Consortium + Harry Rednapp, possible Argyle interest?

One day, someone with money and vision will take a punt on England's biggest, underachieving city club.

With PL exposure and a well finished stadium, Argyle would match the attendance figures of Norwich, Southampton, Swansea and Hull............to name but a few.

zyph wrote:

Redknapp will surely become Director of Football at Bournemouth......at 67yrs old that would suit him now.....especially if he will be recuperating from a knee op......only 15 minutes away from his Sandbanks home.

Not sure about that. Why would Bournemouth want to upset what appears to be a well run club with Eddie Howe doing a fine job as it is. Not sure what Redknapp would bring to the table there to be honest.

I believe there is a possibility of a consortium looking around. I do not believe that Redknapp has anything to do with it.

They scream ''Brent out Brent Out Brent out Brent Out'' and then 'arry books a walking holiday and its ''Brent in Brent in Brent in Brent in''
A footballer gets convicted and serves his time and its ''never in a million years''
A wealthy ex-manager doesn't get convicted and its ''never in a million years''
Make up your mind chaps?

Where does anyone say "Brent in, Brent in.."

Just make shit up, why don't you Tony?

Actually take the better option. Just shut the feck up.

Brent out

tigertony wrote:

They scream ''Brent out  Brent Out Brent out  Brent Out'' and then 'arry books a walking holiday and its ''Brent in Brent in Brent in  Brent in''
A footballer gets convicted and serves his time and its ''never in a million years''
A wealthy ex-manager doesn't get convicted and its ''never in a million years''
Make up your mind chaps?

What a load of nonsense, I warned about Harry as he in my eyes could be another in Brent's mould, I want the best for Argyle not any self centred property developer be they Brent or A.Nother.

Rickler wrote:

Where does anyone say "Brent in, Brent in.."

Just make shit up, why don't you Tony?

Actually take the better option.  Just shut the feck up.

What time you back in hospital or nursery? Oh ... if neither then why are you not at work?

Brent in Brent out Brent out then in or in then out.

More feckin drivel.

tigertony wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Where does anyone say "Brent in, Brent in.."

Just make shit up, why don't you Tony?

Actually take the better option.  Just shut the feck up.

What time you back in hospital or nursery? Oh ... if neither then why are you not at work?

Brent in Brent out Brent out then in or in then out.

I cant see any brent in posts! i see alot of what utter BS the story is though.

Orkwood T Watt wrote:

Iv'e never read the Daily Star.

If you've ever looked at the bog roll after wiping your arse then you have.

Unless or until this fictional consortium goes public Yea man, the only alternative it represents is an alternative universe

X Isle wrote:

Orkwood T Watt wrote:

Iv'e never read the Daily Star.

If you've ever looked at the bog roll after wiping your arse then you have

Unless or until this fictional consortium goes public, it's not an alternative.

Quite right, all after me now,

THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE TO BRENT!

That is indeed a statement of fact Iggy, yes

When one arrives, it won't be.

Nothing wrong with 'Arry. In fact I won't hear a bad word said against that man and his lovely family. (Just wanted to get that in before KJN).

May be something to the consortium rumour. Not Harry though.

X Isle wrote:

That is indeed a statement of fact Iggy, yes

When one arrives, it won't be.

Of course their are alternatives to brent, we could just bite the bullet and declare ourselves a charity and fund it by donations.

Please god this consortium saves us from the slow death of the Brentmare, Backing Arry and his consortium all the way.

Hypothetically of course (because it was in the Daily Star and doesn't specifically relate to us anyway) but wouldn't you want to know a wee bit more about the consortium before nailing your colours to their mast?

Or is it 'anyone but James Brent'?

X Isle wrote:

Hypothetically of course (because it was in the Daily Star and doesn't specifically relate to us anyway) but wouldn't you want to know a wee bit more about the consortium before nailing your colours to their mast?

Or is it 'anyone but James Brent'?

I've seen all i need to see from Brent  he's failed the club miserably, i would take a consortium with Harry Redknapp a true football man all day long, rather than the clueless muppets running the club now.

But it wouldn't just be him would it. True football man?, a good manager granted but he comes with plenty of historical 'off field baggage'. Suroy had far more impeccable football credentials and look how that worked out. Besides an assumption is being made that he'd have a footballing input, but he'd be an investor first and foremost, and one with a less than glorious track record at that.    

What if the others were a murky faceless foreign based consortium?

What if it were a consortium including someone like 'The Goldstone killer' Bill Archer?

And before you say , "what if's" are meaningless, firstly they're not and secondly this whole thing is meaningless as it stands, it's all completely hypothetical anyway.

Bottom line is one needs to look at what is putting one's Johnson in before jumping into bed with the first willing partner that shows some interest.

X Isle wrote:

But it wouldn't just be him would it. True football man?, a good manager granted but he comes with plenty of historical 'off field baggage'. Suroy had far more impeccable football credentials and look how that worked out. Besides an assumption is being made that he'd have a footballing input, but he'd be an investor first and foremost, and one with a less than glorious track record at that.    

What if the others were a murky faceless foreign based consortium?

What if it were a consortium including someone like 'The Goldstone killer' Bill Archer?

And before you say , "what if's" are meaningless, firstly they're not and secondly this whole thing is meaningless as it stands, it's all completely hypothetical anyway.  

Bottom line is one needs to look at what is putting one's Johnson in before jumping into bed with the first willing partner that shows some interest.

The consortium could include gus honeybun for all i care aslong as they got money, good at business and like football you know all things brent isnt.

However this story has to be proven to be true first before we all split hairs for or against. Its only reported in the herald and the daily star so make of that you will.

X Isle wrote:

Hypothetically of course (because it was in the Daily Star and doesn't specifically relate to us anyway) but wouldn't you want to know a wee bit more about the consortium before nailing your colours to their mast?

Or is it 'anyone but James Brent'?

Yep, learnt that from watching your embarrassing proclamation of honesty, integrity and morality when you heralded Brent as your 2nd coming.

Doesn't matter if this is story has any truth behind it or not Angry. If/when ANY consortium or individual ACTUALLY comes forward they have to be looked into, they have to be a better option than what we've got.

Maybe they will be, maybe they won't, but to just say "yep we'll take him because he's not that bloke" is a pretty silly position to take. He's been far from perfect and it's heresy I know, but there are actually worse people than James Brent to run a football club out there

Iggy wrote:

X Isle wrote:

Hypothetically of course (because it was in the Daily Star and doesn't specifically relate to us anyway) but wouldn't you want to know a wee bit more about the consortium before nailing your colours to their mast?

Or is it 'anyone but James Brent'?

Yep, learnt that from watching your embarrassing proclamation of honesty, integrity and morality when you heralded Brent as your 2nd coming.

See signature.

X Isle wrote:

But it wouldn't just be him would it. True football man?, a good manager granted but he comes with plenty of historical 'off field baggage'. Suroy had far more impeccable football credentials and look how that worked out. Besides an assumption is being made that he'd have a footballing input, but he'd be an investor first and foremost, and one with a less than glorious track record at that.    

What if the others were a murky faceless foreign based consortium?

What if it were a consortium including someone like 'The Goldstone killer' Bill Archer?

And before you say , "what if's" are meaningless, firstly they're not and secondly this whole thing is meaningless as it stands, it's all completely hypothetical anyway.  

Bottom line is one needs to look at what is putting one's Johnson in before jumping into bed with the first willing partner that shows some interest.

Is it that you, and your fellow Brentnosers are scared of success? Argyle under the clueless brent are under achieving on a grand scale there is no future with Brent and his disciples, i for one and prepared to stand shoulder to shoulder in the trenches with Arry and not listen to you Shouty Surrender Monkeys who want to keep Argyle small and Village.

X Isle wrote:

Doesn't matter if this is story has any truth behind it or not Angry. If/when ANY consortium or individual ACTUALLY comes forward they have to be looked into, they have to be a better option than what we've got.

Maybe they will be, maybe they won't, but to just say "yep we'll take him because he's not that bloke" is a pretty silly position to take.  He's been far from perfect and it's heresy I know, but there are actually worse people than James Brent to run a football club out there  

when there are names released then im sure fans will google them to death but as there are none mentioned here its a tad difficult to look into them isnt it?

If this does prove too have some merit i hope certain fans look into them alot better than they did Brent.