| Mankover Planning application submitted | |
|
+44MikeWN Hitch Lord Melbury Jon L zyph lawnmowerman mandela Greenskin Sir Francis Drake shonbo Chancellor Jethro Tringreen nzgreen Earwegoagain Kenny G Partridge_Green jabba the gut ecfc PlymptonPilgrim Chemical Ali hippo Elias Rickler green_genie Graham Clark Dick Trickle vincent_vega Innocent Egbunike Cornish Rebel seadog Yea Man VillageGreen akagreengull sufferedsince 68 Freathy Punchdrunk Peggy Tgwu Czarcasm PatDunne Dingle RegGreen harvetheslayer Les Miserable 48 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Rickler
Posts : 6529 Join date : 2011-05-10 Location : Inside the mind...
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:44 pm | |
| - PatDunne wrote:
- I always thought Pig would live in a nicer house than ********* (address from public realm, PCC PLANNING PORTAL)
Maybe he's moving soon? Or maybe he's lying yet again just to help out fellow mod Daz on Pasoti: Check Newell out at 23sec and at 1.30 [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]I didn't realize he had a speech impediment. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:51 pm | |
| - Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Defend this then Nik
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] No need to. It's nonsense as you well know. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:55 pm | |
| Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
|
|
| |
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 5:56 pm | |
| Graham you are desperately needed on pasoti as a counterbalance to the hordes of nodding donkeys, no easy task I know but I can think of no one better equipped for the challenge. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:00 pm | |
| - Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
What made you point it out to me ? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:01 pm | |
| - nikkk wrote:
- harvetheslayer wrote:
- He's so impossibly dim having had his arse handed to him a dozen times today that he still continues to dig that hole deeper.....GC has absolutely mullered him on that one and I can see him having log in issues
No mate ... GC is wrong ... And the last sentence .... a bit unnecessary ... But clear about how he feels. No, you're wrong, and with your fiscal history, I wouldn't trust a word you say. Some people have no shame.
Last edited by beesrus on Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:02 pm | |
| - nikkk wrote:
- Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
What made you point it out to me ? Why are you answering my question with a question? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:04 pm | |
| - Frank Bullitt wrote:
- nikkk wrote:
- Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
What made you point it out to me ? Why are you answering my question with a question? Ha Ha ...Oh never mind. |
|
| |
Yea Man
Posts : 1405 Join date : 2016-02-19
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:06 pm | |
| - Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
You're forgetting the cardinal rule, anything that makes one of the inner sanctum look bad is always nonsense, libel, defamation etc etc. Still it's nice to see Nikki posting here, Atleast he has the balls to do so and fights his corner. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:09 pm | |
| - Yea Man wrote:
- Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
You're forgetting the cardinal rule, anything that makes one of the inner sanctum look bad is always nonsense, libel, defamation etc etc.
Still it's nice to see Nikkk posting here, Atleast he has the balls to do so and fights his corner. It's a shame his mate is too scared to debate on here or free chat, but he does have too many skeletons in the closet he doesn't want exposed. |
|
| |
Yea Man
Posts : 1405 Join date : 2016-02-19
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:10 pm | |
| If Nikkk could also point out to his buddy that his address was also removed from the forum once it had been seen by a mod tjat would be good, or will that not be publicised as it goes against the agenda of us all being freaks?
Last edited by Yea Man on Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:11 pm | |
| - Yea Man wrote:
- Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
You're forgetting the cardinal rule, anything that makes one of the inner sanctum look bad is always nonsense, libel, defamation etc etc.
Still it's nice to see Nikki posting here, Atleast he has the balls to do so and fights his corner. No it's not. Fans gave him an easy ride last time he posted on here. Hey, got your new business up and running yet ? Sorted out your previous actions ? |
|
| |
Yea Man
Posts : 1405 Join date : 2016-02-19
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:14 pm | |
| - Rickler wrote:
- PatDunne wrote:
- I always thought Pig would live in a nicer house than ********* (address from public realm, PCC PLANNING PORTAL)
Maybe he's moving soon? Or maybe he's lying yet again just to help out fellow mod Daz on Pasoti:
Check Newell out at 23sec and at 1.30
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I didn't realize he had a speech impediment. Hope that's not a false testimonial there. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:16 pm | |
| - beesrus wrote:
- Yea Man wrote:
- Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
You're forgetting the cardinal rule, anything that makes one of the inner sanctum look bad is always nonsense, libel, defamation etc etc.
Still it's nice to see Nikki posting here, Atleast he has the balls to do so and fights his corner. No it's not. Fans gave him an easy ride last time he posted on here. Hey, got your new business up and running yet ? Sorted out your previous actions ? Yes and no. Been a difficult time. But on the road to recovery mate. Health and otherwise. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:28 pm | |
| - green_genie wrote:
- Sally Parish of Highways England has rubbished the Planning Application transport assessment advising them that they can't refer to HHP Application as it has lapsed and asked for a 6 month delay for them to reassess.
Bump |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:31 pm | |
| Fans have to realise this is Newell's cup final. This is what he's been there for, to bat back as many dissenters to Brents plans in the park as he can. It matters not whether it be milehouseman or John Lloyd, or my cat. He's been employed for his teeth ggrrrrrrr !! and he's going to show them to the best of his gummy ability. Graham Clark is wise to leave that forum of his own volition, as I did, and many others too. Too late to stop the personal information being illegally abused though, as many have found out. The guy knows no respect for common decency. |
|
| |
Peggy
Posts : 1586 Join date : 2013-03-24 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:37 pm | |
| - green_genie wrote:
- Sally Parish of Highways England has rubbished the Planning Application transport assessment advising them that they can't refer to HHP Application as it has lapsed and asked for a 6 month delay for them to reassess.
2-0 I think |
|
| |
Peggy
Posts : 1586 Join date : 2013-03-24 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:43 pm | |
| - green_genie wrote:
- green_genie wrote:
- Sally Parish of Highways England has rubbished the Planning Application transport assessment advising them that they can't refer to HHP Application as it has lapsed and asked for a 6 month delay for them to reassess.
Sorry to quote myself but while you lot are comparing willies the agency who had 16384 capacity on HP in HHP Planning Approval has called for a six month delay. Will be interesting to see how JBs fanclub try and defend his decision to go for joint application. Think this deserves a thread of its own, tbh - I'll let you choose a title |
|
| |
Elias
Posts : 6006 Join date : 2011-12-05 Location : brent out
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:46 pm | |
| - harvetheslayer wrote:
- Swim with the tide the latest to nail Newells rear end on Pig Central
"We were promised a £10 million stand before in exchange for some cheap land and a large scale development being slapped next door.
Now we're getting £5million debt and another large scale development. How did £10million gift turn into a £5 mil loan?! No wonder the cinema pulled out if all the surplus was expected from them. That's why I think the man is in it for himself to be perfectly honest. Shame. The initial refurb proposal was pretty good, then we got lumbered with a tonne of add ons later on." Swin with the tide was most unpleasant about atd i recall........ About three years ago |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:51 pm | |
| - Peggy wrote:
- green_genie wrote:
- green_genie wrote:
- Sally Parish of Highways England has rubbished the Planning Application transport assessment advising them that they can't refer to HHP Application as it has lapsed and asked for a 6 month delay for them to reassess.
Sorry to quote myself but while you lot are comparing willies the agency who had 16384 capacity on HP in HHP Planning Approval has called for a six month delay. Will be interesting to see how JBs fanclub try and defend his decision to go for joint application. Think this deserves a thread of its own, tbh - I'll let you choose a title
So Brent's unnecessary gamble has predictably backfired? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:10 pm | |
| - nikkk wrote:
- beesrus wrote:
- Yea Man wrote:
- Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Nonsense? What do you mean. Just because he posted it a long time ago doesn't mean it's nonsense.
You're forgetting the cardinal rule, anything that makes one of the inner sanctum look bad is always nonsense, libel, defamation etc etc.
Still it's nice to see Nikki posting here, Atleast he has the balls to do so and fights his corner. No it's not. Fans gave him an easy ride last time he posted on here. Hey, got your new business up and running yet ? Sorted out your previous actions ? Yes and no. Been a difficult time. But on the road to recovery mate. Health and otherwise. Your health will not improve while you are still in denial, which you plainly are. That's how it is for us humans, despite the rhetoric of certain daylight sorts. I am not your mate, and given your business history, never likely to be. I would recommend a dose of humility. |
|
| |
Tgwu
Posts : 14779 Join date : 2011-12-11 Location : Central Park (most days)
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:54 pm | |
| Thank you for consulting Sport England on the above application. I can confirm that the consultation has been received and was accepted on 23 August 2017. In accordance with Paragraph 011 of NPPG (Article 22 of the Development Management Procedure (England) Order 2015), Sport England will respond to this consultation within 21 days of the date of acceptance. However, if insufficient information is received in order to allow us to make a substantive response to the consultation, Sport England will contact you to request further information. The 21 day deadline will not commence until receipt of the additional information. As a public body, Sport England is subject to the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, which gives members of the public the right to access the information we hold. In the event of a request being received, we will be obliged to release information relating to the application and our response unless an exemption in the Act applies. You should therefore inform us if you believe any elements of your submission to be confidential or commercially sensitive so that we can take your concerns into account. If you would like any further information or advice please contact the undersigned at the address below Planning Administration Team T:020 7273 1777 E: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:16 pm | |
| nutshell this people for me please. |
|
| |
green_genie
Posts : 1321 Join date : 2013-04-06
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted Thu Sep 07, 2017 10:05 pm | |
| - Angry wrote:
- nutshell this people for me please.
Vile educated willies are bigger than curly pig ones. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Mankover Planning application submitted | |
| |
|
| |
| Mankover Planning application submitted | |
|