| Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) | |
|
+13vincent_vega Dougie Freathy Greenskin lawnmowerman RegGreen harvetheslayer akagreengull Elias PatDunne sufferedsince 68 Tgwu Chemical Ali 17 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Elias
Posts : 6006 Join date : 2011-12-05 Location : brent out
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:04 pm | |
| Cant cobi s army be raised to clean up in return for a £2 discount at the next reservr game ? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:19 pm | |
| - Elias wrote:
- Cant cobi s army be raised to clean up in return for a £2 discount at the next reservr game ?
The bucket rattlers have been up there already to clean up yet failed to miss two dead birds in plain sight in the devonport end |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:19 pm | |
| - Pafcintheplace wrote:
- Seeing pictures like that just gives the impression of a club that doesn't have any pride in its self, a don't give a shit, 'that'll do' culture.
Morevoer a staff that has customers fans in contempt. The performance of the club over the last 100 odd years shows what that culture will deliver on the pitch. Mickey Mouse club as Carl Fletcher put it Mickey Mouse manager was Carl. Couldn't string a few thoughts/sentences together. Mind you, neither could Shez. Must be a football fing innit yeah, no yeah......... Y'know them fings we done good. Sad to say that DA's deliberations are becoming increasingly monotone, predictable and laboured. |
|
| |
Dougie
Posts : 3191 Join date : 2011-12-02
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:31 pm | |
| From memory the original plan was to demolish the grandstand in October 2013 after the Portsmouth game. Nothing nada nil zilch has happened since then and shows that the original plan was well and truly built on a foundation of sand - how quickly the medical centre, school, lighthouse all floundered - the grandstand built on no cost to the club (or Brent) but dependent on the largesse of government capital financing, loans from PCC, horsetrading of city centre planning permission, income from retail units that were never filled anyway in a place that no one would want to go outside of match days and a cinema that never actually got anyone to sign on the dotted line to run |
|
| |
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:40 pm | |
| You have to admire the thickness of ol' Brenties skin, no progress with a positive spin lol. |
|
| |
PatDunne
Posts : 2614 Join date : 2013-11-21 Age : 63
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:48 pm | |
| - Dougie wrote:
- From memory the original plan was to demolish the grandstand in October 2013 after the Portsmouth game. Nothing nada nil zilch has happened since then and shows that the original plan was well and truly built on a foundation of sand - how quickly the medical centre, school, lighthouse all floundered - the grandstand built on no cost to the club (or Brent) but dependent on the largesse of government capital financing, loans from PCC, horsetrading of city centre planning permission, income from retail units that were never filled anyway in a place that no one would want to go outside of match days and a cinema that never actually got anyone to sign on the dotted line to run
To be fair, apart from all the points you mention, it was a good plan. Would have loved to have seen Tudors face when Jim told him he was in for 8 million. |
|
| |
RegGreen
Posts : 6018 Join date : 2015-07-08
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:16 am | |
| Didnt tudor shit his pants and tried distance himself from jimmy just before the last election..hmmm funny that hey!! |
|
| |
RegGreen
Posts : 6018 Join date : 2015-07-08
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:38 pm | |
| - Tringreen wrote:
- Pafcintheplace wrote:
- Seeing pictures like that just gives the impression of a club that doesn't have any pride in its self, a don't give a shit, 'that'll do' culture.
Morevoer a staff that has customers fans in contempt. The performance of the club over the last 100 odd years shows what that culture will deliver on the pitch. Mickey Mouse club as Carl Fletcher put it Mickey Mouse manager was Carl. Couldn't string a few thoughts/sentences together. Mind you, neither could Shez. Must be a football fing innit yeah, no yeah......... Y'know them fings we done good. Sad to say that DA's deliberations are becoming increasingly monotone, predictable and laboured. He was no football manager but he could certainly spot a mickey mouse football club when he sees one |
|
| |
Jethro
Posts : 8363 Join date : 2013-01-03 Age : 34 Location : Dorset
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:57 pm | |
| Theres nothing we can do , the farm boys will keep rattling the buckets to fund jimmys dream of a village club etc,
I mean who would want this shit at the price he would want for it. |
|
| |
Sir Francis Drake
Posts : 7461 Join date : 2011-12-03 Age : 33 Location : Nr Panama
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:20 am | |
| - Angry wrote:
- There were two dead baby birds in block 1 today that appeared to have been there for quite some time.
i was so tempted to take a picture of them to put on here but for decency i didnt but just another tick in the dont let brent own the ground campaign. This is what happens when the Jehohovah's Witnesses hold their convention elsewhere. Say what you will about them but they always spruced the place up a bit. I wonder why they didn't use HP this summer? Did they come here last year? |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) | |
| |
|
| |
| Home Park facilities looking splendid (maybe not) | |
|