The abusive trolling Greenman on ATD

greensleeves wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

greensleeves wrote:

Peggy wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

From his logic if you did nothing to "save" the club then you're a lesser person

Tell you what, I'm getting more and more pissed off with this shit as time goes on.

There are lots of people around - people like John Lloyd, for instance - who'd been doing loads for the club for years, long before anybody had even heard of Webb, by the way. Then, when things started getting tricky last time round, Newell and his mates started targeting those people, spreading lies about them, abusing them, you name it. (I'd point to the proof, but of course it was all deleted long ago.)

So, not surprisingly, some of those people thought 'feck it, this is not what football's meant to be about' and left them to it. And every time those people have stuck their heads back over the parapet since then the cry's gone up 'what did you do in the war'? (Not to mention the flickr information and all the rest of what's been going on for the last couple of years.)

So: what did I do in the war? Watched you lot feck up big time, that's what.

Hey ....Sweet cheeks haven't you got any ironing to do.

Just when I thought it wasn't possible for you to make yourself look an even bigger bellend than normal you trump yourself.

Your a grade A tosser feck off back under the bar stool you crawled from.

C'mon MODS thats a red card ....

  

Methinks Mr sleeves' solo account has recently become a shared password. Almost a Ponty/greenman ring about the latest stuff. We can do without the sexist crap too. Obviously meant to disrupt the forum, and a different tone than Oddball's ramblings.

I say leave him. Let him have is say. Tids is right. If it isn't illegal the he's part of the pub, albeit the corner that stinks of piss.

On reflection WG is right.

Interesting you should point that out, Winter, seeing that the first post used almost exactly the same words I remember Ponty flinging at me all that time ago.

What a bunch of ignorant, cowardly tossers.

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Yes sleeves he did very well - bought Argyle shares for £50,000, sold them for £500,000 then when the club needed cash he said feck off.

Damon...you would have been more than happy with that sort of profit though wouldn't you.just that you came in a little bit too late to make such big money.peter jones came in at a time when no local businessmen were interested.argyle were rock bottom at the wrong end of the football league with very poor crowds,nobody would touch them with a barge pole...peter jones took on the risk and invested his money,he took a gamble ....the rest is history...his timing was pretty good as well...as he got out just as you were coming in....thats a sign of a very astute businessman.

Not doubting it for a second sleeves. But having made the money it would have shown a little class to put some back in when the call came. The fact that he didnt shows exactly what he is here for. And that isnt the betterment of PAFC.

Talking of the word astute thats not the sort of language greensleaves normally uses . HMMMMMMMMMMM

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Not doubting it for a second sleeves. But having made the money it would have shown a little class to put some back in when the call came. The fact that he didnt shows exactly what he is here for. And that isnt the betterment of PAFC.

Not being that conversant, who asked for the cash? If it was the Mag7 then I can see why he told them to take a hike, why do good after bad?

Damon with respect you could say that against any other director.

Winter Green wrote:

Methinks Mr sleeves' solo account has recently become a shared password. Almost a Ponty/greenman ring about the latest stuff. We can do without the sexist crap too. Obviously meant to disrupt the forum, and a different tone than Oddball's ramblings.

Saved me a job there WG, just about to make the same observation. But then again none of the gang read anything on here   

It's plainly obvious but please allow it/them/he/she to stay because it persuades the less liberated and brain washed pasotian of the failings of its owners/moderators/treacherous scabs. In the past ATD has done very well with such practices, from 15 to knocking 600.

Chemical Ali wrote:

knecht wrote:

Mapperley, darling wrote:

......
youll find that we all own this site. unless tring is brent in disguise   

You've heard that rumour too!?

If I remember accurately, I think GOB owned the site but he then passed on the ownership to the two keyholders - whoever they might be.

Maybe the site historians will correct me if I'm wrong.

Mouldy and I are in effect the owners as we can close down the site etc but We are voted in by the Mods who are voted in by ATD-ers (who meet the voting criteria) so I believe that ATD is owned by the users. This has always been the belief since we started the new site after the old Site (Argyle Talk) owner (I can't remember his name) allowed Newell and Ponty free reign to wreck the site in exchange for being allowed back on pasoti.

Pasoti though seems to have mixed ownership- first it was Dave Gadd, then it was owned by the Mods, then it went back to Dave Gaddd, now it's a Nool/ Gadd ownership with a leading hacker site director in tow.

it was that spurs fan..... prodigirl..the previous owner, that is

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Not doubting it for a second sleeves. But having made the money it would have shown a little class to put some back in when the call came. The fact that he didnt shows exactly what he is here for. And that isnt the betterment of PAFC.

Damon - I know it appears I'm on your case a bit about Stapleton but why didn't he put his profits from his share sale to Kagami back into the club instead of fleecing the Youth Trust?

Indeed it could be said about any other director - but no other director made £450,000 out of Argyle. The fact that Jones did and still refused to reply to the call puts him a few steps lower than the rest.

Tis - Brent asked for the cash.

Maybe Stapleton had a hand in the 300K from "Heaney" to get the administration game underway.

one day this dream will come true



when pasoti falls from the club's bossom and with this new argyle wall that day is coming will pasoti's own Napoleon do the right thing and disappear?

GOB wrote:

It's plainly obvious but please allow it/them/he/she to stay because it persuades the less liberated and brain washed pasotian of the failings of its owners/moderators/treacherous scabs. In the past ATD has done very well with such practices, from 15 to knocking 600.

I agree. But it's also a difficult one for the Mods, especially when you have a Pasoti poodle who's sole intention is to provoke, insult and antagonize.

I've actually always been of the opinion that the people - i.e. you, me and every other normal poster - should all be responsible for calling someone out if they're acting like an utter cnut.

greensleeves wrote:

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Yes sleeves he did very well - bought Argyle shares for £50,000, sold them for £500,000 then when the club needed cash he said feck off.

Damon...you would have been more than happy with that sort of profit though wouldn't you.just that you came in a little bit too late to make such big money.peter jones came in at a time when no local businessmen were interested.argyle were rock bottom at the wrong end of the football league  with very poor crowds,nobody would touch them with a barge pole...peter jones took on the risk and invested his money,he took a gamble ....the rest is history...his timing was pretty good as well...as he got out just as you were coming in....thats a sign of a very astute businessman.

Um what about using your work email address to set up an account to slag off the club captain.   

Czarcasm wrote:

GOB wrote:

It's plainly obvious but please allow it/them/he/she to stay because it persuades the less liberated and brain washed pasotian of the failings of its owners/moderators/treacherous scabs. In the past ATD has done very well with such practices, from 15 to knocking 600.

I agree. But it's also a difficult one for the Mods, especially when you have a Pasoti poodle who's sole intention is to provoke, insult and antagonize.

I've actually always been of the opinion that the people - i.e. you, me and every other normal poster - should all be responsible for calling someone out if they're acting like an utter cnut.  

I agree, 100%

Sarky...I don't do abuse just disagree with a lot of the unsubstantiated tat that is is posted on here.You're a big boy.If you guys cant handle criticsm tough.You go against all your rules though with some of the abuse that you hand out.Makes you look very childish.

Charlie Wood wrote:

Winter Green wrote:

Methinks Mr sleeves' solo account has recently become a shared password. Almost a Ponty/greenman ring about the latest stuff. We can do without the sexist crap too. Obviously meant to disrupt the forum, and a different tone than Oddball's ramblings.

Saved me a job there WG, just about to make the same observation. But then again none of the gang read anything on here   

Nope everything gets copied and pasted and then shown

Iggy I dont read pm's. If you got anything to say,then put it up front where everyone can read it.

greensleeves wrote:

Sarky...I don't do abuse

Yes you do. You've just used sexist abuse. And all in the borrowed account of someon else. Coward.
No one has a problem with anybody coming on here debating Argyle matters, that's what this forum is for. It's allowed. Just try and keep the abuse out of it.