GreenAndy1981 has been a bad boy

My final word on the subject and I've no wish for anyone else to become involved in my argument.

My beef with suffersince68 is his foulmouthed response to me previously asking me if Tring was shagging my mother. I told him that she had died not that long before his quip painfully with cancer after a long illness. i.e. I didn't appreciate the comment. His response was to ask if it was ok to refer to my boyfriend or some such words. Now he might think he is hack the lad with a smart mouth but I didn't and still don't.

The above was in response to my ongoing argument with Tring about constant references to Newell and pasoti and anything else that the site is commenting on. Yes I know there is history but given he calls me boring, how boring is it to constantly post the same old same old stuff. I also believe this site has posters, not all, who jump in on a bandwagon just like pasoti users are accused of, and back certain people. They always turn up to add their boot to a put down. The above is one and you Czarcasm are another. It is exactly that of turning out the dogs that is also complained about of the other site. I think Tring is a one post pony with the same references to anyone who isn't slagging off pasoti or Newell by petty name calling. If you don't agree with the comments then you get branded by the hord. It's a good job the word "discussion" isn't in this sites title because often it isn't really allowed.

You think you are different to pasoti? I think you should look at your own site in the mirror. There are some good posters on here. Some even do discuss opinions. They do it without abuse of others or bullying. Some don't seem to know the meaning of the word discussion. I am not and never have been a member of pasoti. I have seen though the responses by some on there to people who don't sing a certain song and have never had any inkling to join it. This site did seem different but once you get into it then it becomes obvious, well to me anyway, that it isn't really any different at all. Some people on pasoti are strang and seem to want to control or whatever how things are done. This site has those as well despite denials and boasts of how different it is.

Thats it I've said my piece and as said it is the last comment I will make.

shonbo wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

shonbo wrote:

SufferedSince68 wrote:

Poor old boring bloke, no friends to bore awww shame, you could always join the farm they are always looking for dull cnuts like you .x

Czar - tell me, what does that add to any discussion or debate?

Well yeah, only i'll take your SS68 quote, and raise you a....

"I stay here just to piss you off fvckwit. Seems like it's working a treat. Any more info on who is shagging mothers?"

(that's from the guy you're applauding)

"BooHoo mummy, the boy I was bullying is punching me back"

SG never starts at that level, he makes his point, which people are free to disagree with (and do) but then wankers like ss86 (whose views I am more closely aligned too) uses fvckwit, tringy calls him boring bloke (thats a laugh) and SG is able to communicate at their level. He gives it back. He doesn't start it.

Its a football web site at the end of the day, however this site prides itself on having free expression and then if you dont toe the majority line, you get slagged off. Pasoti mk2 anyone.

Geeez. Shonbo, as you fully admit, you jump on someone who's views you widely share, 'cos you don't like that person. You're not the only one guilty of it, but you really need to play the ball, not the man.

You may think SS68 is a wanker, I'm sure he'll get over that. Pasoti Mk2? Don't be silly. How long do you think a hijack like this would last over there.

And for the record, to say that SG doesn't start anything is rather amusing. He's the most argumentative, provocative poster on this site, bar none.

Anyhow, try not to get typecast - someone will try and label you a Sensypoodle otherwise...

Well said SG, although there is a difference between here and pasoti. Folks get to say what they want here and it doesn't get moved, deleted etc. With that comes some responsibility of the users on this site.

The difference here is, that you are not banned for having a different view, I am not banned for trolling Czar and ss86, we're allowed to get on with it. All for the good. I expect if I ever met you all, I am aiming for the CTC next year, I'd buy you all a beer, but in the the meantime lets all vanish up our own backsides.

Well at least once

Czarcasm wrote:

shonbo wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

shonbo wrote:

SufferedSince68 wrote:

Poor old boring bloke, no friends to bore awww shame, you could always join the farm they are always looking for dull cnuts like you .x

Czar - tell me, what does that add to any discussion or debate?

Well yeah, only i'll take your SS68 quote, and raise you a....

"I stay here just to piss you off fvckwit. Seems like it's working a treat. Any more info on who is shagging mothers?"

(that's from the guy you're applauding)

"BooHoo mummy, the boy I was bullying is punching me back"

SG never starts at that level, he makes his point, which people are free to disagree with (and do) but then wankers like ss86 (whose views I am more closely aligned too) uses fvckwit, tringy calls him boring bloke (thats a laugh) and SG is able to communicate at their level. He gives it back. He doesn't start it.

Its a football web site at the end of the day, however this site prides itself on having free expression and then if you dont toe the majority line, you get slagged off. Pasoti mk2 anyone.

Geeez. Shonbo, as you fully admit, you jump on someone who's views you widely share, 'cos you don't like that person.

I don't not like ss86, but his continuous negative use of fukwit (copyright GOB) etc is just boring and adds nothing



You're not the only one guilty of it, but you really need to play the ball, not the man.

You may think SS68 is a wanker,

Probably overstepped the mark there in all honesty, don't know him, but a lot of his posts imho are wankerish


I'm sure he'll get over that. Pasoti Mk2? Don't be silly. How long do you think a hijack like this would last over there.,

Indeed, I've just stated that - however its a shame that one or two on here can't use a little bit of self responsibility to make it a better site. Then again, if fukwit, cnut are everyday terms for them, they'll get on well with John Terry and Ferdinand I guess.

And for the record, to say that SG doesn't start anything is rather amusing. He's the most argumentative, provocative poster on this site, bar none.

Oh, he starts stuff alright, he has an opinion. But its about argyle which is what this site is here to discuss.

Anyhow, try not to get typecast - someone will try and label you a Sensypoodle otherwise...

[b]

Never heard the term sensypoodle befor and I note the subtle way you haven't called me it, but the innuendo is clear. I'd like you to take that back, just as I now apologise calling ss86 a wanker.

I note, that you have not even attempted to answer the questions I posed to you, and I'm not sure how I'm going to sleep now that you've called me a sensypoodle, probaby crying I guess.

Sensiblegreeny wrote:

My final word on the subject and I've no wish for anyone else to become involved in my argument.

My beef with suffersince68 is his foulmouthed response to me previously asking me if Tring was shagging my mother. I told him that she had died not that long before his quip painfully with cancer after a long illness. i.e. I didn't appreciate the comment. His response was to ask if it was ok to refer to my boyfriend or some such words. Now he might think he is hack the lad with a smart mouth but I didn't and still don't.

The above was in response to my ongoing argument with Tring about constant references to Newell and pasoti and anything else that the site is commenting on. Yes I know there is history but given he calls me boring, how boring is it to constantly post the same old same old stuff. I also believe this site has posters, not all, who jump in on a bandwagon just like pasoti users are accused of, and back certain people. They always turn up to add their boot to a put down. The above is one and you Czarcasm are another. It is exactly that of turning out the dogs that is also complained about of the other site. I think Tring is a one post pony with the same references to anyone who isn't slagging off pasoti or Newell by petty name calling. If you don't agree with the comments then you get branded by the hord. It's a good job the word "discussion" isn't in this sites title because often it isn't really allowed.

You think you are different to pasoti? I think you should look at your own site in the mirror. There are some good posters on here. Some even do discuss opinions. They do it without abuse of others or bullying. Some don't seem to know the meaning of the word discussion. I am not and never have been a member of pasoti. I have seen though the responses by some on there to people who don't sing a certain song and have never had any inkling to join it. This site did seem different but once you get into it then it becomes obvious, well to me anyway, that it isn't really any different at all. Some people on pasoti are strang and seem to want to control or whatever how things are done. This site has those as well despite denials and boasts of how different it is.

Thats it I've said my piece and as said it is the last comment I will make.

I'm sorry to come over all 'anorak', but it's at times like this when it's useful having posting history.

Some info for you - The last time I responded to you, or indeed quoted you, was on June 27th, and that was with a 'pot calling the kettle black' picture. (ooh, nasty man eh?) I'm pretty sure that prior to that I kept up my general policy of ignoring your monotonous ramblings, in the main too.

So don't play the victim.

shonbo wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

shonbo wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

shonbo wrote:

SufferedSince68 wrote:

Poor old boring bloke, no friends to bore awww shame, you could always join the farm they are always looking for dull cnuts like you .x

Czar - tell me, what does that add to any discussion or debate?

Well yeah, only i'll take your SS68 quote, and raise you a....

"I stay here just to piss you off fvckwit. Seems like it's working a treat. Any more info on who is shagging mothers?"

(that's from the guy you're applauding)

"BooHoo mummy, the boy I was bullying is punching me back"

SG never starts at that level, he makes his point, which people are free to disagree with (and do) but then wankers like ss86 (whose views I am more closely aligned too) uses fvckwit, tringy calls him boring bloke (thats a laugh) and SG is able to communicate at their level. He gives it back. He doesn't start it.

Its a football web site at the end of the day, however this site prides itself on having free expression and then if you dont toe the majority line, you get slagged off. Pasoti mk2 anyone.

Geeez. Shonbo, as you fully admit, you jump on someone who's views you widely share, 'cos you don't like that person.

I don't not like ss86, but his continuous negative use of fukwit (copyright GOB) etc is just boring and adds nothing



You're not the only one guilty of it, but you really need to play the ball, not the man.

You may think SS68 is a wanker,

Probably overstepped the mark there in all honesty, don't know him, but a lot of his posts imho are wankerish


I'm sure he'll get over that. Pasoti Mk2? Don't be silly. How long do you think a hijack like this would last over there.,

Indeed, I've just stated that - however its a shame that one or two on here can't use a little bit of self responsibility to make it a better site. Then again, if fukwit, cnut are everyday terms for them, they'll get on well with John Terry and Ferdinand I guess.

And for the record, to say that SG doesn't start anything is rather amusing. He's the most argumentative, provocative poster on this site, bar none.

Oh, he starts stuff alright, he has an opinion. But its about argyle which is what this site is here to discuss.

Anyhow, try not to get typecast - someone will try and label you a Sensypoodle otherwise...

[b]

Never heard the term sensypoodle befor and I note the subtle way you haven't called me it, but the innuendo is clear. I'd like you to take that back, just as I now apologise calling ss86 a wanker.

I note, that you have not even attempted to answer the questions I posed to you, and I'm not sure how I'm going to sleep now that you've called me a sensypoodle, probaby crying I guess.

The poodle thing was a little reference to SG trying to label me in one of his earlier rants. So you can sleep easy...

Czarcasm wrote:

Sensiblegreeny wrote:

My final word on the subject and I've no wish for anyone else to become involved in my argument.

My beef with suffersince68 is his foulmouthed response to me previously asking me if Tring was shagging my mother. I told him that she had died not that long before his quip painfully with cancer after a long illness. i.e. I didn't appreciate the comment. His response was to ask if it was ok to refer to my boyfriend or some such words. Now he might think he is hack the lad with a smart mouth but I didn't and still don't.

The above was in response to my ongoing argument with Tring about constant references to Newell and pasoti and anything else that the site is commenting on. Yes I know there is history but given he calls me boring, how boring is it to constantly post the same old same old stuff. I also believe this site has posters, not all, who jump in on a bandwagon just like pasoti users are accused of, and back certain people. They always turn up to add their boot to a put down. The above is one and you Czarcasm are another. It is exactly that of turning out the dogs that is also complained about of the other site. I think Tring is a one post pony with the same references to anyone who isn't slagging off pasoti or Newell by petty name calling. If you don't agree with the comments then you get branded by the hord. It's a good job the word "discussion" isn't in this sites title because often it isn't really allowed.

You think you are different to pasoti? I think you should look at your own site in the mirror. There are some good posters on here. Some even do discuss opinions. They do it without abuse of others or bullying. Some don't seem to know the meaning of the word discussion. I am not and never have been a member of pasoti. I have seen though the responses by some on there to people who don't sing a certain song and have never had any inkling to join it. This site did seem different but once you get into it then it becomes obvious, well to me anyway, that it isn't really any different at all. Some people on pasoti are strang and seem to want to control or whatever how things are done. This site has those as well despite denials and boasts of how different it is.

Thats it I've said my piece and as said it is the last comment I will make.

I'm sorry to come over all 'anorak', but it's at times like this when it's useful having posting history.

Some info for you - The last time I responded to you, or indeed quoted you, was on June 27th, and that was with a 'pot calling the kettle black' picture. (ooh, nasty man eh?) I'm pretty sure that prior to that I kept up my general policy of ignoring your monotonous ramblings, in the main too.

So don't play the victim.

Fair enough Czar, I think he was responding to SS86 and not you and me. I remember that post of yours and wasn't that impressed, pot kettle black, really adds to the debate doesn't it. I felt tonight I should put my oar in as its getting boring and does not imho add to the value of this site. You still haven't responded to any of my questions or points, why?

BTw preparing for bed with a dry pillow

shonbo wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Sensiblegreeny wrote:

My final word on the subject and I've no wish for anyone else to become involved in my argument.

My beef with suffersince68 is his foulmouthed response to me previously asking me if Tring was shagging my mother. I told him that she had died not that long before his quip painfully with cancer after a long illness. i.e. I didn't appreciate the comment. His response was to ask if it was ok to refer to my boyfriend or some such words. Now he might think he is hack the lad with a smart mouth but I didn't and still don't.

The above was in response to my ongoing argument with Tring about constant references to Newell and pasoti and anything else that the site is commenting on. Yes I know there is history but given he calls me boring, how boring is it to constantly post the same old same old stuff. I also believe this site has posters, not all, who jump in on a bandwagon just like pasoti users are accused of, and back certain people. They always turn up to add their boot to a put down. The above is one and you Czarcasm are another. It is exactly that of turning out the dogs that is also complained about of the other site. I think Tring is a one post pony with the same references to anyone who isn't slagging off pasoti or Newell by petty name calling. If you don't agree with the comments then you get branded by the hord. It's a good job the word "discussion" isn't in this sites title because often it isn't really allowed.

You think you are different to pasoti? I think you should look at your own site in the mirror. There are some good posters on here. Some even do discuss opinions. They do it without abuse of others or bullying. Some don't seem to know the meaning of the word discussion. I am not and never have been a member of pasoti. I have seen though the responses by some on there to people who don't sing a certain song and have never had any inkling to join it. This site did seem different but once you get into it then it becomes obvious, well to me anyway, that it isn't really any different at all. Some people on pasoti are strang and seem to want to control or whatever how things are done. This site has those as well despite denials and boasts of how different it is.

Thats it I've said my piece and as said it is the last comment I will make.

I'm sorry to come over all 'anorak', but it's at times like this when it's useful having posting history.

Some info for you - The last time I responded to you, or indeed quoted you, was on June 27th, and that was with a 'pot calling the kettle black' picture. (ooh, nasty man eh?) I'm pretty sure that prior to that I kept up my general policy of ignoring your monotonous ramblings, in the main too.

So don't play the victim.

Fair enough Czar, I think he was responding to SS86 and not you and me. I remember that post of yours and wasn't that impressed, pot kettle black, really adds to the debate doesn't it. I felt tonight I should put my oar in as its getting boring and does not imho add to the value of this site. You still haven't responded to any of my questions or points, why?

BTw preparing for bed with a dry pillow

Erm no, he was refering to me (I've highlighted it)

Right, what questions haven't I responded to?

I think ss86 was primary and you were only secondary.

Original Question

SufferedSince68 wrote:
Poor old boring bloke, no friends to bore awww shame, you could always join the farm they are always looking for dull cnuts like you .x


Czar - tell me, what does that add to any discussion or debate?

You did not answer my question....

You responded, but did not answer!

shonbo wrote:

I think ss86 was primary and you were only secondary.

Original Question

SufferedSince68 wrote:
Poor old boring bloke, no friends to bore awww shame, you could always join the farm they are always looking for dull cnuts like you .x


Czar - tell me, what does that add to any discussion or debate?

You did not answer my question....

You responded, but did not answer!

You're asking the wrong person really aren't you? I'm not his keeper, and I'm not sure he'd need me to be his apologist!

If you're asking my opinion, then I'd say that adding something to a debate isn't, and shouldn't have to be a pre-requisite for ATD. Everyone has a certain style. SS68 certainly has his. Brash, to the point - yeah for sure. Some won't like it - you obviously don't! Others, like myself, have a chuckle at his rants.

Right, need some now...

Cheers mate

shonbo wrote:

Cheers mate

No worries...

Bloody hell. Over the top abuse or what?!

knecht wrote:

Bloody hell. Over the top abuse or what?!

Good day to you knecht

Haha take that

Had to happen sooner or later, actually surprised it tok a whole 7 pages before someone on Pasoti pointed the finger of blame in this direction:

http://www.pasoti.co.uk/talk/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=69594&start=90

Well it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if Newell himself didn't concoct this fella just to have a little bit more drama. If it wasn't Newell then he missed a trick by not having outraged of Plymouth start giving donations to make up for Andy and suddenly the whole of Pasoti miraculously stump up the whole amount, cue dozens of threads from them all saying how it has brought a tear to their eyes, restored their faith in human kind blah blah blah.

Greenjock wrote:

Had to happen sooner or later, actually surprised it tok a whole 7 pages before someone on Pasoti pointed the finger of blame in this direction:

http://www.pasoti.co.uk/talk/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=69594&start=90

Well it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if Newell himself didn't concoct this fella just to have a little bit more drama. If it wasn't Newell then he missed a trick by not having outraged of Plymouth start giving donations to make up for Andy and suddenly the whole of Pasoti miraculously stump up the whole amount, cue dozens of threads from them all saying how it has brought a tear to their eyes, restored their faith in human kind blah blah blah.

It's not at all surprising that someone tried to point the finger at ATD users. And the fact that it's Greenmarc isn't that surprising either. If he'd even bothered to look he'd have seen that our view of this GreenAndy1981 character is, if anything, even more anti- than much of whats been posted on pasoti. And for this bloke to renege on helping St Lukes hospice is a particularly low act. Anyone who's had a relative who's suffered from a terminal illness will know what fantastic work Hospices do; I don't understand the mentality of anyone who would take pleasure from screwing over such an excellent and important local charity.

GHOST, who has risen to prominence since IJN gave up being a mod, but not his admin rights as an owner of the site, was always likely to jump in with his army issue boots as he's a soldier don't you know, and he's keen to make it known that he advocates IJN's involvement with the Private Investigator who was hired by Newell's "friend" to check out where I live.

Just think, the money spent on the P.I. could have gone towards the Hospice as well, but then that isn't as important as tracking me and my mother, which is quite normal behaviour.

Still waiting for The President's view on his best mates behaviour, which he is aware of and was probably sat next to IJN when the "friend" on the GT's coach showed Newell my mothers details, but I won't hold my breath.

Andy_Symons wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Had to happen sooner or later, actually surprised it tok a whole 7 pages before someone on Pasoti pointed the finger of blame in this direction:

http://www.pasoti.co.uk/talk/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=69594&start=90

Well it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if Newell himself didn't concoct this fella just to have a little bit more drama. If it wasn't Newell then he missed a trick by not having outraged of Plymouth start giving donations to make up for Andy and suddenly the whole of Pasoti miraculously stump up the whole amount, cue dozens of threads from them all saying how it has brought a tear to their eyes, restored their faith in human kind blah blah blah.

It's not at all surprising that someone tried to point the finger at ATD users. And the fact that it's Greenmarc isn't that surprising either. If he'd even bothered to look he'd have seen that our view of this GreenAndy1981 character is, if anything, even more anti- than much of whats been posted on pasoti. And for this bloke to renege on helping St Lukes hospice is a particularly low act. Anyone who's had a relative who's suffered from a terminal illness will know what fantastic work Hospices do; I don't understand the mentality of anyone who would take pleasure from screwing over such an excellent and important local charity.

Agreed Andy and if that silly act alone wasn't enough, I find it even more distasteful that one or two on there are attempting to connect Tring to such a disgusting hoax. Tring and me have our differences but to attempt gain brownie points by this attempt of connecting and slurring Tring with this hoax that has nearly been carried out at the expense of St Lukes, is in my opinion at least equal to the foolish and disgusting hoax that occurred in the first place.

I've often said that there's never been an issue with pasoti users generally but I'm starting to change my mind. What sort of sick scum is that site attracting these days!

GOB wrote:

Andy_Symons wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Had to happen sooner or later, actually surprised it tok a whole 7 pages before someone on Pasoti pointed the finger of blame in this direction:

http://www.pasoti.co.uk/talk/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=69594&start=90

Well it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if Newell himself didn't concoct this fella just to have a little bit more drama. If it wasn't Newell then he missed a trick by not having outraged of Plymouth start giving donations to make up for Andy and suddenly the whole of Pasoti miraculously stump up the whole amount, cue dozens of threads from them all saying how it has brought a tear to their eyes, restored their faith in human kind blah blah blah.

It's not at all surprising that someone tried to point the finger at ATD users. And the fact that it's Greenmarc isn't that surprising either. If he'd even bothered to look he'd have seen that our view of this GreenAndy1981 character is, if anything, even more anti- than much of whats been posted on pasoti. And for this bloke to renege on helping St Lukes hospice is a particularly low act. Anyone who's had a relative who's suffered from a terminal illness will know what fantastic work Hospices do; I don't understand the mentality of anyone who would take pleasure from screwing over such an excellent and important local charity.

Agreed Andy and if that silly act alone wasn't enough, I find it even more distasteful that one or two on there are attempting to connect Tring to such a disgusting hoax. Tring and me have our differences but to attempt gain brownie points by this attempt of connecting and slurring Tring with this hoax that has nearly been carried out at the expense of St Lukes, is in my opinion at least equal to the foolish and disgusting hoax that occurred in the first place.

I've often said that there's never been an issue with pasoti users generally but I'm starting to change my mind. What sort of sick scum is that site attracting these days!

Well said GOB

I'd better get my minders sorted for my next visit to Home Park, or even the Cherry Tree lol !
Think I'll go to the Blockhouse with Punchie............ but don't tell anyone.

It seems that I have become so like Newell, that ATD is now just like the farm, I have a gang and I play games at the expense of a cancer charity ffs !

Reminder to self: Stop pulling the strings of Frank , Knecht, Charlie and Ali. It's becoming too obvious that I'm running this forum , after bullying off four previous moderators.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !

ps At least boringbloke has said his last word on the subject........... what was the subject anyway ............. don't ya just luv ATD ? !

I think that's just your wish list Tring

GOB wrote:

I think that's just your wish list Tring

Well, I suppose there's a lot to be said for a benign dictatorship.......................... in the right hands of course.

I reckon we have achieved that, as ably demonstrated by Frank.

Yup, It's just like the old Naps & Ponty partnership

Who was the fat guy that was photographed with the Burberry TCE boys at Exeter? The one who kept blaming a family bereavement for his activities? Just wonder if he uses the word moron a lot, and is who IJN is now pinning the hoax on?

Maybe IJN will explain to his followers that it's this person and not someone from ATD?