What happened to Peddlars new Pasoti?

Personally I cant beleive a word that IJN posts - the abandonment of PASOTI was obviously a lie, he wasnt welcome as a mod so he took ownership instead! He will have an influence, and a negative one at that.

I know at least one mod (Carousel) has quit in relation to this mess - amazed that more didnt follow his lead.

What about Charlie you still haven't answered the question Mark why was he banned.?????

what did charlie do?

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Well I've never talked shit so that won't be a problem will it Iggy!

Greenjock - do I give a monkey's what you think of me - no not really. When I look in the mirror I know I'm being honest and I've never intentionally lied to anyone on this site or PASOTI.

Your "issues" are not really with me or PASOTI but certain people who use it. Likewise many of the issues between posters on either site are with individuals and not with the site(s) itself, yet it's the site(s) that gets labelled.

One thing that is certain - if I want to question the way the club is run or managed, nobody will stop me.

Re-reading this I've realised I'm being too polite and rational.... feck off Greenjock!

Hmmmm - a spell-checker!!

Nice one GOB - as ignorant as ever I see or was your post a response to Jock?

You're right Mark, the certain individuals being the spineless mods



I'm really upset now so I'm off to open another Pasoti account and start threatening women like your friends do. Your son must be so proud to see his father involved in all the shit. All the stuff he's witnessed and said feck all about, but that's ok as long as you don't get involved yourself eh Mark?

That's the same attitude most wankers have to life in general, turn a blind eye to the bad stuff and it's not your fault. Except it is. You are partly responsible for the crap that happens because you're too afraid to speak out to such noble people as Newell, De Liar, Webb, Jameson and Hooper.

Enjoy your site then Mark, you never know you might win a season ticket for next year if you carry on keeping your mouth shut

And the site will only get better now some new mods are about to be found. Cerbera will make a fantastic addition to the turncoat ethos that already exists Webb can teach him all he knows.

Ofcourse Mark won't answer why Charlie is banned because it's the same reason why Frank Bullit got banned, because Newell and Postey don't like them. That's called a mod vote.

It'd be interesting if a Mod vote resulted in Charlie being banned for no apparent reason. Are they all really that corrupt?

It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if this was a dual IJN/PL2Faced decision - and to feck with what the other Mods thought.

I see Newell has avoided answering the question from womble as to why Charlie was banned.

Nobody believes a word you say Newell.

The only reason this "announcement" was made is because you made a complete cock up by posting under the mod account.

As you are now owner though, does that mean you will apologise for sending pm's around pasoti about Andy and Gareth?

Or apologise to ponty for saying he was posting as greenman when pissed.

Or even better, ask your REAL friend Webb why he told a keyholder of this site you had been told to get off the internet by the club.

Abother liar there.

where is that liar chris these days anyway?

Yea Man wrote:

I see Newell has avoided answering the question from womble as to why Charlie was banned.

Nobody believes a word you say Newell.

The only reason this "announcement" was made is because you made a complete cock up by posting under the mod account.

As you are now owner though, does that mean you will apologise for sending pm's around pasoti about Andy and Gareth?
Or apologise to ponty for saying he was posting as greenman when pissed.

Or even better, ask your REAL friend Webb why he told a keyholder of this site you had been told to get off the internet by the club.

Abother liar there.

I've had an apology from him for that.

Gareth Nicholson wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

I see Newell has avoided answering the question from womble as to why Charlie was banned.

Nobody believes a word you say Newell.

The only reason this "announcement" was made is because you made a complete cock up by posting under the mod account.

As you are now owner though, does that mean you will apologise for sending pm's around pasoti about Andy and Gareth?
Or apologise to ponty for saying he was posting as greenman when pissed.

Or even better, ask your REAL friend Webb why he told a keyholder of this site you had been told to get off the internet by the club.

Abother liar there.

I've had an apology from him for that.

Andy hasn't.

Argyle Fans' Trust wrote:

Gareth Nicholson wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

I see Newell has avoided answering the question from womble as to why Charlie was banned.

Nobody believes a word you say Newell.

The only reason this "announcement" was made is because you made a complete cock up by posting under the mod account.

As you are now owner though, does that mean you will apologise for sending pm's around pasoti about Andy and Gareth?
Or apologise to ponty for saying he was posting as greenman when pissed.

Or even better, ask your REAL friend Webb why he told a keyholder of this site you had been told to get off the internet by the club.

Abother liar there.

I've had an apology from him for that.

Andy hasn't.

Has Postey apologised to Andy for the shit he posted about him under the guise of Greenman? Or is he trying to make out it was someone else using the account

What a wanker. Bet his mum's really proud

Gareth Nicholson wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

I see Newell has avoided answering the question from womble as to why Charlie was banned.

Nobody believes a word you say Newell.

The only reason this "announcement" was made is because you made a complete cock up by posting under the mod account.

As you are now owner though, does that mean you will apologise for sending pm's around pasoti about Andy and Gareth?
Or apologise to ponty for saying he was posting as greenman when pissed.

Or even better, ask your REAL friend Webb why he told a keyholder of this site you had been told to get off the internet by the club.

Abother liar there.

I've had an apology from him for that.

i'm sure it was genuine too.

Argyle Fans' Trust wrote:

Gareth Nicholson wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

I see Newell has avoided answering the question from womble as to why Charlie was banned.

Nobody believes a word you say Newell.

The only reason this "announcement" was made is because you made a complete cock up by posting under the mod account.

As you are now owner though, does that mean you will apologise for sending pm's around pasoti about Andy and Gareth?
Or apologise to ponty for saying he was posting as greenman when pissed.

Or even better, ask your REAL friend Webb why he told a keyholder of this site you had been told to get off the internet by the club.

Abother liar there.

I've had an apology from him for that.

Andy hasn't.

Is that you talking to yourself Gareth?

Not at all. Although sad to step down from the Trust board I can't pretend life isn't easier.

Did he apology publically or to each person that received a PM or just to Gareth?

I t seems to me that a very private apology is only a half apology if it doesn't right the wrong. Does rather seem to be his modus operandi spread the s**t and like a bad central park dogger dog walker not clear up the mess afterwards.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAhEFuq62-I

The future for PAFC/Pasoti None but the dull, the spotty, the ignorant, the compliant will be welcome. Praaaaper Janners !

Dougie wrote:

Did he apology publically or to each person that received a PM or just to Gareth?

I t seems to me that a very private apology is only a half apology if it doesn't right the wrong. Does rather seem to be his modus operandi spread the s**t and like a bad central park dogger dog walker not clear up the mess afterwards.

I found out because someone sent me a PM asking if it was true and mistakenly copied Ian into it. After I had confirmed that it was bollocks, Ian apologised to me and to the other person. I don't know whether or not anyone else received an apology.

Do I think that he has taken the trouble to contact anyone else he might have told a similar story to and made sure they were aware it was bullshit? On balance, no.

Dont take at face value anything mark pedlar says, the throbber was going to ban me for calling him and his dimwit son pedlar! thats abuse according to the pasoti missionary, if he thinks pasoti will be independant from nool he's either simple or a willing puppet!

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Dont take at face value anything mark pedlar says, the throbber was going to ban me for calling him and his dimwit son pedlar! thats abuse according to the pasoti missionary, if he thinks pasoti will be independant from nool he's either simple or a willing puppet!

Certainly would have expected the courtesy of a response from Mark by now in respect of Charlie's banning or a reason why he can't simply reveal the truthful facts as he understands them.

Gert, are you joking?

I still haven't had the courtesy of a response as to why I was banned - and that was years ago..

Pedlar informed me on ATD that he has reviewed the files and the banning was correct!
Lol.

Stalanist Russia had nothing on Pedlar and his crew...

Rickler wrote:

Gert, are you joking?

I still haven't had the courtesy of a response as to why I was banned - and that was years ago..

Pedlar informed me on ATD that he has reviewed the files and the banning was correct!
Lol.

Stalanist Russia had nothing on Pedlar and his crew...

To be honest Rickler I like to give the benefit of doubt until the evidence is absolutely overwhelming a la Newell, Webb, Jones, De Lar, Jameson etc etc etc. It's certainly mounting against Mark but frankly my dear I don't think he gives a damn either way. Fair enough, just thought as a pasoti mod bothering to comment on ATD at all he'd want to be frank and honest. That's what decent guys tend to do.

It 'Pedled' off

Tringreen wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAhEFuq62-I

The future for PAFC/Pasoti None but the dull, the spotty, the ignorant, the compliant will be welcome. Praaaaper Janners !

HA

Does he travel on the black pasty ?

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Dont take at face value anything mark pedlar says, the throbber was going to ban me for calling him and his dimwit son pedlar! thats abuse according to the pasoti missionary, if he thinks pasoti will be independant from nool he's either simple or a willing puppet!

Another lie - I never threatened to ban you - far from it being abuse, it would be a compliment of the highest order. I've only ever threatened to ban Hairy. The hundreds of others I've whacked all deserved it and recieved no warning. You can't help not being clever enough to tell the difference between M A R K and J A M I E it's certainly not a banning offence.

I'm neither simple nor a puppet, however, Jamie IS a dimwit.

Hiya Rickler - Assylum allowing you out today?

Gert Loinz wrote:

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Dont take at face value anything mark pedlar says, the throbber was going to ban me for calling him and his dimwit son pedlar! thats abuse according to the pasoti missionary, if he thinks pasoti will be independant from nool he's either simple or a willing puppet!

Certainly would have expected the courtesy of a response from Mark by now in respect of Charlie's banning or a reason why he can't simply reveal the truthful facts as he understands them.

I think there either is or will be an explanation on its way soon. Sorry - I have to work some-times!!

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Dont take at face value anything mark pedlar says, the throbber was going to ban me for calling him and his dimwit son pedlar! thats abuse according to the pasoti missionary, if he thinks pasoti will be independant from nool he's either simple or a willing puppet!

Another lie - I never threatened to ban you - far from it being abuse, it would be a compliment of the highest order. I've only ever threatened to ban Hairy. The hundreds of others I've whacked all deserved it and recieved no warning. You can't help not being clever enough to tell the difference between M A R K and J A M I E it's certainly not a banning offence.

I'm neither simple nor a puppet, however, Jamie IS a dimwit.

Hiya Rickler - Assylum allowing you out today?

Its the truth MARK and you know it! you told me abuse would not be tolerated and i agree calling someone a pedlar is a fvcking insult, the problem is peds old boy you've been one of nools puppets for so long you've forgot what the truth is! whats he made you assistant site manager