Stickergate banning

Surprise it have made the Herald, How come the Herald can use a photo of another incident nothing to do with this. The person in the picture could have been a innocent of any wrong doing.

Hitch wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Hitch wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Angry wrote:

How is it fraud? do the club sell Brent out stickers too and the design infridges on their design? do they own the copyright to eeee saved usss

The sticker thing is a sideshow. The club are trying to say that Punchy used his carers ST fraudulently, which technically, it might be. But if that is fraud, then so is Pasoti giving out individual match day tickets from ONE season ticket to different people.

Bottom line us they’re laughably trying to use a technicality to ban someone who low and behold just happens to be an anti-Brent ATDer.

Will Back, be clamping down on Nools ticket abuse? lol will he fcvk!

I can't stand the pathological liar and his years of hypocritical cyber bullying and abuse but there is a world of difference in a paid for, club sanctioned, promotion of giving tickets away on the farm and Punchy using a carer's ticket improperly. Punchy needs hard evidence that he was targeted prior to the ticket discovery. Is there any?

Harve said he has messenger messages from somebody connected to the club confirming it was all planned.

Ahhh but what was the original plan? To expose the ticket concession 'fraud' or confront him about stickergate?

99.9% the stickers. Backs fallen on his feet with the additional stuff. Not only that the targets are "they" not one single person. When I asked "so clearly the club can identify people from their real names and seat numbers from season tickets"  (if they can link avatar name to real name or from FB) the answer predictably came back as "of course"
From comments this morning its pretty clear the club are not happy this has the hit front page of the herald and would rather nip in the bud......wankers shouldnt have jumped the gun and put it on the club site
Its all too obvious where this is going to go next nailed on. Draw your own conclusions as regards Punchys former career

Hitch wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Angry wrote:

How is it fraud? do the club sell Brent out stickers too and the design infridges on their design? do they own the copyright to eeee saved usss

The sticker thing is a sideshow. The club are trying to say that Punchy used his carers ST fraudulently, which technically, it might be. But if that is fraud, then so is Pasoti giving out individual match day tickets from ONE season ticket to different people.

Bottom line us they’re laughably trying to use a technicality to ban someone who low and behold just happens to be an anti-Brent ATDer.

Will Back, be clamping down on Nools ticket abuse? lol will he fcvk!

I can't stand the pathological liar and his years of hypocritical cyber bullying and abuse but there is a world of difference in a paid for, club sanctioned, promotion of giving tickets away on the farm and Punchy using a carer's ticket improperly. Punchy needs hard evidence that he was targeted prior to the ticket discovery. Is there any?

Well it would seem the most likely scenario is ...

1) I take it Punchy posted a pic of a BrentOut sticker? Someone is monitoring the Freechat site and has flagged it to Jon Back. Jon Back will know names/faces etc of prominent Anti-Brent Facebook Freechat posters - that is an absolute given, and he has then marched over and got Punchy kicked out be the stewards. Now, in the process of him getting kicked out thy have taken his season ticket and realised that Punchy is in the ground without the person he is the carer for.

This is the jackpot for Jon Back/PAFC, because they then don't have to appear as petty as to be kicking someone out for putting a sticker down. They can then claim that it is all about the supposed 'de-frauding' due to Punchy being in the ground, without having to mention anything as trivial as a BrentOut sticker.

By the pig master  he lied to get fans extra tickets for the Liverpool home game. I know one person he lied for received six extra.

Czarcasm wrote:

Hitch wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Angry wrote:

How is it fraud? do the club sell Brent out stickers too and the design infridges on their design? do they own the copyright to eeee saved usss

The sticker thing is a sideshow. The club are trying to say that Punchy used his carers ST fraudulently, which technically, it might be. But if that is fraud, then so is Pasoti giving out individual match day tickets from ONE season ticket to different people.

Bottom line us they’re laughably trying to use a technicality to ban someone who low and behold just happens to be an anti-Brent ATDer.

Will Back, be clamping down on Nools ticket abuse? lol will he fcvk!

I can't stand the pathological liar and his years of hypocritical cyber bullying and abuse but there is a world of difference in a paid for, club sanctioned, promotion of giving tickets away on the farm and Punchy using a carer's ticket improperly. Punchy needs hard evidence that he was targeted prior to the ticket discovery. Is there any?

Well it would seem the most likely scenario is ...

1) I take it Punchy posted a pic of a BrentOut sticker? Someone is monitoring the Freechat site and has flagged it to Jon Back. Jon Back will know names/faces etc of prominent Anti-Brent Facebook Freechat posters - that is an absolute given, and he has then marched over and got Punchy kicked out be the  stewards. Now, in the process of him getting kicked out thy have taken his season ticket and realised that Punchy is in the ground without the person he is the carer for.

This is the jackpot for Jon Back/PAFC, because they then don't have to appear as petty as to be kicking someone out for putting a sticker down. They can then claim that it is all about the supposed 'de-frauding' due to Punchy being in the ground, without having to mention anything as trivial as a BrentOut sticker.

Nailed it in one....

I feel vindicated for not using FB again, not only does it not work well as a forum but it is Porkies dream to have all that personal information on tap for him to abuse, whilst you all gaily share all your latest match photos linked to your family, friends and work dark forces are busily copying and pasting into folders for future use. Employers use FB as the go to tool in all sorts of manners as do the police and government agencies, why do you think Newell avoids FB like the plague?

From PAFC Site '2017-18 MEMBERSHIPS - TERMS AND CONDITIONS
All Membership sales are non-transferrable and non-refundable'

Yet posters on the farm claiming unchallenged that you can pass your ticket to a mate if you cant attend, just how much fraud is that vile site condoning.....

PatDunne wrote:

From PAFC Site '2017-18 MEMBERSHIPS - TERMS AND CONDITIONS
All Membership sales are non-transferrable and non-refundable'

Yet posters on the farm claiming unchallenged that you can pass your ticket to a mate if you cant attend, just how much fraud is that vile site condoning.....

The ticket abuse on pasoti under Nool/Greenman has been going on for years, why hasn't the club secretary acted to ban Nool/Greenman? or is it if you are fully supportive of all things Brent and hand over "donations" to Brent they will ignore it?

So....in the video on FB taken by Punchy during his confrontation with Jon Back, Back speaks to Punchy and refers to him using his proper first name - Neil. How did Back know what Punchy's real name was? Do they have history? Did Punchy volunteer his name seconds before the clip was taken or did Back know his target? Hmmmm

Hitch wrote:

So....in the video on FB taken by Punchy during his confrontation with Jon Back, Back speaks to Punchy and refers to him using his proper first name - Neil. How did Back know what Punchy's real name was? Do they have history? Did Punchy volunteer his name seconds before the clip was taken or did Back know his target? Hmmmm

Who's sad enough to moniter the internet twenty four seven? we know where Back got his information.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Hitch wrote:

So....in the video on FB taken by Punchy during his confrontation with Jon Back, Back speaks to Punchy and refers to him using his proper first name - Neil. How did Back know what Punchy's real name was? Do they have history? Did Punchy volunteer his name seconds before the clip was taken or did Back know his target? Hmmmm

Who's sad enough to moniter the internet twenty four seven? we know where Back got his information.

Yes - but to hit back hard you have to prove it.

The first of many bans I would think - quite shocking developments over the last 24 hours.

Blimey, there seems to be some creepy people associated with Argo. And for no other reason that I can see apart from wanting brent to get rich seemingly at the expense of Argo, completely unopposed. One day brent will be gone and his entourage will be gone. Then we'll have our club back. And I can go back to supporting Argo at HP again.

harvetheslayer wrote:

Elias wrote:

Any moron can advise the result after the event.

lol is that aimed at me for some reason....??

Aimed at your 'source' yes

PatDunne wrote:

From PAFC Site '2017-18 MEMBERSHIPS - TERMS AND CONDITIONS
All Membership sales are non-transferrable and non-refundable'

Yet posters on the farm claiming unchallenged that you can pass your ticket to a mate if you cant attend, just how much fraud is that vile site condoning.....

Think itll be hard to defend.........

Earwegoagain wrote:

I feel vindicated for not using FB again, not only does it not work well as a forum but it is Porkies dream to have all that personal information on tap for him to abuse, whilst you all gaily share all your latest match photos linked to your family, friends and work dark forces are busily copying and pasting into folders for future use. Employers use FB as the go to tool in all sorts of manners as do the police and government agencies, why do you think Newell avoids FB like the plague?

The perfect dossier builder, no effort required

Newell just had his arse handed to him once again by Mark Jenkin

"Well you keep on claiming you never read the other site (ATD Freechat) so perhaps you could ignore it.
I'm not taking sides, I've no interest, but it's getting tiresome when anybody with an opinion on the direction of the club is tarred as an arselicker (by them) or in a cabal by you"

Czarcasm wrote:

Hitch wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Angry wrote:

How is it fraud? do the club sell Brent out stickers too and the design infridges on their design? do they own the copyright to eeee saved usss

The sticker thing is a sideshow. The club are trying to say that Punchy used his carers ST fraudulently, which technically, it might be. But if that is fraud, then so is Pasoti giving out individual match day tickets from ONE season ticket to different people.

Bottom line us they’re laughably trying to use a technicality to ban someone who low and behold just happens to be an anti-Brent ATDer.

Will Back, be clamping down on Nools ticket abuse? lol will he fcvk!

I can't stand the pathological liar and his years of hypocritical cyber bullying and abuse but there is a world of difference in a paid for, club sanctioned, promotion of giving tickets away on the farm and Punchy using a carer's ticket improperly. Punchy needs hard evidence that he was targeted prior to the ticket discovery. Is there any?

Well it would seem the most likely scenario is ...

1) I take it Punchy posted a pic of a BrentOut sticker? Someone is monitoring the Freechat site and has flagged it to Jon Back. Jon Back will know names/faces etc of prominent Anti-Brent Facebook Freechat posters - that is an absolute given, and he has then marched over and got Punchy kicked out be the  stewards. Now, in the process of him getting kicked out thy have taken his season ticket and realised that Punchy is in the ground without the person he is the carer for.

This is the jackpot for Jon Back/PAFC, because they then don't have to appear as petty as to be kicking someone out for putting a sticker down. They can then claim that it is all about the supposed 'de-frauding' due to Punchy being in the ground, without having to mention anything as trivial as a BrentOut sticker.

Spot on, Punchy posts a piccy of the sticker on Freechat at 2.48pm, 15 mins later i get a phonecall from Punchy saying he's been asked to leave.

Shithole of a club

With a shit owner.

Nool claiming to a victim the same nool that sends a white feather to an argyle fan dying of cancer.
If you support Brent or not, Nool is a scumbag on any level.

To everyone, when posting your comments please be mindful there is a police investigation regarding the incident at yesterday's match.
Any comments that cause an issue will be removed. Thanks.

Statement from Ian Newell Pasotimods. Trying real hard to deflect any criticism from the Brentorian Gestapo Guard. It's obvious that Punchy was targeted for being a vile Brent abuser. How did Back and the stewards know punch was using a disabled carers ticket if it went scanned? He was targeted for the sticker then the ticket issue came to light. The police won't be interested in this, I reckon he will get a ban from club, that's it.

Earwegoagain wrote:

To everyone, when posting your comments please be mindful there is a police investigation regarding the incident at yesterday's match.
Any comments that cause an issue will be removed. Thanks.

Statement from Ian Newell Pasotimods. Trying real hard to deflect any criticism from the Brentorian Gestapo Guard. It's obvious that Punchy was targeted for being a vile Brent abuser. How did Back and the stewards know punch was using a disabled carers ticket if it went scanned? He was targeted for the sticker then the ticket issue came to light. The police won't be interested in this, I reckon he will get a ban from club, that's it.

If the Police get involved because Back is an ex cop, they should be investigated!

All I can imagine the police saying is: "why are you bothering us with this?"

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Hitch wrote:

I'd be fascinated to hear the full banning story. When was the sticker put up? Who reported the discovery? With what mandate did Jon Back issue a lifetime ban to a season ticket holder? Was there an official warning? Any previous? etc

Argyle fans being banned by Brent lackeys like Back is disgraceful, just because they want a better Argyle than Six miserable years of Brentonomics have provided ???    Get out of our club Brent.

Spot on there.

I happened to bump into Mr Back last week after the Fleetwood match.
He did look rather sheepish, not his usual warm, welcoming self.
I suppose as I post on here and know a few of the 'Top Brass' of Sticker HQ, my name could well be on the list, maybe not as a major player, but as an irritant.
Could well be an interesting Autumn/Winter (of discontent).