Who Owns Pasoti?

Rickler wrote:

 Important ownership information comes to light!!!!  

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I couldn't give a toss about what Newell says about it all.

I know for a genuine, 24 carat fact that Newell was a front man for 3 others. The Pasoti mods probably don't or didn't until now. What I do not know is who they are and have never claimed to although speculating is fun.

I'm not one to normally endorse allegations without some proof, but Newell himself seems to support SFD!  

In this little ditty below, taken from Newell’s own flikr account where Newell is threatening Rick Cowdery over the ATD 'meet and greet',  Newell claims that “all of the co-owners would be very upset”?  Surely he is not going to claim that “all” means just him and Gadd?  This proves he either lied in his email to Rick Cowdery or is currently lying to the readership on Pasoti?  I know where I would put my money...

Regardless...  Someone somewhere, is always being lied to by Newell.

He really has no shame at all.





No wonder the thread was locked on Pasoti...  Hey Greensleeves... You or anyone else got the balls to ask Newell on Pasoti to explain himself?  How about you Rappo?

Somehow I don't think so.

Whilst not wishing to rush to IJN's defence he may not be lying, he may have acquired the other shares in the meantime.

That doesn't jive with the rest of his story....

How hasn't most of this never made the papers ?

because no one else cares

Dane. wrote:

because no one else cares

some of us do, so feck off.

Dane is right nobody else cares. Certainly not the nationals. What story would they go with?
A league 2 club where all manner of things have happened or a man u player who has dressed up like a suicide bomber?

Shit, we can't get local papers in Plymouth to report some of it because they fear... well feck knows what!

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

Dane is right nobody else cares. Certainly not the nationals. What story would they go with?
A league 2 club where all manner of things have happened or a man u player who has dressed up like a suicide bomber?

Shit, we can't get local papers in Plymouth to report some of it because they fear... well feck knows what!

The Herald is too scared to go against the club like some local rags are and they are in Brent's pocket so there is no chance of them reporting on anything of interest

The answer is obvious Nigel. If you remember, Ian owning Pasoti jointly with Gaddy came after the meet and greet, original the mods were joint owners.

Not that you'll believe me of course because it doesn't fit with your conspiracy theories.

So, Gadd made all the mods co owners for free ?

Tringreen wrote:

So, Gadd made all the mods co owners for free ?

I have no idea mate. You'd have to ask Gaddy.

Mrrapson wrote:

The answer is obvious Nigel. If you remember, Ian owning Pasoti jointly with Gaddy came after the meet and greet, original the mods were joint owners.

Not that you'll believe me of course because it doesn't fit with your conspiracy theories.

LOl..

You might want to delete that and try again!

That really is embarrassing.  It really shows your complete lack of knowledge of Pasoti history ( and goes against Newell's version).


Go on...  I dare you to raise the subject on Pasoti!

Rickler wrote:

Mrrapson wrote:

The answer is obvious Nigel. If you remember, Ian owning Pasoti jointly with Gaddy came after the meet and greet, original the mods were joint owners.

Not that you'll believe me of course because it doesn't fit with your conspiracy theories.

LOl..

You might want to delete that and try again!

That really is embarrassing.  It really shows your complete lack of knowledge of Pasoti history ( and goes against Newell's version).


Go on...  I dare you to raise the subject on Pasoti!

Why? As someone said further up, no one cares.

Mrrapson wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Mrrapson wrote:

The answer is obvious Nigel. If you remember, Ian owning Pasoti jointly with Gaddy came after the meet and greet, original the mods were joint owners.

Not that you'll believe me of course because it doesn't fit with your conspiracy theories.

LOl..

You might want to delete that and try again!

That really is embarrassing.  It really shows your complete lack of knowledge of Pasoti history ( and goes against Newell's version).


Go on...  I dare you to raise the subject on Pasoti!

Why? As someone said further up, no one cares.

I think you meant, 'no one dares' ?

Everyone is now fully aware of the webb of deceit and control applied by the    and his chums. It is abundantly clear that you either accept the bullying and deceptions so clearly exposed or you become an enemy and are not a praaaper nodding Aviva.

Tringreen wrote:

So, Gadd made all the mods co owners for free ?

No he did not. Nothing of the sort ever happened.

Does it matter, we all know the score, apart from warning others, nothing we say or do will make any difference.

Here's an interesting stat for you. We were talking to people around us on Saturday. 8 of them. 2 had heard of Pasoti and none had heard of atd. 3 of them had no idea who webby was. Just re-enforces the point that except for the minority on the websites no one cares.

pepsipete wrote:

Does it matter, we all know the score, apart from warning others, nothing we say or do will make any difference.  

That doesn't mean we should say nothing. That's what they want. What they demand. If the control freaks are allowed free rein to rewrite history they will succeed and the axis of self interest will continue unchallenged.
Largely through the disclosures emanating from ATD , a far greater number of supporters, some articulate and high profile, are now questioning the motives of the usual suspects and the reluctant one.

It must continue.

Who high profile? Name one high profile person on this site?

Mrrapson wrote:

Who high profile? Name one high profile person on this site?

Leigh Rapson

Chemical Ali wrote:

Mrrapson wrote:

Who high profile? Name one high profile person on this site?

Leigh Rapson

Checkmate   

Mrrapson wrote:

Here's an interesting stat for you. We were talking to people around us on Saturday. 8 of them. 2 had heard of Pasoti and none had heard of atd. 3 of them had no idea who webby was. Just re-enforces the point that except for the minority on the websites no one cares.

The seeming fact that the majority of the fanbase have little idea of what is going on within the club, makes it all the easier for a few to get away with whatever they like, no matter how damaging it is to the club.
That's why I suggested the trust should be playing more shots like handing out leaflets at matches, in an attempt to educate the masses as to the issues so vital to the future of PAFC.

Chemical Ali wrote:

Mrrapson wrote:

Who high profile? Name one high profile person on this site?

Leigh Rapson

Hahaha, I wish. Sadly I'm a nobody and I know it.

You do sponsor Banton though!

The Herald doesn't "fear" Brent any more than all the other previous PAFC owners.
These local rags just represent local businesses of which PAFC have a reasonably high profile. That's where their network and profit margins are, local business, if they indeed have a margin these days. It's why nobody, including Nool's Pasoti, spoke up when everyone and their dog was whispering of the 200K or 300K losses per month Todd and Gardner were racking up. I would add that those of us who spoke out against the Argyle Todd era were not looked on kindly by Pasoti moderators. Says it all, and where they wannabe. They won't get there. Forums are yesterday's chip paper. Things move on and existing traditional mass media outlets are pushing Twitter. Forums and email allowed far too much uncensored input for their liking. Twitter is easy to control.

What the Herald has always specialised in is either the odd "good news" PAFC or ANOther building development or massive front page spreads of the latest unwashed woman who has defrauded a bank  out of a few hundred quid. Apparently that deserves special attention and is earth shattering news. I haven't bought it in 10 years, but laughed when I saw my friend's copy on her table this week. Same old crap, another full page photo of another ne'er do well. Modern day stocks. Poor bashing has always sold papers. I get the Positive News myself, once a quarter. Fine paper, nothing but good news. Not a lot of mentions for Argyle. 

Chemical Ali wrote:

You do sponsor Banton though!

I certainly do. I also sponsored the first and second rounds of the fa cup.