Anyone else had a letter from Philip Ross Solicitors ?.

Tringreen wrote:

Angry of Manchester wrote:

I think a someone has broken the law regarding data protection here especially when the person in question is innocent someone(s) PD was the man who said it fair enough, not sure what LT said or Mike for that matter but village there is no justification for it. The person who issued the threat should apologise publicly and privately.

I agree. The solicitor has caused unnecessary stress to poor Village. It's a shambles, just like the dough boys currently clinging to perceived power at HP. Are they the only ones who can't see they've been had ? Maybe they don't care, as long as they feel important

Just watching the rugby from Adams Park, Wycombe. I've been in that stand and it's not much to write home about but................. it is better than our proposed Aviva shed.

It's the idiot that provided the information to the solicitor that wants shooting for the distress caused. This should not be allowed to be dropped.

It reminds me of the time that Newell was caught collecting date on his Flkr account.

What a load of crap. I would throw the letter straight in the bin.

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

Charlie Wood wrote:

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

This is the way to go

Charlie Wood wrote:

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

absolutely he should via his own brief so nikkk learns he cant go around accussing innocent people. PD was who you had the gripe with so only he should have had the letter and this place for hosting it.

Heh heh, I remember the post, Punchie was merely slagging off Nikkkkkkkkk's firm for all the wrong reasons, nothing too strange there in ol' Punchie posting inexactitudes. I shall be happy to correspond with said shysters and cost ol' Nikky a nice few quid as for defamation to exist there needs to be some malicious intent, quoting a post is exactly the same in law as confirming that somebody said something, anyone who thinks they could get a conviction based on that must be some sort of pro shyster philanthropist.

The real issue here is where did the shysters get the address ?

Imho that would appear to be a prima facae case of a contravention of the data protection act, first course the shysters need to be fronted and required to advise where they got the details, make the feckers squirm in fact, when they won't release the details of their source get on to the ombudsman and make their lives as difficult as they like to think they can make yours. No reason to ever be affeared of shysters, in my experience they are generally no use in a row and if you ain't done nuffin wrong the bastards can't touch you.

Good afternoon Jock - it will be a sad day for all when you decide to stop posting

GOB wrote:

VillageGreen wrote:

lawnmowerman wrote:

My main concern would be how did the solicitor get your address also what did punchy say ????

Yeah,so am i.

Yup, that is baffling.

Seemingly, someone has managed to confuse Village Green's IP with Punchdrunk's IP, handed that to someone that keeps a fan database and feked up big time!

If the IP came from ATD then at least the IP would have been correct, my guess is that the IP came from somewhere else or it's just a hit and miss exercise to shut everyone up.

It's conspiracy time!

let them bring it.

Abso-bloody-lutely Tissers.

Charlie Wood wrote:

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

I have done that now.

Dear Sir.

I wish to complain against a threatening letter sent to my address on 23rd March 2013 (Notice and take-down letter under Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive (2000/31EC) .

The letter was regarding damaging comments made on the Plymouth Argyle Talk Democratic thread - ''New Grandstand wish list!?.

Firstly,i do not use the user name of ''punchdrunk'' and secondly,i have not posted any comments on the named thread.

My user name on Plymouth Argyle Talk Democratic is ''VillageGreen'' and i do not use any other user name.

I would like to know how you got hold of my address and/or details and who passed them on to you,so that i can look at taking possible legal action myself for the unwanted attention this has brought me.

I would also like an apology from you in writing.

Mike Searle wrote:

Good afternoon Jock - it will be a sad day for all when you decide to stop posting

Too true.

I'll give that post 20 minutes.

Just like Nool breaking the data protection act by having all the details on his Flickr account.

Pasoti claim that only details like e-mail address and IP addresses are kept, and only while the person is a member of their site. I feckin hope this has come from that scumbag Postey or Newell, in fact I would piss myself publicly if it is

Right VG, I'm representing you now, so we speak to the shit solicitors, get the information as to who provided your address when you weren't involved. This will lead to feckin great public apologies on here and Pasoti by Postey or whoever gave the info, and by Nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk for giving the wrong persons details to the brief.

We will accept nothing less than a total internet banning for the guilty person who provided your address, and look at criminal procedures unless a massive feckin wedge is paid in £20 notes that fill a black bin bag. Then Nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk can pay for the decent stand that the club deserves and not the shit one Brent is trying to fob us off with, but the stand will be called the ATD stand, and ONLY people we want in it can feckin use it. Nool can sit in a bath of pigshit on the touchline, sponsored by FES.

The apology by these foolish, foolish people is to be as big as a house, has to contain the news that Pasoti is closed forever, and is headed "I'm so sorry, I didn't realise how great ATD was and how Pasoti is run by a bunch of slimy bastards, plus Newell stinks and Webb is a turncoat"

Yours sincerely

NIKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK BARON KNIGHTS

Oh and we should all change our usernames to Punchdrunk now

VillageGreen wrote:

Charlie Wood wrote:

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

I have done that now.

Dear Sir.

I wish to complain against a threatening letter sent to my address on 23rd March 2013 (Notice and take-down letter under Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive (2000/31EC) .

The letter was regarding damaging comments made on the Plymouth Argyle Talk Democratic thread - ''New Grandstand wish list!?.

Firstly,i do not use the user name of ''punchdrunk'' and secondly,i have not posted any comments on the named thread.

My user name on Plymouth Argyle Talk Democratic is ''VillageGreen'' and i do not use any other user name.

I would like to know how you got hold of my address and/or details and who passed them on to you,so that i can look at taking possible legal action myself for the unwanted attention this has brought me.

I would also like an apology from you in writing.

None of my business of course but If you haven't sent that I would hold fast, you have no need to address anything but the issue of them knowing your address and every time they have to write to you it will cost somebody else money, the contravention by somebody of the DP act is the major issue and whoever did it needs to be exposed and screwed, imho.

The fact that they got the wrong man is a pain for you but could easily be dealt with, the DP act is a different bucket of bananas all together.

Greenjock wrote:

Charlie Wood wrote:

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

This. Then I would write to nikkkkkkkkkk and tell him to shove his high interest rate loans up his feckin ass. I've had several checks made against me lately and it could be Hooper snooping again but I actually believe that it's somebody at first European securities as they can run checks on people for credit purposes.

That's my view, that nikkkkkkkkkk wossisface from. FES or somebody attached to that company has been running background checks on me as a favour to someone else like Newell.

The good think here is that nikkkkkkkkkk and his solicitors are as shit at their job as Tony Hooper and they've got the wrong person. I would go to a solicitor myself and demand to know where they got your details village green, that will be interesting to say the least.

Hey nikkkkkkkkkk, suck my fat one you dopey cnut.

If FES can run security checks on people as any other normal lender would this is probably how Village has received the letter.

Someone has put 2+2 together and got 5 by thinking they have found out village's real name and have then used that to perform a search and then found the address.

The question is IF and it's only an IF that is how Village's address has been found, is that even legal and isn't it a breach of a law regarding credit searches.

This is going to get quiet messy if somebody has performed a search on somebody, the WRONG person aswell I might add.

If Village needs any assistance then feel free to contact the mods on here and we'll help in anyway we can.

This business has proven two things though, the previous "threats" we received from our friend were complete bullshit and two solicitors must be on comission to fit as many big words as possible into one sentence

VillageGreen wrote:

Charlie Wood wrote:

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

I have done that now.

Dear Sir.

I wish to complain against a threatening letter sent to my address on 23rd March 2013 (Notice and take-down letter under Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive (2000/31EC) .

The letter was regarding damaging comments made on the Plymouth Argyle Talk Democratic thread - ''New Grandstand wish list!?.

Firstly,i do not use the user name of ''punchdrunk'' and secondly,i have not posted any comments on the named thread.

My user name on Plymouth Argyle Talk Democratic is ''VillageGreen'' and i do not use any other user name.

I would like to know how you got hold of my address and/or details and who passed them on to you,so that i can look at taking possible legal action myself for the unwanted attention this has brought me.

I would also like an apology from you in writing.

Good follow up VG.

We can provide you with a complete list of all of your posts made as Village Green if you ever need it.

LT is right Village

the evidence is there for all to see you didnt make the comments PD did that doesnt need addressing. What does need to is how they obtained your address and name and falsely accussed you. hammer home that to them and let them know you are serious with your own legal options regarding this.

I guess Village Green's invite to a day of lavish entertainment in the DB will be winging it's way through the airwaves imminently. I believe Nik has his own entertainments manager in residence.

A post that was abusive & potentially libellous towards FES has just been removed. You may think that you can deal with any possible legal action yourself but please don't bring the possibility of such action onto this site.

Yea Man wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Charlie Wood wrote:

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

This. Then I would write to nikkkkkkkkkk and tell him to shove his high interest rate loans up his feckin ass. I've had several checks made against me lately and it could be Hooper snooping again but I actually believe that it's somebody at first European securities as they can run checks on people for credit purposes.

That's my view, that nikkkkkkkkkk wossisface from. FES or somebody attached to that company has been running background checks on me as a favour to someone else like Newell.

The good think here is that nikkkkkkkkkk and his solicitors are as shit at their job as Tony Hooper and they've got the wrong person. I would go to a solicitor myself and demand to know where they got your details village green, that will be interesting to say the least.

Hey nikkkkkkkkkk, suck my fat one you dopey cnut.

If FES can run security checks on people as any other normal lender would this is probably how Village has received the letter.

Someone has put 2+2 together and got 5 by thinking they have found out village's real name and have then used that to perform a search and then found the address.

The question is IF and it's only an IF that is how Village's address has been found, is that even legal and isn't it a breach of a law regarding credit searches.

This is going to get quiet messy if somebody has performed a search on somebody, the WRONG person aswell I might add.

If Village needs any assistance then feel free to contact the mods on here and we'll help in anyway we can.

This business has proven two things though, the previous "threats" we received from our friend were complete bullshit and two solicitors must be on comission to fit as many big words as possible into one sentence

No it's certainly not legal if this is how the information was obtained. Finance companies can obviously run credit checks, I used to do this regularly in a previous profession , but only if that person is applying for a loan. The fact that they have the wrong person anyway means that IF the information has come from inside First European Securities VG will be quite entitled to sue the company

I'm not sure how it stands if it's been Hooper again, not that anyone in their right mind would hire that useless cnut again, because again whoever is searching is doing it on a completely innocent party.

I would actually contact a solicitor, I would represent you but I'm busy next week, and look at receiving damages VG. Sorry but this is another incident which is far, far beyond stupid comments on a forum, this is sinister like Hooper looking into me.

Maybe someone with a Pasoti account could ask Nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk, Postey, Nool and Hooper publicly if they know anything about it

And if you are offered a Cava and Vol au vonts buffet and a seat next to Newell courtesy of Nikkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk I would like to think that you would tell them where to shove it. This is the chance to prove what a bunch of complete bastards the people involved are.

Moderator wrote:

A post that was abusive & potentially libellous towards FES has just been removed. You may think that you can deal with any possible legal action yourself but please don't bring the possibility of such action onto this site.

That was my post, can someone explain what was potentially libellous about it please?

VillageGreen wrote:

Charlie Wood wrote:

Village, I would contact Philip Ross, denying you are the poster "Punchdrunk", demand a written apology for distress caused to yourself and ask them to supply you with the details of how they obtained your name and address so that you have the opportunity to take the matter further.

I have done that now.

Dear Sir.

I wish to complain against a threatening letter sent to my address on 23rd March 2013 (Notice and take-down letter under Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive (2000/31EC) .

The letter was regarding damaging comments made on the Plymouth Argyle Talk Democratic thread - ''New Grandstand wish list!?.

Firstly,i do not use the user name of ''punchdrunk'' and secondly,i have not posted any comments on the named thread.

My user name on Plymouth Argyle Talk Democratic is ''VillageGreen'' and i do not use any other user name.

I would like to know how you got hold of my address and/or details and who passed them on to you,so that i can look at taking possible legal action myself for the unwanted attention this has brought me.

I would also like an apology from you in writing.

Good on you VG!

If anyone else incorrectly gets a threatening letter then reply saying "I will not be removing any comment I have made, see you in court!".

GOB wrote:

If anyone else incorrectly gets a threatening letter then reply saying "I will not be removing any comment I have made, see you in court!".

Just take ages to reply, the more letters they send you the more money it costs them/the complainant.

Doesn't cost you a penny to reply

I think that under the Data Protection Act that Village Green has to be told how the information was gained. This could get interesting!