Been Suspended by Sunderland today Pending a police investigation into allegations of Under age Sex with a 14 year old girl. of course Innocent until proven guilty mantra.
Posts : 15902 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Thu Mar 24, 2016 6:39 pm
Not long enough!
_______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl)
PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17
He was behind me at Charlton! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Now an officially semi retired old fart! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:39 pm
mouldyoldgoat wrote:
Not long enough!
,, A joke?
6 years for getting a nosh off a slapper that was gagging for it?
He didn't hurt anyone and in most other countries wouldn't even have committed a crime, if he was a muzzy they could have been married for 6 years and they might have 4 kids.
Dick Trickle
Posts : 2622 Join date : 2014-02-15
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:12 pm
That "slapper" who you have never met and don't know anything about is a child, someone's daughter. That "slapper" has suffered abuse you won't even be able to consider and has according to her victim statement which was backed by police officers contemplated suicide.
She idolised that man and he took advantage. This wasn't a girl "dolled up" in a nightclub. This was a girl who met the man after games in a Sunderland shirt with his name on and was groomed into his car behind a takeaway.
Adam Johnson is no better than the Rotherham groomers. They all used power and influence on vulnerable victims.
You are one thoughtless, vindictive, hate fuelled individual.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:19 pm
he'll be out in 3 i feel
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:48 pm
He'll need rule 43 foreshore.
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15902 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:49 pm
Lord Tisdale wrote:
mouldyoldgoat wrote:
Not long enough!
,, A joke?
6 years for getting a nosh off a slapper that was gagging for it?
He didn't hurt anyone and in most other countries wouldn't even have committed a crime, if he was a muzzy they could have been married for 6 years and they might have 4 kids.
You really are a cnut of the highest order!
_______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl)
PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17
He was behind me at Charlton! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Now an officially semi retired old fart! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Rollo Tomasi
Posts : 736 Join date : 2013-04-30
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:07 pm
I've never understood how Bill Wyman dodged prosecution regarding a 14 year old Mandy Smith.
Can someone enlighten me.
seadog Admin
Posts : 15069 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 65 Location : @home or on the piss
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Rich, famous and not a footballer.
As for Lord Tis his latest odious remark is entirely predictable.
_______________________________________ COYG!
harvetheslayer
Posts : 7795 Join date : 2015-04-02 Location : Wormwood Scrubs awaiting the imminent arrival of Johnson..
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:32 am
I'm probably going to regret posting but having been on the receiving end of malicious females with a deliberate end game to get them outa the shit which resulted in a jail sentence for me, this 6 years is absolutely outrageous. FFS she was boasting about shafting an England footballer in school and her "victim statement" looked superb after she sued Johnson for a quick million a few weeks ago.....
Yes he was WRONG but in that case when the situation was reversed last week why did the female teacher only get 250 hours community service.
Traumatised my arse go take a look at her FB yesterday
Sir Francis Drake
Posts : 7461 Join date : 2011-12-03 Age : 33 Location : Nr Panama
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 9:51 am
Lord Tisdale wrote:
mouldyoldgoat wrote:
Not long enough!
,, A joke?
6 years for getting a nosh off a slapper that was gagging for it?
He didn't hurt anyone and in most other countries wouldn't even have committed a crime, if he was a muzzy they could have been married for 6 years and they might have 4 kids.
Lors Tisdale thinks 15 is obviously fair game by the looks of it. How about 14? 13? 12? Or maybe the 9 he mentions?
How young would too young for you, Lord Tisdale?
MikeWN
Posts : 344 Join date : 2015-07-21
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 11:18 am
harvetheslayer wrote:
I'm probably going to regret posting but having been on the receiving end of malicious females with a deliberate end game to get them outa the shit which resulted in a jail sentence for me, this 6 years is absolutely outrageous. FFS she was boasting about shafting an England footballer in school and her "victim statement" looked superb after she sued Johnson for a quick million a few weeks ago.....
Yes he was WRONG but in that case when the situation was reversed last week why did the female teacher only get 250 hours community service.
Traumatised my arse go take a look at her FB yesterday
Why are you watching a 15yr old on FB? I don't even know who she is, nor do I want to. There was plenty of info in the reports of the case. Who bothers to track down the girl's social media?
I think the 6 years might have been an 'example' punishment given their ages and what's happened, but as has already been said, Johnson did all the chasing. He took advantage of her. You'd have to be proper shitheel to suggest otherwise. I have no doubt that people will have got in her ear about making some money out of this. That's the thing with 15yr olds - they tend to be easily led idiots.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 11:19 am
Lord Tisdale wrote:
mouldyoldgoat wrote:
Not long enough!
,, A joke?
6 years for getting a nosh off a slapper that was gagging for it?
He didn't hurt anyone and in most other countries wouldn't even have committed a crime, if he was a muzzy they could have been married for 6 years and they might have 4 kids.
have you read the court sentencing report? you will find he did far more than getting noshed off.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 11:36 am
Lord Tisdale wrote:
mouldyoldgoat wrote:
Not long enough!
,, A joke?
6 years for getting a nosh off a slapper that was gagging for it?
He didn't hurt anyone and in most other countries wouldn't even have committed a crime, if he was a muzzy they could have been married for 6 years and they might have 4 kids.
How much longer do we have to put up with this nauseating, racist cnut on here?
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 11:52 am
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:16 pm
Dick Trickle wrote:
Adam Johnson is no better than the Rotherham groomers.
Hell's teeth, I knew you were stupid but that pretty much takes the biscuit.
In Rotherham the gangs of middle aged muzzies took girls as young as 12 and gang raped over and over again them for a period of years, Johnson got a kiss and a nosh just the once.
What you have done is a bit like comparing a single slap in the face to daesh ritually executing people by burning them alive in cages.
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:35 pm
Sir Francis Drake wrote:
Lors Tisdale thinks 15 is obviously fair game by the looks of it. How about 14? 13? 12? Or maybe the 9 he mentions?
How young would too young for you, Lord Tisdale?
Well I'm not a muslim so 9 might be a tad soon for the full bifter but whatever turns you on Franny.
I don't believe in an arbitrary age being applied to anything much in Law, as regards sex then puberty would seem to be a bit of prominent marker for us, then I would consider physical harm to be the major issue.
In such heinously repressive regimes as those of Austria, Germany, Italy and Portugal the "Age of Consent" is 14, so had Johnson nipped over there he would have been fine.
Footballers are not in a position of responsibility, they are just generally thick lads who can kick a ball about well, Johnson had no greater obligation to society in general than any other man of his age, same as Ched Evans he has been hung out to dry because he has a profile and is being used by the justice system to send a message. That is just wrong, everybody should be treated the same under the law and this girl who has created such a sympathy vote with her faux suicide attempt is just another chancer out for a few quid.
Johnson is without question not a nice guy and a fine would be pretty pointless, but 6 years FFS? You could kill somebody and get less time, just as long as you weren't a footballer. There was a case just the other day where some thug beat the living crap out of a women in front of her child, she is scarred and scared for life, he walked, in my book that is a far worse crime.
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:40 pm
Homeslice wrote:
How much longer do we have to put up with this nauseating, racist cnut on here?
You do know it constitutes a libel to describe somebody as a "racist" when you have no evidence to support that claim don't you?
Though with the generally weak ass moderation around here I guess you will be fine as I would never waste the time and effort to pursue you for your overt ignorance.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 2:49 pm
The vote is currently 5 - 0 to permanently ban Tis, with 2 mods still to log in and vote. We were going to wait for their opinions even though they wouldn't be able to change the outcome of the vote.
Enough is enough.
A detailed explanation of our decision will come later.
sufferedsince 68
Posts : 6420 Join date : 2014-06-01 Location : Brentocabin
Subject: Re: Adam Johnson Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:01 pm
Frank Bullitt wrote:
The vote is currently 5 - 0 to permanently ban Tis, with 2 mods still to log in and vote. We were going to wait for their opinions even though they wouldn't be able to change the outcome of the vote.
Enough is enough.
A detailed explanation of our decision will come later.
If Tis had been a Rabid leftwing open up the Borders type of chap, who loved Syrians more than his mother, a stern telling off would have sufficed. A permanent ban is way over the top.