Eeeee saved us!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Good financial results, £800k profit, though skilfully choosing to use the word "surplus" instead.

No info about what proportion of the £800k was reinvested invested in PAFC and how

Pafcintheplace wrote:

Good financial results, £800k profit, though skilfully choosing to use the word "surplus" instead.

No info about what proportion of the £800k was reinvested invested in PAFC and how

I'm sure that in the spirit of the irreproachable and crystal clear transparency promised by Brent it's only a matter of time before we find that out

charleymouse wrote:

Pafcintheplace wrote:

Good financial results, £800k profit, though skilfully choosing to use the word "surplus" instead.

No info about what proportion of the £800k was reinvested invested in PAFC and how

I'm sure that in the spirit of the irreproachable and crystal clear transparency promised by Brent it's only a matter of time before we find that out

the only way will know whats owed is if we go back in admistration...cos jimmy dont produce accounts does he

Does anyone seriously trust any figures coming out of Home Park? , particularly as we have an owner without a spark of credibility, as reported of course by the reluctant ones press mouthpiece.