Plymouth Argyle made a loss

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

charleymouse wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

Sadly charley i cant claim the Twat barb as an original ss68, Pat Dunne, a top poster named after our former top keeper, used the Twat Barb on said twat before me, Pat is the true owner of the Twatoxcet.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

Sadly charley i cant claim the Twat barb as an original ss68, Pat Dunne, a top poster named after our former top keeper, used the Twat Barb on said twat before me, Pat is the true owner of the Twatoxcet.

In some cases, only a twatbomb will do!

'Accurate and to the point' as always Mr Suffered, please continue to use the Barb as you wish, because Twats often come in twos...

charleymouse wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

Blimey are you that stoopid? It wasn't humour. I was being deadly serious. I absolutely detest people make fun of others looks, disability, lifestyle or job. When they do, in my eyes, its because they are sliding down the ''loser slide'' and have to quickly divert the conversation away from the agenda.

tigertony wrote:

Blimey are you that stoopid? It wasn't humour. I was being deadly serious. I absolutely detest people make fun of others looks, disability, lifestyle or job. When they do, in my eyes, its because they are sliding down the ''loser slide'' and have to quickly divert the conversation away from the agenda.

Brent was hardly being compared to the Elephant man.

I think even Brent himself would see why people might make the comparison.
The comment only makes fun of his looks if you consider Harry Potter as looking weird or stupid.
If you consider HP normal looking, it's just like being compared to somebody famous who is 'normal' looking.  

Beauty in the eye of the beholder and all that.  Any insult is in your mind.

tigertony wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

Blimey are you that stoopid? It wasn't humour. I was being deadly serious. I absolutely detest people make fun of others looks, disability, lifestyle or job. When they do, in my eyes, its because they are sliding down the ''loser slide'' and have to quickly divert the conversation away from the agenda.

Are you that stupid? (And why write "stoopid"? Another attempt to be amusing which failed utterly...) Clearly I wasn't referring to this post, but to about 90% of other things you post, not a single one of which has made me even slightly smile. But I will make sure that I don't slide down the "loser slide" (whatever the feck that is) because I'd clearly find you at the bottom of it.

charleymouse wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

Your right it is good ATD is quite tolerant, it's just unfortunate some on here are becoming all PASOTIesque

And who would that be then, Graiser? Who is organising multis? Who is chucking users off the site and banning them just because they disagree with certain points of view? That isn't happening on ATD and if you are going to chuck that kind of accusation out I think you should have the balls to name names.

This has been done before, but the last remaining reason to read Pasoti was the half dozen or so posters who used to frequent Terraces who were genuinely funny. Graiser and Tony single-handedly double-handedly brought that Board to its knees with their 'bants'. So much so that the last remaining decent posters all gave up the ghost.

Now we have to put up with them.

Czarcasm wrote:

This has been done before, but the last remaining reason to read Pasoti was the half dozen or so posters who used to frequent Terraces who were genuinely funny. Graiser and Tony single-handedly double-handedly brought that Board to its knees with their 'bants'. So much so that the last remaining decent posters all gave up the ghost.

Now we have to put up with them.

I genuinely don't think I have encountered anyone less funny than those two, whether on the net or in RL. They seem to have no self-awareness at all.

charleymouse wrote:

tigertony wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

Blimey are you that stoopid? It wasn't humour. I was being deadly serious. I absolutely detest people make fun of others looks, disability, lifestyle or job. When they do, in my eyes, its because they are sliding down the ''loser slide'' and have to quickly divert the conversation away from the agenda.

Are you that stupid? (And why write "stoopid"? Another attempt to be amusing which failed utterly...) Clearly I wasn't referring to this post, but to about 90% of other things you post, not a single one of which has made me even slightly smile. But I will make sure that I don't slide down the "loser slide" (whatever the feck that is) because I'd clearly find you at the bottom of it.

Highly unlikely you would find me there. In fact 100% certain I wouldn't be there. I am pleased you find 10% funny and I will promise to do better.

tigertony wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

tigertony wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

Blimey are you that stoopid? It wasn't humour. I was being deadly serious. I absolutely detest people make fun of others looks, disability, lifestyle or job. When they do, in my eyes, its because they are sliding down the ''loser slide'' and have to quickly divert the conversation away from the agenda.

Are you that stupid? (And why write "stoopid"? Another attempt to be amusing which failed utterly...) Clearly I wasn't referring to this post, but to about 90% of other things you post, not a single one of which has made me even slightly smile. But I will make sure that I don't slide down the "loser slide" (whatever the feck that is) because I'd clearly find you at the bottom of it.

Highly unlikely you would find me there. In fact 100% certain I wouldn't be there. I am pleased you find 10% funny and I will promise to do better.

Oh no, no, no. I was estimating that in maybe 10% of your posts you were trying to make serious points (misguided or wrong ones as far as I've observed, but we'll take that as read...), but in the other 90%, you are constantly trying to be funny and failing. Just to be clear I, like most ATD posters find 0% of what you post in any way amusing, in fact your attempts to be funny and indulge in "bantz" genuinely makes me cringe, such is your utter lack of self-awareness.

Edited to remove comment which clearly overstepped the mark.

Come on charleymouse, there is no need to get personal or claim to represent the whole site.

seadog wrote:

Come on charleymouse, there is no need to get personal or claim to represent the whole site.

Well said Mr Seadog.....better coming from you.

charleymouse wrote:

tigertony wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

tigertony wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

tigertony wrote:

zyph wrote:

Well done Mr Rickler........some of it I agree with.....some is just propaganda by Ian King....who I think won't be sending Brent a Christmas Card this year or any year.

Yep! I was going to read it but when the 1st paragraph set the tone of ''anti-Brent'' and also made fun of his looks I didn't bother. Watched Corrie instead.

Twat.

Usually I might expect better on this site, but suffered is bang on here.

It's a good job that ATD is tolerant of shit attempts at humour, otherwise tigertony would been booted out years ago!

Blimey are you that stoopid? It wasn't humour. I was being deadly serious. I absolutely detest people make fun of others looks, disability, lifestyle or job. When they do, in my eyes, its because they are sliding down the ''loser slide'' and have to quickly divert the conversation away from the agenda.

Are you that stupid? (And why write "stoopid"? Another attempt to be amusing which failed utterly...) Clearly I wasn't referring to this post, but to about 90% of other things you post, not a single one of which has made me even slightly smile. But I will make sure that I don't slide down the "loser slide" (whatever the feck that is) because I'd clearly find you at the bottom of it.

Highly unlikely you would find me there. In fact 100% certain I wouldn't be there. I am pleased you find 10% funny and I will promise to do better.

Oh no, no, no. I was estimating that in maybe 10% of your posts you were trying to make serious points (misguided or wrong ones as far as I've observed, but we'll take that as read...), but in the other 90%, you are constantly trying to be funny and failing. Just to be clear I, like most ATD posters find 0% of what you post in any way amusing, in fact your attempts to be funny and indulge in "bantz" genuinely makes me cringe, such is your utter lack of self-awareness.

...

Oh great one from France, I've been a part of your cringeworthy attempt at intimidation and it didn't and doesn't really bother me as I can see right through you the person you are and that's why I've left you behind and moved on, but your last paragraph is disgusting, particularly in light of recent well publicised child abuse offences and that you actually saw fit to imply that TT, who you do not know (and for yours and any others benefit I don't either) is a child abuser, its criminal and slanderous and you'd be wise to wind your neck in and play clean.

Quote amended to remove accusation.

TT may be not be funny, but please stop the accusations

Nobody could accuse TT of being funny.

AstiSpumante wrote:

Nobody could accuse TT of being funny.

OK point taken. I've booked on evening classes about ''being funny'' so things should improve. I'll pick you up on the way Graiser .. think Freathy might be tagging along.