| Banned? | |
|
+8mouldyoldgoat Czarcasm Elias Punchdrunk Les Miserable seadog pepsipete Lord Tisdale 12 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
| Subject: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 12:21 pm | |
| Feckin' banned for holding views that the mods don't like, you have turned into Pashitty, a shame, I guess your mods would be off to Chicago to exercise their right to free speech by denying Trumpy his, typical of the types of control freaks you claim to despise. |
|
| |
pepsipete
Posts : 14772 Join date : 2011-05-11 Age : 86 Location : Ivybridge
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 12:54 pm | |
| IMO its not your opinions its your petty name calling. |
|
| |
seadog Admin
Posts : 15066 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 65 Location : @home or on the piss
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 1:08 pm | |
| Same old, same old. _______________________________________ COYG!
|
|
| |
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 1:30 pm | |
| - pepsipete wrote:
- IMO its not your opinions its your petty name calling.
Yeah, take note buffalo head |
|
| |
Punchdrunk
Posts : 1939 Join date : 2016-02-18
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:13 pm | |
| - Les Miserable wrote:
- pepsipete wrote:
- IMO its not your opinions its your petty name calling.
Yeah, take note buffalo head The Buffaloes? |
|
| |
Elias
Posts : 6006 Join date : 2011-12-05 Location : brent out
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:19 pm | |
| - pepsipete wrote:
- IMO its not your opinions its your petty name calling.
Well said |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:20 pm | |
| - Lord Tisdale wrote:
- Feckin' banned for holding views that the mods don't like, you have turned into Pashitty, a shame, I guess your mods would be off to Chicago to exercise their right to free speech by denying Trumpy his, typical of the types of control freaks you claim to despise.
How can you post a message if you're banned? #Confused.com!!! |
|
| |
Czarcasm
Posts : 10244 Join date : 2011-10-23
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:29 pm | |
| - HIGNFY wrote:
- Lord Tisdale wrote:
- Feckin' banned for holding views that the mods don't like, you have turned into Pashitty, a shame, I guess your mods would be off to Chicago to exercise their right to free speech by denying Trumpy his, typical of the types of control freaks you claim to despise.
How can you post a message if you're banned? #Confused.com!!! T'was only a 24 hr ban, I believe. |
|
| |
Punchdrunk
Posts : 1939 Join date : 2016-02-18
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:36 pm | |
| Cmon let's not go all Pasoti on the man and feed him to the lions before he's had a chance.
Let Tis explain his point. |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15901 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 3:56 pm | |
| He is welcome to explain his points of view but without the abuse of other posters and the mods. Almost all his replies to posts on threads include abuse of other posters because he doesn't agree with their views. _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Now an officially semi retired old fart! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] |
|
| |
Czarcasm
Posts : 10244 Join date : 2011-10-23
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:48 pm | |
| I think loads of us are guilty of calling one or two people a moron/prick/cnut/fuckwit or even a racist, occasionally. Nothing usually escalates because the situation (generally, as a rule) subsides and people move on.
The difference with Tis though, is that everyone who gets into a disagreement with him will get the personal abuse. He can't help himself. But we have to remember that we all support a team that he hates with a passion, so abusing 'one of us' will come naturally to him. Then of course you have the other trait he possesses, which is one of never ever being wrong. So you have to factor in his frustration when having to come on here to point out how wrong we (always) are.
He's an angry old man, foreshore. But he does make me chuckle at times. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:35 pm | |
| - Lord Tisdale wrote:
- Feckin' banned for holding views that the mods don't like, you have turned into Pashitty, a shame, I guess your mods would be off to Chicago to exercise their right to free speech by denying Trumpy his, typical of the types of control freaks you claim to despise.
Clearly you were given 24 hours off, for being a complete bellend that still seems to think it's 1975. However you can write some pretty enlightening stuff from time to time particularly about the rugger, which makes it a bigger shame that you have be a complete tool the rest of the time. |
|
| |
mouldyoldgoat Admin
Posts : 15901 Join date : 2011-12-22 Age : 62 Location : Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:24 pm | |
| - Hugh Watt wrote:
- Lord Tisdale wrote:
- Feckin' banned for holding views that the mods don't like, you have turned into Pashitty, a shame, I guess your mods would be off to Chicago to exercise their right to free speech by denying Trumpy his, typical of the types of control freaks you claim to despise.
Clearly you were given 24 hours off, for being a complete bellend that still seems to think it's 1975.
However you can write some pretty enlightening stuff from time to time particularly about the rugger, which makes it a bigger shame that you have be a complete tool the rest of the time. You are right Hugh, he can bring some good stuff to threads but he also brings crap like above. Ok, he is pissed off at his suspension which he could very easily PM the Mods with his issue, but he posts another abuse. He has been told a number of times about this and he continues to do it. Well enough is enough. If he doesn't like our rules then he can go elsewhere. Yes, if he leaves, then this site will be poorer for all the enlightening good stuff but ATD will be much the richer without his shit. He has a choice. _______________________________________ I'm one of the common people so says the wife! (A true GSG Girl) PepsiPete Forecasting League Champion 2016-17 He was behind me at Charlton! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Now an officially semi retired old fart! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] |
|
| |
tigertony
Posts : 2406 Join date : 2012-01-05
| Subject: Re: Banned? Sun Mar 13, 2016 9:21 pm | |
| - Czarcasm wrote:
- I think loads of us are guilty of calling one or two people a moron/prick/cnut/fuckwit or even a racist, occasionally. Nothing usually escalates because the situation (generally, as a rule) subsides and people move on.
The difference with Tis though, is that everyone who gets into a disagreement with him will get the personal abuse. He can't help himself. But we have to remember that we all support a team that he hates with a passion, so abusing 'one of us' will come naturally to him. Then of course you have the other trait he possesses, which is one of never ever being wrong. So you have to factor in his frustration when having to come on here to point out how wrong we (always) are.
He's an angry old man, foreshore. But he does make me chuckle at times. So would I be if my club received £1 million+ then signed big Clinton for free. |
|
| |
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:24 pm | |
| - Czarcasm wrote:
- I think loads of us are guilty of calling one or two people a moron/prick/cnut/fuckwit or even a racist,
Except that I wasn't banned for slagging off another poster in those kind of terms, I simply referred to a mod as a muppet, the ultimate sin against a control freak. Dunno why you boys put up with posting in a straight jacket, we need a referendum on the whole modding regime, freedom for the ATD one. |
|
| |
sufferedsince 68
Posts : 6420 Join date : 2014-06-01 Location : Brentocabin
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:30 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Les Miserable
Posts : 7516 Join date : 2014-03-30
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:48 pm | |
| - Lord Tisdale wrote:
- Czarcasm wrote:
- I think loads of us are guilty of calling one or two people a moron/prick/cnut/fuckwit or even a racist,
Except that I wasn't banned for slagging off another poster in those kind of terms, I simply referred to a mod as a muppet, the ultimate sin against a control freak.
Dunno why you boys put up with posting in a straight jacket, we need a referendum on the whole modding regime, freedom for the ATD one. When are the next mod elections due and who is due to stand down or for re-election? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:50 pm | |
| Tis, you were banned because you continue to use unacceptable language. Calling Germans "Nazis", refugees "rape fugees", "migrants" and "rodents".
When the mods took action you called us muppets. So we gave you a 24 hour ban for your language and mod abuse. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:52 pm | |
| Next mod election is in May. It will mark the 5th anniversary of ATD. There will be a lot of mod positions up for grabs. |
|
| |
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:09 pm | |
| - Frank Bullitt wrote:
- Tis, you were banned because you continue to use unacceptable language. Calling Germans "Nazis", refugees "rape fugees", "migrants" and "rodents".
When the mods took action you called us muppets. So we gave you a 24 hour ban for your language and mod abuse. Yes sir, sorry sir, I'll try to be a snivelling servile tw@ for you all in future. I know this is the only place some of you guys ever get to be hard with the big boys. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:10 pm | |
| I accept your apology Tis. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:13 pm | |
| The very idea of Tisdale complaining of how he has been treated on this Spring-like primrose smelling forum is laughable. Given his comments so far, he wouldn't give the time of day, or a bucket of spit, to a single male refugee from war torn Syria. They've got the cheek to have a mobile phone on them, don't you know. Just how uncivilised does he think these countries have been ?
He knows what the rules are here. He's been breaking them for a past time for a very long time, along with his chum. Every instance should be picked up. No one wants the bore banned, just to abide by the rules. One of those is no racism/hate crime language. Shorely, that's not too much to ask. There's a big debate at the moment regarding the whole shape and direction of the EU, the UK and in fact the whole of Western democracy. It would be nice to debate these issues with the likes of Tisdale, but without the hail of shit. |
|
| |
seadog Admin
Posts : 15066 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 65 Location : @home or on the piss
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:46 pm | |
| I get a semi every time Tis posts. _______________________________________ COYG!
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Banned? Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:12 pm | |
| - seadog wrote:
- I get a semi every time Tis posts.
Is it a two legged affair ? |
|
| |
Hugh Midde
Posts : 1010 Join date : 2015-11-02 Location : The Happy Isles where nobody grows old
| Subject: Re: Banned? Tue Mar 15, 2016 3:53 pm | |
| - Lord Biro wrote:
- There's a big debate at the moment regarding the whole shape and direction of the EU, the UK and in fact the whole of Western democracy. It would be nice to debate these issues with the likes of Tisdale, but without the hail of shit.
Tis might get rather adjacent to the knuckle but he does come across as a mite more informed than some of ATD's resident pinkoes. The facts when he lays them out before you seem very plausible, whereas you can't help but feel that somewhere along the line his detractors would resort to calling like minded people, "little Englanders" or the blanket rubbishing of perfectly respectable citizens who happen to be (because of a lack of choice), members of UKIP. |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Banned? | |
| |
|
| |
| Banned? | |
|