The Mankover all action Thread.

harvetheslayer wrote:

Akkeron for the Chop lol......

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Akkeron RIP?

All coming together nicely.

Voluntary liquidation request, yet another smokescreen.

Dingle wrote:

Voluntary liquidation request, yet another smokescreen.  

Here we go chaps.....as Bees says its the "Emergency Parachute Routine" being urgently deployed...

harvetheslayer wrote:

Dingle wrote:

Voluntary liquidation request, yet another smokescreen.  

Here we go chaps.....as Bees says its the "Emergency Parachute Routine" being urgently deployed...

How many hundreds of times have you stated thats brents mo harve ?

Yet that was all bullshit apparently....

we're gonna need a truckload of popcorn for this

Jethro wrote:

we're gonna need a truckload of popcorn for this

POI is organising a multi drop as we speak.....

harvetheslayer wrote:

Jethro wrote:

we're gonna need a truckload of popcorn for this

POI is organising a multi drop as we speak.....

better get an artic this time, make it two,

I will ask the question if Brent's bankrupt does that affect the club more then just a stalled mankover,
Eg losing ten points

harvetheslayer wrote:

Jethro wrote:

we're gonna need a truckload of popcorn for this

POI is organising a multi drop as we speak.....

I have stock piled 2 trailers full, which is roughly 80 tonnes. Just for these occasions. Mind you, I had to re-stock after the Mr Brent standing down news broke.

Bugger off Brent!

On a serious note. 'IF' this story has any credence, what are the implications for Argo, with brent still holding 30%. I must admit, one is not aufait with such complicated financial matters (apart from bankruptcy of course, but Piss shoes De-Larf will tell you all you need to know anyway).

Could this effect the club? If so, in what way?

Well its not on the farm just yet,
Nools been down to lidl to stock de larf up with fake red bull can't let that news slip out can we...

Old Timer wrote:

I have long suspected that things were not well with the "new" development , for one thing i would have thought it would be cheaper to knock the whole thing down and build from a new foundation.I would like to see the p.m. as it seems to question the safety of the old structure.

No, there isn’t anything in the PM that specifically mentions safety.

It’s an opinion from an ‘industry professional’ that the mankover is a recognised cheap option and will turn out to be “an inadequate bodge”.

Hardly breaking news tbh!

Don't worry. Nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk assured everyone on FC it's absolutely nothing to see. Move along now.

P.O.I wrote:

Don't worry. Nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk assured everyone on FC it's absolutely nothing to see. Move along now.

He will sign back up here now watch......

Well, his first explanation that it was due to late filing was wrong.

Czarcasm wrote:

Old Timer wrote:

I have long suspected that things were not well with the "new" development , for one thing i would have thought it would be cheaper to knock the whole thing down and build from a new foundation.I would like to see the p.m. as it seems to question the safety of the old structure.

No, there isn’t anything in the PM that specifically mentions safety.

It’s an opinion from an ‘industry professional’ that the mankover is a recognised cheap option and will turn out to be “an inadequate bodge”.

Hardly breaking news tbh!

This is in part what Harves PM says:

Harve in a PM wrote:

When I say strongly advised I mean that they told him point-blank that trying to adapt the existing structure, while the cheaper option, would lead to an inadequate bodge and would never work - so much so that they told him they would not be prepared to undermine their reputation by accepting the contract if he insisted on redeveloping the existing structure.

So what does "would never work" mean?

Care to explain Harve?

Are you seriously implying that the mankover will be a safety hazard to fans and is more than likely to collapse causing death or injury?

Are there not safety inspections on the work being undertaken? Are the inspectors being bought off?


Anyone who believes this nonsense seriously needs their head examining - we're in 9/11 and the US government did it territory...

P.O.I wrote:

Don't worry. Nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk assured everyone on FC it's absolutely nothing to see. Move along now.

blocked by him anyone got any screen shots ?

Just sign in to Companies House and go to Akkeron, it's public information.

Dear oh dear our LA friend is implying its MY pm lol
Sorry fella you'll need to try harder...a lot harder old boy.

Rickler wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Old Timer wrote:

I have long suspected that things were not well with the "new" development , for one thing i would have thought it would be cheaper to knock the whole thing down and build from a new foundation.I would like to see the p.m. as it seems to question the safety of the old structure.

No, there isn’t anything in the PM that specifically mentions safety.

It’s an opinion from an ‘industry professional’ that the mankover is a recognised cheap option and will turn out to be “an inadequate bodge”.

Hardly breaking news tbh!

This is in part what Harves PM says:

Harve in a PM wrote:

When I say strongly advised I mean that they told him point-blank that trying to adapt the existing structure, while the cheaper option, would lead to an inadequate bodge and would never work - so much so that they told him they would not be prepared to undermine their reputation by accepting the contract if he insisted on redeveloping the existing structure.

So what does "would never work" mean?

Care to explain Harve?

Are you seriously implying that the mankover will be a safety hazard to fans and is more than likely to collapse causing death or injury?

Are there not safety inspections on the work being undertaken?  Are the inspectors being bought off?


Anyone who believes this nonsense seriously needs their head examining - we're in 9/11 and the US government did it territory...

I cannot say about the unsafe part but I can say that the 'Grandstand' will need to be replaced long before the loan is paid off.

harvetheslayer wrote:

Dear oh dear our LA friend is implying its MY pm lol
Sorry fella you'll need to try harder...a lot harder old boy.

I'm not implying anything.. I'm stating as fact you sent out a PM with the following quote.

Are you seriously denying the following words were not in the PM you sent around?

Harve in a PM wrote:

When I say strongly advised I mean that they told him point-blank that trying to adapt the existing structure, while the cheaper option, would lead to an inadequate bodge and would never work - so much so that they told him they would not be prepared to undermine their reputation by accepting the contract if he insisted on redeveloping the existing structure.

and you forgot to respond these simple questions....

Are you seriously implying that the mankover will be a safety hazard to fans and is more than likely to collapse causing death or injury?

Are there not safety inspections on the work being undertaken? Are the inspectors being bought off?

Jethro wrote:

To the tune of london bridge is falling down.
Argyles grandstand is falling down, falling down,
Argyles Grandstand is falling down.
Bodge it up, Jimmy.

hallett ain’t gunna build it up again
Hallett ain’t gunna build it up again poor old argyle!!

I do believe he said it was Brent’s baby down to him daughter and bungo for them to sort the pile of shit out!
While ma & pa hallett pretty much run the club long the same lines brent did

Looks to me Reg the club will be fecked for years to come
Thanks to the shyster and the dimlows supporting shit.