Pasoti

Pasoti... Where they like to watch.

I meet hundreds of people, real people, who come up to me at every home game, at every fans fest and at every supporters meeting telling me they read Pasoti every day, support our advertisers and love the job that James is doing but don't wish to publicly step up because of all the online hate that gets directed at us by freaks and weirdos.

These people, real people, hard working supporters and their families are the reason we keep this site personality free, debate free and remain 100% behind Sir Jim. We think, because they are too silent to think, they would prefer it that way.

Put the simulation game down Ian you still haven't finished screen printing Womble's private messages.

Rickler wrote:

Pasoti...   Where they like to watch.

With a big box of Tissues!

I'm another one who no longer posts on Pasoti after many years of being an enthusiastic and loyal user. I've got nothing personal against any of the hierarchy (I've never met any of them, and they've always been decent in any one-to-one dealings). However, a nagging sense that the site's independence had been compromised following the arrival of James Brent, developed into a full-blown WTF after I was set upon for daring to ask how much we owed Brent, and under what terms. Someone split the thread and pathetically changed its title to make me look like an utter numpty. Someone else launched a tirade against me and my "mates", whoever they were supposed to be.

That was many months ago and I haven't logged back in since. Nor do I have any plans to under the current set up.

What was once a free forum of debate, campaigning and endless questioning of the club has become a sanitised, commercial platform controlled by people who are - in my view - far too close to the owner to even consider using the word 'independent' as a selling point.

Pasoti, as I once knew and loved it, is no more.


I

Welcome Paul.

Brill, Mock.

Like it Mocker. Should have been Shilts, shouldn't it ?

Welcome Paul. Coming out is never easy to do. Well, it is when the forum much loved by so many has been annexed by a dodgy character and so many fans disenfranchised of their right to debate the club fairly.
I remember when they had a pop at you, totally unecessary given your obvious care for the club and your input into Pasoti over the years. Very similar to when Newell launched into a verbal attack of John Lloyd. Obviously, he was getting rid of those respected voices he saw as a personal threat to his own designs.
ATD is a good site, lightly moderated where the language can be ripe, but no more so than at Home Park. The threads are not as numerous and tedious, and they ramble and wend where they go. And lo, look at the lack of stickies
Far more interesting Argyle discourse than bidding on a commercial platform. And you won't see anyone on here extolling the virtues of an Ivor's pasty. They're crap, with far too much pepper and not enough turnip. We do promote an "ordinary chap's" pasty, though.

welcome paul.

Welcome Paul,

I thoroughly enjoyed "Nearly Men" and look forward to the next book...

Did you say recently it was coming soon?

It's like Carswell's defection to UKIP :O

Who next? The Doctor?

28 pages on a forum you don't like. Some may think you lot are slightly obsessed. Can't think why though.

How long do you want me to keep "Real Supporter" for? Shall I just pull the plug now?

Frank Bullitt wrote:

How long do you want me to keep "Real Supporter" for? Shall I just pull the plug now?

You mean he's not a real supporter?
Not another Multi surely.
Has he been drinking?

So a new member to the forum who doesn't tow the party line gets treated like that?

Real_Supporter wrote:

So a new member to the forum who doesn't tow the party line gets treated like that?

A new WUM.
We've all had a drink.

Well he's obviously a prick faced troll, but hey don't let's follow the PASOTI mantra and ban him, let the fella have his fun and hang himself

Might be fun to see him start to go overboard and do a "Ponty". Comic rhetoric so far. I have no problem with that.
Who do you support then Realsupporter, Madrid ?

Sorry guys I have banned him. See the site section for details.

He couldn't believe I was on here.
Thought I was intelligent.

Obviously deranged.

There have been many examples of poor, inconsistent and downright hypocritical behaviour on the part of the moderators on PASOTI over the years.

When one of them called Peggy "sugar tits" and refused to apologise when I called him on it, for a start.
When one of them used Bex's log in to post in her name after her death.
When they collectively allowed a succession of fake accounts to be used to stir up factional discontent in the AFT and the PASB.

That's just a few of the instances that come to mind within a few moments of thought.

Whenever any of those incidents occured, there was little in the way of apology. From there, trust and respect quietly and quickly eroded.

The recent tactic of suggesting posters who aren't in agreement with the party line must obviously be very drunk is just another sinister development.

It's not banter. It's not discussion amongst equals. It's abuse, nothing less.

The only sensible reaction is to disengage, sadly, but with the knowledge that any other response would be to ignore Einstein's maxim on the definition of insanity.

BBC1 wrote:

He couldn't believe I was on here.
Thought I was intelligent.

He knew your name, are you scared?

John_Lloyd wrote:

There have been many examples of poor, inconsistent and downright hypocritical behaviour on the part of the moderators on PASOTI over the years.

When one of them called Peggy "sugar tits" and refused to apologise when I called him on it, for a start.
When one of them used Bex's log in to post in her name after her death.
When they collectively allowed a succession of fake accounts to be used to stir up factional discontent in the AFT and the PASB.

That's just a few of the instances that come to mind within a few moments of thought.

Whenever any of those incidents occured, there was little in the way of apology. From there, trust and respect quietly and quickly eroded.

The recent tactic of suggesting posters who aren't in agreement with the party line must obviously be very drunk is just another sinister development.

It's not banter. It's not discussion amongst equals. It's abuse, nothing less.

The only sensible reaction is to disengage, sadly, but with the knowledge that any other response would be to ignore Einstein's maxim on the definition of insanity.

I struggle to understand the logic behind why they would use a dead womans account to post from...that is just sick up there with sending white feathers to cancer victims.

Which scumbag was it who did that to bexs account?