(Nearly)

When is FES back in court?

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

That episode has some distance to run.

Lawyers all over the place are rubbing their hands in glee.

It's very serious.

After reading the above, Iv'e pre-ordered 6 weeks supply of popcorn. I think I'm going to need it.   

Butterkist toffee would be my recommendation POI, if you have a sweet tooth

Pafcintheplace wrote:

Butterkist toffee would be my recommendation POI, if you have a sweet tooth

  

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Unable to meet the February wage bill.

That's why Wrathall's money is back.

Very, very worrying.

But all OK now.

So I have been told.

Forgot to add:

Nikkk is waaaaaaaaaay behind meeting his contractual obligations vis a vis sponsorship which has, in no small way, led to Wrathall's input being needed.

That figures. I was wondering today how PAFC could find it self so short of cash in Mid Feb, when the club were happy to sanction the signings of Parsons and Banton as recently as January. This suggests that something drastic had changed in the financial position of the club in the last 8 weeks. The recent FES/FIL problems, and their (rumoured) inability to meet their payments, would explain this sudden change in financial position.

It also suggests that Brent either has little or no money to fall back on, or has money, but would rather see the club go back into admin then use it. Either way, not good for Argyle.

On the plus side, given that Brent was able to negotiate that extended tax 'holiday' from the council, maybe he could also negotiate a rent holiday from the council as well. Lets face it, if Brent/Akkeron hit the wall, a lot of big cheeses at the council are going to look even sillier than they already do.

Didn't Nikkk say that all payments to the club were covered and we're coming out of his own pocket?

If this isn't the case did he deliberately lie or has something else drastic happened that has put a spanner in the works.

Dunno.

All I know is no cash at Argyle as expected.

It can't be long before all the FES ads get taken down. About May probably so that it isn't too obvious.

After all there's nothing to put up in their place.

ik thought they had to be removed once a company goes bust? i recall west ham had to remove their sponsor XL when that went bust pretty rapidly!

The PL probably has its own rules.

So wonder where this leaves Nool. I mean I know he's good at this sort of thing but his tongue can't be up Brents and Nikkkkkkkkks arse simultaneously when they square off can it?

Nool has a fork tongue so it may well be possible.