The Iowa Caucus.

Anybody else interested?

Only insofar as having a morbid fascination about how well a xenophobic, racist homophobe seems to be doing in the polls at the moment.

Surely someone like Trump couldn't be allowed to be US President.

Could he?

When your real god is money then why not? Hopefully he'll get offed by one of his gun toting rednecks he's so keen on keeping armed. And then there's another Bush waiting in the wings in case Trumpy doesn't get in.
Load of feckin nonsense, the sooner the good old us of a descends into civil war the better at least they won't have so much time to be the self appointed world police force, I hate the coonts.

Lord Tisdale wrote:

Anybody else interested?

Not since Jed Bartlet retired

I reckon Jed Clampett will walk it. Oil men always do well.

Charlie Wood wrote:

Lord Tisdale wrote:

Anybody else interested?

Not since Jed Bartlet retired

Did you have to, I have been clean for over six months but now i am dying to watch an episode or seven?

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

Only insofar as having a morbid fascination about how well a xenophobic, racist homophobe seems to be doing in the polls at the moment.

Surely someone like Trump couldn't be allowed to be US President.

Could he?

Do you really think he would be any worse than Bushes Snr and Jnr, Reagan or even Clinton or Obama?

Trump says what he says to garner votes, they all do, he is a very successful businessman who will do a job, for me, I would take almost anyone over Gash Clinton.

Spring is coming.
R U standing for UKIP again this year ?

And could a racist war mongering homophobe be worse than the last 50 years of the White House ? Too right he would be. No comparison whatsoever.

I've actually warmed to him a little now Franny.

Amsterdamage wrote:

I've actually warmed to him a little now Franny.

Surely you mean Grandad Trump?

Read on for how successful a businessman he is.

Basically he isn't that successful he just inherited a massive fortune which isn't as massive now as it ought to be (even if it is still pretty immense).

Yep my post should have gone in behind big pimpin Fred Trump. Personally I couldn't give a toss where his money came from he is just a horrible bastard that needs shooting, I believe many lives would be saved in the long run, I could see this guy giving 'Nam a run for its money in the sandpit.

Here's a snap of Trunp and his daughter sitting on a pair of copulating parrots.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Nothing disturbing about that at all, is there? Perfectly normal.

If his hand wasn't hiding his erection that photo would be disgusting.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
The luvvies don't like him either lol.

Trump handed his arse to him on a plate by Cruz. Cruz said this,
"Iowa has sent notice that the Republican nominee and the next president of the United States will not be chosen by the media, will not be chosen by the Washington establishment," said Mr Cruz.
So it's not just here that the press are controlled by Tories lapping at the buttocks of their rich sponsors.
Cruz obtained his victory by canvassing evangelicals, chosen by God foreshore, GOD BLESS AMERICA! YEE feckin HAAAA!

So it's him against Hilary "I sucked but didn't swallow" Clinton.

Lord Biro wrote:

Spring is coming.
R U standing for UKIP again this year ?

And could a racist war mongering homophobe be worse than the last 50 years of the White House ? Too right he would be. No comparison whatsoever.

God no, once was enough.

Both Bush Pressies were racist, war mongering, homophobes, LBJ was far worse, you are reading far too much in to what they say for the media, Trump has the small advantage of saying what he thinks, the others were far sneakier.

Everybody feared Reagan because he was going to blow up the world, he was actually the least aggressive POTUS of the last 50 years, you need to do a bit more proper reading Biccy.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Amsterdamage wrote:

I've actually warmed to him a little now Franny.

Surely you mean Grandad Trump?

Read on for how successful a businessman he is.

Basically he isn't that successful he just inherited a massive fortune which isn't as massive now as it ought to be (even if it is still pretty immense).

Isn't he a year older than Clinton and five years younger than Sanders?

Not winning Iowa is not the KoD for any Republican and I just can't see Cruz doing it in the more erudite regions of the US, he is actually more right wing than Trumpy, how a junior senator from Texas will play in New Hampshire, the North East and California is by no means predictable, especially as he isn't even Murkan.

Amsterdamage wrote:

So it's him against Hilary "I sucked but didn't swallow" Clinton.

Don't be a div, Clinton would always play better than Sanders in Iowa while Cruz will flame out shortly, these race haven't even passed the warm stage yet, Super Tuesday is miles off and in the death money will talk.

No doubt in this I'm happy to bow to your superior knowledge, it's not something I have a great deal of interest in but the punditry I've read have suggested that Cruz v Clinton will be the likely outcome but then as in over here it depends whose paying the pundit as they call the tune. I don't know enough about any of them really apart from Trumpy and the more I know the less I like.

In 1992 Trump did this:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]