Rate Porkies latest meltdown.

Nool must be very upset about the split in the fan base as he has done so much over the years to unify it.

I was reading the frothing over there just now and my missus asked me "what are you so happy about?" it's feckin amusing watching it all unfold. Seeing the words cabal, noisy few, don't live in Plymouth ect....funny as fook.
Apparently Nool used to like the AFT until he realised it couldn't be bullied (feck knows he's tried and is still trying to bully the trust). Who gives a fook whether Newell supports something or not? I would have thought that Newell lending support to any fans group would have any normal fans running for cover and leaving in droves.
Brent fecked up by not applying for planning on the Grandstand refurb on its own I certainly wouldn't have objected to it. The man is totally incompetent.

Has he fecked up ? It all depends on whether he has called the politics and desperation right. That will trump the technicalities. Who would have thought UKIP would have tucked in under the Tory Plymouth flag in the last couple of weeks, fearing a rout in May. And there is a long drawn out process of permissions to follow. We shall see.
I must say, I don't share the optimism on here for the HHP part of the park. Hope I'm wrong of course. I keep myself to other areas of the park these days, far too noisy by the Life centre hub/Argyle, not what I want from a park, no different than a business park.

beesrus wrote:

Has he fecked up ? It all depends on whether he has called the politics and desperation right. That will trump the technicalities. Who would have thought UKIP would have tucked in under the Tory Plymouth flag in the last couple of weeks, fearing a rout in May. And there is a long drawn out process of permissions to follow. We shall see.
I must say, I don't share the optimism on here for the HHP part of the park. Hope I'm wrong of course. I keep myself to other areas of the park these days, far too noisy by the Life centre hub/Argyle, not what I want from a park, no different than a business park.

Agreed, sadly todays 'servile consumer' wants a park where they can buy an expensive cup of coffee in a paper cup and do some eating, the idea of parks being grass, trees, flowers, well that's just daft.

beesrus wrote:

Has he fecked up ? It all depends on whether he has called the politics and desperation right.

Obviously time will tell, but it'll be very, very difficult for the planning committee (or whoever makes the decision) to ignore the submissions from the Highways Agency, the environment people and the issue of the ACV. No matter what else has been said / gone on, those three things will probably swing it (and it's possible there could be more such things between now and then)

He's fecked up by lumping it together Bees. 3 reasons why, parking which is a huge obstacle unless he adds a couple of million quid to build the original underground car aprk for 360 cars at HHP, the ACV (not sure about how much weight this carries and runs out in ]2021) but the Central Park Area Action Plan I think could be a huge hurdle as well, this is the framework put in place by the council no less, so they are bound to follow it and this scheme doesn't.

Post subject: Re: AFT statement on HHP development and **new update 19th S

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:25 pm  



Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:15 pm
Location: The Janner Nation!!  

Anyone who knows me Pete (including you) know I've never slavishly adhered to any bugger.

The reason why I feel like playing the man not the ball is because of people like you, Webby, Graham, Lee etc etc. The AFT used to be a great thing belong to, now it's a joke of a Trust.

As for 'constitutional rights' codswallop mate, that's their rules not the everyday Argyle fan that wants to support PAFC.


So many lols, Stapleton? Brent? and the trust WAS great when it supported Brent wasn't it pig. .

If Brent planned on building a puppy incinerator on the fecking centre circle his band of goons would still back it. They don't support Argyle. They support Brent.

PatDunne wrote:

Post subject: Re: AFT statement on HHP development and **new update 19th S

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:25 pm  



Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:15 pm
Location: The Janner Nation!!  

Anyone who knows me Pete (including you) know I've never slavishly adhered to any bugger.

The reason why I feel like playing the man not the ball is because of people like you, Webby, Graham, Lee etc etc. The AFT used to be a great thing belong to, now it's a joke of a Trust.

As for 'constitutional rights' codswallop mate, that's their rules not the everyday Argyle fan that wants to support PAFC.


So many lols, Stapleton? Brent? and the trust WAS great when it supported Brent wasn't it pig. .

Anyone who knows me knows i love Jb and only Jb, the Trust was great when it loved Jb as much as me me and Jb xx.

Earwegoagain wrote:

He's fecked up by lumping it together Bees. 3 reasons why, parking which is a huge obstacle unless he adds a couple of million quid to build the original underground car aprk for 360 cars at HHP, the ACV (not sure about how much weight this carries and runs out in ]2021) but the Central Park Area Action Plan I think could be a huge hurdle as well, this is the framework put in place by the council no less, so they are bound to follow it and this scheme doesn't.

Also in the mix, though, is the council know the old works depot and other stapleton/cricket ground land is going to come into the equation shortly, with talk of ahem ! football academies among god knows what these days. Those negotiations are ongoing now, and of course involve Argyle and ex-Argyle. All these things are inter related.. There could be extra park and ride parking squashed in there alongside whatever is envisaged, taking pressure off the life centre/ice rink arena, and the darling office space.

Pavillions is pivotal too both for Brent and his £5.5m and the council so they can tart up that end of town, like you say throw in an academy or two on the old depot and there could be misery for us fans for years to come.

Frank Bullitt wrote:

If Brent planned on building a puppy incinerator on the fecking centre circle his band of goons would still back it. They don't support Argyle. They support Brent.

It's unbelievable to read all that crap, the "antis" as anybody that dares to discuss the plans is now known as and lets not forget the "cabal" which includes about ten people who coincidentally are some of the most reasoned and intelligent Argyle fans out there and they are getting it big time purely for having a point of view, if the thick twat hadnt banned them all from JBSOTI he could have controlled them much better but then thinking isnt his strong point is it?
They have zero arguments on how this is good for Argyle because there aren't any. First of all it was the mantra that HHP was paying for Argyle to develop the stand, now that argument has been kicked into the long grass we are left with, antis, these sort of people, people that don't live in Plymouth with zero argument about why it benefits anybody other than Brent.
Newell and his jamboys are seriously feckin deluded if they think Brent will remember them when he's gone, the first thing he will do after signing on the dotted line is delete and block Porkies number, I can't wait for that day to come.

Earwegoagain wrote:

Frank Bullitt wrote:

If Brent planned on building a puppy incinerator on the fecking centre circle his band of goons would still back it. They don't support Argyle. They support Brent.

It's unbelievable to read all that crap, the "antis" as anybody that dares to discuss the plans is now known as and lets not forget the "cabal" which includes about ten people who coincidentally are some of the most reasoned and intelligent Argyle fans out there and they are getting it big time purely for having a point of view, if the thick twat hadnt banned them all from JBSOTI he could have controlled them much better but then thinking isnt his strong point is it?
They have zero arguments on how this is good for Argyle because there aren't any. First of all it was the mantra that HHP was paying for Argyle to develop the stand, now that argument has been kicked into the long grass we are left with, antis, these sort of people, people that don't live in Plymouth with zero argument about why it benefits anybody other than Brent.
Newell and his jamboys are seriously feckin deluded if they think Brent will remember them when he's gone, the first thing he will do after signing on the dotted line is delete and block Porkies number, I can't wait for that day to come.

The argument to defend brent for them is just to shout the same crap louder.

To be fair, Porkies meltdown is nothing in comparison to Quizmike's hissy fit. It's quite spectacular.

Frank Bullitt wrote:

To be fair, Porkies meltdown is nothing in comparison to Quizmike's hissy fit. It's quite spectacular.

worth popping over the road to rubbber neck is it ?

Non member of the Trust Quzzical Commie Mike is FURIOUS!

Frank Bullitt wrote:

If Brent planned on building a puppy incinerator on the fecking centre circle his band of goons would still back it. They don't support Argyle. They support Brent.

And have you noticed, Porky has spent the whole time wittering on about conspiracies, murky individuals operating in the shadows, sinister cabals controlling the AFT from afar....he's not said a word about the actual planning application. I wonder if he'll take his tinfoil hat off for long enough to give us some serious, considered views about the actual planning app?

Nah, of course he won't, that's not in the job description for Brent's Chief Attack Dog.

Surely one of the two four storey buildings is going to block the view of the sea, though?

Earwegoagain wrote:

Non member of the Trust Quzzical Commie Mike is FURIOUS!

Notice none of the Attack nerds would pass Knobbers proper Janner test, unless London Kent Sussex and Cornwall, is now part of Plimuff.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Non member of the Trust Quzzical Commie Mike is FURIOUS!

Notice none of the Attack nerds would pass Knobbers proper Janner test, unless London Kent Sussex and Cornwall, is now part of Plimuff.

Even "lifelong" Plymothian attack pig himself wasn't actually born in Plymouth was he

Yea Man wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Non member of the Trust Quzzical Commie Mike is FURIOUS!

Notice none of the Attack nerds would pass Knobbers proper Janner test, unless London Kent Sussex and Cornwall, is now part of Plimuff.

Even "lifelong" Plymothian attack pig himself wasn't actually born in Plymouth was he

I thought the Janner King was born next to the Dockyard Siren in full Argyle kit ?

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Non member of the Trust Quzzical Commie Mike is FURIOUS!

Notice none of the Attack nerds would pass Knobbers proper Janner test, unless London Kent Sussex and Cornwall, is now part of Plimuff.

Even "lifelong" Plymothian attack pig himself wasn't actually born in Plymouth was he

I thought the Janner King was born next to the Dockyard Siren in full Argyle kit ?

I wonder what this year's christmas single will be ?

Yea Man wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Non member of the Trust Quzzical Commie Mike is FURIOUS!

Notice none of the Attack nerds would pass Knobbers proper Janner test, unless London Kent Sussex and Cornwall, is now part of Plimuff.

Even "lifelong" Plymothian attack pig himself wasn't actually born in Plymouth was he

Anything he says is bollocks then.

Why would siren in Devonport have anything to do with whether you are a true Janner? Devonport wasn't part of Plymouth until 1914. And I have never heard the siren from Greenbank or Derriford so does that rule out anyone born there?

Or is Nool talking out of his arse?