What happened to Peddlars new Pasoti?

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Dont take at face value anything mark pedlar says, the throbber was going to ban me for calling him and his dimwit son pedlar! thats abuse according to the pasoti missionary, if he thinks pasoti will be independant from nool he's either simple or a willing puppet!

Another lie - I never threatened to ban you - far from it being abuse, it would be a compliment of the highest order. I've only ever threatened to ban Hairy. The hundreds of others I've whacked all deserved it and recieved no warning. You can't help not being clever enough to tell the difference between M A R K and J A M I E it's certainly not a banning offence.

I'm neither simple nor a puppet, however, Jamie IS a dimwit.

Hiya Rickler - Assylum allowing you out today?

Its the truth MARK and you know it! you told me abuse would not be tolerated and i agree calling someone a pedlar is a fvcking insult, the problem is peds old boy you've been one of nools puppets for so long you've forgot what the truth is! whats he made you assistant site manager

If that's what you want to believe carry on mate. It's a lie cos I never said it. I know lies are welcome on here in order to boost your personal credibility so fine if that's what you need. See I don't need or want or care about cred on here so I'll just keep telling the truth and pointing out the lies of others.

You sent me a pm mark telling me that calling you pedlar was abuse and if i called you or young dimwit, pedlar again on the forum you would ban me !it happened i know it and you know it

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

You sent me a pm mark telling me that calling you pedlar was abuse and if i called you or young dimwit, pedlar again on the forum you would ban me !it happened i know it and you know it

Nope - checked the pm you're either talking bollocks deliberately or you didn't understand what I was saying - I can understand that. You're not very bright.

"Mark Pedlar"

I think there either is or will be an explanation on its way soon. Sorry - I have to work some-times

Why does it take 24hrs to give reason please explain. For a person to be banned there must be a reason put to fellow mods to vote on not make one up after.

same old same old

Edit to add just seen site manager :lol!:on pasoti say charlie was deactivated coz of yea man sorry some bloke in Cheltenham again. if you belief that you will belief anything

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

You sent me a pm mark telling me that calling you pedlar was abuse and if i called you or young dimwit, pedlar again on the forum you would ban me !it happened i know it and you know it

Nope - checked the pm you're either talking bollocks deliberately or you didn't understand what I was saying - I can understand that. You're not very bright.

I may not be a bright lad thats true, what i try not to be is a liar mate! you sent that pm to me pedlar and now your lying like fvck denying it! all those years of banning non believers from your masters farm has i will be kind made you absent minded.

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

You sent me a pm mark telling me that calling you pedlar was abuse and if i called you or young dimwit, pedlar again on the forum you would ban me !it happened i know it and you know it

Nope - checked the pm you're either talking bollocks deliberately or you didn't understand what I was saying - I can understand that. You're not very bright.

I may not be a bright lad thats true, what i try not to be is a liar mate! you sent that pm to me pedlar and now your lying like fvck denying it! all those years of banning non believers from your masters farm has i will be kind made you absent minded.

Not absent-minded old chap as i've just read the pm. My recollection is perfect aided by reading it again within the last 20 minutes.

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

You sent me a pm mark telling me that calling you pedlar was abuse and if i called you or young dimwit, pedlar again on the forum you would ban me !it happened i know it and you know it

Nope - checked the pm you're either talking bollocks deliberately or you didn't understand what I was saying - I can understand that. You're not very bright.

I may not be a bright lad thats true, what i try not to be is a liar mate! you sent that pm to me pedlar and now your lying like fvck denying it! all those years of banning non believers from your masters farm has i will be kind made you absent minded.

Not absent-minded old chap as i've just read the pm. My recollection is perfect aided by reading it again within the last 20 minutes.

post up what it said then.

Funny how these Pasoti types are always economical with the truth when it comes to the crunch

How can anyone doubt what a pasoti mod says

Pedlar once threatened to kidnap my dog.

Well now Postey (doesn't he love the site manager account) has explained it was all a mistake and Charlie was banned in error because he might have been a porn star from Cheltenham infiltrating Pasoti we can all sleep easier knowing it wasn't just him being a cnut as usual.

Never knew Cheltenham was such a hotbed of porn, be interesting tomorrow at the fanfest when both the away fans and the Pasoti mods are huddled in the corners talking about deepthroating.

I hope Charlie bumps into the SITE MANAGER soon and tells him where to stick his accidental banning, just as long as he's prepared to have the female members of his family threatened. The usual Pasoti mod behaviour.

I love how these wankers can have a pop at people like Andy Symons and John Petrie but worship the ground Ian Newell and Chris Webb walk on, says a lot about their characters I suppose.

The safest place to avoid any Pasoti mods tonight? The Trust sixties night. They'd rather be tucked up in bed cracking one off to Brents HHP plans

Greenjock wrote:

Well now Postey (doesn't he love the site manager account) has explained it was all a mistake and Charlie was banned in error because he might have been a porn star from Cheltenham infiltrating Pasoti we can all sleep easier knowing it wasn't just him being a cnut as usual.

Never knew Cheltenham was such a hotbed of porn, be interesting tomorrow at the fanfest when both the away fans and the Pasoti mods are huddled in the corners talking about deepthroating.

I hope Charlie bumps into the SITE MANAGER soon and tells him where to stick his accidental banning, just as long as he's prepared to have the female members of his family threatened. The usual Pasoti mod behaviour.

I love how these wankers can have a pop at people like Andy Symons and John Petrie but worship the ground Ian Newell and Chris Webb walk on, says a lot about their characters I suppose.

The safest place to avoid any Pasoti mods tonight? The Trust sixties night. They'd rather be tucked up in bed cracking one off to Brents HHP plans

They need to think up a new excuse.

I haven't attempted to register on Pasoti for feckin ages as it's no fun anymore

However we were plagued by a troll using a proxy server in Cheltenham for a while, maybe the pasoti troll is actually them.

Heaven forbid, there may actually be more than one Argyle supporter here in this town

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Hiya Rickler - Assylum allowing you out today?

Small hint Mark...

In order to have any impact at all, and not to look the sort of "idiot" (I think was your term) that should be in an 'Asylum', try getting your spelling right!

PS. How do you look in the mirror and reconcile working for Newell?

To be in your position... What a bitch, eh..?

Q Who owns Pasoti Pedlar ?
A I fink the mods do.

Ponty ' That is correct '

You couldn't make it up.

Pasoti....... The official forum for controlling Avivas. What a sad, sad state of affairs.

Tringreen wrote:

Q Who owns Pasoti Pedlar ?
A I fink the mods do.

Ponty ' That is correct '

You couldn't make it up.

Pasoti....... The official forum for controlling Avivas. What a sad, sad state of affairs.

Either a total dumbass, along with Ponty, or just a complete and utter lying cnut, along with Ponty, take your pick

Tringreen wrote:

Q Who owns Pasoti Pedlar ?
A I fink the mods do.

Ponty ' That is correct '

You couldn't make it up.

Pasoti....... The official forum for controlling Avivas. What a sad, sad state of affairs.

In the sense they control and make changes to the site the MODs still own it, as mark pedlar said, it makes no change to their position. The only differene is a change at the hoghest level where website profits i presume are now split 50/50 between Newell and D Gadd.

Greengiant wrote:

Tringreen wrote:

Q Who owns Pasoti Pedlar ?
A I fink the mods do.

Ponty ' That is correct '

You couldn't make it up.

Pasoti....... The official forum for controlling Avivas. What a sad, sad state of affairs.

In the sense they control and make changes to the site the MODs still own it, as mark pedlar said, it makes no change to their position. The only differene is a change at the hoghest level where website profits i presume are now split 50/50 between Newell and D Gadd.

But Newell would also have decision making on which pasoti mods stay and who comes in. I think in reference to Baba, Newell/ Postey said that Gadd had sacked Baba twice which suggests the owner has that ability to hire and fire mods.

Greenjock wrote:

Tringreen wrote:

Q Who owns Pasoti Pedlar ?
A I fink the mods do.

Ponty ' That is correct '

You couldn't make it up.

Pasoti....... The official forum for controlling Avivas. What a sad, sad state of affairs.

Either a total dumbass, along with Ponty, or just a complete and utter lying cnut, along with Ponty, take your pick

That's how I see it!

Here's a test of the 'new' pasoti: let's see how long this bit of bile's allowed to stay.

Hooper the Snooper wrote:

On a seperate issue I hear that the working party are meeting this morning. 3 of their members are: Roger Willis, Babararacucudada and Sir Francis Drake. Anyone know any more of the expert team? Besides the eminently suitable Richard Jones of course.

Peggy * wrote:

Here's a test of the 'new' pasoti: let's see how long this bit of bile's allowed to stay.

Hooper the Snooper wrote:

On a seperate issue I hear that the working party are meeting this morning. 3 of their members are: Roger Willis, Babararacucudada and Sir Francis Drake. Anyone know any more of the expert team? Besides the eminently suitable Richard Jones of course.

Judging from that I would say that any psychologist would conclude that Hooper's dik size is approx. 2.5mm

Hooper really is a creep of the highest order.

Peggy * wrote:

Here's a test of the 'new' pasoti: let's see how long this bit of bile's allowed to stay.

Hooper the Snooper wrote:

On a seperate issue I hear that the working party are meeting this morning. 3 of their members are: Roger Willis, Babararacucudada and Sir Francis Drake. Anyone know any more of the expert team? Besides the eminently suitable Richard Jones of course.

Perhaps someone who's honest, dependable and an expert in their field should be on the working group? Imagine Hooper would love another clipboard and lanyard but unfortunately he doesn't meet any of the above criteria being a snidey useless cnut

Mark Pedlar sacked as a mod.

http://www.pasoti.co.uk/talk/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=75517