Harry Burgoyne

Punchdrunk wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

zyph wrote:

Don't argue TT....SS68 and his kind know best...mustn't contradict the theme of scepticism and hate.

No hate involved Troll, by the way why do you troll Argyle Forums you have not been to Homepark for thirty years? Find a team in Kent to latch onto.

I think I might give not606.com another visit.

Geddon bhey

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

zyph wrote:

Don't argue TT....SS68 and his kind know best...mustn't contradict the theme of scepticism and hate.

No hate involved Troll, by the way why do you troll Argyle Forums you have not been to Homepark for thirty years? Find a team in Kent to latch onto.

What's 30 years got to do with it? Many of the anti-JB brigade haven't been to HP for years (if you believe what they say) and they post on here.

Surley getting an England U21 keeper in on loan is good news? I think hell be our numer 1 this season

Big Robby wrote:

Surley getting an England U21 keeper in on loan is good news? I think hell be our numer 1 this season

Why take a chance on an unproven youngster when with ten thousand fans, player transfer fees, Argyle could afford to buy a quality keeper if not perhaps Brent and Hallet, could explain whats happened to the money?

Matthews was a loan from Norwich last season and was by far the best keeper we had all season

Harry Burgoyne has played 8 or 9 times for the first team....he will be a good catch for Argyle....Derek Adams as come good again.

It's quite obvious Austerity Argo will not be paying fees for anyone to anyone in the transfer market as long as the current owner and board still influence PAFC

BRENT OUT

akagreengull wrote:

It's quite obvious Austerity Argo will not be paying fees for anyone to anyone in the transfer market as long as the current owner and board still influence PAFC

BRENT OUT

lets be fair its not like wolves need the money is it....

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

zyph wrote:

Don't argue TT....SS68 and his kind know best...mustn't contradict the theme of scepticism and hate.

No hate involved Troll, by the way why do you troll Argyle Forums you have not been to Homepark for thirty years? Find a team in Kent to latch onto.

I suspect the reason Zyph post here is the same as yours, he has an opinion, the D in ATD does stand for democratic doesn’t it ?

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Big Robby wrote:

Surley getting an England U21 keeper in on loan is good news? I think hell be our numer 1 this season

Why take a chance on an unproven youngster when with ten thousand fans, player transfer fees, Argyle could afford to buy a quality keeper if not perhaps Brent and Hallet, could explain whats happened to the money?

Do you have a keeper in mind ?

tigertony wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

zyph wrote:

Don't argue TT....SS68 and his kind know best...mustn't contradict the theme of scepticism and hate.

No hate involved Troll, by the way why do you troll Argyle Forums you have not been to Homepark for thirty years? Find a team in Kent to latch onto.

What's 30 years got to do with it? Many of the anti-JB brigade haven't been to HP for years (if you believe what they say) and they post on here.

I've got a grand to lay down that says I've been to more games at HP than you have.

The problem which I highlighted earlier on is if Burgoyne turns out to be the real deal (as I think he will) he will be straight back to Wolves jostling for the no 1 shirt, just like Remi Matthews probably will be for Norwich after his successful loan spell with us.
If this proves so then this time next season it's back to square 1 again,the long term plan for Goalkeepers seems to be to get them in on loan purely to stop us spending money to have one of our own.

Absolutely Punchy, regular ten thousand crowds last season, but apparently no money and certainly no ambition (dare I say it) to pay a fee for a decent goalie and invest in future team building.
Brent doesn't care if it's back to square one, because the faithful remain eternally thankful and won't question his motives.

I was hoping Argyle would have signed a keeper for good, rather than go for a loan.

Punchdrunk wrote:

The problem which I highlighted earlier on is if Burgoyne turns out to be the real deal (as I think he will) he will be straight back to Wolves jostling for the no 1 shirt, just like Remi Matthews probably will be for Norwich after his successful loan spell with us.
If this proves so then this time next season it's back to square 1 again,the long term plan for Goalkeepers seems to be to get them in on loan purely to stop us spending money to have one of our own.

That's the way throughout the team though, isn't it?

Our churn rate for players is massive compared to what it used to be. I wonder how we compare with the others in the division?

Wholesale player changes every season is a strange methodology for a regime that says it wants to build a club. Maybe players aren't considered part of that equation, just mercenaries to please the seated ones. Wouldn't be the first time.

Sour grapes all over the place from the regulars.

Maybe Adams thinking is that another year or so and Michael Cooper will be his No1....so he keeps finding good loan keepers until that time arrives.

zyph wrote:

Sour grapes all over the place from the regulars.

Maybe Adams thinking is that another year or so and Michael Cooper will be his No1....so he keeps finding good loan keepers until that time arrives.

Why do you have to get a sly dig in on every single post you make?
What's your problem?

zyph wrote:

Sour grapes all over the place from the regulars.

Maybe Adams thinking is that another year or so and Michael Cooper will be his No1....so he keeps finding good loan keepers until that time arrives.

Troll, You dont go you haven't been to Homepark in thirty years! No one could ever accuse you of being a regular.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


Plymbore

Cutting edge debate.

I used to frequent not 606 a short while ago albeit for a short period of time.

Not 606 is frequented by Sensible Greeny and his mate on here Plymbore (Zyph).

I tried to reason with them a few years ago on their own not606 forum and I was banned within an hour which kind of makes a mockery about the whinges of Graisers and Zyph spurious claims of ATD being non democratic and bullying.

Punchdrunk wrote:

I used to frequent not 606 a short while ago albeit for a short period of time.

Not 606 is frequented by Sensible Greeny and his mate on here Plymbore (Zyph).

I tried to reason with them a few years ago on their own not606 forum and I was banned within an hour which kind of makes a mockery about the whinges of Graisers and Zyph spurious claims of ATD being non democratic and bullying.  

You got thrown off by a not606 supermod...who knew what you were about.

zyph wrote:

Punchdrunk wrote:

I used to frequent not 606 a short while ago albeit for a short period of time.

Not 606 is frequented by Sensible Greeny and his mate on here Plymbore (Zyph).

I tried to reason with them a few years ago on their own not606 forum and I was banned within an hour which kind of makes a mockery about the whinges of Graisers and Zyph spurious claims of ATD being non democratic and bullying.  

You got thrown off by a not606 supermod...who knew what you were about.

By doing exactly the same thing that you do on here.