| Keith Todd v Paul S | |
|
+16Mock Cuncher GreenSam Sir Francis Drake Damon.Lenszner Rickler Jethro PlymptonPilgrim Charlie Wood mouldyoldgoat Greenskin Freathy Czarcasm Tringreen Elias Dane Noseyparker 20 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:50 am | |
| True, I can't deny that. Im just challenging people when they make non substantiated comments that's all. Maybe I'm good for the site in same ways maybe I'm an irritant as I'm not agreeing like a nodding dog to what some people say
Anyway, as I've stated before, argyle isn't THAT important in the greater scheme of things and people get far too excited at times. I'm saying that as a supporter man & boy since 1978.
I enjoy debate, it's great fun when it's done in a well rounded & intelligent way. Simply dismissing people because they have differing views isn't very "atd democratic" and smacks of silliness
The term keyboard warrior is quite apt with a select few on here!
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:57 am | |
| So was miss Stapleton not the club bike? That's whats been peddled, excuse the pun, for as long as I can remember.
If she was then it doesn't matter who's daughter it is does it? If it's all lies then it hasn't come from me, I don't know any of the players, directors or their family. It's come from people who live or lived in Plymouth who purport to know them and have made it up.
If it is true then she was a slapper. Not nice to know that about someone but the truth often bursts. Like I told Mike Newell it's not nice to find out your father's a cnut but shit happens. There are plenty of cnuts and plenty of slappers so the chances are high that we'll all know some of each. |
|
| |
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:58 am | |
| - Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nosey, do you think that the people who were passing Stapes' phone number around to all and sundry should be rewarded with positions at the club and seats in the directors box?
Absolutely not (if true). |
|
| |
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:02 am | |
| - Greenjock wrote:
- So was miss Stapleton not the club bike? That's whats been peddled, excuse the pun, for as long as I can remember.
If she was then it doesn't matter who's daughter it is does it? If it's all lies then it hasn't come from me, I don't know any of the players, directors or their family. It's come from people who live or lived in Plymouth who purport to know them and have made it up.
If it is true then she was a slapper. Not nice to know that about someone but the truth often bursts. Like I told Mike Newell it's not nice to find out your father's a cnut but shit happens. There are plenty of cnuts and plenty of slappers so the chances are high that we'll all know some of each. It's all about respect and not crossing the line. I'll hazard a guess if you spoke about that to anyone who has a daughter then you would not last very long on your feet. You may support argyle and be passionate and that is to be applauded but stooping to the level you have is most definetly a disgrace. I challenge ANY father on here to back this man's for his comments on somebody's daughter |
|
| |
Greenskin
Posts : 6243 Join date : 2011-05-16 Age : 64 Location : Tavistock area
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:04 am | |
| - Noseyparker wrote:
- Who is saying that Mr Watt hasn't made that information up? It seems to me that there are an awful lot of things on here that are blatantly made up & become, after time, urban myth
That's my point really I am.I hope Hugh Watt won't mind me speaking in his defence but i did some research on the subject and re-read my copy of Paul Sturrocks Promotion Diary,written by Rick Cowdery and published in 2002.The book details the lead up to Sturrock's appointment and it corresponds to the letter with HW 's statement in his earlier post.Atkins was indeed McCauley's first choice,i won't go into too much detail except to quote the following passge from the book on page 8; "McCauley relistened to the arguments for Sturrock and against his preferred choice Atkins and eventually decided against his self confessed impetuosity" David Byrne was indeed heavily involved in the matter both in suggesting Sturrock as a candidate and then intervening when talks had broken down.I guess it doesn't pay too much to say people are telling fibs when they patently aren't,sort of destroys credibility in other aspects. |
|
| |
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:06 am | |
| If its true and an be backed up, gpfine. I'm all for the truth & substantiated facts |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:07 am | |
| - Noseyparker wrote:
- Hugh Watt wrote:
- He almost didn't as he would he would have appointed Ian Adkins. If it wasn't for David Byrne who happened to know that sturrock was looking for a new challenge it would never have happened.
More fibs! So Paul sturrock's championship diary contains 'fibs' does it? I'm sure Rick Cowdrey would be interested to know that. The boards prefered candidate was Ian Atkins.
Last edited by Hugh Watt on Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:09 am | |
| See above Mr Watt. I'm not averse to apologising if I am wrong! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:16 am | |
| - Noseyparker wrote:
- Greenjock wrote:
- So was miss Stapleton not the club bike? That's whats been peddled, excuse the pun, for as long as I can remember.
If she was then it doesn't matter who's daughter it is does it? If it's all lies then it hasn't come from me, I don't know any of the players, directors or their family. It's come from people who live or lived in Plymouth who purport to know them and have made it up.
If it is true then she was a slapper. Not nice to know that about someone but the truth often bursts. Like I told Mike Newell it's not nice to find out your father's a cnut but shit happens. There are plenty of cnuts and plenty of slappers so the chances are high that we'll all know some of each. It's all about respect and not crossing the line. I'll hazard a guess if you spoke about that to anyone who has a daughter then you would not last very long on your feet.
You may support argyle and be passionate and that is to be applauded but stooping to the level you have is most definetly a disgrace.
I challenge ANY father on here to back this man's for his comments on somebody's daughter
Well I have a son and he dates some right old slappers - hope that helps. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:24 am | |
| - Noseyparker wrote:
- Greenjock wrote:
- So was miss Stapleton not the club bike? That's whats been peddled, excuse the pun, for as long as I can remember.
If she was then it doesn't matter who's daughter it is does it? If it's all lies then it hasn't come from me, I don't know any of the players, directors or their family. It's come from people who live or lived in Plymouth who purport to know them and have made it up.
If it is true then she was a slapper. Not nice to know that about someone but the truth often bursts. Like I told Mike Newell it's not nice to find out your father's a cnut but shit happens. There are plenty of cnuts and plenty of slappers so the chances are high that we'll all know some of each. It's all about respect and not crossing the line. I'll hazard a guess if you spoke about that to anyone who has a daughter then you would not last very long on your feet.
You may support argyle and be passionate and that is to be applauded but stooping to the level you have is most definetly a disgrace.
I challenge ANY father on here to back this man's for his comments on somebody's daughter
NoseyParker, sorry if being honest and direct offends you but just because you know somebody shouldn't affect your view of them. You started defending the lass in question when it was suggested she was over friendly with several of the team. If it's not true just say it's not true. If it is true then you could say she was young, starstruck and silly but she's now grown up and changed, or whatever. You've made character references of several people already on this thread because you knew them or have heard one persons account of others and we're supposed to take that as gospel. I have a son who I love more than anything in the world but if he became a serial killer in years to come I wouldn't blindly defend him. As I've said I don't know anyone past or present at the club personally so I'm not biased. You on the other hand are. You may not like my bluntness but it's because I'm detached from the emotional side of it all. Personally I don't like your smug attitude on here but it's a forum where people air their opinions. I won't be "doing a Norris" if you're not my biggest fan. And if you don't like certain people's posting style on here you could always "do an Akos". |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:47 am | |
| I think the problem is Nosey, you signed up on here under a username that was part of the trolling of the Argyle talk forum so people are automatically using that against you.
I'm not saying you were the Noseyparker from the old forum. |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:05 am | |
| Guess who ?
Search in: Blocks 17 & 18 and The Away End Subject: Newbie here - thought I was only one! Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:59 pm A friend pointed me to this site and I have to say I am so pleased what I have been reading on it so far...
I honestly thought I was the only one who is embarrassed how certain individuals have appointed themselves as "high ranking officials" within the club. Bully tactics, jealousy, hero worship, I could go on, it seems to be the norm these days at OUR club.
Sadly Mr Brent has handed the mantle to these people as his interest obviously lies in the development of the area around the ground (understandably). Where will all of this end? Chairman Webb? Chief exec Newell? Thugs & unionists, an awful mix.
It only seems yesterday that someone allegedly threatened to have a previous chairmans offspring kidnapped. Has this been forgotten already? Surely nobody will be surprised as to what is going on today, taking into account the shenanigans of 12 months ago?
The GT's have got it right as they do it for the love of the club, not to make themselves look good! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:11 am | |
| - Tringreen wrote:
- Guess who ?
Search in: Blocks 17 & 18 and The Away End Subject: Newbie here - thought I was only one! Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:59 pm A friend pointed me to this site and I have to say I am so pleased what I have been reading on it so far...
I honestly thought I was the only one who is embarrassed how certain individuals have appointed themselves as "high ranking officials" within the club. Bully tactics, jealousy, hero worship, I could go on, it seems to be the norm these days at OUR club.
Sadly Mr Brent has handed the mantle to these people as his interest obviously lies in the development of the area around the ground (understandably). Where will all of this end? Chairman Webb? Chief exec Newell? Thugs & unionists, an awful mix.
It only seems yesterday that someone allegedly threatened to have a previous chairmans offspring kidnapped. Has this been forgotten already? Surely nobody will be surprised as to what is going on today, taking into account the shenanigans of 12 months ago?
The GT's have got it right as they do it for the love of the club, not to make themselves look good! Was it Chris Webb Greenman? |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| |
| |
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:19 am | |
| - Yea Man wrote:
- I think the problem is Nosey, you signed up on here under a username that was part of the trolling of the Argyle talk forum so people are automatically using that against you.
I'm not saying you were the Noseyparker from the old forum. "The trouble is" This 3 words indicate that I'm responsible for other people's sheer stupidity. Does that mean if my first name was "mark" then I would automatically be the man who murdered John Lennon? Ridiculous analogy but it makes my point I think! |
|
| |
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:20 am | |
| Those not this (ref previous post) |
|
| |
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:24 am | |
| - Greenjock wrote:
- Noseyparker wrote:
- Greenjock wrote:
- So was miss Stapleton not the club bike? That's whats been peddled, excuse the pun, for as long as I can remember.
If she was then it doesn't matter who's daughter it is does it? If it's all lies then it hasn't come from me, I don't know any of the players, directors or their family. It's come from people who live or lived in Plymouth who purport to know them and have made it up.
If it is true then she was a slapper. Not nice to know that about someone but the truth often bursts. Like I told Mike Newell it's not nice to find out your father's a cnut but shit happens. There are plenty of cnuts and plenty of slappers so the chances are high that we'll all know some of each. It's all about respect and not crossing the line. I'll hazard a guess if you spoke about that to anyone who has a daughter then you would not last very long on your feet.
You may support argyle and be passionate and that is to be applauded but stooping to the level you have is most definetly a disgrace.
I challenge ANY father on here to back this man's for his comments on somebody's daughter
NoseyParker, sorry if being honest and direct offends you but just because you know somebody shouldn't affect your view of them.
You started defending the lass in question when it was suggested she was over friendly with several of the team. If it's not true just say it's not true. If it is true then you could say she was young, starstruck and silly but she's now grown up and changed, or whatever.
You've made character references of several people already on this thread because you knew them or have heard one persons account of others and we're supposed to take that as gospel.
I have a son who I love more than anything in the world but if he became a serial killer in years to come I wouldn't blindly defend him.
As I've said I don't know anyone past or present at the club personally so I'm not biased. You on the other hand are.
You may not like my bluntness but it's because I'm detached from the emotional side of it all. Personally I don't like your smug attitude on here but it's a forum where people air their opinions. I won't be "doing a Norris" if you're not my biggest fan. And if you don't like certain people's posting style on here you could always "do an Akos". You missed my point. My point is that I think it is wrong to say vile things about people's offspring, in whatever situation you are in. If you are a father, I sincerely hope that nobody says vile things against your family in the future As far as I'm concerned its end of topic |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:25 am | |
| - Noseyparker wrote:
- Yea Man wrote:
- I think the problem is Nosey, you signed up on here under a username that was part of the trolling of the Argyle talk forum so people are automatically using that against you.
I'm not saying you were the Noseyparker from the old forum. "The trouble is"
This 3 words indicate that I'm responsible for other people's sheer stupidity. Does that mean if my first name was "mark" then I would automatically be the man who murdered John Lennon?
Ridiculous analogy but it makes my point I think! Just for clarity of the particulars - who said the three words "The trouble is"? |
|
| |
Noseyparker
Posts : 358 Join date : 2012-11-04
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:32 am | |
| I noticed that after I posted it! Ha
"The problem is" |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15894 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:40 am | |
| Yea Man was trying to explain some of the hostility towards you in the begining and not saying you are responsible for others. Any hostility since is down to you. _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Now an officially semi retired old fart! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:43 am | |
| - Noseyparker wrote:
- Greenjock wrote:
- Noseyparker wrote:
- Greenjock wrote:
- So was miss Stapleton not the club bike? That's whats been peddled, excuse the pun, for as long as I can remember.
If she was then it doesn't matter who's daughter it is does it? If it's all lies then it hasn't come from me, I don't know any of the players, directors or their family. It's come from people who live or lived in Plymouth who purport to know them and have made it up.
If it is true then she was a slapper. Not nice to know that about someone but the truth often bursts. Like I told Mike Newell it's not nice to find out your father's a cnut but shit happens. There are plenty of cnuts and plenty of slappers so the chances are high that we'll all know some of each. It's all about respect and not crossing the line. I'll hazard a guess if you spoke about that to anyone who has a daughter then you would not last very long on your feet.
You may support argyle and be passionate and that is to be applauded but stooping to the level you have is most definetly a disgrace.
I challenge ANY father on here to back this man's for his comments on somebody's daughter
NoseyParker, sorry if being honest and direct offends you but just because you know somebody shouldn't affect your view of them.
You started defending the lass in question when it was suggested she was over friendly with several of the team. If it's not true just say it's not true. If it is true then you could say she was young, starstruck and silly but she's now grown up and changed, or whatever.
You've made character references of several people already on this thread because you knew them or have heard one persons account of others and we're supposed to take that as gospel.
I have a son who I love more than anything in the world but if he became a serial killer in years to come I wouldn't blindly defend him.
As I've said I don't know anyone past or present at the club personally so I'm not biased. You on the other hand are.
You may not like my bluntness but it's because I'm detached from the emotional side of it all. Personally I don't like your smug attitude on here but it's a forum where people air their opinions. I won't be "doing a Norris" if you're not my biggest fan. And if you don't like certain people's posting style on here you could always "do an Akos". You missed my point. My point is that I think it is wrong to say vile things about people's offspring, in whatever situation you are in. If you are a father, I sincerely hope that nobody says vile things against your family in the future
As far as I'm concerned its end of topic As I've said, if my son does the things others accuse him of I won't be one of these fucktards who see life through rose tinted specs and say " my son wouldn't do that, he's not like that". I don't know how many Argyle players got to know wosshername intimately, all I know is what has been said several times about her on various forums. If it's not true then it's vile. If it's true then she was, lets say, loose- lipped. If that's the case then make excuses for her if you want but don't make out that people who know about it are vile. Lets face it back in the day that's the sort of young lady we would all like to leave a nightclub with but not necessarily the young lady you want to take home to meet your parents. Anyway what was this thread about? You have inside knowledge of the Stapleton's and are defending a guy who was at the helm when the crucial decisions were made that are very much part of the reason Argyle are now being spit-roasted in an entirely different way to, oh forget it. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:49 am | |
| Nosey, was Stapleton involved in the Heaney/BIL bid to buy Argyle from the administrators? |
|
| |
Sir Francis Drake
Posts : 7461 Join date : 2011-12-03 Age : 33 Location : Nr Panama
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 11:57 am | |
| Nobody has dome anything wrong here even if what is alleged to have happened actually happened. Exactly who and how many relationships people have is the business of those concerned and nobody else especially when they are young, free and single. So Girl Shags Footballers makes her a slag but Footballer Shags Girls makes him a stud... It's a clear a case of puerile, invasive, unnecessary, patheticly sexist and misogynistic double standards as you could ever wish to see to condemn any woman for this. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:05 pm | |
| - Sir Francis Drake wrote:
- Nobody has dome anything wrong here even if what is alleged to have happened actually happened. Exactly who and how many relationships people have is the business of those concerned and nobody else especially when they are young, free and single. So Girl Shags Footballers makes her a slag but Footballer Shags Girls makes him a stud... It's a clear a case of puerile, invasive, unnecessary, patheticly sexist and misogynistic double standards as you could ever wish to see to condemn any woman for this.
No, I think the footballer's modus operand of gangbangs, roasting, filming young girls etc is vile and I've been outspoken about it in the past. My point is don't have a go at people for bringing it up if it's true. If it's so vile to talk about it then it's vile to have taken part in it, whatever your sex. Mr Parker perhaps should have asked people not to talk about it in the first place instead of defending one alleged participants role in it. If the stories are true all of the participants are slappers in my book. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:15 pm | |
| - Sir Francis Drake wrote:
- Nobody has dome anything wrong here even if what is alleged to have happened actually happened. Exactly who and how many relationships people have is the business of those concerned and nobody else especially when they are young, free and single. So Girl Shags Footballers makes her a slag but Footballer Shags Girls makes him a stud... It's a clear a case of puerile, invasive, unnecessary, patheticly sexist and misogynistic double standards as you could ever wish to see to condemn any woman for this.
This |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Keith Todd v Paul S | |
| |
|
| |
| Keith Todd v Paul S | |
|