President's Progress !!

Winter Green wrote:

Funnily enough Rollo, Karl Marx was thought to be a bit wayward and was rumoured to have a child with the housekeeper. If you actually understood left wing politics you would understand sexual behaviour isn't one of the main tenets.

It is the right wing bourgeois that harp on about right and wrong in this area, and do you know why ?. Mainly because they're worried who's going to inherit the property, and in fact if you read yer Engels, you'll find the whole idea of marriage and monogamy was invented to ease the passing of property without another fight.

On a more general non left/right wing thing, the whole idea of "right and wrong" comes down to one very simple rule, and tries to bridge the continual blurring of the ego necessary and family cooperation necessary in our human survival. Community/tribe/family/pack whatever you call it is good, self is bad. Look through any discussion you like, especially Christian teachings, and you will find that is at the bottom of the "morality" thing. It's obvious therefore the Left will always hold the cards in such a debate.

Would anyone call a former  right wing millionaire mill owner turned late philanthropist a hypocrite ? I don't think so. It's more likely to be called salvation.
Webby is a hypocrite because he espoused the family values thing on more than one public occasion. Nothing to do with left/right.
A bit simplistic I know but here to help as best I can

    

If you actually understood left wing politics you would understand sexual behaviour isn't one of the main tenets.

LMFAO!

left right or centre it makes not a jot of difference or holds any relevancy concerning this subject. Whatever chris's political ploys are he is what he is

Winter Green wrote:

Funnily enough Rollo, Karl Marx was thought to be a bit wayward and was rumoured to have a child with the housekeeper. If you actually understood left wing politics you would understand sexual behaviour isn't one of the main tenets.

It is the right wing bourgeois that harp on about right and wrong in this area, and do you know why ?. Mainly because they're worried who's going to inherit the property, and in fact if you read yer Engels, you'll find the whole idea of marriage and monogamy was invented to ease the passing of property without another fight.

On a more general non left/right wing thing, the whole idea of "right and wrong" comes down to one very simple rule, and tries to bridge the continual blurring of the ego necessary and family cooperation necessary in our human survival. Community/tribe/family/pack whatever you call it is good, self is bad. Look through any discussion you like, especially Christian teachings, and you will find that is at the bottom of the "morality" thing. It's obvious therefore the Left will always hold the cards in such a debate.

Would anyone call a former  right wing millionaire mill owner turned late philanthropist a hypocrite ? I don't think so. It's more likely to be called salvation.
Webby is a hypocrite because he espoused the family values thing on more than one public occasion. Nothing to do with left/right.
A bit simplistic I know but here to help as best I can

Enlightening, educational, and well penned, WG. Oh, and thanks for using the word 'Bourgeois'. It's my favourite, ever.  

Webb was at the gt new year eve party with his new girlfriend last night.

Dane. wrote:

Webb was at the gt new year eve party with his new girlfriend last night.  

the guy has more front than brighton pier. Was he given a conquers welcome when he was announced?

Angry wrote:

Dane. wrote:

Webb was at the gt new year eve party with his new girlfriend last night.  

the guy has more front than brighton pier. Was he given a conquers welcome when he was announced?

Probably.
As if anyone who wasn't a bona-fide arsekisser to the regime would be allowed near the GT suite anyway.

punchdrunk wrote:

Angry wrote:

Dane. wrote:

Webb was at the gt new year eve party with his new girlfriend last night.  

the guy has more front than brighton pier. Was he given a conquers welcome when he was announced?

Probably.
As if anyone who wasn't a bona-fide arsekisser to the regime would be allowed near the GT suite anyway.

all i know is if he did that on any camp i was on he would be lynched

Will it be allowed on GOS? or will it go the same way as the views of the Directors Box?

If gos are being told what they are allowed to post it's the end of a once great website

Pokesdown wrote:

Will it be allowed on GOS? or will it go the same way as the views of the Directors Box?

Do you think the snaps of the Directors Box's have been omitted from GOS? Genuine question. I hadn't really noticed.

had a look at the pics apart from the same usual suspects that go these Nuremberg rallies couldn't see her.

http://www.greensonscreen.co.uk/randomdisplays/gtnyeparty12/1/index.asp

Angry wrote:

had a look at the pics apart from the same usual suspects that go these Nuremberg rallies couldn't see her.

http://www.greensonscreen.co.uk/randomdisplays/gtnyeparty12/1/index.asp

That was last year's party.

Chemical Ali wrote:

Angry wrote:

had a look at the pics apart from the same usual suspects that go these Nuremberg rallies couldn't see her.

http://www.greensonscreen.co.uk/randomdisplays/gtnyeparty12/1/index.asp

That was last year's party.

well of course thats why i couldnt find her    

btw i am available for private investigating  

Person Of Interest wrote:

Pokesdown wrote:

Will it be allowed on GOS? or will it go the same way as the views of the Directors Box?

Do you think the snaps of the Directors Box's have been omitted from GOS? Genuine question. I hadn't really noticed.

Nah...

It was just an amazing co-incidence that as soon as flak started flying on here about certain people, that they stopped appearing. And it certainly wouldn't have anything to do with Newell crawling up to Steve who runs the site.

Dane. wrote:

Webb was at the gt new year eve party with his new girlfriend last night.  

If that's the case, then it explains why the story had to be carefully "leaked" on Monday.

Of course, if you don't do anything dodgy, then there's no need to manage the message ...

(And Pokesdown: I liked the film poster avatar better    )

Peggy wrote:

Dane. wrote:

Webb was at the gt new year eve party with his new girlfriend last night.  

If that's the case, then it explains why the story had to be carefully "leaked" on Monday.

Of course, if you don't do anything dodgy, then there's no need to manage the message ...

(And Pokesdown: I liked the film poster avatar better :-) )

Nahh... Newell has no control over the timely release of such stories over on Pyongyang.   
Its a massive shit sandwich full of corruption, filth, dirty tricks and deceit.Quite how many people get brainwashed by their spin proves the hopelessness of the situation.
In any other club that had genuine ambition of getting somewhere goons like Chris Webb and Ian Newell would never have seen the light of day, meanwhile down here they get given the keys to the sweetie shop.
Madness. Utter Madness.

Tell you what, a couple of people must have been well hacked off that the attempt to "release" it on Sunday didn't work   

Still, they had a plan B, so all was well in the end (missus).

Peggy wrote:

Dane. wrote:

Webb was at the gt new year eve party with his new girlfriend last night.  

If that's the case, then it explains why the story had to be carefully "leaked" on Monday.

Of course, if you don't do anything dodgy, then there's no need to manage the message ...

(And Pokesdown: I liked the film poster avatar better :-) )

Just for you Peggy   

Happy New Year   

 

Rickler wrote:

Person Of Interest wrote:

Pokesdown wrote:

Will it be allowed on GOS? or will it go the same way as the views of the Directors Box?

Do you think the snaps of the Directors Box's have been omitted from GOS? Genuine question. I hadn't really noticed.

Nah...

It was just an amazing co-incidence that as soon as flak started flying on here about certain people, that they stopped appearing.  And it certainly wouldn't have anything to do with Newell crawling up to Steve who runs the site.

PHOTO 26 slipped through the net ,along with the fine gentleman mixing with the Avivas   

http://www.greensonscreen.co.uk/photodisplay.asp?parm=2013-12-29M2

who is the guy talking to newell

Looks like Tony Hooper/ Chowell

Chemical Ali wrote:

Looks like Tony Hooper/ Chowell

Do we need so many freeloaders sitting with the directors :S

Angry wrote:

Chemical Ali wrote:

Looks like Tony Hooper/ Chowell

we do we need so many freeloaders sitting with the directors :S

Its unbelievable isnt it!!
If the Devil could cast his net........................