| pasoti Thread | |
|
+9Chemical Ali Mapperley, darling Freathy Elias shonbo Mrrapson Tringreen mouldyoldgoat Sir Francis Drake 13 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:03 pm | |
| - knecht wrote:
- Sir Francis Drake wrote:
- Bogsider wrote:
- Sir Francis Drake wrote:
- I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.
By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations? By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.
If that's true, I guess it means that ATD is regularly read by 'the club' and has been effective in exposing unacceptable behaviour by El Pres & Mr Newell.
Does that mean the work is over? You are joking................. aren't you ? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:03 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:08 pm | |
| Over? I thought we were just warming up! |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:15 pm | |
| The situation is far more dire now than it was when I first fell foul of the dimwitted, devious control freaks who have and continue to use Pasoti as their powerbase. They now strut around HP like they own the place and it wouldn't surprise me in the least, if Brent hands ownership to them to rid himself of the irksome oiks, so that he can concentrate on his real business interests. I don't think we've seen anything yet.
Pasoti continues to be a breeding ground of pedlars , PL2 faced liars and self promoting janner control freaks.
Last edited by Tringreen on Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:31 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:18 pm | |
| - knecht wrote:
- Sir Francis Drake wrote:
- Bogsider wrote:
- Sir Francis Drake wrote:
- I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.
By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations? By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.
If that's true, I guess it means that ATD is regularly read by 'the club' and has been effective in exposing unacceptable behaviour by El Pres & Mr Newell.
Does that mean the work is over? No. It's not that they've been using the internet, but what they've been using it for. If the only response to that is to tell them to stop using the internet, then they'll find some other modus operandi* *Yer actual Latin, I think. #educatedwankersRus Oh - PS to any interested onlookers. There's a massive police station within two minutes of my gaff, along with a CCTV camera right outside and a former Army unarmed combat instructor on call. Feel free to go through my bin, though. It's one of those big shared ones, and there might just be nappies in it. |
|
| |
Freathy
Posts : 7230 Join date : 2011-05-12
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:31 pm | |
| - Tringreen wrote:
- The situation is far more dire now than it was when I first fell foul of the dimwitted, devious control freaks who have and continue to use Pasoti as their powerbase.
They now strut around HP like they own the place and it wouldn't surprise me in the least, if Brent hands ownership to them to rid himself of the irksome oiks, so that he can concentrate on his real business interests. I don't think we've seen anything yet.
I think you could be right. We all know brent doesn't give a shit about Argyle as a football club so everyone's worst nightmare really could be just around the corner. PAFC RIP |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:44 pm | |
| If what has been said is even half correct then this should now be a Football League matter? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:55 pm | |
| I'm only surprised not more people have not picked up on what is likely to happen in the medium term. Forget the already divided fanbase, the club itself would be riven with strife for years to come. Actually Tring, supposedly Brent is being 'watched like a hawk' by the Footbal folk that allowed the staff repayment plan, so I can't see anything immediate could be achieved for a while, and there is 'decency' to be considered. But given the history of this self serving cabal, it's almost impossible to think this wouldn't be an aim. And of course, a Fans' Trust fiscally shackled with trying to give Brent's PAFC a pile of money in the meantime, would take care of any competitors.
Last edited by Penzance on Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:59 pm | |
| - Freathy wrote:
- Tringreen wrote:
- The situation is far more dire now than it was when I first fell foul of the dimwitted, devious control freaks who have and continue to use Pasoti as their powerbase.
They now strut around HP like they own the place and it wouldn't surprise me in the least, if Brent hands ownership to them to rid himself of the irksome oiks, so that he can concentrate on his real business interests. I don't think we've seen anything yet.
I think you could be right. We all know brent doesn't give a shit about Argyle as a football club so everyone's worst nightmare really could be just around the corner.
PAFC RIP If those chimps run the club, my live football for what it is these days will be at plainmoor. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:02 pm | |
| - Penzance wrote:
- I'm only surprised not more people have not picked up on what is likely to happen in the medium term.
Forget the already divided fanbase, the club itself would be riven with strife for years to come. Are you saying that Piggy, Plwebb, PL2-faced, Snooper and co could be actually running the show if Brent get's his slimey way with development and not the footballing side of things, and feck off? That can't happen. can it? CAN IT? *Starts to shout through anger*
Last edited by Schlumberger on Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:04 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:03 pm | |
| - Penzance wrote:
- I'm only surprised not more people have not picked up on what is likely to happen in the medium term.
Forget the already divided fanbase, the club itself would be riven with strife for years to come. Sometimes you have to actually spell things out to people Penz.Even repeat yourself a few times. You know, like a one trick pony ! Even then, few listen. It became clear to me when Webb boasted, 'This is now our club to build', Newell confirmed, 'There would be no walleted directors and that his good friend Webb had a lot of influence at the club[hard luck Peggy] and they listen to what he finks'. |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:07 pm | |
| Yep, and then there was Newell's comments on pasoti telling the club's commercial department at the club to get their act together 'like Pasoti had'. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:09 pm | |
| - GOB wrote:
- If what has been said is even half correct then this should now be a Football League matter?
Do you need some sort of accreditation or qualifications to run a football club? I'm only asking because I haven't got the foggiest! If not, my dog and myself are free most weekends. I couldn't do any worse than if the 3 Amigo's who have their feet in the door start running PAFC! |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:14 pm | |
| - Penzance wrote:
- Yep, and then there was Newell's comments on pasoti telling the club's commercial department at the club to get their act together 'like Pasoti had'.
Maybe Brent is just stringing them along, believing them to be fans' leaders, hoping that they'll pay off his debts and produce an improving club that he can sell ? I don't think it matters much to him either way. If it takes a few years for the fools and GT's to pay off his debts whilst the club flounders, so be it. I've been carrying one of your quotes as my signature for months. Some of us knew the score then and before |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:20 pm | |
| - Schlumberger wrote:
- GOB wrote:
- If what has been said is even half correct then this should now be a Football League matter?
Do you need some sort of accreditation or qualifications to run a football club? I'm only asking because I haven't got the foggiest! If not, my dog and myself are free most weekends. I couldn't do any worse than if the 3 Amigo's who have their feet in the door start running PAFC! I was think more along the lines of bringing football, the Football League and the club into disrepute. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:26 pm | |
| I wonder how long this "headhunting" failure will go on for ? We should have a pasty sweepstake on ATD .... see who can get nearest to the date a PROPER CEO and football chairman are appointed at the club. I'll put down a marker .... another 2 years. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:32 pm | |
|
Last edited by Iggy on Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:37 pm | |
| Surely Newell and co will never get on the board.......surely!!
Someone who sends PM's around on a forum to try and discredit people should be having his AAA pass revoked not given more power and treats. |
|
| |
Mapperley, darling
Posts : 2345 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 55
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:48 pm | |
| careful, he'll tell your boss that you use t'internet |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:49 pm | |
| - Yea Man wrote:
- Surely Newell and co will never get on the board.......surely!!
Someone who sends PM's around on a forum to try and discredit people should be having his AAA pass revoked not given more power and treats. But they are real friends.They've looked eachother in the eye |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:44 pm | |
| - Yea Man wrote:
- Surely Newell and co will never get on the board.......surely!!
Someone who sends PM's around on a forum to try and discredit people should be having his AAA pass revoked not given more power and treats. Not to mention the feathers. |
|
| |
Chemical Ali
Posts : 7322 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 47 Location : Plymouth
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:11 am | |
| I see Pedlar is spouting rubbish once again- - Quote :
- I have only ever banned one user personally and over the past 12 months, PASOTI Mods as a group have only banned 4 different posters - always done by a majority vote and nearly always unanimously. Predominantly those bannings have been for threatening behaviour towards the site and or individuals. In addition we have voted on continuing bans for 11 others whose annual review have come up for review, all of those have been upheld. Like the recent ones most of those were for threstening behviour or were Exter fans trolling. I can quite honestly say no-one has been banned for having an alternative view - there are too many of those among the Mods themselves!!
I hadn't posted for almost 2 months and was IP banned by the pasoti mods in March (I think it was for a post on here suggesting that pasoti mods had multi accounts such as Deep Throat, Windsor Boy, Derrick Sanderson etc- how wrong I was ). Frank Bullitt has also been banned from pasoti and the reason given was that "he wasn't welcome on the site". Nothing to do with threatening behaviour in either case. |
|
| |
Mapperley, darling
Posts : 2345 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 55
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:21 am | |
| - Chemical Ali wrote:
- I see Pedlar is spouting rubbish once again-
- Quote :
- I have only ever banned one user personally and over the past 12 months, PASOTI Mods as a group have only banned 4 different posters - always done by a majority vote and nearly always unanimously. Predominantly those bannings have been for threatening behaviour towards the site and or individuals. In addition we have voted on continuing bans for 11 others whose annual review have come up for review, all of those have been upheld. Like the recent ones most of those were for threstening behviour or were Exter fans trolling. I can quite honestly say no-one has been banned for having an alternative view - there are too many of those among the Mods themselves!!
I hadn't posted for almost 2 months and was IP banned by the pasoti mods in March (I think it was for a post on here suggesting that pasoti mods had multi accounts such as Deep Throat, Windsor Boy, Derrick Sanderson etc- how wrong I was ).
Frank Bullitt has also been banned from pasoti and the reason given was that "he wasn't welcome on the site". Nothing to do with threatening behaviour in either case.
banned a couple of years back for suggesting ijn had multis |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:40 am | |
| PL2 faced has been mighty quiet this last week? They were operating as a tag team but pedlar's sort of fighting a lone battle at the moment, and making a dick of himself in the process.
Maybe postey's distraught that his buddy Newell is leaving Pasoti and wants his own car park pass and seat amongst the Gods? Maybe an announcement is imminent!
Graham Clark's gone somaybe there will be a breakaway group who want to have their own way, just like deepthroat? They could ask Cerbs for the password to his site so they can pat each other on the back all day without any criticism? |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: pasoti Thread | |
| |
|
| |
| pasoti Thread | |
|