The White Feather Incident

For posters who want proof that Ian Newell sent a white feather to a man who was bravely fighting cancer then here is the proof you desired from the man himself, the recipient of said feather.

https://www.argyletd.com/t3717p125-the-proxy-associate-director-speaks#100316

Here to help as always.

Oooooh, what a nasty man.

Or did the Pig send the feather to someone he was rowing with while ignorant of the condition of the recipient, a whole different kettle of bananas from the heinous crime implied by the ATD regime.

He knew. It's well documented here and over there. "He had to be told" was the lovely retort to complaints.

Thai was quite open about his illness, campaigned about it on his signature and was well known in the grandstand. Okay for you Tis?

We as in ATD donated money to thai's chairty when he died and Damon also did a fair bit too. He was a good poster who fought his battle bravely was respected on both sites which is sadly rare now days and certainly didnt deserve to be insulted by ian with that white feather.

i believe ian sent it too him because thai mention chris webb's son in a post hardly warrant that deplorable act from ian did it?

I'd be about 99% sure that almost no one on PASOTI has heard about that.

You post it there, it gets deleted and you pick up a ban.

The only way of making it work is to drag PASOTI users down here to have a look themselves.

UndercoverGreen wrote:

I'd be about 99% sure that almost no one on PASOTI has heard about that.

You post it there, it gets deleted and you pick up a ban.

The only way of making it work is to drag PASOTI users down here to have a look themselves.

It was absolutely discussed on Pasoti at length. The only way Newell and his cronies could survive with all their revolting bullying, subterfuge and wickedness was to buy the website. Truly awful human-beings on every level.

When was it last discussed Hitch? Been a lot of new users since then.

Ian has always come across nice and a decent bloke, limited experience of him though.

Ian is a cock

UndercoverGreen wrote:

When was it last discussed Hitch? Been a lot of new users since then.

Ian has always come across nice and a decent bloke, limited experience of him though.

I doubt the threads exist anymore but the last was at the time of Phil's death last year.

Most pathological liars come across as nice and decent in person, initially - it's part of the illness or genetic disposition.

I got a posting limit on there for being 'too enthusiastic'.

I still have my doubts from both sides of the argument to be honest, but I'm working on it. I've recently seen all the fuss about ATD and thought I'd get an account to see what the big fuss was.

The two sites are, er.. Rather different!

yeh like Britain and Germany were different in 1940

Lower than a snakes belly, Despicable.

UndercoverGreen wrote:

When was it last discussed Hitch? Been a lot of new users since then.

Ian has always come across nice and a decent bloke, limited experience of him though.

I was reading some old threads on both sites earlier, and one stuck in my head.
He does do a lot of good, charity work, work for the club, favours for fans etc. However they are made sure they are well known and broadcast, often even stickied.

The bad things are made sure they are very quickly deleted.
Raises a lot of questions in itself.

OnlyOdi wrote:

UndercoverGreen wrote:

When was it last discussed Hitch? Been a lot of new users since then.

Ian has always come across nice and a decent bloke, limited experience of him though.

I was reading some old threads on both sites earlier, and one stuck in my head.
He does do a lot of good, charity work, work for the club, favours for fans etc. However they are made sure they are well known and broadcast, often even stickied.

The bad things are made sure they are very quickly deleted.
Raises a lot of questions in itself.

You're learning my friend.

OnlyOdi wrote:

UndercoverGreen wrote:

When was it last discussed Hitch? Been a lot of new users since then.

Ian has always come across nice and a decent bloke, limited experience of him though.

I was reading some old threads on both sites earlier, and one stuck in my head.
He does do a lot of good, charity work, work for the club, favours for fans etc. However they are made sure they are well known and broadcast, often even stickied.

The bad things are made sure they are very quickly deleted.
Raises a lot of questions in itself.

he does that because he wants to be seen as the number one argyle fan ever its been his ambition for a longtiime and everything he is doing now is to aide that dream of his. It would be wrong to assume he does all his chairty auctions, favours and such because he is a kind man he does it because it gives him power and something over someone its the same trick the krays used back in the day.

Ian Newell comes across as the ultimate ' marmite moment'.....you like him or not.....Mr Jekyll or Mr Hyde also comes to mind....I've met him twice and have survived....If what is claimed is true then it is very disappointing and I can understand why it leaves a bad taste in those that it as touched.

Let me ask a question of the Newell 'disbelievers'...

What accusations against him are you doubting are true?

Dick Trickle wrote:

Thai was quite open about his illness, campaigned about it on his signature and was well known in the grandstand. Okay for you Tis?

Well no actually, the Pig is inherently dim and may well not have picked up on what you guys assume to be the bleedin obvious.

Either way, as odious as it would appear to be if he were aware a perusal of the context would be necessary before I would think the vitriol being slung about was in order, or even close to reasonable.

As I believe I might have said at the Brighton Conference, there are usually two sides to an argument and from my personal observations anyone foolish enough to suggest the Pig is not actually the spawn of Satan gets set upon by the ATD Dogs of War, meaning that the case for the defence is never likely to be allowed to be made on here.

Just an unbiased view like.

That's a fine back handed complement to pay, Tiz...

You're saying, the pig is too feckin stupid to know what he's doing.

I'd love to see that as a defense in a court of law.

Lord Tisdale wrote:

Dick Trickle wrote:

Thai was quite open about his illness, campaigned about it on his signature and was well known in the grandstand. Okay for you Tis?

Well no actually, the Pig is inherently dim and may well not have picked up on what you guys assume to be the bleedin obvious.

Either way, as odious as it would appear to be if he were aware a perusal of the context would be necessary before I would think the vitriol being slung about was in order, or even close to reasonable.

As I believe I might have said at the Brighton Conference, there are usually two sides to an argument and from my personal observations anyone foolish enough to suggest the Pig is not actually the spawn of Satan gets set upon by the ATD Dogs of War, meaning that the case for the defence is never likely to be allowed to be made on here.

Just an unbiased view like.

Newell knew full well thai had cancer before he sent the picture to him me lord, even if he didnt he wasnt exactly apologising to him when it was pointed out.

Rickler wrote:

That's a fine back handed complement to pay, Tiz...

You're saying, the pig is too feckin stupid to know what he's doing.

I'd love to see that as a defense in a court of law.

Seems to work for plenty but that is not what I was saying, although thinking on diminished responsibility wouldn't be a bad plea.

The point is that whatever mitigation there might or might not be, it ain't getting a hearing on good ol' ATD.

Angry wrote:

Newell knew full well thai had cancer before he sent the picture to him me lord, even if he didnt he wasnt exactly apologising to him when it was pointed out.

"Newell knew full well","even if he didnt"?

I think that pretty much makes the case plus we none of us seem that good at admitting we were wro, wro, wro.........wrong.

Do we have the text of the conversation which led to the fateful sending of the feather?

Lord Tisdale wrote:

Angry wrote:

Newell knew full well thai had cancer before he sent the picture to him me lord, even if he didnt he wasnt exactly apologising to him when it was pointed out.

"Newell knew full well","even if he didnt"?

I think that pretty much makes the case plus we none of us seem that good at admitting we were wro, wro, wro.........wrong.

Do we have the text of the conversation which led to the fateful sending of the feather?

Its neither here nor there if ian knew about thai's cancer or not the fact remains he never once apologised for it and even tried to justify it o still maintain he knew as it wasnt hard to see as thai spoke about it many many times on there.
.

Angry wrote:

Lord Tisdale wrote:

Angry wrote:

Newell knew full well thai had cancer before he sent the picture to him me lord, even if he didnt he wasnt exactly apologising to him when it was pointed out.

"Newell knew full well","even if he didnt"?

I think that pretty much makes the case plus we none of us seem that good at admitting we were wro, wro, wro.........wrong.

Do we have the text of the conversation which led to the fateful sending of the feather?

Its neither here nor there if ian knew about thai's cancer or not the fact remains he never once apologised for it and even tried to justify it o still maintain he knew as it wasnt hard to see as thai spoke about it many many times on there.
.

Newell did apologise to Phil (Thai) via a PM on Pasoti whilst Phil was still alive.