Home Park News (grandstand & Training piches)

I am hearing that the Non Disclosure Agreement doesn't appear to apply to everyone.

GreenDick25 wrote:

I am hearing that the Non Disclosure Agreement doesn't appear to apply to everyone.

Who on earth could you be referring to?

GreenDick25 wrote:

I am hearing that the Non Disclosure Agreement doesn't appear to apply to everyone.

It's got to be all in or none in surely.
Mind you, this is Argyle we are talking about, so normal rules are out the window.

BBC1 wrote:

GreenDick25 wrote:

I am hearing that the Non Disclosure Agreement doesn't appear to apply to everyone.

It's got to be all in or none in surely.
Mind you, this is Argyle we are talking about, so normal rules are out the window.

I think some people are interpreting what they can disclose, and to who they can disclose it to, very differently. And there are some interesting opinions about other members of the working group being passed around as fact.

I guess Bacon Boy is involved?

So, they all had to initially agree/sign an NDA, but with a caveat that not all of them, or certain individuals don't have to adhere to the NDA if it doesn't suit them in certain situations!

Priceless stuff from Uzbrentistan.

GreenDick25 wrote:

BBC1 wrote:

GreenDick25 wrote:

I am hearing that the Non Disclosure Agreement doesn't appear to apply to everyone.

It's got to be all in or none in surely.
Mind you, this is Argyle we are talking about, so normal rules are out the window.

I think some people are interpreting what they can disclose, and to who they can disclose it to, very differently. And there are some interesting opinions about other members of the working group being passed around as fact.

Only in the Argyle World does this sort of shit happen.
Really couldn't make it up.

Realistically, how could someone who is desperate to be seen as 'in-the-know', possibly be expected to adhere to an NDA?

He couldn't do that if his life depended on it.

Czarcasm wrote:

Realistically, how could someone who is desperate to be seen as 'in-the-know', possibly be expected to adhere to an NDA?

He couldn't do that if his life depended on it.

Will be interesting to see how the information is 'leaked'.

BBC1 wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Realistically, how could someone who is desperate to be seen as 'in-the-know', possibly be expected to adhere to an NDA?

He couldn't do that if his life depended on it.

Will be interesting to see how the information is 'leaked'.

Bathing ape account being reactivated i bet. But as John Blackley doesnt work at argyle anymore it might be tricky.

BBC1 wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Realistically, how could someone who is desperate to be seen as 'in-the-know', possibly be expected to adhere to an NDA?

He couldn't do that if his life depended on it.

Will be interesting to see how the information is 'leaked'.

From what I understand it is just a case of Blabbermouth at the moment, as opposed to a campaign to leak information. I am sure that could change depending on the scale of the plans and any opposition to them.

GreenDick25 wrote:

BBC1 wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Realistically, how could someone who is desperate to be seen as 'in-the-know', possibly be expected to adhere to an NDA?

He couldn't do that if his life depended on it.

Will be interesting to see how the information is 'leaked'.

From what I understand it is just a case of Blabbermouth at the moment, as opposed to a campaign to leak information. I am sure that could change depending on the scale of the plans and any opposition to them.

oh there will be no opposition to brents plans from that group. He picked it carefully he isnt silly enough to allow real fans opinions other than the fans he can control.

Talking of plans, can anybody remember where Dougie posted his stunning plans for the grandstand last time round?

Might be worth taking another look at them.

Peggy wrote:

Talking of plans, can anybody remember where Dougie posted his stunning plans for the grandstand last time round?

Might be worth taking another look at them.

i agree. Minus the clusterfuck thats not part of this plan it will look even better.

Senior Greens meeting next week. GAG will be removed foreshore.

green_genie wrote:

Senior Greens meeting next week. GAG will be removed foreshore.

There will be lockdown of the senior greens next week then. Selected members only.
And a complete news blackout!

What kind of Saddo wants to send in a CV to the Brent Twins, and get involved in this pointless waste of time? Knobber from the net obvs, but why the others?

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

What kind of Saddo wants to send in a CV to the Brent Twins, and get involved in this pointless waste of time? Knobber from the net obvs, but why the others?

Depends who the others are?

We know their names on a list, but do we know them by a different name on the internet and do we know what they do in their real lives, professionally and for kicks? Until some facts are known it's hard to make a judgement.

Graham Clark for instance, would have been a wonderful addition.

The group is just a box ticking exercise. There is no expertise as such in terms of design, building and construction - but why would there need to be when drawings have already been produced.

Oh, and who has commissioned the initial drawings? Why, it's Brent's Akkeron, who, as far as I can recall haven't actually delivered anything of note in the South West.

Conflict of interest? You bet.

Pafcintheplace wrote:

The details of this Asbestos Stand will be revealed late, as a fait accompli. Brent ain't stupid, he's got his Chief Arselicker on board in the working group to oversee the process.

Oh yes I'm amazed that others are concerned about the finished article. Its not happening rest assured.... If something actually does happen it will be hugely hampered by the asbestos and who better then Pork Chop to litter the facts far and wide.
3 meetings over 3 months you're having a Giraffe Brent if you think anyone with an IQ of more more than 17 will believe your bullshit....Non Delivery Brent is the watchword

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

The group is just a box ticking exercise. There is no expertise as such in terms of design, building and construction - but why would there need to be when drawings have already been produced.

Oh, and who has commissioned the initial drawings? Why, it's Brent's Akkeron, who, as far as I can recall haven't actually delivered anything of note in the South West.

Conflict of interest? You bet.

Yep. If Brent can't get something off the ground even when someone else is paying for it that really would be an epic fail.

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

Oh, and who has commissioned the initial drawings? Why, it's Brent's Akkeron, who, as far as I can recall haven't actually delivered anything of note anywhere

Corrected for you...

Has anyone actually spent time looking at details of Akkerons activites  ??  I'm sat here in amazement running through closure after closure way more than even I had ever envisaged and after the first Google page I had to reach for the Diazapam
Brent is a walking disaster a train wreck of incredible length waiting to derail

Why is Natatomisam registered address as Home Park. Or is some form of Holding Company of Akkeron ??

Czarcasm wrote:

Yep. If Brent can't get something off the ground even when someone else is paying for it that really would be an epic fail.

Isn't that always the idea ?

harvetheslayer wrote:

Has anyone actually spent time looking at details of Akkerons activites  ??  I'm sat here in amazement running through closure after closure way more than even I had ever envisaged and after the first Google page I had to reach for the Diazapam
Brent is a walking disaster a train wreck of incredible length waiting to derail

Why is Natatomisam registered address as Home Park. Or is some form of Holding Company of Akkeron ??

Green Jimmy as straight as they come.