What happened to Peddlars new Pasoti?

GOB wrote:

Quote :

Just to set the record straight - someone posted earlier that I had admitted to having multi accounts on here. I haven't. On the hijack thread on PASOTI I was taking the piss and said at one point I had several accounts on ATD - I haven't and never have - a mod from ATD should be able to confirm this...? In the same post (or one a litle later)I revealed that Yea Man was Chris Webb again for those who missed the joke - I was taking the piss!!

Quote :

Tring or GOB or both also posted that I had made it clear in one of my responses that IJN still had a big influence in PASOTI mod room. That's not quite what I said. I said that it was inevitable that IJN would have an influence there, he had been a mod for a long time. I thought I also made it clear that he doesn't have an influence in decision making on PASOTI - if I didn't I make it again now.

Quote :

IJN only has one account on PASOTI. Both email addresses have been linked to different historical editions of "IJN" but he has not had a multi account since he left the mod room earlier this year. We investigated the double email earlier this year and it was linked to a deleted account. There is so much historical stuff on PASOTI that trying to register with someone's email address is often going to come up with "in use". I've tried three different email addresses that i've used over the years and they are blocked too even though i've only used one for a couple of years.

Quote :

There really aren't that many multis. I know you may not believe that, or want to, but there aren't. Those mods that have multis only use them for modding purposes nowadays. I know that wasn't the case in the past but hand on heart I can honestly say that now.

Quote :

Tring - I don't know what you want me to say - yes it's a small (13ish) man clique. It's not going to change quickly. As for IJN being asked back as a Mod - I can't see that happening. I have already said the next mods will be got (I can't think of a word that you'll not find fault with) in a different way. I asked for comments or thoughts on the hijack thread and got ..... few!!

Quote :

Nope PASOTI policy is voted upon. No single mod can administer a ban or any form of discipline without a mod vote. No mod can make an amendment to a post without it being logged and documented.

How did you vote over banning Charlie Wood and AlanoTivvy last night then Mark?

Pete1886 wrote:

Was it Mark or was it Ponty who said that all the mods were joint owners of Pasoti or did I dream that?

It was both of them but it was said through clenched teeth

By the way, I'm on my chrome book and have forgotten how to do links on it but please look up 'The Wealdstone Raider' on youtube. It's the first clip 33 seconds long.

I haven't laughed so much in years. I reckon it's a glimpse at the future for Argyle, with the Wealdstone Raider representing any one of the locals, real janners, who according to nool and co ,are the silent majority in being grateful to Sir James of Brent for offering us a crap stand, while he mops up the millions.

Alfreton away.....'Shit ground, no fans. Dya want some ?' We have it all to look forwrd to

Tringreen wrote:

Pete1886 wrote:

Was it Mark or was it Ponty who said that all the mods were joint owners of Pasoti or did I dream that?

It was both of them but it was said through clenched teeth

By the way, I'm on my chrome book and have forgotten how to do links on it but please look up 'The Wealdstone Raider' on youtube. It's the first clip 33 seconds long.

I haven't laughed so much in years. I reckon it's a glimpse at the future for Argyle, with the Wealdstone Raider representing any one of the locals, real janners, who according to nool and co ,are the silent majority in being grateful to Sir James of Brent for offering us a crap stand, while he mops up the millions.

Alfreton away.....'Shit ground, no fans. Dya want some ?' We have it all to look forwrd to

The Wealdstone Raider

In a word Class

Gert Loinz wrote:

Tringreen wrote:

Pete1886 wrote:

Was it Mark or was it Ponty who said that all the mods were joint owners of Pasoti or did I dream that?

It was both of them but it was said through clenched teeth

By the way, I'm on my chrome book and have forgotten how to do links on it but please look up 'The Wealdstone Raider' on youtube. It's the first clip 33 seconds long.

I haven't laughed so much in years. I reckon it's a glimpse at the future for Argyle, with the Wealdstone Raider representing any one of the locals, real janners, who according to nool and co ,are the silent majority in being grateful to Sir James of Brent for offering us a crap stand, while he mops up the millions.

Alfreton away.....'Shit ground, no fans. Dya want some ?' We have it all to look forwrd to

The Wealdstone Raider

In a word Class

"You want some?"

Pissed myself laughing. Great vid. Local characters, you can't educate pork.

Greenjock wrote:

GOB wrote:

Quote :

Just to set the record straight - someone posted earlier that I had admitted to having multi accounts on here. I haven't. On the hijack thread on PASOTI I was taking the piss and said at one point I had several accounts on ATD - I haven't and never have - a mod from ATD should be able to confirm this...? In the same post (or one a litle later)I revealed that Yea Man was Chris Webb again for those who missed the joke - I was taking the piss!!

Quote :

Tring or GOB or both also posted that I had made it clear in one of my responses that IJN still had a big influence in PASOTI mod room. That's not quite what I said. I said that it was inevitable that IJN would have an influence there, he had been a mod for a long time. I thought I also made it clear that he doesn't have an influence in decision making on PASOTI - if I didn't I make it again now.

Quote :

IJN only has one account on PASOTI. Both email addresses have been linked to different historical editions of "IJN" but he has not had a multi account since he left the mod room earlier this year. We investigated the double email earlier this year and it was linked to a deleted account. There is so much historical stuff on PASOTI that trying to register with someone's email address is often going to come up with "in use". I've tried three different email addresses that i've used over the years and they are blocked too even though i've only used one for a couple of years.

Quote :

There really aren't that many multis. I know you may not believe that, or want to, but there aren't. Those mods that have multis only use them for modding purposes nowadays. I know that wasn't the case in the past but hand on heart I can honestly say that now.

Quote :

Tring - I don't know what you want me to say - yes it's a small (13ish) man clique. It's not going to change quickly. As for IJN being asked back as a Mod - I can't see that happening. I have already said the next mods will be got (I can't think of a word that you'll not find fault with) in a different way. I asked for comments or thoughts on the hijack thread and got ..... few!!

Quote :

Nope PASOTI policy is voted upon. No single mod can administer a ban or any form of discipline without a mod vote. No mod can make an amendment to a post without it being logged and documented.

How did you vote over banning Charlie Wood and AlanoTivvy last night then Mark?

ooooh! ive been mentioned AGAIN!!!!! wooop woop!
cant believe there's anyone left on the farm, just be talking to himself.... oh,i forgot ,he already pm's himself

alannotivvy wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

GOB wrote:

Quote :

Just to set the record straight - someone posted earlier that I had admitted to having multi accounts on here. I haven't. On the hijack thread on PASOTI I was taking the piss and said at one point I had several accounts on ATD - I haven't and never have - a mod from ATD should be able to confirm this...? In the same post (or one a litle later)I revealed that Yea Man was Chris Webb again for those who missed the joke - I was taking the piss!!

Quote :

Tring or GOB or both also posted that I had made it clear in one of my responses that IJN still had a big influence in PASOTI mod room. That's not quite what I said. I said that it was inevitable that IJN would have an influence there, he had been a mod for a long time. I thought I also made it clear that he doesn't have an influence in decision making on PASOTI - if I didn't I make it again now.

Quote :

IJN only has one account on PASOTI. Both email addresses have been linked to different historical editions of "IJN" but he has not had a multi account since he left the mod room earlier this year. We investigated the double email earlier this year and it was linked to a deleted account. There is so much historical stuff on PASOTI that trying to register with someone's email address is often going to come up with "in use". I've tried three different email addresses that i've used over the years and they are blocked too even though i've only used one for a couple of years.

Quote :

There really aren't that many multis. I know you may not believe that, or want to, but there aren't. Those mods that have multis only use them for modding purposes nowadays. I know that wasn't the case in the past but hand on heart I can honestly say that now.

Quote :

Tring - I don't know what you want me to say - yes it's a small (13ish) man clique. It's not going to change quickly. As for IJN being asked back as a Mod - I can't see that happening. I have already said the next mods will be got (I can't think of a word that you'll not find fault with) in a different way. I asked for comments or thoughts on the hijack thread and got ..... few!!

Quote :

Nope PASOTI policy is voted upon. No single mod can administer a ban or any form of discipline without a mod vote. No mod can make an amendment to a post without it being logged and documented.

How did you vote over banning Charlie Wood and AlanoTivvy last night then Mark?

ooooh! ive been mentioned AGAIN!!!!! wooop woop!
cant believe there's anyone left on the farm, just be talking to himself.... oh,i forgot ,he already pm's himself

It'd be interesting to know what the vote count and reasons were for Charlie being banned.

i hope everyone wanted me off the farm, not quite sure what i did that was so bad but heh ho,its all good fun

Greenjock wrote:

GOB wrote:

Quote :

Just to set the record straight - someone posted earlier that I had admitted to having multi accounts on here. I haven't. On the hijack thread on PASOTI I was taking the piss and said at one point I had several accounts on ATD - I haven't and never have - a mod from ATD should be able to confirm this...? In the same post (or one a litle later)I revealed that Yea Man was Chris Webb again for those who missed the joke - I was taking the piss!!

Quote :

Tring or GOB or both also posted that I had made it clear in one of my responses that IJN still had a big influence in PASOTI mod room. That's not quite what I said. I said that it was inevitable that IJN would have an influence there, he had been a mod for a long time. I thought I also made it clear that he doesn't have an influence in decision making on PASOTI - if I didn't I make it again now.

Quote :

IJN only has one account on PASOTI. Both email addresses have been linked to different historical editions of "IJN" but he has not had a multi account since he left the mod room earlier this year. We investigated the double email earlier this year and it was linked to a deleted account. There is so much historical stuff on PASOTI that trying to register with someone's email address is often going to come up with "in use". I've tried three different email addresses that i've used over the years and they are blocked too even though i've only used one for a couple of years.

Quote :

There really aren't that many multis. I know you may not believe that, or want to, but there aren't. Those mods that have multis only use them for modding purposes nowadays. I know that wasn't the case in the past but hand on heart I can honestly say that now.

Quote :

Tring - I don't know what you want me to say - yes it's a small (13ish) man clique. It's not going to change quickly. As for IJN being asked back as a Mod - I can't see that happening. I have already said the next mods will be got (I can't think of a word that you'll not find fault with) in a different way. I asked for comments or thoughts on the hijack thread and got ..... few!!

Quote :

Nope PASOTI policy is voted upon. No single mod can administer a ban or any form of discipline without a mod vote. No mod can make an amendment to a post without it being logged and documented.

How did you vote over banning Charlie Wood and AlanoTivvy last night then Mark?

At the time I said all those things were true or genuinely believed to be true.

Just to set the record straight - someone posted earlier that I had admitted to having multi accounts on here. I haven't. On the hijack thread on PASOTI I was taking the piss and said at one point I had several accounts on ATD - I haven't and never have - a mod from ATD should be able to confirm this...? In the same post (or one a litle later)I revealed that Yea Man was Chris Webb again for those who missed the joke - I was taking the piss!!

Still True

Tring or GOB or both also posted that I had made it clear in one of my responses that IJN still had a big influence in PASOTI mod room. That's not quite what I said. I said that it was inevitable that IJN would have an influence there, he had been a mod for a long time. I thought I also made it clear that he doesn't have an influence in decision making on PASOTI - if I didn't I make it again now.

True at the time but obviously not so now.

IJN only has one account on PASOTI. Both email addresses have been linked to different historical editions of "IJN" but he has not had a multi account since he left the mod room earlier this year. We investigated the double email earlier this year and it was linked to a deleted account. There is so much historical stuff on PASOTI that trying to register with someone's email address is often going to come up with "in use". I've tried three different email addresses that i've used over the years and they are blocked too even though i've only used one for a couple of years.
True then and still true up until Tuesday. I beleieve it to be true again now.

There really aren't that many multis. I know you may not believe that, or want to, but there aren't. Those mods that have multis only use them for modding purposes nowadays. I know that wasn't the case in the past but hand on heart I can honestly say that now.

Still true - although the Trust multi seems to not being used within the rules that we gave it.

Tring - I don't know what you want me to say - yes it's a small (13ish) man clique. It's not going to change quickly. As for IJN being asked back as a Mod - I can't see that happening. I have already said the next mods will be got (I can't think of a word that you'll not find fault with) in a different way. I asked for comments or thoughts on the hijack thread and got ..... few!!

Well he's certainly not been asked back, but nevertheless he now is. But he's made it clear that he isn't and doesn't want to be a mod.

Nope PASOTI policy is voted upon. No single mod can administer a ban or any form of discipline without a mod vote. No mod can make an amendment to a post without it being logged and documented.

Still true.



I can't comment on Charlie Wood.

Alan not Tivvy is lying he is not banned from PASOTI - he asked to be deleted.

Mark Pedlar wrote:

I can't comment on Charlie Wood. Alan not Tivvy is lying he is not banned from PASOTI - he asked to be deleted.

Why Mark? Because you don't know the full story or are you forbidden to tell it? Hero or Henchman?

As above why can't / won't comment about Charlie . Same old pasoti only open and honest when it suits them .

Surely if he'd broken a rule you could just reply "Charlie broke rule bla bla of the agreement" or "Charlie was a troll" or "Charlie had multi accounts" etc.

But could it be that he's the first in a number of ATDers who will find they can no longer access Pasoti now that Newell is back in charge?

What are they so scared of?

Yea Man wrote:

Surely if he'd broken a rule you could just reply "Charlie broke rule bla bla of the agreement" or "Charlie was a troll" or "Charlie had multi accounts" etc.

But could it be that he's the first in a number of ATDers who will find they can no longer access Pasoti now that Newell is back in charge?
What are they so scared of?

'Revenge killings' and controlled suppression or very much part of the weoponry of the thuggish dictatorship of the dim.

Mark Pedlar wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

GOB wrote:

Quote :

Just to set the record straight - someone posted earlier that I had admitted to having multi accounts on here. I haven't. On the hijack thread on PASOTI I was taking the piss and said at one point I had several accounts on ATD - I haven't and never have - a mod from ATD should be able to confirm this...? In the same post (or one a litle later)I revealed that Yea Man was Chris Webb again for those who missed the joke - I was taking the piss!!

Quote :

Tring or GOB or both also posted that I had made it clear in one of my responses that IJN still had a big influence in PASOTI mod room. That's not quite what I said. I said that it was inevitable that IJN would have an influence there, he had been a mod for a long time. I thought I also made it clear that he doesn't have an influence in decision making on PASOTI - if I didn't I make it again now.

Quote :

IJN only has one account on PASOTI. Both email addresses have been linked to different historical editions of "IJN" but he has not had a multi account since he left the mod room earlier this year. We investigated the double email earlier this year and it was linked to a deleted account. There is so much historical stuff on PASOTI that trying to register with someone's email address is often going to come up with "in use". I've tried three different email addresses that i've used over the years and they are blocked too even though i've only used one for a couple of years.

Quote :

There really aren't that many multis. I know you may not believe that, or want to, but there aren't. Those mods that have multis only use them for modding purposes nowadays. I know that wasn't the case in the past but hand on heart I can honestly say that now.

Quote :

Tring - I don't know what you want me to say - yes it's a small (13ish) man clique. It's not going to change quickly. As for IJN being asked back as a Mod - I can't see that happening. I have already said the next mods will be got (I can't think of a word that you'll not find fault with) in a different way. I asked for comments or thoughts on the hijack thread and got ..... few!!

Quote :

Nope PASOTI policy is voted upon. No single mod can administer a ban or any form of discipline without a mod vote. No mod can make an amendment to a post without it being logged and documented.

How did you vote over banning Charlie Wood and AlanoTivvy last night then Mark?

At the time I said all those things were true or genuinely believed to be true.

Just to set the record straight - someone posted earlier that I had admitted to having multi accounts on here. I haven't. On the hijack thread on PASOTI I was taking the piss and said at one point I had several accounts on ATD - I haven't and never have - a mod from ATD should be able to confirm this...? In the same post (or one a litle later)I revealed that Yea Man was Chris Webb again for those who missed the joke - I was taking the piss!!

Still True

Tring or GOB or both also posted that I had made it clear in one of my responses that IJN still had a big influence in PASOTI mod room. That's not quite what I said. I said that it was inevitable that IJN would have an influence there, he had been a mod for a long time. I thought I also made it clear that he doesn't have an influence in decision making on PASOTI - if I didn't I make it again now.

True at the time but obviously not so now.

IJN only has one account on PASOTI. Both email addresses have been linked to different historical editions of "IJN" but he has not had a multi account since he left the mod room earlier this year. We investigated the double email earlier this year and it was linked to a deleted account. There is so much historical stuff on PASOTI that trying to register with someone's email address is often going to come up with "in use". I've tried three different email addresses that i've used over the years and they are blocked too even though i've only used one for a couple of years.
True then and still true up until Tuesday. I beleieve it to be true again now.

There really aren't that many multis. I know you may not believe that, or want to, but there aren't. Those mods that have multis only use them for modding purposes nowadays. I know that wasn't the case in the past but hand on heart I can honestly say that now.

Still true - although the Trust multi seems to not being used within the rules that we gave it.

Tring - I don't know what you want me to say - yes it's a small (13ish) man clique. It's not going to change quickly. As for IJN being asked back as a Mod - I can't see that happening. I have already said the next mods will be got (I can't think of a word that you'll not find fault with) in a different way. I asked for comments or thoughts on the hijack thread and got ..... few!!

Well he's certainly not been asked back, but nevertheless he now is. But he's made it clear that he isn't and doesn't want to be a mod.

Nope PASOTI policy is voted upon. No single mod can administer a ban or any form of discipline without a mod vote. No mod can make an amendment to a post without it being logged and documented.

Still true.



I can't comment on Charlie Wood.

Alan not Tivvy is lying he is not banned from PASOTI - he asked to be deleted.

i asked for my details to be wiped from PASOTI's records the other week. I have not been able to post on PASOTI for a month or more,i was given a warning before then. All of a sudden,after a white feather remark( if i remember rightly,could be wrong) i couldnt post anything.
I have not recieved any messages from any mod to explain why or a reply as to whether my details have been deleted from Stassii HQ.
As Porky is now OFFICIALLY in charge,i emailed the mods this morning to again delete any records and to contact me to confirm .
hope this explains the situation from my side.I certainly aint lying unlike all you two faced pricks on the farm

You asked for them to be deleted - they were - that's what happens.

You claimed further on this thread you were banned - you're not.

When you say something that isn't true it's called a lie.

Mark Pedlar wrote:

You asked for them to be deleted - they were - that's what happens.

You claimed further on this thread you were banned - you're not.

When you say something that isn't true it's called a lie.

Or "a mistake"? Who knows?

Who knows if you are straight Mark? Who knows if I am? In this crazy internet world, it's sometimes hard to tell.

I appreciated what you posted when you were here last time. Like anyone else (or almost anyone else) you are welcome on here.

Good luck.

if i cant post i presume im banned, that happened before i asked to be deleted.
if i had recieved an email from a mod explaining why i couldnt post then everything would be alot clearer!

unfortunately is always murky at the farm

and where on THIS thread have i said i was banned?
Jock may have,but not me.

Its sad for me as i used to enjoy posting on pasoti back in the day aswell as other places but over the years ian has well and truly corrupted that site so debate cant be had without the threat of your personal details being used to send "the boys round" or as we seen with greenjock and others your details can be passed on to others to be investigated, cant disagree with a pov without it being brought up 6 months later to try and discredit you and just one more as i'll be here all day you cant post an opinion that isnt what ian wants without you being banned or set up for it.

IJN has always been known to be a serial spammer on forums with a pure hatred for any other argyle forum whether they were anti pasoti or not or weren't anti pasoti till ian changed that opinion over the years pafctalk, argyle talk, vital was at a time, rotg and that official one on the website years ago and probably others too have all been victims to his lies and spam and lets not forget exeweb to wish our exeter city friends can tell us some stories about his conduct on there.

Whilst i believe mark is legit with what he is saying from his pov i feel however there is absolutely no way possible ian will not hold a mod account in secret to ensure his propaganda is heard above all. Mark remember who you are dealing with never trust a word he says.

Its sad things are as they are as remove ian and there would be far better relations between this place and pasoti more users would be comfortable using both openly.

Although his fundraising for the club is admirable and some of his actions in the admin period where too (i say some as he also was responsible for deep throat and passing around private mobile numbers) it does not excuse or condone is dam right disgusting behavior towards some fans over the years.

Pasoti is nothing more than an official propaganda forum now not a supporters one. There are some good posters on there that will be silenced more now. With ian sitting next to the club owner and telling him fans want this and that is it any wonder we have a shit stand being proposed? a loan company that hardly any one had heard off pretty much taking over the place with his logo whilst yes again admirably sponsoring everything possible going and people like chris webb losing his status as a admin hero to a run of the mill cheerleader. The fans on a broader scale have got to watch him like a hawk.

Mark Pedlar wrote:

You asked for them to be deleted - they were - that's what happens.

You claimed further on this thread you were banned - you're not.

When you say something that isn't true it's called a lie.

I think you're as spineless as the rest of them tbh. Can't comment on Charlie Wood's banning? Just like all the other bannings and accounts that coincidentally can't be accessed once opposition to Newells beliefs are shown.

It's so cowardly, can't even be men enough to do it officially.

Newells always run Pasoti as he liked and it's no surprise that the most cowardly of the lot Postey is his chosen right hand man. Couldn't blow the skin off a rice pudding but gives it the big un anonymously, making threats, naming my mother and sister to add more menace. My sister would break the cnut in two without breaking sweat.

In fact all you Pasoti mods are gutless wankers for allowing it all to go on unopposed for so long. A supposedly independent site which is nothing more than Brent's mouthpiece now, and only that because Brent was clever enough to recognise that porky would do anything to be close to the action.

Webbs been protected on Pasoti for nearly two years now, another feckin coward who has to post anonymously because he's not man enough to do it under his own name. And Peter Jones, why protect that ass-wipe? Another snidey cnut who isn't afraid to spy and work with the rotten modroom.

Total fucktards like Lee Jameson and Tony Hooper acting like butter wouldn'tmelt when they're as cowardly and corrupt as the rest of you.

A site that could be decent is controlled by a little gang of you who think you are something really special when in truth you're sad. Sad because your'e too afraid to cross Newell. I'll bet he has so much evidence of wrongdoing by all the mods you're trapped now. We all saw how his lapdog rapson was used to break the story about the mod posting from a dead woman's account and the way he had wozzers deepthroat involvement evidence stored for future use.

How you can bear to be near cnuts like that I really don't know.

Pass on a message to Postey for me will you? Tell him my mum's fine and ask how his is.

Postey? Sniveling little shit who makes threats but in real life is afraid of his own shadow, mind you he should be because his times imminent.

Be good to see him wet himself when he is asked to repeat his threats face to face.

Oh and I'm sure you know the other people who used Greenman Mark, a whole gang of cowards willing to let an 18 yr old lad face the music? Nice people I must say.

Anyway your'e not going to get banned on here, some people believed you were different, but your word is now shit. As trustworthy as all the rest.

Twas funny to see fatman cock up yesterday though, and the mad scramble to explain it

If you are your own man Mark, I find it hard to believe that you are still modding (or should that be nodding?) on the farm. Maybe with the new "site manager" role being given to lap dog and no 1 company man Ian De Lar, things may change but I doubt that very much. The question is do you feel sidelined by this latest news?
Anyway welcome back to the dark side, if you are able to put up with the bitching in the first week or two you will find this site a good one, all views are welcome, the difference is that if you talk shit you need to be strong enough to take it back.

Greenjock wrote:

Mark Pedlar wrote:

You asked for them to be deleted - they were - that's what happens.

You claimed further on this thread you were banned - you're not.

When you say something that isn't true it's called a lie.

I think you're as spineless as the rest of them tbh. Can't comment on Charlie Wood's banning? Just like all the other bannings and accounts that coincidentally can't be accessed once opposition to Newells beliefs are shown.

It's so cowardly, can't even be men enough to do it officially.

Newells always run Pasoti as he liked and it's no surprise that the most cowardly of the lot Postey is his chosen right hand man. Couldn't blow the skin off a rice pudding but gives it the big un anonymously, making threats, naming my mother and sister to add more menace. My sister would break the cnut in two without breaking sweat.

In fact all you Pasoti mods are gutless wankers for allowing it all to go on unopposed for so long. A supposedly independent site which is nothing more than Brent's mouthpiece now, and only that because Brent was clever enough to recognise that porky would do anything to be close to the action.

Webbs been protected on Pasoti for nearly two years now, another feckin coward who has to post anonymously because he's not man enough to do it under his own name. And Peter Jones, why protect that ass-wipe? Another snidey cnut who isn't afraid to spy and work with the rotten modroom.

Total fucktards like Lee Jameson and Tony Hooper acting like butter wouldn'tmelt when they're as cowardly and corrupt as the rest of you.

A site that could be decent is controlled by a little gang of you who think you are something really special when in truth you're sad. Sad because your'e too afraid to cross Newell. I'll bet he has so much evidence of wrongdoing by all the mods you're trapped now. We all saw how his lapdog rapson was used to break the story about the mod posting from a dead woman's account and the way he had wozzers deepthroat involvement evidence stored for future use.

How you can bear to be near cnuts like that I really don't know.

Pass on a message to Postey for me will you? Tell him my mum's fine and ask how his is.

Postey? Sniveling little shit who makes threats but in real life is afraid of his own shadow, mind you he should be because his times imminent.

Be good to see him wet himself when he is asked to repeat his threats face to face.

Oh and I'm sure you know the other people who used Greenman Mark, a whole gang of cowards willing to let an 18 yr old lad face the music? Nice people I must say.

Anyway your'e not going to get banned on here, some people believed you were different, but your word is now shit. As trustworthy as all the rest.

Twas funny to see fatman cock up yesterday though, and the mad scramble to explain it

TBH I feel a bit of a coward meself when I read some of your posts Jock

And dear old IJN now says that he only had a mod account the other day to contact the other mods to give them the news? Has the PM system broken down on pasoti?
Genuine question.

Well I've never talked shit so that won't be a problem will it Iggy!

Greenjock - do I give a monkey's what you think of me - no not really. When I look in the mirror I know I'm being honest and I've never intentionally lied to anyone on this site or PASOTI.

Your "issues" are not really with me or PASOTI but certain people who use it. Likewise many of the issues between posters on either site are with individuals and not with the site(s) itself, yet it's the site(s) that gets labelled.

One thing that is certain - if I want to question the way the club is run or managed, nobody will stop me.

Re-reading this I've realised I'm being too polite and rational.... feck off Greenjock!

Hmmmm - a spell-checker!!

Nice one GOB - as ignorant as ever I see or was your post a response to Jock?

im off to watch the racing on telly.have fun