Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 7:23 am
The outright greed displayed by numerous people over the last 10 years is shameful. It's opened my eyes to the scheming, unprincipled and dishonest nature when money is concerned.
Stapleton, Dennerley, Gill, Guilfoyle, Ridsdale, Todd, Gardner, Kagami, Jones, Wrathall(twice), Brent. The club has become a cesspit with no end in sight.
All this coincides with ground purchasing. Argyle can rot in hell as far as I'm concerned.
Tgwu
Posts : 14779 Join date : 2011-12-11 Location : Central Park (most days)
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:06 am
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:13 am
I wonder if Graham has any view on the 'Statement' being turned into a Poll on the farm.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:25 am
There are polls on here, Facebook Freechat, and pasoti. The Freechat and ATD polls are overwhelmingly in favour of the ground remaining publicly owned. Pasoti's is in favour of Brent owning the ground. Who'da thought it.
The interesting thing is the Freechat poll, which is the most transparent of the three - every voter can be seen, and only one vote per person. And it's massively in favour of public ownership.
Last edited by Homeslice on Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:36 am; edited 1 time in total
PatDunne
Posts : 2614 Join date : 2013-11-21 Age : 63
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:35 am
Yes, a poll on here separate to the original posting......
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:38 am
The poll over there was only set up for the multis to do their thing.
Czarcasm
Posts : 10244 Join date : 2011-10-23
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:43 am
Czarcasm wrote:
What this statement does, effectively, is formalise an opposition viewpoint from people whose opinions ought to matter.
As someone said previously, it is very much a laying down of battle lines.
It will of course prove to be utterly fruitless though.
Brent came to make money. He hasn't made it yet. The Freehold purchase will of course turn that situation on its head.
I think we should have a countdown clock - how long before an official response points to a supposed small majority of fans favouring the Freehold purchase?
At 6.23pm yesterday Wing Commander De Lar on Brents cheerleading Forum wrote:-
In the recent AFT survey a slight majority of fans (50.7%) wanted the club to take up the option of buying the freehold.
Priceless.
Czarcasm
Posts : 10244 Join date : 2011-10-23
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:49 am
Les Miserable wrote:
The poll over there was only set up for the multis to do their thing.
Indeed. The Modroom will have been busier than Heathrow Air Traffic Control with all the various Admin/Owners busy signing in/out to get all their sleeper accounts actively voting.
A tireless Stirling effort PasotiMods. Bravo.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:58 am
A good response from Graham to Adolf Harper on Daz's* "statement" thread.
*Clearly Nool using Daz's account.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:12 am
Frank Bullitt wrote:
A good response from Graham to Adolf Harper on Daz's* "statement" thread.
*Clearly Nool using Daz's account.
And of course Newell jumps in feet first, misses the point Graham is making by a country mile, dishes out a bit of personal abuse, and tries to turn the whole thing into a pasoti v ATD/Freechat battle.
Wouldn't it be good if just once he could debate the issues rather than turn everything into one of his paranoid rants against those with whom he disagrees? His behaviour doesn't do his Lord and Master any good, and it can't be long before the reluctant one realises this, if he hasn't already.
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:16 am
Graham Clark, John Lloyd, ATD and Freechat, you have been warned
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:17 am
The Pig on Pasoti wrote:
Playing to your limited audiences again Graham?
If ATD and FreeChat are indicative of your support base it really does say it all.
It seem as if Lloyd's survey findings aren't the answer you guys wanted.
What a truly loathsome creature he is. Yes Newell, Pasoti is "bent" because you "bent" it.
The Thugs reign is coming to an abrupt end very shortly Frank.......He has nowhere left to run
How has it come to this? It started with Tring and Ricks and now its Graham Clark and John Lloyd.
The last desperate roll of the Dice for a man finally realising that 99% consider him Plymouths finest Wanker by a Country Mile.....
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:44 am
They've been unleashed...
PatDunne
Posts : 2614 Join date : 2013-11-21 Age : 63
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:46 am
Because the undercurrent created by people like you, who only hint at this site being controlled by some super being, is constant.
No doubt fueled by a drunken series of posts by a sad and obsessive ex and very bitter Mod saying that James Brent owns part of this site.
I truly believe that there are too many aluminium hat wearers on the Internet and other hints from people like LG and Chancellor plus of course you, further endorse that feeling.
What do I think? I think that PAFC have left massive gaps in the communication to fans and it was bound to be filled with theories like yours and 'the undersigned'.
I trust our board, I think they are men of integrity and they care about our club.
However I realise the mouth breathers will say 'Uou're bound up say that' - So Graham there's little point in me answering it is there.
What I do believe in is the democratic vote actually shows what the majority think, however it seems as if 'the undersigned' seem to think they should speak up for us poor uninformed folk. What outstanding arrogance!!
Anyway I'm off, I have a life.
Nool just couldn't keep it in, phew, thought my huge bag of popcorn would go to waste, so why does IJN dislike GC so much?
Chemical Ali
Posts : 7322 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 47 Location : Plymouth
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:54 am
I see nool is getting very moralistic about the pasoti poll on the statement.
How can anyone trust a site with its history of breaches of the data protection act and creation of multi accounts? The pasoti poll is worthless as it's not a true gauge of supporter feeling as there are too many multis posting (and voting). You only have to look at the viscious nature of the Greenman episode and the lies told for over a year following to see what the pasoti management is like (both postey and nool involved) and how they will lie and cheat to ensure their mate James is happy.
Just look at how many pro statement posts have been edited/ censored compared to none of the anti statement posts. Fairly moderated my ass!
Also TonyD = Postey
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:07 am
I think a much fairer way of looking at these polls is to take an aggregate figure of all three. Doesn't look so good for Pasoti's Big Pig then....
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:08 am
Coming together nicely over there now......I sense a meltdown
RegGreen
Posts : 6018 Join date : 2015-07-08
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:24 am
alannotivvy wrote:
Bandwagon wrote:
I've shared a table in that business lounge with Newel & that Daz guy - surreal experience is all I can say!!
tell us more Bandy
yeah come on Bandy you cant drop a grenade like that and not tell us bandy
Tgwu
Posts : 14779 Join date : 2011-12-11 Location : Central Park (most days)
Subject: Re: 'NEVER AGAIN' - A Statement Sat Aug 27, 2016 11:37 am
PatDunne wrote:
Because the undercurrent created by people like you, who only hint at this site being controlled by some super being, is constant.
No doubt fueled by a drunken series of posts by a sad and obsessive ex and very bitter Mod saying that James Brent owns part of this site.
I truly believe that there are too many aluminium hat wearers on the Internet and other hints from people like LG and Chancellor plus of course you, further endorse that feeling.
What do I think? I think that PAFC have left massive gaps in the communication to fans and it was bound to be filled with theories like yours and 'the undersigned'.
I trust our board, I think they are men of integrity and they care about our club.
However I realise the mouth breathers will say 'Uou're bound up say that' - So Graham there's little point in me answering it is there.
What I do believe in is the democratic vote actually shows what the majority think, however it seems as if 'the undersigned' seem to think they should speak up for us poor uninformed folk. What outstanding arrogance!!
Anyway I'm off, I have a life.
Nool just couldn't keep it in, phew, thought my huge bag of popcorn would go to waste, so why does IJN dislike GC so much?
He educated, he well mannered, contact with the people in the know, do not tell porkies and do not use multi