They really are low

Guest

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

the club is now begging for volunteers to go litter picking. As a user in the comments section said Argyle "You are a privately owned company not a charity"

Posts : 6420 Join date : 2014-06-01 Location : Brentocabin

Perhaps Green Jim could change the Name to Plymouth Wombles, and go in for picking up litter in a big way? Bucket Rattling Loaned Players volunteers for litter Picking,with the ninth best budget in the fourth division the money from 7500 crowds is not spent on the team, just where does it go?

Subject: Re: They really are low Wed Jan 14, 2015 11:00 pm

I saw that...

Be interesting to see if Brent and Martyn Starnes will be there to lead the way?

Guest

Rickler wrote:: I saw that...

Be interesting to see if Brent and Martyn Starnes will be there to lead the way?

perhaps nikkkkk will too as i see he was one of the commentators

Guest

The players get paid thousands a week. How about starting there when asking for 'volunteers'?

Subject: Re: They really are low Thu Jan 15, 2015 7:54 am

ejh wrote:: The players get paid thousands a week. How about starting there when asking for 'volunteers'?

They are supposed to be there too Laughing

Basket case of a club.

Guest

A photo opportunity for all the usual suspects on Greens on screen !

Will Nickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk be sponsoring ?

Guest

Punchdrunk wrote:: A photo opportunity for all the usual suspects on Greens on screen !

Will Nickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk be sponsoring ?

He could do the decent thing and take those vile FES and FIL boards that are left away.

Subject: Re: They really are low Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:54 pm

Angry wrote:

Punchdrunk wrote:: A photo opportunity for all the usual suspects on Greens on screen !

Will Nickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk be sponsoring ?

He could do the decent thing and take those vile FES and FIL boards that are left away.

Wot n show the whole world we are penniless and sponsorless, ffs, wot sort of message would that send out to prospective mugs!

Subject: Re: They really are low Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:16 pm

Angry wrote:: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

the club is now begging for volunteers to go litter picking. As a user in the comments section said Argyle "You are a privately owned company not a charity"

I do wonder sometimes. What exactly is the problem with this?

Somebody starts a worthwhile campaign - none of us likes litter, do we? - and approaches a high profile local organisation (Argyle) for publicity to get it some local press. Argyle agrees and supplies a few bodies for the photographs to kick it off. The campaign gets noticed (on here at least if nowhere else) as a result, some litter gets picked up, we are all reminded that litter is an ugly nuisance and Argyle gets some welcome good PR.

There's plenty to get annoyed about but this isn't one of those things.

Posts : 2614 Join date : 2013-11-21 Age : 63

I do feel that the club should keep it's 'area' clean regardless of PR.

Guest

All the Presidents Men wrote:

Angry wrote:

Punchdrunk wrote:: A photo opportunity for all the usual suspects on Greens on screen !

Will Nickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk be sponsoring ?

He could do the decent thing and take those vile FES and FIL boards that are left away.

Wot n show the whole world we are penniless and sponsorless, ffs, wot sort of message would that send out to prospective mugs!

Fes dont sponsor us anymore as its folded so yes get rid shit logo anyway and nothing but an egotrip from a stravos loadsamoney wannabe.

Guest

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Angry wrote:: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

the club is now begging for volunteers to go litter picking. As a user in the comments section said Argyle "You are a privately owned company not a charity"

I do wonder sometimes. What exactly is the problem with this?

Somebody starts a worthwhile campaign - none of us likes litter, do we? - and approaches a high profile local organisation (Argyle) for publicity to get it some local press. Argyle agrees and supplies a few bodies for the photographs to kick it off. The campaign gets noticed (on here at least if nowhere else) as a result, some litter gets picked up, we are all reminded that litter is an ugly nuisance and Argyle gets some welcome good PR.

There's plenty to get annoyed about but this isn't one of those things.

And they cant get the council who own the stadium as we know and the area around it who have paid workers who do that sort of thing to do it because? oh yeah thats right it means parting with money and as brent hates that its yet again beg the kids to do it for nothing in return.

Dont get me started on their excuses over those bricks that are in a awful state that they refuse to maintain.

Guest

They could put the remaining FIL filth in zoo corner down to chelson meadow but 'the meadow' would have to be fumigated afterwards. Razz

Posts : 2406 Join date : 2012-01-05

Angry wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Angry wrote:: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

the club is now begging for volunteers to go litter picking. As a user in the comments section said Argyle "You are a privately owned company not a charity"

I do wonder sometimes. What exactly is the problem with this?

Somebody starts a worthwhile campaign - none of us likes litter, do we? - and approaches a high profile local organisation (Argyle) for publicity to get it some local press. Argyle agrees and supplies a few bodies for the photographs to kick it off. The campaign gets noticed (on here at least if nowhere else) as a result, some litter gets picked up, we are all reminded that litter is an ugly nuisance and Argyle gets some welcome good PR.

There's plenty to get annoyed about but this isn't one of those things.

And they cant get the council who own the stadium as we know and the area around it who have paid workers who do that sort of thing to do it because? oh yeah thats right it means parting with money and as brent hates that its yet again beg the kids to do it for nothing in return.

Dont get me started on their excuses over those bricks that are in a awful state that they refuse to maintain.

Wasn't JB funding O'Connors fee? You seem happy parting with money so offer to pay the fee for O'Connor.
How many buses did you lot pay for over the last few years. Was it zero or 0.

Guest

tigertony wrote:

Angry wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Angry wrote:: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

the club is now begging for volunteers to go litter picking. As a user in the comments section said Argyle "You are a privately owned company not a charity"

I do wonder sometimes. What exactly is the problem with this?

Somebody starts a worthwhile campaign - none of us likes litter, do we? - and approaches a high profile local organisation (Argyle) for publicity to get it some local press. Argyle agrees and supplies a few bodies for the photographs to kick it off. The campaign gets noticed (on here at least if nowhere else) as a result, some litter gets picked up, we are all reminded that litter is an ugly nuisance and Argyle gets some welcome good PR.

There's plenty to get annoyed about but this isn't one of those things.

And they cant get the council who own the stadium as we know and the area around it who have paid workers who do that sort of thing to do it because? oh yeah thats right it means parting with money and as brent hates that its yet again beg the kids to do it for nothing in return.

Dont get me started on their excuses over those bricks that are in a awful state that they refuse to maintain.

Wasn't JB funding O'Connors fee? You seem happy parting with money so offer to pay the fee for O'Connor.
How many buses did you lot pay for over the last few years. Was it zero or 0.

Was he though? its easy to say yeah he as paying after the player and club both say no. Plus as O'Connor is out of contract in June its hardly Brent attempting to break the bank to sign him when he will be cheap. Offers to fund Bobby Reid's signing then i might agree ith your above post.

Buses sarcasm

Posts : 1321 Join date : 2013-04-06

Graham Clark has stated FL rules allow that 50% of non-budgeted income can be used for transfers.

Even with the Plymouth fee of £200K for Hourihane, stretching it a lot to say Brent offering to fund O' Connor.

....and while we're on litter. FoCP have had Central Park tidy days going for months. Shame JB's mates have vilified them.

Guest

green_genie wrote:: Graham Clark has stated FL rules allow that 50% of non-budgeted income can be used for transfers.

Even with the Plymouth fee of £200K for Hourihane, stretching it a lot to say Brent offering to fund O' Connor.

....and while we're on litter. FoCP have had Central Park tidy days going for months. Shame JB's mates have vilified them.

that £200,00 grand or the small amount we actually saw of it after ipswich and the cva took their cut has pretty much gone.

Posts : 1321 Join date : 2013-04-06

Angry wrote:

green_genie wrote:: Graham Clark has stated FL rules allow that 50% of non-budgeted income can be used for transfers.

Even with the Plymouth fee of £200K for Hourihane, stretching it a lot to say Brent offering to fund O' Connor.

....and while we're on litter. FoCP have had Central Park tidy days going for months. Shame JB's mates have vilified them.

that £200,00 grand or the small amount we actually saw of it after ipswich and the cva took their cut has pretty much gone.

£100K to CVA. Small add on fee to Ipswich. How much so you think O' Connor with half season contract would cost?

## link ##

Guest

green_genie wrote:

Angry wrote:

green_genie wrote:: Graham Clark has stated FL rules allow that 50% of non-budgeted income can be used for transfers.

Even with the Plymouth fee of £200K for Hourihane, stretching it a lot to say Brent offering to fund O' Connor.

....and while we're on litter. FoCP have had Central Park tidy days going for months. Shame JB's mates have vilified them.

that £200,00 grand or the small amount we actually saw of it after ipswich and the cva took their cut has pretty much gone.

£100K to CVA. Small add on fee to Ipswich. How much so you think O' Connor with half season contract would cost?

## link ##

If its not enough to get Blackburn to accept i would guess not alot also sheridan has signed loan players using funds too. Also cva got half and ipswich got a wack we were left with less than £100.000 #plymouthprice

Posts : 1737 Join date : 2012-03-26

Pedant alert: no money went to the 'CVA'.

The Company Voluntary Agreement was the £100k that was divvied up at 0.7p in the pound between the non-secured creditors at the time we went into admin. These were the pasty suppliers and suchlike. They've got their pennies and that's their lot. They won't be getting any more.

The 50% of non-budgeted income goes to the football creditors who the football league insisted that we pay in full over however long an amount of time in order to maintain our membership of the FL. Although the latter point has gone completely ignored following the new announcement that we aren't going to be paying all of it after all. So maybe it doesn't have to be so stringently applied after all, but that's where the £100k of Hourihane money went anyway.

Posts : 2614 Join date : 2013-11-21 Age : 63

GreenSam wrote:: Pedant alert: no money went to the 'CVA'.

The Company Voluntary Agreement was the £100k that was divvied up at 0.7p in the pound between the non-secured creditors at the time we went into admin. These were the pasty suppliers and suchlike. They've got their pennies and that's their lot. They won't be getting any more.

The 50% of non-budgeted income goes to the football creditors who the football league insisted that we pay in full over however long an amount of time in order to maintain our membership of the FL. Although the latter point has gone completely ignored following the new announcement that we aren't going to be paying all of it after all. So maybe it doesn't have to be so stringently applied after all, but that's where the £100k of Hourihane money went anyway.

and the St Johns Ambulance.............

Posts : 1321 Join date : 2013-04-06

PatDunne wrote:

GreenSam wrote:: Pedant alert: no money went to the 'CVA'.

The Company Voluntary Agreement was the £100k that was divvied up at 0.7p in the pound between the non-secured creditors at the time we went into admin. These were the pasty suppliers and suchlike. They've got their pennies and that's their lot. They won't be getting any more.

The 50% of non-budgeted income goes to the football creditors who the football league insisted that we pay in full over however long an amount of time in order to maintain our membership of the FL. Although the latter point has gone completely ignored following the new announcement that we aren't going to be paying all of it after all. So maybe it doesn't have to be so stringently applied after all, but that's where the £100k of Hourihane money went anyway.

and the St Johns Ambulance.............

Good points, well made.

Wonder if they have managed to track down the missing creditors yet?

Posts : 1737 Join date : 2012-03-26

PatDunne wrote:

GreenSam wrote:: Pedant alert: no money went to the 'CVA'.

The Company Voluntary Agreement was the £100k that was divvied up at 0.7p in the pound between the non-secured creditors at the time we went into admin. These were the pasty suppliers and suchlike. They've got their pennies and that's their lot. They won't be getting any more.

The 50% of non-budgeted income goes to the football creditors who the football league insisted that we pay in full over however long an amount of time in order to maintain our membership of the FL. Although the latter point has gone completely ignored following the new announcement that we aren't going to be paying all of it after all. So maybe it doesn't have to be so stringently applied after all, but that's where the £100k of Hourihane money went anyway.

and the St Johns Ambulance.............

Indeed, I just used one example.

Posts : 2406 Join date : 2012-01-05

Angry wrote:

green_genie wrote:

Angry wrote:

green_genie wrote:: Graham Clark has stated FL rules allow that 50% of non-budgeted income can be used for transfers.

Even with the Plymouth fee of £200K for Hourihane, stretching it a lot to say Brent offering to fund O' Connor.

....and while we're on litter. FoCP have had Central Park tidy days going for months. Shame JB's mates have vilified them.

that £200,00 grand or the small amount we actually saw of it after ipswich and the cva took their cut has pretty much gone.

£100K to CVA. Small add on fee to Ipswich. How much so you think O' Connor with half season contract would cost?

## link ##

If its not enough to get Blackburn to accept i would guess not alot also sheridan has signed loan players using funds too. Also cva got half and ipswich got a wack we were left with less than £100.000 #plymouthprice

You really must read more. Blackburn had accepted the offer - it was AOC who wanted to keep his options open.