| So then the new stand | |
|
+7Chemical Ali Mock Cuncher Czarcasm green_genie VillageGreen akagreengull Han Solos Other Ship 11 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Sat Jan 11, 2014 9:37 pm | |
| - GreenSam wrote:
- Would be amazed if demolition started anytime before the Summer.
hope springs eternal greensam |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Sat Jan 11, 2014 10:13 pm | |
| - Chemical Ali wrote:
- I heard Sparksy talking about James Brent (and Martyn Starnes) doing an interview/ or Q&A on radio Devon to discuss the business side of Argyle- Steve Davey suggested they may talk about the mini-stand.
Why would they talk about that they are only building it because they wouldnt be allowed to build the clusterfuck. Future custodians of PAFC will curse James Brent for his greed and for handicapping the club. |
|
| |
watgull
Posts : 40 Join date : 2012-01-21
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:04 am | |
| Where is jock when I need him. Jock if you are reading I need an email address or pm to give you an update on what we last talked about. Regards watgull. |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15889 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:08 am | |
| Jock, send an email to the mods at [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] saying we can give watgull your email addy and we will pass it on. _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Now an officially semi retired old fart! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] |
|
| |
Elias
Posts : 6006 Join date : 2011-12-05 Location : brent out
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:07 am | |
| if there waiting for all the units to be signed up then we could be waiting a decade ! |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:17 pm | |
| - watgull wrote:
- Where is jock when I need him. Jock if you are reading I need an email address or pm to give you an update on what we last talked about. Regards watgull.
You have a PM. |
|
| |
green_genie
Posts : 1321 Join date : 2013-04-06
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:36 pm | |
| - Elias wrote:
- if there waiting for all the units to be signed up then we could be waiting a decade !
Martyn Starnes told PASTA l;ast night that delay was due to Kier needing to reach agreements with subcontractors. Nobody at meeting has mentioned need for the units to be let so maybe JB is prepared to take a punt, but then there is no mention of new lease to be signed with PCC (with or without buy back clause) or the planning approval conditions such as Seagrave Rd junction which there is no sign of. Then again PASTA were told by JB last january that all revenues from stand except one or two retail units would be going to PAFC. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:29 pm | |
| - green_genie wrote:
- ......
Then again PASTA were told by JB last january that all revenues from stand except one or two retail units would be going to PAFC. Is it true that JB told PASTA last January that all revenues from stand except one or two retail units would be going to PAFC?! Can you confirm that he said that all revenues from stand except one or two retail units would be going to PAFC?! Because if it's true that JB said that all revenues from stand except one or two retail units would be going to PAFC then it brings into question all sorts of things about the club! The first thing it brings into question is his competence. Further things it brings into question are his vows of "Integrity, honesty, financial stability". I just hope the claim that he said that all revenues from stand except one or two retail units would be going to PAFC is wrong. Surely, if he said that all revenues from stand except one or two retail units would be going to PAFC then that is what will happen. Surely. (PS Could a dentist be construed as a "retail unit" inasmuch as they sell services, teeth etc?) |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:33 pm | |
| Bugger! Whilst I was posting the above twaddle, I missed Mr Brent being interviewed by Sparksy pre-match. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:51 pm | |
| Decent ground with an ambitious owner and the skys the limit, the reason argyle fans gave up on the club in the championship, was the total lack of ambition shown by stapledon and his crap board over the iminent building of a new grand stand, what speccy is proposing is a plainmoor style mini stand, which says fourth division and be grateful. |
|
| |
green_genie
Posts : 1321 Join date : 2013-04-06
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:07 pm | |
| [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] - Chepstowgreen wrote:
- - he said there would be a couple of outlets within the new grandstand which wouldn't provide income for the club, but conferencing facilities etc would do
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:52 pm | |
| - green_genie wrote:
- [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
- Chepstowgreen wrote:
- - he said there would be a couple of outlets within the new grandstand which wouldn't provide income for the club, but conferencing facilities etc would do
And this from the same poster leapt out at me " he couldn't say he was certain that the whole redevelopment would definitely be built, but it was a million miles closer than any previous plan. He said there were certain obstacles in the way including funding, local objections, planning granted etc but insisted he was very confident all will be overcome and it would progress". I suspect there are reams of issues tied up in that brief statement. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:58 pm | |
| - knecht wrote:
- green_genie wrote:
- [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
- Chepstowgreen wrote:
- - he said there would be a couple of outlets within the new grandstand which wouldn't provide income for the club, but conferencing facilities etc would do
And this from the same poster leapt out at me "he couldn't say he was certain that the whole redevelopment would definitely be built, but it was a million miles closer than any previous plan. He said there were certain obstacles in the way including funding, local objections, planning granted etc but insisted he was very confident all will be overcome and it would progress".
I suspect there are reams of issues tied up in that brief statement. BUGGER! I've just noticed that that thread is dated January 2013 not 2014 |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:00 pm | |
| - green_genie wrote:
- [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
- Chepstowgreen wrote:
- - he said there would be a couple of outlets within the new grandstand which wouldn't provide income for the club, but conferencing facilities etc would do
My post above was me being ironic/sarcastic/ or something. I know that it was a given that all except a couple would go to the club's income. |
|
| |
Elias
Posts : 6006 Join date : 2011-12-05 Location : brent out
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:04 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: So then the new stand | |
| |
|
| |
| So then the new stand | |
|