The Anti James Brent Brigade-Why?

beesrus wrote:

Grovehill wrote:

I just can't believe they don't realise how they are being used.

They're not being used. They agree with it all. "Why wouldn't a businessman want to make a profit ?" zzzzzzzzzzz

I see half the size Exeter are one step closer tonight to level pegging with Argyle, even though they weren't saved by a banker., but a fans' trust. I thought fans' trusts were incapable of running an enterprise as efficiently as the plethora of squires on offer.

There's Fans Trust's and some "fans" I wouldn't trust as far as I could throw 'em!

Pasoti's dislike for the AFT preludes to well before deep throat.

Has the pig not had a Sean (Connery) yet with all this dissent lol

This should be noted. Clive Toms stated on the farm (HC Green)

"When Argyle sold the land they got the market rate for it plus a guarantee of receiving 50% of any windfall profit from the development. Had the original development gone ahead Argyle would have got a lot more."

harvetheslayer wrote:

This should be noted. Clive Toms stated on the farm (HC Green)

"When Argyle sold the land they got the market rate for it plus a guarantee of receiving 50% of any windfall profit from the development. Had the original development gone ahead Argyle would have got a lot more."

Thought Tom's would be more worried about the meteoric demise of his beloved Everton.

Another lie perpetuated by the desperate Brentists. Read GLs post and he nails why we should be wary of Brent.

[quote="harvetheslayer"]This should be noted. Clive Toms stated on the farm (HC Green)

"When Argyle sold the land they got the market rate for it plus a guarantee of receiving 50% of any windfall profit from the development.
Had the original development gone ahead Argyle would have got a lot more."

And why didn't HP1 go ahead? Possible investors saw what a barking mad plan it was and they looked into Akkeron's previous achievements.
British Land have actually delivered and a city centre site is clearly better than one in a park. The failure of HP1 was nothing to do with
a few football fans or people living in the area who objected.

And don't even mention the percentage PAFC were being given if they weren't given a new grandstand. Just the oversight that the club are at
the back of the queue after Lombard and PCC have their cut.

Bob Crow wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

This should be noted. Clive Toms stated on the farm (HC Green)

"When Argyle sold the land they got the market rate for it plus a guarantee of receiving 50% of any windfall profit from the development. Had the original development gone ahead Argyle would have got a lot more."

Thought Tom's would be more worried about the meteoric demise of his beloved Everton.

does he mean that bit of land he sold to himself and swiftly put in Mrs Brent’s name that was asset stripped from the club that bit of land does he mean...and if he is the messiah that some claim Why didn’t he lend us the money then instead of asset stripping it then ???

I think we're falling into the trap of believing that Brent's original HHP plan was a genuine attempt at actually getting something built.

It was soooooooo half-arsed in terms of both conception and implementation that it was never going to go ahead; he either didn't know this, which makes him a complete dunderhead, or didn't care very much. I suspect it is the latter. It was just about getting planning permission and sticking the uplift in land value on the balance sheet.

Had he genuinely intended to build something he would have come up with a feasible plan and not the one he did.

And now that the planning permission has expired we have HHP2 but with none of the planning permissions discharged that isn't going anywhere any time soon but at least the uplift in value is back on the books.

Might as well share this here as anywhere else: it occurred to me the other day that we are mirroring the plot of The Wizard of Oz.

We start of in Kansas where things are tough and the farm looks like it is going under. There is a huge storm that scares us all rigid but we pull through and end up in Oz where everything is both completely different and yet strangely familiar.

Then begins a quest where we believe that we need the Wizard to show us the way because we don't have the heart, brains or courage to do it for ourselves.

On arrival in Oz unexpectedly the curtain drops away and a charlatan with no super powers at all is revealed pedalling his organ as frantically as he is peddling the myths that sustain his legendary wisdom and omnipotence.

We're all either Dorothy or her friends, Nooly is the Wicked Witch and there's munchkins all over the place who haven't a bloody clue what they are doing or why they are doing it but make lots of noise and irritate everybody.

I must admit Reg makes a good point. Why didn't he lend us the money ? Brent has had a game plan all along and with fatty dispersing all threats within a ten mile radius of Brent, he has had a pretty easy ride to date. All the time he's got fatty to drive off potential threats, nothing will change up there I'm afraid

Lol,on Brents forum they've got Wankster the scouser, Smith the Kiwi Cock the Everton fan and various other fvckwits explaining why Ten and a half thousand argo fans should shut up be grateful to Jimmy for a Dogshit Budget and a Dogshit Mankover (if it happens) what i want to know is when will one of them ask Nool about The White Feather?

Ah but the white feather is all forgiven apparently because he apologised

It was only the other day he flatly denied anything to do with it I believe

Well, I for one, remember him actually saying online at the time the dying man deserved it, due to an altercation at a game. He made several posts about the subject at the time. The lowest scummy thing any fan has ever done on any Argyle fan forum anywhere. He can deny it all he likes, he lies about so many things.

Another experimental lie of his was saying his 10000 posts and crude behaviour on Exeweb were the work of his son. Obviously at the time concerned that his history would play badly with Brent et all at the club. He needn't have worried, Brent couldn't give a monkeys what goes on down in the stalls, if it furthers his asset strip.

beesrus wrote:

Well, I for one, remember him actually saying online at the time the dying man deserved it, due to an altercation at a game. He made several posts about the subject at the time. The lowest scummy thing any fan has ever done on any Argyle fan forum anywhere. He can deny it all he likes, he lies about so many things.

Another experimental lie of his was saying his 10000 posts and crude behaviour on Exeweb were the work of his son. Obviously at the time concerned that his history would play badly with Brent et all at the club. He needn't have worried, Brent couldn't give a monkeys what goes on down in the stalls, if it furthers his asset strip.

Agree with that B Man, Nool claims free chat and ATD are full of Vile Nasty people, yet it was Nool who sent a dying man a white feather for Cowardice? Why would anyone post on a forum run by someone capable of that?

When all my personal details got published online for all to see after he illegally "harvested" them from pasoti first of all he apologised, he then banned me, deleted all the posts and most of that thread and now denies it happened at all. Hes rewritten a lot of history but luckily some of us just love a screenshot.

Balham Green fell foul of the "site owners privilege" before the obese slug realised what a tool he was being.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr Newell has said the following earlier this afternoon.................................

"As for you comment regarding debate, I completely agree with you. But we don’t want any of the ‘Someone who hasn’t got access to this site’ crap.

Everyone has access to this site unless they have broken our rules or allow people to abuse the people that run this site. Hope that’s clear enough............... 12:56 pm today.

Another Bare Faced Lie. I cannot access that site and rarely look at it. My crime, suggesting that honest posters were suffering online bullying for having an opinion. So Mr. Newell who does not read this site, get one of your friends to explain how everyone has access to PASOTI.

Kenny G wrote:

Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr Newell has said the following earlier this afternoon.................................

"As for you comment regarding debate, I completely agree with you. But we don’t want any of the ‘Someone who hasn’t got access to this site’ crap.

Everyone has access to this site unless they have broken our rules or allow people to abuse the people that run this site. Hope that’s clear enough............... 12:56 pm today.

Another Bare Faced Lie. I cannot access that site and rarely look at it. My crime, suggesting that honest posters were suffering online bullying for having an opinion. So Mr. Newell who does not read this site, get one of your friends to explain how everyone has access to PASOTI.

You forget online bullying is permitted as long as it's himself doing it. "site owners privilege" as he puts it.

Gob had it right a long long time ago, a clear case of a personality disorder. Who on earth would want to give of their opinion on an online forum with such a character in charge, doing all manner of things with your online information.

Nools law, it's pretty complex.

ch00se wrote:

Bob Crow wrote:

Kenny G wrote:

Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr Newell has said the following earlier this afternoon.................................

"As for you comment regarding debate, I completely agree with you. But we don’t want any of the ‘Someone who hasn’t got access to this site’ crap.

Everyone has access to this site unless they have broken our rules or allow people to abuse the people that run this site. Hope that’s clear enough............... 12:56 pm today.

Another Bare Faced Lie. I cannot access that site and rarely look at it. My crime, suggesting that honest posters were suffering online bullying for having an opinion. So Mr. Newell who does not read this site, get one of your friends to explain how everyone has access to PASOTI.

You forget online bullying is permitted as long as it's himself doing it. "site owners privilege"  as he puts it.

A shame he's not clued up to data protection laws then, and that he thinks it's legal to attempt to hack into peoples e-mails. Didn't Glen Mulcaire get locked up for such a thing?

“...or allow people to abuse the people that run this site”

So basically you are saying that you want to moderate EVERY Argyle site on the internet.

beesrus wrote:

Well, I for one, remember him actually saying online at the time the dying man deserved it, due to an altercation at a game. He made several posts about the subject at the time. The lowest scummy thing any fan has ever done on any Argyle fan forum anywhere. He can deny it all he likes, he lies about so many things.

Another experimental lie of his was saying his 10000 posts and crude behaviour on Exeweb were the work of his son. Obviously at the time concerned that his history would play badly with Brent et all at the club. He needn't have worried, Brent couldn't give a monkeys what goes on down in the stalls, if it furthers his asset strip.

It was hardly an altercation. Thai (RIP) I think mentioned Webbs son glaring at him which apparently was the most henious crime on Earth.