lets get back to TCM,,,,,bleddy good wasn't he,,,,,loved to trim bushes in Totnes,,,,, he'd do anything for a totnes pound,,,,kept it in the community like,,,,,,now trimming even more bushes in newton abbot,,,and nobody has a clue who he is,,,,,not even super sleuth jock....sorry is my slip showing,,,,must put some spelling misteaks in...
Back to top Go down
Highwayman

Highwayman


Posts : 749
Join date : 2012-08-03
Age : 67

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 9:23 pm

Not to mention the old dears, roadkill dinners and his love for the tradesmans entrance.


Last edited by Highwayman on Wed May 15, 2013 9:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 9:24 pm

greensleeves wrote:
Highwayman,,,,, thats boring old PASOTI talk,,,,,Lets get back to TCM,,,,,bleddy good wasn't he,,,,,loved to trim bushes in Totnes,,,,, he'd do anything for a totnes pound,,,,kept it in the community like,,,,,,now trimming even more bushes in newton abbot,,,and nobody has a clue who he is,,,,,not even super sleuth jock....sorry is my slip showing,,,,must put some spelling misteaks in...

Ummmm (rubs chin suspiciously) Suspect
Back to top Go down
Rickler

Rickler


Posts : 6529
Join date : 2011-05-10
Location : Inside the mind...

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 9:25 pm

Justanotherfan wrote:
but he also has responsibilities to shareholders and investors

Meaning in Brent's case.... His 'wife'.


Nice try though...


Last edited by Rickler on Wed May 15, 2013 10:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
Greenskin

Greenskin


Posts : 6243
Join date : 2011-05-16
Age : 64
Location : Tavistock area

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 9:40 pm

Highwayman wrote:
Greenskin wrote:
greensleeves wrote:
Jock your language should really improve......Do I know Nikkkk...haha...do I jump on Bandwagons....haha....do I get a free bus....haha....am I a rabbit...haha...justanotherfan that's all.

Is the lack of spacing of any relevance?

Would this be one of your pearls of wisdom then GS/ justanotherfan.


"What part of the above does not show that James Brent is actually going above and beyond that which would serve his bottom line. If he were only in it for commercial reasons then make no mistake, a smaller capacity than proposed would be built. I think his commitment to PAFC has so far been admirable, I have no doubt that along with all other fans (he surely is one) he would love to see a large, state of the art ground but he also has responsibilities to shareholders and investors, not to mention banks. It would be criminally irresponsible to put a project of this magnitude in jeopardy to satisfy the dreams and aspirations of a vocal minority when said dreams and aspirations have no historical basis."

Admirable reply to the post,i thought:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
Lord Tisdale

Lord Tisdale


Posts : 3040
Join date : 2011-11-23

Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 10:09 pm

worried of penzance wrote:
I'll be picking holes.

Supporting the Gargs means you've already picked your hole.

Off the top of me head I can't think of another little club which has rebuilt an entire ground on the same site so comparisons are pretty much moot, probably because nobody else has been lucky enough to be gifted as much as you lot, I suppose Peterborough is the closest and they will have a markedly reduced capacity when the terrace at one end is converted this summer, but they of course have never had a bigger cap all seater. It seems your uniqueness knows no bounds, fortunately nothing about it is to be envied by any but the smallest of fry.

Now be sensible, do you really think that a ground with a cap near 18k, including a sexy new money spinning stand, is something to e sniffed at by a club without a pot to pith in ? The fact is that you weren't even close to the best supported side the 4th Division lasr season and you wont be next either.

Most clubs in your position, ie. Pith poor and going nowhere would finish up like Oldham where they knocked down the old stand and simply can't afford to replace it at all. You lot should get down on your knees and give thanks to whatever god you believe in that Usury Brent saved your asses when he did.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 10:14 pm

greensleeves wrote:
Highwayman,,,,, thats boring old PASOTI talk,,,,,Lets get back to TCM,,,,,bleddy good wasn't he,,,,,loved to trim bushes in Totnes,,,,, he'd do anything for a totnes pound,,,,kept it in the community like,,,,,,now trimming even more bushes in newton abbot,,,and nobody has a clue who he is,,,,,not even super sleuth jock....sorry is my slip showing,,,,must put some spelling misteaks in...

Super sleuth jock?

I can't be fecked with all that. Pretending to be someone else on a football forum is all a bit sad if you ask me,,,,,,
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 10:23 pm

Lord Tisdale wrote:
worried of penzance wrote:
I'll be picking holes.

You lot should get down on your knees and give thanks to whatever god you believe in that Usury Brent saved your asses when he did.

Grateful for saving our arses? In all honesty, yes. For what the dickhead is up to now? Never.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 10:39 pm

As Tring predicted it and is never wrong here I am to join in once again. (Oh feck I hear)/

"Did I ever complain when I was hounded on pasoti". Tring old son you have done nothing but complain over and over. You were right and you were hounded off and banned has been your cry ever since I first came onto this site. You aren't alone in that either with other posters crying the same. Do you keep files on people incidentally? Somebody needs a bit of a boot and you come up with a post from a year or so ago. You did the same with me by going into another website to tell everyone how many posts I had made there and what my points tally was etc. That's a bit creepy really and slightly resembles stalking.

What my original post was doing is pointing out that hardly anyone has a clue which set of figures is right or wrong. All people are doing is using the ones that best suit their own idea and it is not based on anything they actually know. GOB then tells me he has a clue. Clearly he has no experties in the building business at all because when asked what clue he has he decides he doesn't have to answer. Seems ok when questioning me but not prepared to answer any himself. I've admitted right from the start I don't know the answers and know nothing about pricing up a seat in a stand. Sorry to keep pointing it out but an internet fact isn't a real one neccessarily. There must be loads of facts people can quote to put the boot into Brent without making any up. Just because I don't take everything at face value in the opposition corner does not make me a Brent lover or anything close.

This leads me on to the anti gang thing. Everytime somebody says something that isn't the flavour of ATD they get invited to post on pasoti. I've been accused of being somebody from the other side a couple of times and today it was ZYPH. Paranoid or what. This site reminds people at least once a day that anyone is free, within the bounds of the rules, to give any opinion they want to. Diversity isn't just a dance troup it is quite healthy on a discussion forum or at least it should be. It seems not however. If you don't sing the right song then you get invited to leave even if it is voluntarily. Not by all but certainly by some. If not that then there is a bit of a gang mentality which jumps in one after the other which is just another way of trying to shut somebody up. The alternative is to come up with some name for them, I won't list them because Tring has copy write on most. The sad part is that a lot of people on here don't seem to recognise the similarities to what they rant about elsewhere.

So to sum up for me at least. I have never been a member on pasoti. I have never met Newell, Webb or Brent in any capacity even by accident. I am not a Brent lover albeit I am not a hater particularly either. I don't think everything Brent does or says is wonderful but I also accept that some things are not necessarily bad. I wish the new Stand was to be bigger and better and the content more for the benefit of the club. I do not just blindly accept internet facts as facts just to suit an argument. I take each thing as it happens as a seperate item except where they might overlap onto another issue and influence it. If you are still awake I thank you for reading this post.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest




Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 EmptyWed May 15, 2013 10:41 pm

[quote="Person Of Interest"]
greensleeves wrote:
It will happen.Esmer is so off the pace these days.If Nikkkk says it will happen then it will.[/quote

Is he pissed? I have been told that nicccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk does like a red wine or 30.

well it started out as a single glass of red wine or two but when you add interest the red wine adds up.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Akkeron response to WG   Akkeron response to WG - Page 7 Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Akkeron response to WG
Back to top 
Page 7 of 16Go to page : Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 11 ... 16  Next
 Similar topics
-
» From the BBC - Akkeron
» Akkeron Group LLP
» More Akkeron Hotels in Admin
» Akkeron Hotels Group goes into administration
»  Akkeron Allstars vs Wycombe Wanderlust

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Plymouth Argyle Talk - Democratic :: Home Park :: The Mayflower-
Jump to: