Postey Speaks (to the Herald)

Greenjock wrote:

What feckin power do the Trust seek anyway? That line's always trotted out by De Liar but what exactly does he think Andy Symons is after?

It's a piss poor excuse and it makes him look an even bigger cnut than he already looks.

Andy wants to sit next to his fwiend Ian.

Czarcasm wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

What feckin power do the Trust seek anyway? That line's always trotted out by De Liar but what exactly does he think Andy Symons is after?

It's a piss poor excuse and it makes him look an even bigger cnut than he already looks.

Andy wants to sit next to his fwiend Ian.

He thinks his site managers badge and clipboard are in danger.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but maybe, just maybe it's a case of certain fans, let's call them superfans for want of a better phrase, are judging people by their own standards.

During admin, the two Ians and Chris were very public in keeping the club afloat. Many others invested time, effort and donations, but certainly in the weird world of online hijinks, they were the standard bearers. Once admin was over and we all set sail on the good ship Brentflower, they assumed or were bestowed positions within the halls of the club. I wouldn't have predicted that they would have so radically changed their perspectives/agendas.

Fighting for the club brings an AAA pass, eventually apparently. I'd guess that these 'stepford' fans are loath to dilute the superfan gene pool. Is it because they are afraid that history will repeat itself and those currently on the AFT will stage a coup, that they are so vehemently anti-trust.

People have mentioned personality clashes. If thats what stops you wanting the best for the club, then you are a fucktard of the nth degree and you shouldn't have the front to call yourself a puporter, let alone a supporter.

Steve

Bit stream of conciousness that. Hope my point comes across though.

Czarcasm wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

What feckin power do the Trust seek anyway? That line's always trotted out by De Liar but what exactly does he think Andy Symons is after?

It's a piss poor excuse and it makes him look an even bigger cnut than he already looks.

Andy wants to sit next to his fwiend Ian.

I think that friendship might be over before it began

Deadly Lampshade/StingCurtain/Porkus/DeepThroat/Greenman/Saracen10/Napolean/etc etc wrote:

Quote :

Biggs, Ian believes that to be true, and that's the beauty of this Freedom of Speech thing, it works both ways.

'Countless hours' multiply that by 100 and that's what Ian has given to this site, yet he's what, censored'.

I don't know who's on the WG, I'm not sure if anyone does, but I know that Esmer is on there, and I know he's a good man, I know Graham Clark has helped and I know he's a good man, I'm not sure who else is on there, but I bet you my bottom dollar that there are people on there, who bring nothing to the party, but are pals with the big man.

Why do I (and Ian) think this? I tell you why, because it's the style of the (virtually) self appointed leader, that's the way he works.

I also hear that Ed Shillabear has been sacked, because the leader of the AFT has appointed himself onto the PASB, anyone care to comment.

Troublemakers? You betcha. It's in their DNA.

Ask the question, why didn't Graham Clark stand on the WG?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Remember he doesn't do politics and personal attacks, he just does auctions and coaches and nice stuff.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

The two Ian's are a bigger pair of tits than this classic has

ejh wrote:

I dont think he realised his comments would be printed, and was an off the record discussion about the Herald article and the criticism it was generating. Spectacular own goal.

Welcome EJH. If it's the same one who uses Pasoti I like reading your little tussles with the people's republic of Pasoti officers.

cornysteve wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but maybe, just maybe it's a case of certain fans, let's call them superfans for want of a better phrase, are judging people by their own standards.

During admin, the two Ians and Chris were very public in keeping the club afloat. Many others invested time, effort and donations, but certainly in the weird world of online hijinks, they were the standard bearers. Once admin was over and we all set sail on the good ship Brentflower, they assumed or were bestowed positions within the halls of the club. I wouldn't have predicted that they would have so radically changed their perspectives/agendas.

Fighting for the club brings an AAA pass, eventually apparently. I'd guess that these 'stepford' fans are loath to dilute the superfan gene pool. Is it because they are afraid that history will repeat itself and those currently on the AFT will stage a coup, that they are so vehemently anti-trust.

People have mentioned personality clashes. If thats what stops you wanting the best for the club, then you are a fucktard of the nth degree and you shouldn't have the front to call yourself a puporter, let alone a supporter.

Steve

Bit stream of conciousness that. Hope my point comes across though.

Liking your work Steve

Angry of Mayfair wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

The two Ian's are a bigger pair of tits than this classic has

Angry...I bow down to thee. I'd forgotten those pair existed and that's without the single most cheekiest smile/wink I've ever seen. Stunning.

Pokesdown wrote:

Angry of Mayfair wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

The two Ian's are a bigger pair of tits than this classic has

Angry...I bow down to thee. I'd forgotten those pair existed and that's without the single most cheekiest smile/wink I've ever seen. Stunning.

they have come out of retirement in honor of thai and to insult posty #doubleresult

I wonder why De La Arsehole and Newell are so shy about the reason they prefer the Akkeron plans so much?

It's been asked several times but they're both evading the issue and just spouting more hatred against Andy Symons.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Strange that an accusation has been made about Andy Symons replacing Ed on the PASB- the PASB, WG, Akkeron and James Brent had a meeting last night and Andy did not attend- if he had replaced Ed surely he would be there?

The pasoti leadership continue to mud sling and lie in order to try and discredit the Trust. Only problem for them is 90% of argyle fans disagree with them and only their multis and sycophants back them.

I thought by banning public enemy number 1, the chap that was ruining the forum for others that they'd all be like the care bears or the Get Along Gang - big feckin LOL

The two Ian's are getting a beating now from REAL fans.

LOL LOL feckin LOL

These threads are going to terraces faster than Newell can empty a bag of Tesco doughnuts.

george galloway coined a phrase when describing gordon brown and tony blair. two cheeks of the same backside.

I would say that is apt for this occasion too.

unbelievable

De Liar and Nool - Brent's attack sheep

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Angry of Mayfair wrote:

george galloway coined a phrase when describing gordon brown and tony blair. two cheeks of the same backside.

I would say that is apt for this occasion too.

I don't often lol but in this case ....

Imagine if you're getting an utter roasting on a thread and Ian Newell jumps in to try and save you. It's like....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

You couldn't make it up.

IJN on the new stand

Quote :

I'm no expert on any of this, but by God, people's expectations are way too high I think.

Yet he's on the clubs grandstand working group. Has overseen and passed judgement on 36 revisions to the plan. Praised the magnificent 2 two teir proposal. Battered everyone who had seen the one tier nonsense despite that being the public version. And is happy with the shelf compromise.

So his expecting was a magnificent two tiered stand. His expectations were obviously two high. I would love someone to explain why the plans had changed so significantly while he was on holiday. Perhaps he and the rest of the fan reps on the club working group could get an answer.

Ha ha he'll be joing Friends of Home Park next. Funny how he suddenly falls in behind not building on any green space in the park motive.

IJN says

Quote :

Problem would be, our park would be ruined.

Dougie wrote:

Ha ha he'll be joing Friends of Home Park next. Funny how he suddenly falls in behind not building on any green space in the park motive.

IJN says

Quote :

Problem would be, our park would be ruined.

so building a hotel, cinema, ice rink, shops and a road wont then?

I'm no expert... he doesn't always tell lies then.

It's an amazing thread. It's getting to the point where normal non-freaks are going to see through the wafer thin REAL fan stuff.

IJN is shitting it. He doesn't want to go back to sitting with the normal people. If he doesn't go out of his way to defend Brent's plans, he's not going to be welcome in that Director's box seat. Imagine just how distraught he'd be if he had to sit next to someone who actually pays to get in.

I pity the fool.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Dougie wrote:

Ha ha he'll be joing Friends of Home Park next. Funny how he suddenly falls in behind not building on any green space in the park motive.

IJN says

Quote :

Problem would be, our park would be ruined.

Wasn't he slating the decision to involve friends of central park not long ago?

Yep. Tree huggers. The man is a revolving door.

And here's a classic

Quote :

'Facts' how boring.

Fiction, that's what we all want on here.

Isn't it?

This just before his Ed Shilabeer 'fact' was shown to be a 'fiction'

Quote :

I'm excited by the development, truly excited, apart from the fact the stand isn't big enough.

Another gem; from a fan's point of view isn't the stand the be all and end all?