Fundraising.

Good luck wozzer

I'm not a fan of the others involved, but wozzer is a mate so good luck to him

Again it's one of those things where they are asking for sponsorship to do something which, actually, most people would really love to do...

If they raise £35k for St. Lukes though, then fair play.

Mock Cuncher wrote:

Again it's one of those things where they are asking for sponsorship to do something which, actually, most people would really love to do...

If they raise £35k for St. Lukes though, then fair play.

Yes we are and the opportunity is there for anyone.

I see Nool is tagging along, i'm sure Nikkk will pay for him to have a private jet fly him to the top.

I'll donate £100 if Newell and Webb feck off up the A38 and as far away from Home Park as possible and never return.

Mock Cuncher wrote:

Again it's one of those things where they are asking for sponsorship to do something which, actually, most people would really love to do...

If they raise £35k for St. Lukes though, then fair play.

Indeed Mock. St.Lukes has a special place in my heart seeing as two family members saw the last of their days out there. Infact, a couple of years ago, I thought I was going to pay a visit, thank god for modern medicine is all I can say, and big-up to Wozzer for what he is doing.

even for charity ian has to promote his sugar daddies companies. There is no shame to his greed is there?

Angry of Mayfair wrote:

even for charity ian has to promote his sugar daddies companies. There is no shame to his greed is there?

Yes, exactly.

Fantastic cause, wrong people with the wrong motives.

I know somebody that is doing something similar, my money will be going to St Luke's via him.

Good luck Woz.

Just give the money and save the expenses.

As its a charity thread I'll bite my tongue.

Just Giving wrote:

Five of them will be trekking for day after day (6 days in total), travelling through several ecosystems and will endure differing weather fluctutaing between heat and cold.

The + 2 Barron and Newell, will be a) Sponsoring themselves on this trip and b) act as a forwarding party, ensuring that their colleagues have a safe trip by visiting the summit before the others and then revisting Machu Picchu as the others achieve their target..

Who the feck does he think he is??

GOB wrote:

Angry of Mayfair wrote:

even for charity ian has to promote his sugar daddies companies. There is no shame to his greed is there?

Yes, exactly.

Fantastic cause, wrong people with the wrong motives.

I know somebody that is doing something similar, my money will be going to St Luke's via him.

What do you think my motives are then?

What were your motives when posting as deep throat ?

Yea Man wrote:

Just Giving wrote:

Five of them will be trekking for day after day (6 days in total), travelling through several ecosystems and will endure differing weather fluctutaing between heat and cold.

The + 2 Barron and Newell, will be a) Sponsoring themselves on this trip and b) act as a forwarding party, ensuring that their colleagues have a safe trip by visiting the summit before the others and then revisting Machu Picchu as the others achieve their target..

Who the feck does he think he is??

Dr Livingstone I presume? Newell the joke that just keeps giving.

worried of penzance wrote:

What were your motives when posting as deep throat ?

this

worried of penzance wrote:

What were your motives when posting as deep throat ?

I don't see what that has to do with raising money for St Lukes.

Come on lads leave DT out of this thread.

wozzer wrote:

GOB wrote:

Angry of Mayfair wrote:

even for charity ian has to promote his sugar daddies companies. There is no shame to his greed is there?

Yes, exactly.

Fantastic cause, wrong people with the wrong motives.

I know somebody that is doing something similar, my money will be going to St Luke's via him.

What do you think my motives are then?

I wasn't specifically talking about you Wozzer.

i'll donate to st lukes later on.

As I said, I'll be doing the same.

And me, but I won't be doing it by sponsoring a group which collectively contains somebody who has threatened another Argyle supporter.

Like Persons of Interest St Lukes is special for me also for family reasons. Does it really matter who collects what for them and why. Fact is something like that place shouldn't need collections in the first place it should be funded from Government but it does or it won't continue. Wherever they get their money from and from whomever is irrelevant for me as long as they do.

Yes it matters to me SG. St Luke's means a lot to all of us and it will get a donation from me but not via this route.

St Lukes is the local example of probably the finest movement this country has ever encouraged, and it has come about because government has failed us in our need for a caring death. We all have thankful familial experience of these places. I personally have experienced nothing but good deaths under hospice care, and bad deaths under hospital care.
I agree with Sensible, these beautiful places should be funded by government fully, and it is a political undemocratic decision not to do so, as 99% of people would want it to be the case.
Wozzer, as I saw it, comments were not aimed at you. You decided to take it on yourself to broaden something, rather than just allow something to pass. I thought that wrong and decided to respond.

I've donated rather a lot for my circumstances GOB but I and my good lady do it on a personal level and not through sponsorships. But I still don't care who gives what and when or why as long as people do. I have never told anyone what I give but if somebody wants to make a song and dance and publicise themselves then that's their choice if it means lots of dosh for the hospice. You can always think they are tossers whilst accepting the money and they will never know.