EU referendum...THE RESULT...and aftermath...

Moist_Von_Lipwig wrote:

Les Miserable wrote:

Welcome to Europe young man. If you are unhappy about anything or there is something we can do to improve your stay please be sure to let us know. I do hope Moist is OK.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thanks for your concern, I'm fine thanks....

Not good news. Hopefully an isolated case. I don't think I'd be any safer in the UK (in or out of the EU!) than I am here.

After all, the atrocities in France and Belgium were commited by French and Belgian nationals. Also, the 7/7 bombers were all young British men (born in Britain!).

The key to the problem is the sharing of intelligence across Europe...........

Sadly, it would seem not.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Dont speak too soon ffs !

And another, coming together nicely in Merkins Germany, 3 in the last week


Sorry, 4.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Les Miserable wrote:

And another, coming together nicely in Merkins Germany, 3 in the last week

"Coming together nicely" is an odd choice of phrase to use when describing horrific, random, murderous acts.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Les Miserable wrote:

And another, coming together nicely in Merkins Germany, 3 in the last week

"Coming together nicely" is an odd choice of phrase to use when describing horrific, random, murderous acts.

It is indeed, ironic even.

Here's an article that does rather more than scratch the post-Referendum surface and there's much to ponder.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

(Be warned it is quite long.)

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

MikeWN wrote:

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

Far simpler than that. If you're like-minded, you may well want to read it. If you're not, you probably won't.

MikeWN wrote:

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

It isn't balanced at all, it's a piece of one sided,patronising shit.

Greenskin wrote:

MikeWN wrote:

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

It isn't balanced at all, it's a piece of one sided,patronising shit.

Greenskin wrote:

MikeWN wrote:

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

It isn't balanced at all, it's a piece of one sided,patronising shit.

Annnnd there it is.

It's yet another condescending piece claiming that the Leavers allowed their emotions to trump their brains.

Saint Francis wouldn't have linked it if it had said any different.

The people have spoken. How dare they.

Yawn provoking, bottom line for me about immigration is the recent government comment, EU immigrants come here looking for a job, Non EU immigrants come here having found work.

No issue with immigration but it has to be controlled

Greenskin wrote:

MikeWN wrote:

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

It isn't balanced at all, it's a piece of one sided,patronising shit.

Stop holding back, say what you think

Greenskin wrote:

MikeWN wrote:

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

It isn't balanced at all, it's a piece of one sided,patronising shit.

Would you ike to back that up with some examples from the piece in question?

Which bits, in your opinion, were especially shit?

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Greenskin wrote:

MikeWN wrote:

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

It isn't balanced at all, it's a piece of one sided,patronising shit.

Would you ike to back that up with some examples from the piece in question?

Which bits, in your opinion, were especially shit?

Don't call him ike, tina.

Les Miserable wrote:

And another, coming together nicely in Merkins Germany, 3 in the last week

Sorry, 4.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Greenskin wrote:

MikeWN wrote:

Interesting, thought-provoking, balanced and backed up. I really enjoyed that article.

This being the internet, someone will be along dreckly to decry it as Capitalist/Marxist dogma because it doesn't strictly fit into their own pre-conceived opinion. That or claim it's the work of the devil because SFD posted the link.

It isn't balanced at all, it's a piece of one sided,patronising shit.

Would you ike to back that up with some examples from the piece in question?

Which bits, in your opinion, were especially shit?

The "raus,raus,raus" analogy in relation to the Referendum party in 1997 gave a fair indication of the blokes mindset early on in the piece. Bit of an odd thing to say actually, seeing as James Goldsmith was Jewish.

Anything else?

Yep

SFD quoted left wing propoganda wrote:

There is no rich country of equivalent size that is more densely populated. The only country which has both more people than England and more people per square kilometre is Bangladesh. What this means, experientially, is that there is a kind of denseness to England and to Englishness; England is both very similar to itself and significantly different when you move ten miles down the road.

He's wrong:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] and [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Anything else?

It's enough. Certainly can't be arsed to go through a paragraph by paragraph critique of the article which essentially is a rehash of all the arguments put forward by your good self since your side lost.

This is pathetic. We can all find posts to suit our argument.

You are a bit sad really.

He's even gone to the trouble of taking a picture of a newspaper(guardian foreshore) article and uploading it. A total zealot.

More desperate and childish with every post. Like a four year old who won't stop going on until he gets what he wants..