WEB CAMs WATCH

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

Seen a lot worse than that.

Yes tongue in cheek but it is a complete shambles. Over the course of the week I watched the Cams when they could be bothered to activate them and theres absolutely sod all going on.  If you look at Cam 1 all thats happened in what 3 months since the roof came off is the appearance of these rakers. Complete lack of workers says it all.

Am guessing they are laid off when they run out of money and they have to wait until each next home match for a cash boost. Just under 4 weeks Bungo claimed steels were going up on the Grandstand in 2 weeks time. All I see is trash lying around 24/7

I've seen much worse as well Mouldy but it's just good working practice and pride in the job. Builders have to carry lots of things around, where is the walkway in that shot? Not only that but an unmarked hole, coils of pipe and odd lumps of masonry lying around is just asking for an accident. I would have a labourer tasked with tidying the shite up and keeping it tidy.

Webcam 2 deserted
Webcam 3 one bloke on a cherry picker and 2 geezers around a skip doing sod all.

Jon Back we know you read this come on here and explain why we can screenshot view after view with sod all happening. You should have 50 guys on that site at least

Why is this taking 2 years to complete (at least) compared to 6 months for the entire other 3 sides ??

WHY  ??

Good luck with that, he can't even be bothered to reply to Graham Clarks reasonable query on a forum where he actually posts

Hugh Watt wrote:

Good luck with that, he can't even be bothered to reply to Graham Clarks reasonable query on a forum where he actually posts

I'd forgotten about that. Obviously at time of your post he hadnt bothered responding then
Perhaps some of Newells dribbling avivas are not quite so thick after all as you got one of Deliars Multis answering and GCs question and errr thats it

harvetheslayer wrote:

Hugh Watt wrote:

Good luck with that, he can't even be bothered to reply to Graham Clarks reasonable query on a forum where he actually posts

I'd forgotten about that. Obviously at time of your post he hadnt bothered responding then
Perhaps some of Newells dribbling avivas are not quite so thick after all as you got one of Deliars Multis answering and GCs question and errr thats it

Just gone 5pm and no reply from Bungo to Graham Clark.

Hugh Watt wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

Hugh Watt wrote:

Good luck with that, he can't even be bothered to reply to Graham Clarks reasonable query on a forum where he actually posts

I'd forgotten about that. Obviously at time of your post he hadnt bothered responding then
Perhaps some of Newells dribbling avivas are not quite so thick after all as you got one of Deliars Multis answering and GCs question and errr thats it

Just gone 5pm and no reply from Bungo to Graham Clark.

Bungo's not answering awkward questions about the Mankover, but if you asked him who his favourite Spice girl was he would reply straight away.

Hugh Watt wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

Hugh Watt wrote:

Good luck with that, he can't even be bothered to reply to Graham Clarks reasonable query on a forum where he actually posts

I'd forgotten about that. Obviously at time of your post he hadnt bothered responding then
Perhaps some of Newells dribbling avivas are not quite so thick after all as you got one of Deliars Multis answering and GCs question and errr thats it

Just gone 5pm and no reply from Bungo to Graham Clark.

He's far too busy pratting around trying to give the impression he actually knows what he's doing. If he gave a reply right away it'd give away the fact he spends most of his day refreshing Pasoti.

Then Bungo wonders why he gets a lack of respect in return,

Maybe he hasn't replied to Graham's question because he doesn't know the answer.

Dingle wrote:

Maybe he hasn't replied to Graham's question because he doesn't know the answer.  

He could earn himself a grain of respect , from those who don't respect him, If He just came out and admitted he doesn't know the answer.

You are reading this or have been made aware of a screenshot of this.

Do you know the answer or are you just hoping you can ignore it and it will go away?

Close to 48 hours since GC asked the question and despite Back being a media animal he's incapable of answering a very simple question
Cmon Back what are you hiding once again....??

Whilst I can agree that doubling the workforce does not necessarily halve construction time, reading the Herald this morning and there's currently 150 workers onsite at the British Land Bretonside development.

Dingle wrote:

Maybe he hasn't replied to Graham's question because he doesn't know the answer.  

Maybe he could, y'know, find someone that does know the answer?

Hugh Watt wrote:

Dingle wrote:

Maybe he hasn't replied to Graham's question because he doesn't know the answer.  

Maybe he could, y'know, find someone that does know the answer?

He's the project manager Hugh if he doesnt know Gawd help us. Useless asking quivering lip he couldnt give a flying feck. Perhaps we should ask Darren GOS favourite employee. Comes to something when theres so few on site that they know their names

Dingle wrote:

Maybe he hasn't replied to Graham's question because he doesn't know the answer.  

Comically, this probably isn’t too far from the truth.

I think he genuinely believes that talking in riddles is enough to bamboozle your average yokel Janner. Which in a large number of cases is of course true.

harvetheslayer wrote:

Close to 48 hours since GC asked the question and despite Back being a media animal he's incapable of answering a very simple question
Cmon Back what are you hiding once again....??

A good example of Si's new age of transparency. Maybe the information is too "sensitive" lol.

10am on a weekday

Deserted just a complete joke Jon Back

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Why did the project manager even mention 'rather expensive but very effective new water proofing system that will be applied to the first few rows of the upper tier' if he didn't know what it was.

Dingle wrote:

Why did the project manager even mention  'rather expensive but very effective new water proofing system that will be applied to the first few rows of the upper tier' if he didn't know what it was.

Suspect the answer is simply that Back and his hapless crew have finally realised that the roof being constructed was not fit for purpose and in light of that some additional perspex extension is being put in place to stop certain seats getting soaked

All 3 WC's have just died!

Repossessed.....

P.O.I wrote:

All 3 WC's have just died!

Reserve game wasn't it might be back on now

or not

Jethro wrote:

P.O.I wrote:

All 3 WC's have just died!

Reserve game wasn't it might be back on now

or not

Ah. Of course. Cheers Jefro.

If you look at the horizontal extensions now which I presume will be below the actual roof it appears to jut out to the front of the Mayflower seating....??  Or certainly close to it

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]