Argyle's Sponsor in Trouble?

Charlie Wood wrote:
I guess Nikk's login has gone the way of so many others, a trinket to be shared about amongst the "faithful" that are left in the trenches with Brenty. Nik has always answered questions before, in retrospect it's a matter of judgement how accurately they were answered, these responses just don't seem authentic.

Surely from day 1 owners being chauffeured around by the hoi polloi just didn't ring true, football club owners regard fans as a necessary evil...don't they...to be tolerated and stroked from a distance and fans with half a brain know that, they certainly don't "have a dream" of one day being the club president. If Porky HAD been asking probing, awkward questions, two things are certain, he wouldn't have been given any answers and Brenty would have made different travelling arrangements even if he was saving a few bob on the petrol.

Porky has a great talent for rewriting history and is doing it again in claiming to be an ordinary Joe. How about when he was the fan's "liaison" or "rep" at the grandstand planning stage, not that there was any chance of him sharing any knowledge gained with any of the real ordinary Joe's, it was only brought out later, as an aside, to demonstrate his Oh so important place in the pecking order.

The Plymouth Argyle I have put to one side bears no resemblance to my Plymouth Argyle.

AstiSpumante wrote:
Absolutely, It stinks of another Greensleeves type account to be shared amonst the faithful for the purposes of shit stirring and trolling. If Nikkkkkkkkkk has allowed his login password to be intentionally used by others I'd be hugely disappointed in him. I've never met the man but the last time he came on here when FES was in trouble he seemed to be making a genuine attempt to answer questions honestly even if some of what he said didn't turn out the way he'd hoped it would and for his apparent honesty and willingness to come on to ATD I respected him. Last night his posting style seemed completely different, maybe it was too much wine, hopefully he can come back on tonight and lay my suspicions to rest.


Well, almost a month has passed and old Nikkkkkkk hasn't graced us with a response. Sadly it seems that wasn't him posting that night and therefore his ATD account has either been shared or hacked. Would the real Nikkkkk care to confirm or deny ?

https://www.argyletd.com/t7066p25-bid-to-take-development-project-from-james-brent#211146

delete his account...I strongly suspect those bastards were using my old details to troll this site after I departed the first time .

In checking his posts from that thread and others he has made, nothing stands out to say it is a shared account. Maybe he had a bad day and was not in the best of moods when he came on here.

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

In checking his posts from that thread and others he has made, nothing stands out to say it is a shared account. Maybe he had a bad day and was not in the best of moods when he came on here.

Except for the posting style being noticably different, something several of us pointed out. Like you say mouldy, maybe he'd had a bad day, just a bit strange that he hasn't been back since..................almost as though the Nikkkkk account has been rumbled      

It does seem abit strange as the posting was a completely different style to this usual well mannered verse

AstiSpumante wrote:

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

In checking his posts from that thread and others he has made, nothing stands out to say it is a shared account. Maybe he had a bad day and was not in the best of moods when he came on here.

Except for the posting style being noticably different, something several of us pointed out. Like you say mouldy, maybe he'd had a bad day, just a bit strange that he hasn't been back since..................almost as though the Nikkkkk account has been rumbled      

I agree it wasn't his normal style of posting. Maybe he had a visitor that night.  

It must have been this time last year that nikkkkkkkkkkkkkk mania was at its height, Murals, money for all. Now his names not mentioned at all by the farm gratefuls,  a bit sad really.

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

In checking his posts from that thread and others he has made, nothing stands out to say it is a shared account. Maybe he had a bad day and was not in the best of moods when he came on here.

Didn't one of the mod team say the post in question had been posted from an IP address that Nikkk hadn't used before?

Frankly... At this point, who cares?

it matters

stinks of that tcm account to me where one user would use ,,,,,,, like there's no tomorrow and another didnt.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

It must have been this time last year that nikkkkkkkkkkkkkk mania was at its height, Murals, money for all. Now his names not mentioned at all by the farm gratefuls,  a bit sad really.

What, even after IJN promised to stand side by side with his friend in the trenches?

ejh wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

It must have been this time last year that nikkkkkkkkkkkkkk mania was at its height, Murals, money for all. Now his names not mentioned at all by the farm gratefuls,  a bit sad really.

What, even after IJN promised to stand side by side with his friend in the trenches?

The large one is now side by side with Posh Jim at the half time buffet, every Superfan should try The Golden Shower Exprierence.

Good shout on this one Frank, let's hope the 'big big shit' pans out too.

Can we keep these Scandal threads relevant, topical and shite free? they are part of the site's evolutionary process.

I have split the latest hijack to the Zoo.

Niks ok stand on me put himself on the line for me when he had nothing to gain and absolutely everything to lose by admitting something.
I wont forget that rest assured

harvetheslayer wrote:

Niks ok stand on me put himself on the line for me when he had nothing to gain and absolutely everything to lose by admitting something.
I wont forget that rest assured

I realise sending money to young chaps abroad is very important to you and Nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk, but please:

"Can we keep these Scandal threads relevant, topical and shite free? they are part of the site's evolutionary process"

Maybe the way forward would be to lock them all so nothing can be added unless it is relevant and the mods do it.

Aye or every thread will be Harved

Just leave it be the message will sink in.

I don't see why it needs to be a forum that you can add to. It's a story of this forum's past, needs no further input. Things get muddied when people start changing ad weaving meaning and event as we've seen elsewhere.... that's called Newspeak. People can always start another thread elsewhere on here. If it has any value, it's in it's historical context, and it's description states that well.

beesrus wrote:

I don't see why it needs to be a forum that you can add to. It's a story of this forum's past, needs no further input. Things get muddied when people start changing ad weaving  meaning and event as we've seen elsewhere.... that's called Newspeak. People can always start another thread elsewhere on here. If it has any value, it's in it's historical context, and it's description states that well.

+1

tigertony wrote:

beesrus wrote:

I don't see why it needs to be a forum that you can add to. It's a story of this forum's past, needs no further input. Things get muddied when people start changing ad weaving  meaning and event as we've seen elsewhere.... that's called Newspeak. People can always start another thread elsewhere on here. If it has any value, it's in it's historical context, and it's description states that well.

+1

And me. It also prevents annoying Elias style bumps