FCUK THE STAND BRENT YOU UTTER CNUT....

Iggy wrote:

...I'm not so sure that they did know the effects of this scheme, the trouble is that Porky has always been in awe of anyone with power at HP. Was it you that coined the phrase "blinded by a man in a dapper suit?" that about sums it up for me. Once ol Naps meets the suits he goes all gooey

This is it in a nutshell.

I hope there's somebody among you Greens who is anally retentive enough to record absolutely every snippet about your club that appears on TV, because if you do and trawl back to the end of last season, around the time of the game known to us as "The Nightmare On Outland Road", you will see something that both amuses and appalls you in equal measure.

There was a news report about the stand (I think it was on ITV) during which both Brent and Newell were interviewed. (Feck knows why Newell gets these gigs, given that he's supposedly only an "ordinary fan" with no official position).

During some of the background video during a voiceover, there was a shot of Jimmy holding court with some other suits standing around him. All of a sudden, our friendly-neighbourhood corpulent arselicker veers into shot and interrupts Brent by leaning through the group and slapping him on the shoulder before cracking into that obsequious grimace of his that passes for a smile and slinking off on his belly. It's difficult to explain the impact in words, but it was such a cringeworthily arselicking moment that I swear I genuinely winced.

Quote :

...these highly educated wankers are difficult to talk to, they are difficult to get answers from (ask the pasb  ) I have had meetings with people like Brent, they are utterly charming, you go to the meeting with a clearly defined set of objectives after the hour long meeting you are congratulating yourself on how well it went when you realise that not one of your points have been addressed. We know that Newell looked into his eyes and trusted him, he then gave his support to him when it was obvious that the scheme wasn't all that it was too late for the pork coloured tanker to turn. The really sad thing is in my eyes that I dont think ol Napolean will get a thing from his liaison with the speccy one, Naps obviously has his eyes in a prize but you just know that Brent wouldn't lose a wink of sleep by ditching Porky, FES, FIL and all the bucket rattlers too. Naps is trying to squirm out of it now by re writing history but no one is having it, you,ve made your bed old boy, time to lie in it.

He might be able to twist out of it on the back of Webb if you let him. I've genuinely seen nothing from your friendly-neighbourhood Bollinger-drinking socialist to suggest any special intelligence, but what he does seem to have is a low-rent version of Brent's manipulativeness and low cunning. I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if he manages to fool enough of the fanbase to worm his way out when the sh*t hits the fan. Do you think his sudden silence is a coincidence, or an indication that he's preparing a Houdini act? Remember that he was voted "12th Greatest Janner" or something in the Brent Herald. While that was obviously not entirely serious, it does point to the fact that he still seems to have a constituency - namely the alarming number of people who have swallowed the line that "Good Ol' Webby saved the club", without ever being able to explain how in concrete terms. It isn't that long ago that the drummer from some famous band (Bastille?) repeated that canard in the press.

Unfortunately his enemies on here are going to be of limited use when the time comes. It will be too easy for his supporters to point to the level of personal bitterness that is clear for all to see and to dodge the difficult questions by using that history as a smokescreen. You will need representatives who are untainted by any accusations of personal vendettas - and that organisation will be the Trust. That is partly why they are absolutely right not to get into battles with the Brent faction that they cannot win. It doesn't matter how much support the WG plans had, given that not all those who were in favour of them were against Brent or his cronies. On the contrary many of them were still under the spell of the idea that they wouldn't have a club were it not for Brent  - their objections to the original plans didn't necessarily extend to antipathy towards the Reluctant Bidder and his High Command.  Even if they had all caught on to what Brent is really about it would have had no effect on the outcome. Brent owns the club lock, stock and barrel, on top of which PCC and the Herald are a thousand per cent in his corner. A romantic cavalry charge of the kind that has been advocated here at times would have been like a kamikaze attack by a Sopwith Camel on the Tirpitz. If you're going to stop the likes of Newell and Webb you have to be a lot more politically savvy than that.

Lord Tisdale wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Yeah Sturtz you knew the fat cnut was arriving in the black pasty which wouldn't be hard to spot so why the feck didn't some of the Shitty fans he's wronged over the years intercept the cnut and pay there respects to him?

Not shore anyone our side of the fence actually gives a flying about the gay old bear, a bit like the Turks, we only laugh at fat old feck, especially tonight as he tries once more to rationalise the fact that we caught up nearly 80 places, passed you and now appear to have installed ourselves permanently as Debbn's No.1.

With no fit central strikers, our most experienced central midfielder lasting six minutes before going off injured and another still coming back from injury himself.

This meant that our 3-1 win, against a side with possibly the wealthiest owner in League 2, was accomplished with Scott Bennet playing as the main striker - a 22-year old whose best position is probably centre-back, but who has been used more as a midfield destroyer in the past. Today was the third time he has ever played as a striker in his career - the first was the final game of last season in which Tisdale basically played an experimental side in a meaningless match. Despite that he still bullied a big lunk like Branston and won the great majority of the physical battles. Because of the injury to Matt Oakley, Matt Grimes, an 18-year old playing his second or third match, was an enforced substitution and looked more accomplished than any of your midfielders (except possibly Hourihane in the first-half when we put no pressure on him).

Greenjock wrote:

Yeah Sturtz you knew the fat cnut was arriving in the black pasty which wouldn't be hard to spot so why the feck didn't some of the Shitty fans he's wronged over the years intercept the cnut and pay there respects to him?

Yeah as LT accurately states, Porky is your problem and it's up to you to sort it out. As long as you've got "the blob" as your fans rep. on the board, the longer we lord it over you as "Pride of Devon", so it's a win win situation as they say, for us!

Anybody really know what ambition Brent has for Argyle? I would imagine that breaking even and hanging around in league 2 suits him pretty well, even relegation wouldn't be the end of the world would it?

Greenjock wrote:

Sturtz wrote:

You know that little club up the road? You know the insignificant one with no history, small crowds and very little in common with your mighty club?







Well they just beat you 3:1!






[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Is someone taking you from behind there Sturtz? Looks like you're enjoying it too.

I can see it might be confusing mate, but that's actually a picture of the late TV star Sid James, I merely use his image as my avatar as it is amusing and ties in with what many rival fans say as an alternative to saying St James Park.

Hope this helps.

Oh silly me, I thought it was someone from the Brazilian football authorities who'd been told Exeter were rocking up to take on the samba boys.

Roll up, roll up and get your Brazil packages here. Flights, transfers to and from the hotel and an orange crate to stand on outside the Maracana as the match is a sellout.

Alternatively the Brazilian FA can send you a pennant to commemorate the world famous game between the mighty Brazilian national team and Exettor.

Have your board members finished going out there for talks about the game Sturtz? Must take some arranging so I'd reckon at least 5 jollies are needed before they laugh you out of Rio.

Sturtz wrote:

Anybody really know what ambition Brent has for Argyle? I would imagine that breaking even and hanging around in league 2 suits him pretty well, even relegation wouldn't be the end of the world would it?

Relegation wouldn't hurt him if our most recent sponsor does have plans to take over at a later date.

Brent seems to be transferring as much debt as possible into his own name, at the supporters expense. Brent calls it loaning the club money to survive yet our overall debt remains the same. We dont have a scooby what's really happening as the 'transparent' accounts are abreviated. Football on the pitch doesn't equate to attendance nor income. Come to your own conclusion I suppose.

Sponsor is happy with this, very happy. So happy he pumps money into the club. He's one of us though, 'a fan'. What a great bloke!

It's probably too simplistic to say the great bloke will take over and repay Brent at the fan's expense. It wouldn't be modern Argyle if there wasn't further twists, turns & corruption.

To be fair to Brent he never really pretended to be a fan and said again and again that he would only get involved if nobody else would step in, he's been reasonably transparent in this. He's just a clever businessman taking full advantage of an opportunity. The club was handed to him on a plate with porkie and Webb adding the garnish, dressing him up in a green scarf and eulogising about quivering lips and other such nonsense.

You had the chance to form a new trust run club and you sat back and let it happen.

PCC would never have supported a potless fans led club. They had their own ideas and got what they wanted.

Sturtz wrote:

To be fair to Brent he never really pretended to be a fan and said again and again that he would only get involved if nobody else would step in, he's been reasonably transparent in this. He's just a clever businessman taking full advantage of an opportunity. The club was handed to him on a plate with porkie and Webb adding the garnish, dressing him up in a green scarf and eulogising about quivering lips and other such nonsense.

You had the chance to form a new trust run club and you sat back and let it happen.

Exeter fan mentions "trust run club" shock.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Sturtz wrote:

To be fair to Brent he never really pretended to be a fan and said again and again that he would only get involved if nobody else would step in, he's been reasonably transparent in this. He's just a clever businessman taking full advantage of an opportunity. The club was handed to him on a plate with porkie and Webb adding the garnish, dressing him up in a green scarf and eulogising about quivering lips and other such nonsense.

You had the chance to form a new trust run club and you sat back and let it happen.

Never a truer word was spoken

It's probably worth remembering PCC were also complicit in the downfall of Argyle, backing the WC bid. Despite jollies to South Africa plans would never have been approved, allegedly.

What a relief they had Jimmy as a plan b.

punchdrunk wrote:

Sturtz wrote:

To be fair to Brent he never really pretended to be a fan and said again and again that he would only get involved if nobody else would step in, he's been reasonably transparent in this. He's just a clever businessman taking full advantage of an opportunity. The club was handed to him on a plate with porkie and Webb adding the garnish, dressing him up in a green scarf and eulogising about quivering lips and other such nonsense.

You had the chance to form a new trust run club and you sat back and let it happen.

Never a truer word was spoken

I have to disagree Punchy, yes I agree that we should heave pushed for a trust run club, but this was impossible with the trust and it's leaders in bed from an early age with Brenty. As for Sturtz saying that Brenty was reluctant, that is just wrong, he was actively pursuing a purchase of Argyle for about two years before, aided and abetted by PCC.
Also a trust run club would have been led by Webb and Newell, can you think of anything worse?

Iggy wrote:

punchdrunk wrote:

Sturtz wrote:

To be fair to Brent he never really pretended to be a fan and said again and again that he would only get involved if nobody else would step in, he's been reasonably transparent in this. He's just a clever businessman taking full advantage of an opportunity. The club was handed to him on a plate with porkie and Webb adding the garnish, dressing him up in a green scarf and eulogising about quivering lips and other such nonsense.

You had the chance to form a new trust run club and you sat back and let it happen.

Never a truer word was spoken

I have to disagree Punchy, yes I agree that we should heave pushed for a trust run club, but this was impossible with the trust and it's leaders in bed from an early age with Brenty. As for Sturtz saying that Brenty was reluctant, that is just wrong, he was actively pursuing a purchase of Argyle for about two years before, aided and abetted by PCC.
Also a trust run club would have been led by Webb and Newell, can you think of anything worse?

To be fair just about anything organised in Muff is likely to finish up with a wank stain in charge, law of averages innit?

Right, that was my last "derby" instigated derogatory comment for a few months but the simple fact is that evil does flourish when good men do nothing, the democratic process needs to be a constantly evolving thing, with power being the uber corrupter, you have to have constant governance of the governors or those elected to do a job for you will soon be doing a job for themselves, easier said than done mind and a tad irrelevant as the bed has been made.

All you can do now now is agitate, organise, gather together a few quid and wait in the tall grass.

Don't worry we are on it Tis.   It's taking a bit of time but the populous are waking up after some serious prodding from the freaks and weirdos. What is strange is that us freaks and weirdos have some very articulate, intelligent fans who have been supportive of us from the off, it's the sheeple who are so frustrating in their willingness to be led by the Porkles.

Tis wrote:

To be fair just about anything organised in Muff is likely to finish up with a wank stain in charge, law of averages innit?


Tis sadly true, Tis.

Brian green and the x throbber, comedy gold, how many more relegations would we need before the brent worship ended for those two gratefuls?

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Brian green and the x throbber, comedy gold, how many more relegations would we need before the brent worship ended for those two gratefuls?

The day Ian Newell admits he got it wrong is the day those two follow suit. Sheep need to be lead you see SS68 they are incapable of leading.

Talking of wank stains, I see Cerbs is still busying himself as a Brent apologist....

What a little weasel.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Just proves what a **** (feel free to put what you want) cerbera is with that comment. States JB needs the development to make money so he can spend it on PAFC when he has already stated he is not going to spend any more.
Unbelievable

Cerbera lmfao. Got the same two-faceditis Postey and Webb caught.

Cerbs

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Bobi cudge and sammy, missing the Brazilian style football captain clueless used to play in losing to stourbridge dorchester etc.

Latest update from Construction industry media is that "works are due to commence on site by early November 2013"

Czarcasm wrote:

Talking of wank stains, I see Cerbs is still busying himself as a Brent apologist....

What a  little weasel.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Just been perusing some ATD material from 18 months ago.

Cerbera doesn't mind how he gets there. He just craves recognition. Before the election he stated, ' I coudn't care less what happens on Pasoti. ATD is where its at !'

Also found a photo from a Cherry Tree freak meet. The line up........ Symons, Cerbs and sons, Charlie, Peggy, Chemical, Frank and Mr Corporate Governance himself, Jon b.
Of that lot, one now leads the Trust, one is firmly brent's man on the pasb and another is so far up Pasoti and brent's arses that his little legs don't touch the ground.

Tringreen wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Talking of wank stains, I see Cerbs is still busying himself as a Brent apologist....

What a  little weasel.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Just been perusing some ATD material from 18 months ago.

Cerbera doesn't mind how he gets there. He just craves recognition. Before the election he stated, ' I coudn't care less what happens on Pasoti. ATD is where its at !'

Also found a photo from a Cherry Tree freak meet. The line up........ Symons, Cerbs and sons, Charlie, Peggy, Chemical, Frank and Mr Corporate Governance himself, Jon b.
Of that lot, one now leads the Trust, one is firmly brent's man on the pasb and another is so far up Pasoti and brent's arses that his little legs don't touch the ground.

So Charlie, Peggy, Chemical and Frank are in some sort of club are they? I don't get your point that's all.

Cerbera's a dickhead foreshore and Jon Back has proved to be someone who bows and tugs his forelock towards Brent reverentially but Andy is the Trust leader who was cut off by Brent for asking too many questions and is hated on Pasoti.